Go Pro

Maple Leaf Foods (MFI) Competitors

Maple Leaf Foods logo
C$30.71 +0.11 (+0.36%)
As of 07/3/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

MFI vs. PBH, JWEL, SOY, CLR, and HLF

Should you buy Maple Leaf Foods stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Maple Leaf Foods with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Maple Leaf Foods include Premium Brands (PBH), Jamieson Wellness (JWEL), SunOpta (SOY), Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) (CLR), and High Liner Foods (HLF). These companies are all part of the "packaged foods" industry.

How does Maple Leaf Foods compare to Premium Brands?

Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) and Maple Leaf Foods (TSE:MFI) are both mid-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

Premium Brands presently has a consensus target price of C$118.62, indicating a potential upside of 39.17%. Maple Leaf Foods has a consensus target price of C$36.33, indicating a potential upside of 18.31%. Given Premium Brands' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Maple Leaf Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Maple Leaf Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.18

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 3 more articles in the media than Maple Leaf Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Premium Brands and 1 mentions for Maple Leaf Foods. Premium Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Maple Leaf Foods' score of 0.00 indicating that Premium Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Premium Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Maple Leaf Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Maple Leaf Foods has a net margin of 12.44% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 0.52%. Maple Leaf Foods' return on equity of 36.56% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Brands0.52% 2.21% 3.61%
Maple Leaf Foods 12.44%36.56%2.85%

Premium Brands pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Maple Leaf Foods pays an annual dividend of C$0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Premium Brands pays out 377.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Maple Leaf Foods pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Premium Brands has a beta of 0.88205, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Maple Leaf Foods has a beta of 0.346146, indicating that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

32.9% of Premium Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.1% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.9% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Maple Leaf Foods. Maple Leaf Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.56C$99.56MC$0.9094.70
Maple Leaf FoodsC$3.97B0.96C$34.28MC$4.217.29

Summary

Premium Brands beats Maple Leaf Foods on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Maple Leaf Foods compare to Jamieson Wellness?

Maple Leaf Foods (TSE:MFI) and Jamieson Wellness (TSE:JWEL) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Maple Leaf Foods currently has a consensus target price of C$36.33, indicating a potential upside of 18.31%. Jamieson Wellness has a consensus target price of C$44.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.05%. Given Maple Leaf Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Maple Leaf Foods is more favorable than Jamieson Wellness.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Maple Leaf Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.18
Jamieson Wellness
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Maple Leaf Foods has a beta of 0.346146, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jamieson Wellness has a beta of 1.529654, meaning that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Maple Leaf Foods had 1 more articles in the media than Jamieson Wellness. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Maple Leaf Foods and 0 mentions for Jamieson Wellness. Jamieson Wellness' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Maple Leaf Foods' score of 0.00 indicating that Jamieson Wellness is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Maple Leaf Foods Neutral
Jamieson Wellness Positive

Maple Leaf Foods pays an annual dividend of C$0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Jamieson Wellness pays an annual dividend of C$0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Maple Leaf Foods pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jamieson Wellness pays out 52.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Maple Leaf Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Maple Leaf Foods has a net margin of 12.44% compared to Jamieson Wellness' net margin of 8.71%. Maple Leaf Foods' return on equity of 36.56% beat Jamieson Wellness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Maple Leaf Foods12.44% 36.56% 2.85%
Jamieson Wellness 8.71%15.25%4.73%

31.1% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.2% of Jamieson Wellness shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.9% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Jamieson Wellness shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Jamieson Wellness has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Maple Leaf Foods. Maple Leaf Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jamieson Wellness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maple Leaf FoodsC$3.97B0.96C$34.28MC$4.217.29
Jamieson WellnessC$845.84M2.06C$39.83MC$1.7324.25

Summary

Maple Leaf Foods beats Jamieson Wellness on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Maple Leaf Foods compare to SunOpta?

SunOpta (TSE:SOY) and Maple Leaf Foods (TSE:MFI) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

Maple Leaf Foods has a consensus target price of C$36.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.31%. Given Maple Leaf Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Maple Leaf Foods is more favorable than SunOpta.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SunOpta
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Maple Leaf Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.18

25.9% of SunOpta shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.1% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of SunOpta shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.9% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Maple Leaf Foods had 1 more articles in the media than SunOpta. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Maple Leaf Foods and 0 mentions for SunOpta. SunOpta's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Maple Leaf Foods'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
SunOpta Neutral
Maple Leaf Foods Neutral

SunOpta has a beta of 2.692156, suggesting that its stock price is 169% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Maple Leaf Foods has a beta of 0.346146, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Maple Leaf Foods has higher revenue and earnings than SunOpta. Maple Leaf Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SunOpta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SunOptaC$817.72M1.28-C$12.73MC$0.1368.00
Maple Leaf FoodsC$3.97B0.96C$34.28MC$4.217.29

Maple Leaf Foods has a net margin of 12.44% compared to SunOpta's net margin of 1.93%. Maple Leaf Foods' return on equity of 36.56% beat SunOpta's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SunOpta1.93% 9.29% 2.68%
Maple Leaf Foods 12.44%36.56%2.85%

Summary

Maple Leaf Foods beats SunOpta on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Maple Leaf Foods compare to Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)?

Maple Leaf Foods (TSE:MFI) and Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) (TSE:CLR) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and earnings.

Maple Leaf Foods has a net margin of 12.44% compared to Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. Maple Leaf Foods' return on equity of 36.56% beat Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Maple Leaf Foods12.44% 36.56% 2.85%
Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) N/A N/A N/A

Maple Leaf Foods presently has a consensus price target of C$36.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.31%. Given Maple Leaf Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Maple Leaf Foods is more favorable than Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Maple Leaf Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.18
Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Maple Leaf Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO). Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maple Leaf Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maple Leaf FoodsC$3.97B0.96C$34.28MC$4.217.29
Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)C$507.11M0.00C$6.19MC$0.10N/A

Maple Leaf Foods pays an annual dividend of C$0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) pays an annual dividend of C$0.10 per share. Maple Leaf Foods pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) pays out 105.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Maple Leaf Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Maple Leaf Foods had 1 more articles in the media than Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Maple Leaf Foods and 0 mentions for Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO). Maple Leaf Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Maple Leaf Foods Neutral
Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) Neutral

31.1% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 39.9% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Maple Leaf Foods beats Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Maple Leaf Foods compare to High Liner Foods?

Maple Leaf Foods (TSE:MFI) and High Liner Foods (TSE:HLF) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Maple Leaf Foods and Maple Leaf Foods both had 1 articles in the media. Maple Leaf Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled High Liner Foods'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Maple Leaf Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
High Liner Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Maple Leaf Foods presently has a consensus target price of C$36.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.31%. High Liner Foods has a consensus target price of C$16.70, suggesting a potential upside of 11.78%. Given Maple Leaf Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Maple Leaf Foods is more favorable than High Liner Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Maple Leaf Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.18
High Liner Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Maple Leaf Foods pays an annual dividend of C$0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. High Liner Foods pays an annual dividend of C$0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Maple Leaf Foods pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. High Liner Foods pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

High Liner Foods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Maple Leaf Foods. Maple Leaf Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Liner Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maple Leaf FoodsC$3.97B0.96C$34.28MC$4.217.29
High Liner FoodsC$1.09B0.38C$41.70MC$0.9815.24

Maple Leaf Foods has a net margin of 12.44% compared to High Liner Foods' net margin of 2.68%. Maple Leaf Foods' return on equity of 36.56% beat High Liner Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Maple Leaf Foods12.44% 36.56% 2.85%
High Liner Foods 2.68%7.07%5.30%

Maple Leaf Foods has a beta of 0.346146, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, High Liner Foods has a beta of 0.693956, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

31.1% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of High Liner Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.9% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.3% of High Liner Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Maple Leaf Foods beats High Liner Foods on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Maple Leaf Foods News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MFI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MFI vs. The Competition

MetricMaple Leaf FoodsPackaged Foods IndustryDefensive SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$3.82BC$5.16BC$8.55BC$13.07B
Dividend Yield2.79%2.48%3.15%6.18%
P/E Ratio7.292,882.28891.5936.51
Price / Sales0.963,430.84992,149.0810.34
Price / Cash27.20119.32140.9282.29
Price / Book2.8422.519.774.52
Net IncomeC$34.28MC$2.71BC$1.03BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.76%0.56%0.25%1.85%
1 Month Performance0.13%2.13%0.81%1.71%
1 Year Performance7.19%694.78%244.27%36.40%

Maple Leaf Foods Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MFI
Maple Leaf Foods
4.0842 of 5 stars
C$30.71
+0.4%
C$36.33
+18.3%
+7.2%C$3.82BC$3.97B7.2913,500
PBH
Premium Brands
3.6775 of 5 stars
C$84.10
-3.0%
C$118.62
+41.0%
+1.7%C$4.37BC$7.88B93.44540
JWEL
Jamieson Wellness
1.9879 of 5 stars
C$41.68
-0.7%
C$44.50
+6.8%
+18.8%C$1.73BC$845.84M24.09240
SOY
SunOpta
0.1764 of 5 stars
C$8.84
flat
N/AN/AC$1.05BC$817.72M68.001,450
CLR
Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$536.82MC$507.11M86.741,845

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:MFI) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners