Free Trial

High Liner Foods (HLF) Competitors

High Liner Foods logo
C$14.63 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

HLF vs. JWEL, SOY, CLR, BABY, and SWP

Should you buy High Liner Foods stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares High Liner Foods with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with High Liner Foods include Jamieson Wellness (JWEL), SunOpta (SOY), Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) (CLR), Else Nutrition (BABY), and Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee (SWP). These companies are all part of the "packaged foods" industry.

How does High Liner Foods compare to Jamieson Wellness?

Jamieson Wellness (TSE:JWEL) and High Liner Foods (TSE:HLF) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Jamieson Wellness has a net margin of 8.71% compared to High Liner Foods' net margin of 2.68%. Jamieson Wellness' return on equity of 15.25% beat High Liner Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jamieson Wellness8.71% 15.25% 4.73%
High Liner Foods 2.68%7.08%5.30%

Jamieson Wellness has a beta of 1.529654, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, High Liner Foods has a beta of 0.693956, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

48.2% of Jamieson Wellness shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of High Liner Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Jamieson Wellness shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.3% of High Liner Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

High Liner Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Jamieson Wellness. High Liner Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jamieson Wellness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jamieson WellnessC$845.84M1.77C$39.83MC$1.7320.90
High Liner FoodsC$1.09B0.38C$41.70MC$0.9814.93

In the previous week, Jamieson Wellness' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled High Liner Foods'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jamieson Wellness Neutral
High Liner Foods Neutral

Jamieson Wellness currently has a consensus target price of C$44.50, suggesting a potential upside of 23.06%. High Liner Foods has a consensus target price of C$16.70, suggesting a potential upside of 14.15%. Given Jamieson Wellness' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Jamieson Wellness is more favorable than High Liner Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jamieson Wellness
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
High Liner Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Jamieson Wellness pays an annual dividend of C$0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. High Liner Foods pays an annual dividend of C$0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Jamieson Wellness pays out 52.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. High Liner Foods pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. High Liner Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Jamieson Wellness beats High Liner Foods on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Liner Foods compare to SunOpta?

High Liner Foods (TSE:HLF) and SunOpta (TSE:SOY) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, High Liner Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled SunOpta'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
High Liner Foods Neutral
SunOpta Neutral

High Liner Foods presently has a consensus price target of C$16.70, suggesting a potential upside of 14.15%. Given High Liner Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe High Liner Foods is more favorable than SunOpta.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
High Liner Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
SunOpta
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

High Liner Foods has higher revenue and earnings than SunOpta. High Liner Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SunOpta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
High Liner FoodsC$1.09B0.38C$41.70MC$0.9814.93
SunOptaC$817.72M1.28-C$12.73MC$0.1368.00

High Liner Foods has a net margin of 2.68% compared to SunOpta's net margin of 1.93%. SunOpta's return on equity of 9.29% beat High Liner Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
High Liner Foods2.68% 7.08% 5.30%
SunOpta 1.93%9.29%2.68%

High Liner Foods has a beta of 0.693956, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SunOpta has a beta of 2.692156, suggesting that its share price is 169% more volatile than the broader market.

6.7% of High Liner Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.9% of SunOpta shares are held by institutional investors. 44.3% of High Liner Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of SunOpta shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

High Liner Foods beats SunOpta on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Liner Foods compare to Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)?

High Liner Foods (TSE:HLF) and Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) (TSE:CLR) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

High Liner Foods currently has a consensus price target of C$16.70, suggesting a potential upside of 14.15%. Given High Liner Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe High Liner Foods is more favorable than Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
High Liner Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, High Liner Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
High Liner Foods Neutral
Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) Neutral

6.7% of High Liner Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.3% of High Liner Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

High Liner Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO). Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Liner Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
High Liner FoodsC$1.09B0.38C$41.70MC$0.9814.93
Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)C$507.11M0.00C$6.19MC$0.10N/A

High Liner Foods has a net margin of 2.68% compared to Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. High Liner Foods' return on equity of 7.08% beat Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
High Liner Foods2.68% 7.08% 5.30%
Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) N/A N/A N/A

High Liner Foods pays an annual dividend of C$0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) pays an annual dividend of C$0.10 per share. High Liner Foods pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) pays out 105.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. High Liner Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

High Liner Foods beats Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO) on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Liner Foods compare to Else Nutrition?

Else Nutrition (CVE:BABY) and High Liner Foods (TSE:HLF) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

High Liner Foods has a net margin of 2.68% compared to Else Nutrition's net margin of 0.00%. High Liner Foods' return on equity of 7.08% beat Else Nutrition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Else NutritionN/A N/A N/A
High Liner Foods 2.68%7.08%5.30%

6.7% of High Liner Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.3% of High Liner Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

High Liner Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Else Nutrition. Else Nutrition is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Liner Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Else NutritionC$4.02M30.33-C$19.80M-C$0.19N/A
High Liner FoodsC$1.09B0.38C$41.70MC$0.9814.93

High Liner Foods has a consensus price target of C$16.70, suggesting a potential upside of 14.15%. Given High Liner Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe High Liner Foods is more favorable than Else Nutrition.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Else Nutrition
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
High Liner Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Else Nutrition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled High Liner Foods'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Else Nutrition Neutral
High Liner Foods Neutral

Summary

High Liner Foods beats Else Nutrition on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Liner Foods compare to Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee?

High Liner Foods (TSE:HLF) and Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee (TSE:SWP) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

High Liner Foods presently has a consensus target price of C$16.70, suggesting a potential upside of 14.15%. Given High Liner Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe High Liner Foods is more favorable than Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
High Liner Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

High Liner Foods has a beta of 0.693956, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee has a beta of 0.761887, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

High Liner Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee. High Liner Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
High Liner FoodsC$1.09B0.38C$41.70MC$0.9814.93
Swiss Water Decaffeinated CoffeeC$253.90M0.21C$214.47KC$0.1929.68

High Liner Foods has a net margin of 2.68% compared to Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee's net margin of 0.96%. High Liner Foods' return on equity of 7.08% beat Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
High Liner Foods2.68% 7.08% 5.30%
Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee 0.96%4.17%2.84%

In the previous week, Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee had 4 more articles in the media than High Liner Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee and 0 mentions for High Liner Foods. Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat High Liner Foods' score of 0.00 indicating that Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
High Liner Foods Neutral
Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee Positive

6.7% of High Liner Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee shares are held by institutional investors. 44.3% of High Liner Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

High Liner Foods beats Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get High Liner Foods News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HLF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HLF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HLF vs. The Competition

MetricHigh Liner FoodsPackaged Foods IndustryDefensive SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$410.77MC$4.67BC$8.46BC$12.19B
Dividend Yield4.75%2.54%3.19%6.19%
P/E Ratio14.932,882.05891.6636.94
Price / Sales0.383,430.95992,150.1010.45
Price / Cash138.61119.32140.9282.29
Price / Book1.0322.509.184.47
Net IncomeC$41.70MC$2.71BC$1.03BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.76%1.77%0.78%0.65%
1 Month Performance4.28%2.63%1.07%-0.08%
1 Year Performance-20.45%729.26%268.73%41.90%

High Liner Foods Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HLF
High Liner Foods
2.5054 of 5 stars
C$14.63
flat
C$16.70
+14.1%
-20.4%C$410.77MC$1.09B14.93N/A
JWEL
Jamieson Wellness
2.3659 of 5 stars
C$35.68
-0.6%
C$44.50
+24.7%
-0.9%C$1.48BC$845.84M20.62240
SOY
SunOpta
N/AC$8.84
flat
N/AN/AC$1.05BC$817.72M68.001,450
CLR
Clearwater Seafoods Incorporated (CLR.TO)
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$536.82MC$507.11M86.741,845
BABY
Else Nutrition
N/AC$1.17
flat
N/A+0.0%C$121.91MC$4.02MN/A1,729

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:HLF) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners