Go Pro

Loblaw Companies (L) Competitors

Loblaw Companies logo
C$64.18 -0.78 (-1.20%)
As of 07/14/2026 04:20 PM Eastern

L vs. MFC, GWO, SLF, PRU, and ALS

Should you buy Loblaw Companies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Loblaw Companies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Loblaw Companies include Manulife Financial (MFC), Great-West Lifeco (GWO), Sun Life Financial (SLF), Perseus Mining (PRU), and Altius Minerals (ALS). These companies are all part of the "insurance" industry.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Manulife Financial?

Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) and Manulife Financial (TSE:MFC) are both large-cap insurance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.129619, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.712019, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Manulife Financial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Loblaw Companies. Manulife Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Loblaw CompaniesC$64.48B1.16C$2.23BC$2.3027.90
Manulife FinancialC$53.19B1.83C$5.64BC$3.4716.91

Loblaw Companies currently has a consensus price target of C$69.25, suggesting a potential upside of 7.90%. Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of C$57.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.85%. Given Loblaw Companies' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Manulife Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Manulife Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

20.2% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.8% of Manulife Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Manulife Financial has a net margin of 11.97% compared to Loblaw Companies' net margin of 4.29%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 24.88% beat Manulife Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Loblaw Companies4.29% 24.88% 5.89%
Manulife Financial 11.97%12.60%0.55%

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies and Loblaw Companies both had 2 articles in the media. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Manulife Financial's score of 0.34 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Loblaw Companies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Manulife Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of C$1.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manulife Financial pays out 52.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Manulife Financial beats Loblaw Companies on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Great-West Lifeco?

Great-West Lifeco (TSE:GWO) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap insurance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Great-West Lifeco pays an annual dividend of C$2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Great-West Lifeco pays out 53.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Great-West Lifeco has a beta of 0.673322, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.129619, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Great-West Lifeco has a net margin of 12.86% compared to Loblaw Companies' net margin of 4.29%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 24.88% beat Great-West Lifeco's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great-West Lifeco12.86% 15.17% 0.73%
Loblaw Companies 4.29%24.88%5.89%

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 1 more articles in the media than Great-West Lifeco. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 1 mentions for Great-West Lifeco. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Great-West Lifeco's score of 0.45 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great-West Lifeco
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Loblaw Companies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Great-West Lifeco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Loblaw Companies. Great-West Lifeco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great-West LifecoC$36.28B2.26C$4.07BC$4.6519.62
Loblaw CompaniesC$64.48B1.16C$2.23BC$2.3027.90

Great-West Lifeco presently has a consensus price target of C$77.18, suggesting a potential downside of 15.42%. Loblaw Companies has a consensus price target of C$69.25, suggesting a potential upside of 7.90%. Given Loblaw Companies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Great-West Lifeco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great-West Lifeco
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

9.6% of Great-West Lifeco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.2% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 70.7% of Great-West Lifeco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Great-West Lifeco beats Loblaw Companies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Sun Life Financial?

Sun Life Financial (TSE:SLF) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap insurance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

31.7% of Sun Life Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.2% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sun Life Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Loblaw Companies. Sun Life Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sun Life FinancialC$35.87B1.73C$3.76BC$5.3720.84
Loblaw CompaniesC$64.48B1.16C$2.23BC$2.3027.90

Sun Life Financial has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Loblaw Companies' net margin of 4.29%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 24.88% beat Sun Life Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sun Life Financial9.12% 12.89% 0.81%
Loblaw Companies 4.29%24.88%5.89%

In the previous week, Sun Life Financial had 4 more articles in the media than Loblaw Companies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Sun Life Financial and 2 mentions for Loblaw Companies. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Sun Life Financial's score of -0.26 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sun Life Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Loblaw Companies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Sun Life Financial pays an annual dividend of C$3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Sun Life Financial pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Sun Life Financial presently has a consensus price target of C$102.45, indicating a potential downside of 8.44%. Loblaw Companies has a consensus price target of C$69.25, indicating a potential upside of 7.90%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Sun Life Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sun Life Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Sun Life Financial has a beta of 0.786093, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.129619, meaning that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sun Life Financial beats Loblaw Companies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Perseus Mining?

Perseus Mining (TSE:PRU) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both insurance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Perseus Mining has a beta of 1.807927, indicating that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.129619, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$69.25, suggesting a potential upside of 7.90%. Given Loblaw Companies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Perseus Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Perseus Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.67
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Perseus Mining. Perseus Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Perseus MiningC$1.27B4.98C$546.57MC$0.2618.40
Loblaw CompaniesC$64.48B1.16C$2.23BC$2.3027.90

49.3% of Perseus Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.2% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Perseus Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Perseus Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Perseus Mining pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Perseus Mining is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 1 more articles in the media than Perseus Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 1 mentions for Perseus Mining. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Perseus Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Perseus Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Loblaw Companies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Perseus Mining has a net margin of 27.92% compared to Loblaw Companies' net margin of 4.29%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 24.88% beat Perseus Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Perseus Mining27.92% 16.92% 16.07%
Loblaw Companies 4.29%24.88%5.89%

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Perseus Mining on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Altius Minerals?

Altius Minerals (TSE:ALS) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both insurance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Altius Minerals. Altius Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Altius MineralsC$63.30M58.16C$13.64MC$6.2610.55
Loblaw CompaniesC$64.48B1.16C$2.23BC$2.3027.90

Altius Minerals has a beta of 0.398754, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.129619, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Altius Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Altius Minerals pays out 6.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Altius Minerals had 11 more articles in the media than Loblaw Companies. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Altius Minerals and 2 mentions for Loblaw Companies. Altius Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.45 indicating that Altius Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Altius Minerals
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Loblaw Companies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Altius Minerals has a net margin of 543.91% compared to Loblaw Companies' net margin of 4.29%. Altius Minerals' return on equity of 32.43% beat Loblaw Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Altius Minerals543.91% 32.43% 2.60%
Loblaw Companies 4.29%24.88%5.89%

Altius Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$61.75, indicating a potential downside of 6.50%. Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$69.25, indicating a potential upside of 7.90%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Altius Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Altius Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

27.2% of Altius Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.2% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Altius Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Altius Minerals and Loblaw Companies tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Loblaw Companies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for L and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding L and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

L vs. The Competition

MetricLoblaw CompaniesGrocery Stores IndustryDefensive SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$74.70BC$23.11BC$8.33BC$12.29B
Dividend Yield0.97%2.82%3.15%6.17%
P/E Ratio27.9019.69888.5436.35
Price / Sales1.1627.15992,150.129.83
Price / Cash23.18125.61142.3382.29
Price / Book6.783.079.744.49
Net IncomeC$2.23BC$958.31MC$1.03BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.41%0.71%0.10%0.37%
1 Month Performance-0.63%0.93%-0.08%-1.30%
1 Year Performance-70.87%-5.14%245.01%32.60%

Loblaw Companies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
L
Loblaw Companies
1.6053 of 5 stars
C$64.18
-1.2%
C$69.25
+7.9%
-71.4%C$74.70BC$64.48B27.9012,000
MFC
Manulife Financial
2.3607 of 5 stars
C$58.49
-0.1%
C$57.00
-2.5%
+40.6%C$97.20BC$53.19B16.8640,000
GWO
Great-West Lifeco
1.968 of 5 stars
C$90.77
-1.3%
C$77.18
-15.0%
+74.8%C$81.52BC$36.28B19.5233,500
SLF
Sun Life Financial
1.8283 of 5 stars
C$111.00
-1.9%
C$102.45
-7.7%
+30.1%C$61.53BC$35.87B20.6729,200
PRU
Perseus Mining
1.1252 of 5 stars
C$4.68
-2.9%
N/A+48.9%C$6.21BC$1.27B18.0139,900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:L) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners