Go Pro

Metro (MRU) Competitors

Metro logo
C$88.80 -0.69 (-0.77%)
As of 10:50 AM Eastern

MRU vs. L, ATD.B, ATD.A, EMP.A, and FOOD

Should you buy Metro stock or one of its competitors? Metro's main competitors and comparable companies include Loblaw Companies (L), Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.B), Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.A), Empire (EMP.A), and Goodfood Market (FOOD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food retail" industry.

How does Metro compare to Loblaw Companies?

Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) and Metro (TSE:MRU) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Metro had 10 more articles in the media than Loblaw Companies. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Metro and 2 mentions for Loblaw Companies. Metro's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Loblaw Companies' score of -0.50 indicating that Metro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Loblaw Companies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Metro
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Loblaw Companies presently has a consensus price target of C$71.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.13%. Metro has a consensus price target of C$102.33, suggesting a potential upside of 15.24%. Given Metro's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Metro is more favorable than Loblaw Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Metro
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Metro. Metro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Loblaw CompaniesC$65.07B1.11C$2.23BC$2.3626.36
MetroC$22.38B0.84C$957.36MC$4.6918.93

Metro has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Loblaw Companies' net margin of 4.32%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Metro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Loblaw Companies4.32% 25.25% 5.89%
Metro 4.52%14.38%6.40%

19.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.9% of Metro shares are held by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Metro shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Metro pays an annual dividend of C$1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Metro pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.143525, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Metro has a beta of 0.178598, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Loblaw Companies and Metro tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Metro compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Metro (TSE:MRU) and Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD.B) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Metro pays an annual dividend of C$1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.28 per share. Metro pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

44.9% of Metro shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Metro shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Metro has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 0.00%. Metro's return on equity of 14.38% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Metro4.52% 14.38% 6.40%
Alimentation Couche-Tard N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Metro had 12 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Metro and 0 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Metro's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's score of 0.00 indicating that Metro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Metro Positive
Alimentation Couche-Tard Neutral

Metro currently has a consensus price target of C$102.33, suggesting a potential upside of 15.24%. Given Metro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Metro is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Metro
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher revenue and earnings than Metro. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MetroC$22.38B0.84C$957.36MC$4.6918.93
Alimentation Couche-TardC$53.19B0.00C$3.30BC$3.10N/A

Summary

Metro beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Metro compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD.A) and Metro (TSE:MRU) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

44.9% of Metro shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Metro shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher revenue and earnings than Metro. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alimentation Couche-TardC$53.19B0.00C$3.30BC$3.10N/A
MetroC$22.38B0.84C$957.36MC$4.6918.93

Metro has a consensus target price of C$102.33, indicating a potential upside of 15.24%. Given Metro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Metro is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Metro
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Metro had 12 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Metro and 0 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Metro's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's score of 0.00 indicating that Metro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alimentation Couche-Tard Neutral
Metro Positive

Metro has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 0.00%. Metro's return on equity of 14.38% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alimentation Couche-TardN/A N/A N/A
Metro 4.52%14.38%6.40%

Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share. Metro pays an annual dividend of C$1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Metro pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Metro beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Metro compare to Empire?

Empire (TSE:EMP.A) and Metro (TSE:MRU) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

22.6% of Empire shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.9% of Metro shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Empire shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Metro shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Metro has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Empire's net margin of 2.18%. Metro's return on equity of 14.38% beat Empire's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Empire2.18% 12.94% 4.60%
Metro 4.52%14.38%6.40%

Empire currently has a consensus price target of C$55.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.16%. Metro has a consensus price target of C$102.33, indicating a potential upside of 15.24%. Given Metro's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Metro is more favorable than Empire.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Empire
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Metro
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Metro has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Empire. Metro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Empire, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EmpireC$31.95B0.35C$672MC$0.8657.53
MetroC$22.38B0.84C$957.36MC$4.6918.93

Empire pays an annual dividend of C$0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Metro pays an annual dividend of C$1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Empire pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Metro pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Empire has a beta of -0.204775, indicating that its share price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Metro has a beta of 0.178598, indicating that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Metro had 10 more articles in the media than Empire. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Metro and 2 mentions for Empire. Metro's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Empire's score of 0.37 indicating that Metro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Empire
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Metro
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Metro beats Empire on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Metro compare to Goodfood Market?

Metro (TSE:MRU) and Goodfood Market (TSE:FOOD) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Metro has higher revenue and earnings than Goodfood Market. Goodfood Market is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MetroC$22.38B0.84C$957.36MC$4.6918.93
Goodfood MarketC$96.55M0.03-C$3.10M-C$0.14N/A

In the previous week, Metro had 12 more articles in the media than Goodfood Market. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Metro and 0 mentions for Goodfood Market. Metro's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Goodfood Market's score of 0.00 indicating that Metro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Metro Positive
Goodfood Market Neutral

44.9% of Metro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goodfood Market shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Metro shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Goodfood Market shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Metro has a beta of 0.178598, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goodfood Market has a beta of 1.952789, meaning that its share price is 95% more volatile than the broader market.

Metro presently has a consensus price target of C$102.33, indicating a potential upside of 15.24%. Goodfood Market has a consensus price target of C$0.05, indicating a potential upside of 66.67%. Given Goodfood Market's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Goodfood Market is more favorable than Metro.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Metro
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Goodfood Market
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Metro has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Goodfood Market's net margin of -13.96%. Goodfood Market's return on equity of 41.50% beat Metro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Metro4.52% 14.38% 6.40%
Goodfood Market -13.96%41.50%1.61%

Summary

Metro beats Goodfood Market on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Metro News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MRU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MRU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MRU vs. The Competition

MetricMetroConsumer Staples Distribution & Retail IndustryConsumer Staples SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$18.73BC$27.93BC$16.15BC$12.55B
Dividend Yield1.81%3.51%3.21%6.20%
P/E Ratio18.9316.2313.3430.79
Price / Sales0.848.49262,280.459.79
Price / Cash1,364.5642.9157.5982.29
Price / Book2.714.115.074.65
Net IncomeC$957.36MC$883.81MC$834.00MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.72%1.08%0.49%1.02%
1 Month Performance-5.09%1.14%1.38%4.01%
1 Year Performance-9.75%-4.92%13.34%36.32%

Metro Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MRU
Metro
2.8168 of 5 stars
C$88.80
-0.8%
C$102.33
+15.2%
-9.2%C$18.73BC$22.38B18.9397,000
L
Loblaw Companies
2.6582 of 5 stars
C$65.31
-0.8%
C$71.00
+8.7%
-72.4%C$76.01BC$65.07B27.6712,000
ATD.B
Alimentation Couche-Tard
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$52.83BC$53.19B16.01130,000
ATD.A
Alimentation Couche-Tard
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$52.79BC$53.19B15.99130,000
EMP.A
Empire
1.6742 of 5 stars
C$51.28
-0.1%
C$55.00
+7.3%
-11.9%C$11.48BC$31.95B59.63125,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:MRU) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners