Does the media refer more to ATD or L?

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 12 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 7 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.60 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alimentation Couche-Tard 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Loblaw Companies 2 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend ATD.B or L?

Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$71.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.71%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Alimentation Couche-Tard 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Loblaw Companies 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.86

Do analysts rate ATD.A or L?

Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$71.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.71%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Alimentation Couche-Tard 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Loblaw Companies 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.86

Which has better valuation & earnings, L or MRU?

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Metro. Metro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Loblaw Companies C$65.07B 1.17 C$2.23B C$2.36 27.67 Metro C$22.38B 0.87 C$957.36M C$4.69 19.78

Is L or MRU more profitable?

Metro has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Loblaw Companies' net margin of 4.32%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Metro's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Loblaw Companies 4.32% 25.25% 5.89% Metro 4.52% 14.38% 6.40%

Does the media prefer L or MRU?

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 16 more articles in the media than Metro. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 3 mentions for Metro. Metro's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.60 indicating that Metro is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Loblaw Companies 2 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Metro 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, L or EMP.A?

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Empire. Loblaw Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Empire, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Loblaw Companies C$65.07B 1.17 C$2.23B C$2.36 27.67 Empire C$31.95B 0.36 C$672M C$0.86 59.63

Is L or EMP.A more profitable?

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Empire's net margin of 2.18%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Empire's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Loblaw Companies 4.32% 25.25% 5.89% Empire 2.18% 12.94% 4.60%

Does the media favor L or EMP.A?

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 14 more articles in the media than Empire. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 5 mentions for Empire. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Empire's score of -0.24 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Loblaw Companies 2 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Empire 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Loblaw Companies (L) Competitors

C$65.31 -0.50 (-0.76%)

As of 08/4/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

L vs. ATD, ATD.B, ATD.A, MRU, and EMP.A

Should you buy Loblaw Companies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Loblaw Companies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Loblaw Companies include Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD), Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.B), Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.A), Metro (MRU), and Empire (EMP.A). These companies are all part of the "food retail" industry.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 0.659561, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.129619, meaning that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 12 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 7 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.60 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alimentation Couche-Tard	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Loblaw Companies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

34.2% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.7% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 4.11%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alimentation Couche-Tard	4.11%	20.01%	7.00%
Loblaw Companies	4.32%	25.25%	5.89%

Alimentation Couche-Tard presently has a consensus target price of C$101.20, suggesting a potential upside of 8.67%. Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$71.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.71%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alimentation Couche-Tard	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Loblaw Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Loblaw Companies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alimentation Couche-Tard	C$76.51B	1.12	C$1.79B	C$3.37	27.64
Loblaw Companies	C$65.07B	1.17	C$2.23B	C$2.36	27.67

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD.B) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Loblaw Companies. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alimentation Couche-Tard	C$53.19B	0.00	C$3.30B	C$3.10	N/A
Loblaw Companies	C$65.07B	1.17	C$2.23B	C$2.36	27.67

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 19 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 0 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's score of 0.00 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Alimentation Couche-Tard	Neutral
Loblaw Companies	Positive

Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$71.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.71%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alimentation Couche-Tard	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Loblaw Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

19.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 0.00%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alimentation Couche-Tard	N/A	N/A	N/A
Loblaw Companies	4.32%	25.25%	5.89%

Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.28 per share. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD.A) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 0.00%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alimentation Couche-Tard	N/A	N/A	N/A
Loblaw Companies	4.32%	25.25%	5.89%

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alimentation Couche-Tard	C$53.19B	0.00	C$3.30B	C$3.10	N/A
Loblaw Companies	C$65.07B	1.17	C$2.23B	C$2.36	27.67

Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

19.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Alimentation Couche-Tard	Neutral
Loblaw Companies	Positive

Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$71.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.71%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alimentation Couche-Tard	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Loblaw Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Metro?

Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) and Metro (TSE:MRU) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

19.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.9% of Metro shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Metro shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Metro. Metro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Loblaw Companies	C$65.07B	1.17	C$2.23B	C$2.36	27.67
Metro	C$22.38B	0.87	C$957.36M	C$4.69	19.78

Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.129619, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Metro has a beta of 0.162856, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

Metro has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Loblaw Companies' net margin of 4.32%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Metro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Loblaw Companies	4.32%	25.25%	5.89%
Metro	4.52%	14.38%	6.40%

Loblaw Companies currently has a consensus price target of C$71.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.71%. Metro has a consensus price target of C$102.38, suggesting a potential upside of 10.34%. Given Metro's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Metro is more favorable than Loblaw Companies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Loblaw Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Metro	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 16 more articles in the media than Metro. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 3 mentions for Metro. Metro's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.60 indicating that Metro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Loblaw Companies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Metro	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Metro pays an annual dividend of C$1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Metro pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Metro on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Empire?

Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) and Empire (TSE:EMP.A) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Empire pays an annual dividend of C$0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Empire pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 14 more articles in the media than Empire. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 5 mentions for Empire. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Empire's score of -0.24 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Loblaw Companies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Empire	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Loblaw Companies presently has a consensus price target of C$71.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.71%. Empire has a consensus price target of C$55.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.25%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Empire.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Loblaw Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Empire	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38

19.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.6% of Empire shares are held by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Empire shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.129619, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Empire has a beta of -0.21885, indicating that its stock price is 122% less volatile than the broader market.

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Empire's net margin of 2.18%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Empire's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Loblaw Companies	4.32%	25.25%	5.89%
Empire	2.18%	12.94%	4.60%

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Empire. Loblaw Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Empire, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Loblaw Companies	C$65.07B	1.17	C$2.23B	C$2.36	27.67
Empire	C$31.95B	0.36	C$672M	C$0.86	59.63

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Empire on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Loblaw Companies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding L and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

L vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Loblaw Companies	Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail Industry	Consumer Staples Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$76.01B	C$27.75B	C$16.15B	C$12.47B
Dividend Yield	0.94%	3.47%	3.20%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	27.67	17.70	14.53	33.99
Price / Sales	1.17	8.38	262,279.53	9.61
Price / Cash	23.18	43.13	57.67	82.29
Price / Book	6.80	4.19	4.68	4.45
Net Income	C$2.23B	C$884.73M	C$841.31M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-1.09%	0.32%	0.26%	2.18%
1 Month Performance	4.58%	-0.39%	-0.59%	-0.27%
1 Year Performance	-71.21%	-4.68%	14.10%	32.82%

Loblaw Companies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
L Loblaw Companies	2.7481 of 5 stars	C$65.31 -0.8%	C$71.00 +8.7%	-70.8%	C$76.01B	C$65.07B	27.67	12,000	Earnings Report
ATD Alimentation Couche-Tard	2.7831 of 5 stars	C$91.01 flat	C$101.20 +11.2%	+32.7%	C$83.54B	C$76.51B	27.01	150,000	High Trading Volume
ATD.B Alimentation Couche-Tard	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$52.83B	C$53.19B	16.01	130,000
ATD.A Alimentation Couche-Tard	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$52.79B	C$53.19B	15.99	130,000
MRU Metro	2.1208 of 5 stars	C$93.18 flat	C$102.38 +9.9%	-12.0%	C$19.65B	C$22.38B	19.87	97,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:L) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Loblaw Companies (L) Competitors

L vs. ATD, ATD.B, ATD.A, MRU, and EMP.A

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Metro?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Empire?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

L vs. The Competition

Loblaw Companies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Loblaw Companies (L) Competitors

L vs. ATD, ATD.B, ATD.A, MRU, and EMP.A

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Which has more volatility & risk, ATD or L?

Does the media refer more to ATD or L?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ATD or L?

Is ATD or L a better dividend stock?

Is ATD or L more profitable?

Do analysts recommend ATD or L?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ATD or L?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ATD.B or L?

Does the media prefer ATD.B or L?

Do analysts recommend ATD.B or L?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ATD.B or L?

Is ATD.B or L more profitable?

Is ATD.B or L a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Is ATD.A or L more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ATD.A or L?

Is ATD.A or L a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ATD.A or L?

Does the media favor ATD.A or L?

Do analysts rate ATD.A or L?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Metro?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in L or MRU?

Which has better valuation & earnings, L or MRU?

Which has more volatility and risk, L or MRU?

Is L or MRU more profitable?

Do analysts rate L or MRU?

Does the media prefer L or MRU?

Is L or MRU a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Empire?

Is L or EMP.A a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor L or EMP.A?

Do analysts rate L or EMP.A?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in L or EMP.A?

Which has more volatility & risk, L or EMP.A?

Is L or EMP.A more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, L or EMP.A?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

L vs. The Competition

Loblaw Companies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools