Does the media prefer L or ATD?

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 3 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 2 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.35 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Loblaw Companies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Alimentation Couche-Tard 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate L or ATD.B?

Loblaw Companies presently has a consensus price target of C$71.44, indicating a potential upside of 15.96%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Loblaw Companies 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.88 Alimentation Couche-Tard 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts recommend L or ATD.A?

Loblaw Companies presently has a consensus target price of C$71.44, suggesting a potential upside of 15.96%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Loblaw Companies 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.88 Alimentation Couche-Tard 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, MRU or L?

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Metro. Metro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Metro C$22.48B 0.84 C$957.36M C$4.21 21.34 Loblaw Companies C$65.07B 1.09 C$2.23B C$2.36 26.11

Is MRU or L more profitable?

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Metro's net margin of 4.00%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Metro's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Metro 4.00% 12.87% 6.40% Loblaw Companies 4.32% 25.25% 5.89%

Does the media favor MRU or L?

In the previous week, Metro and Metro both had 5 articles in the media. Metro's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.35 indicating that Metro is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Metro 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Loblaw Companies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, EMP.A or L?

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Empire. Loblaw Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Empire, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Empire C$32.17B 0.32 C$672M C$0.99 46.88 Loblaw Companies C$65.07B 1.09 C$2.23B C$2.36 26.11

Is EMP.A or L more profitable?

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Empire's net margin of 2.18%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Empire's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Empire 2.18% 12.94% 4.60% Loblaw Companies 4.32% 25.25% 5.89%

Does the media prefer EMP.A or L?

In the previous week, Empire had 15 more articles in the media than Loblaw Companies. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Empire and 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Empire's score of -0.18 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Empire 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 9 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Loblaw Companies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Loblaw Companies (L) Competitors

C$61.61 -1.44 (-2.28%)

As of 09/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

L vs. ATD, ATD.B, ATD.A, MRU, and EMP.A

Should you buy Loblaw Companies stock or one of its competitors? Loblaw Companies's main competitors and comparable companies include Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD), Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.B), Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.A), Metro (MRU), and Empire (EMP.A). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food retail" industry.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) and Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Loblaw Companies presently has a consensus target price of C$71.44, indicating a potential upside of 15.96%. Alimentation Couche-Tard has a consensus target price of C$99.73, indicating a potential upside of 25.18%. Given Alimentation Couche-Tard's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more favorable than Loblaw Companies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Loblaw Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Alimentation Couche-Tard	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.062263, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 0.670882, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 3.95%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Loblaw Companies	4.32%	25.25%	5.89%
Alimentation Couche-Tard	3.95%	19.91%	7.00%

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 3 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 2 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.35 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Loblaw Companies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Alimentation Couche-Tard	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Loblaw Companies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Loblaw Companies	C$65.07B	1.09	C$2.23B	C$2.36	26.11
Alimentation Couche-Tard	C$80.86B	0.90	C$1.79B	C$3.44	23.16

20.1% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.5% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Alimentation Couche-Tard beats Loblaw Companies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) and Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD.B) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Alimentation Couche-Tard has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Loblaw Companies. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Loblaw Companies	C$65.07B	1.09	C$2.23B	C$2.36	26.11
Alimentation Couche-Tard	C$53.19B	0.00	C$3.30B	C$3.10	N/A

Loblaw Companies presently has a consensus price target of C$71.44, indicating a potential upside of 15.96%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Loblaw Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Alimentation Couche-Tard	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.28 per share. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 0.00%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Loblaw Companies	4.32%	25.25%	5.89%
Alimentation Couche-Tard	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 5 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 0 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's score of 0.00 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Loblaw Companies	Neutral
Alimentation Couche-Tard	Neutral

20.1% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) and Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD.A) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Loblaw Companies	Neutral
Alimentation Couche-Tard	Neutral

20.1% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Loblaw Companies	C$65.07B	1.09	C$2.23B	C$2.36	26.11
Alimentation Couche-Tard	C$53.19B	0.00	C$3.30B	C$3.10	N/A

Loblaw Companies presently has a consensus target price of C$71.44, suggesting a potential upside of 15.96%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Loblaw Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Alimentation Couche-Tard	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 0.00%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Loblaw Companies	4.32%	25.25%	5.89%
Alimentation Couche-Tard	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Metro?

Metro (TSE:MRU) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

46.1% of Metro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Metro shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Metro presently has a consensus price target of C$102.33, suggesting a potential upside of 13.91%. Loblaw Companies has a consensus price target of C$71.44, suggesting a potential upside of 15.96%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Metro.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Metro	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Loblaw Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Metro's net margin of 4.00%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Metro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Metro	4.00%	12.87%	6.40%
Loblaw Companies	4.32%	25.25%	5.89%

In the previous week, Metro and Metro both had 5 articles in the media. Metro's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.35 indicating that Metro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Metro	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Loblaw Companies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Metro. Metro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Metro	C$22.48B	0.84	C$957.36M	C$4.21	21.34
Loblaw Companies	C$65.07B	1.09	C$2.23B	C$2.36	26.11

Metro pays an annual dividend of C$1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Metro pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Metro has a beta of 0.113776, indicating that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.062263, indicating that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Metro on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Empire?

Empire (TSE:EMP.A) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Empire presently has a consensus target price of C$53.67, indicating a potential upside of 15.64%. Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$71.44, indicating a potential upside of 15.96%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Empire.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Empire	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Loblaw Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Empire. Loblaw Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Empire, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Empire	C$32.17B	0.32	C$672M	C$0.99	46.88
Loblaw Companies	C$65.07B	1.09	C$2.23B	C$2.36	26.11

In the previous week, Empire had 15 more articles in the media than Loblaw Companies. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Empire and 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Empire's score of -0.18 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Empire	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	9 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Loblaw Companies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Empire's net margin of 2.18%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Empire's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Empire	2.18%	12.94%	4.60%
Loblaw Companies	4.32%	25.25%	5.89%

Empire has a beta of -0.292125, suggesting that its share price is 129% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.062263, suggesting that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

22.2% of Empire shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Empire shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Empire pays an annual dividend of C$0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Empire pays out 91.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Empire on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Loblaw Companies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding L and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

L vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Loblaw Companies	Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail Industry	Consumer Staples Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$71.20B	C$26.78B	C$15.84B	C$12.60B
Dividend Yield	1.01%	3.50%	3.25%	6.27%
P/E Ratio	26.11	15.53	14.01	38.97
Price / Sales	1.09	7.71	262,279.70	9.20
Price / Cash	23.18	41.40	56.98	82.29
Price / Book	6.42	3.89	4.74	4.58
Net Income	C$2.23B	C$878.29M	C$834.43M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-1.31%	-0.41%	-0.70%	-1.68%
1 Month Performance	-0.48%	-4.21%	-2.41%	-2.24%
1 Year Performance	14.60%	-6.53%	10.86%	22.01%

Loblaw Companies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
L Loblaw Companies	3.2956 of 5 stars	C$61.61 -2.3%	C$71.44 +16.0%	+13.7%	C$71.20B	C$65.07B	26.11	12,000	Dividend Announcement
ATD Alimentation Couche-Tard	4.3009 of 5 stars	C$81.91 +1.8%	C$99.73 +21.8%	+8.8%	C$73.90B	C$80.86B	23.81	145,000	Dividend Announcement
ATD.B Alimentation Couche-Tard	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$52.83B	C$53.19B	16.01	130,000
ATD.A Alimentation Couche-Tard	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$52.79B	C$53.19B	15.99	130,000
MRU Metro	2.543 of 5 stars	C$91.55 +3.8%	C$102.33 +11.8%	-5.0%	C$18.45B	C$22.48B	21.75	99,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:L) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Loblaw Companies (L) Competitors

L vs. ATD, ATD.B, ATD.A, MRU, and EMP.A

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Metro?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Empire?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

L vs. The Competition

Loblaw Companies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Loblaw Companies (L) Competitors

L vs. ATD, ATD.B, ATD.A, MRU, and EMP.A

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Do analysts rate L or ATD?

Which has more risk & volatility, L or ATD?

Is L or ATD more profitable?

Does the media prefer L or ATD?

Which has better earnings & valuation, L or ATD?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in L or ATD?

Is L or ATD a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, L or ATD.B?

Do analysts rate L or ATD.B?

Is L or ATD.B a better dividend stock?

Is L or ATD.B more profitable?

Does the media prefer L or ATD.B?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of L or ATD.B?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Does the media prefer L or ATD.A?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of L or ATD.A?

Is L or ATD.A a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, L or ATD.A?

Do analysts recommend L or ATD.A?

Is L or ATD.A more profitable?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Metro?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MRU or L?

Do analysts recommend MRU or L?

Is MRU or L more profitable?

Does the media favor MRU or L?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MRU or L?

Is MRU or L a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, MRU or L?

Summary

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Empire?

Do analysts rate EMP.A or L?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, EMP.A or L?

Does the media prefer EMP.A or L?

Is EMP.A or L more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, EMP.A or L?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in EMP.A or L?

Is EMP.A or L a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

L vs. The Competition

Loblaw Companies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools