Go Pro

Loblaw Companies (L) Competitors

Loblaw Companies logo
C$61.37 -0.19 (-0.31%)
As of 01:34 PM Eastern

L vs. ATD, ATD.B, ATD.A, MRU, and EMP.A

Should you buy Loblaw Companies stock or one of its competitors? Loblaw Companies's main competitors and comparable companies include Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD), Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.B), Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.A), Metro (MRU), and Empire (EMP.A). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food retail" industry.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 0.670815, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.143525, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

34.3% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.7% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 4.11%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alimentation Couche-Tard4.11% 20.01% 7.00%
Loblaw Companies 4.32%25.25%5.89%

Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Alimentation Couche-Tard currently has a consensus target price of C$101.40, indicating a potential upside of 18.55%. Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$71.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.94%. Given Alimentation Couche-Tard's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more favorable than Loblaw Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

In the previous week, Alimentation Couche-Tard had 1 more articles in the media than Loblaw Companies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard and 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of -0.08 beat Loblaw Companies' score of -0.30 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Loblaw Companies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Loblaw Companies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alimentation Couche-TardC$76.51B1.03C$1.79BC$3.3725.38
Loblaw CompaniesC$65.07B1.09C$2.23BC$2.3625.95

Summary

Alimentation Couche-Tard beats Loblaw Companies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD.B) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Loblaw Companies has a consensus price target of C$71.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.94%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Loblaw Companies. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alimentation Couche-TardC$53.19B0.00C$3.30BC$3.10N/A
Loblaw CompaniesC$65.07B1.09C$2.23BC$2.3625.95

Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.28 per share. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

19.9% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 0.00%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alimentation Couche-TardN/A N/A N/A
Loblaw Companies 4.32%25.25%5.89%

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 5 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 0 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Loblaw Companies' score of -0.30 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alimentation Couche-Tard Neutral
Loblaw Companies Neutral

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD.A) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 4 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 1 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Loblaw Companies' score of -0.30 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Loblaw Companies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 0.00%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alimentation Couche-TardN/A N/A N/A
Loblaw Companies 4.32%25.25%5.89%

Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Loblaw Companies. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alimentation Couche-TardC$53.19B0.00C$3.30BC$3.10N/A
Loblaw CompaniesC$65.07B1.09C$2.23BC$2.3625.95

Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$71.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.94%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

19.9% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Metro?

Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) and Metro (TSE:MRU) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Metro pays an annual dividend of C$1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Metro pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Metro's net margin of 4.00%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Metro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Loblaw Companies4.32% 25.25% 5.89%
Metro 4.00%12.87%6.40%

Loblaw Companies currently has a consensus target price of C$71.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.94%. Metro has a consensus target price of C$102.33, indicating a potential upside of 13.96%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Metro.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Metro
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

19.9% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of Metro shares are held by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Metro shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Metro. Metro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Loblaw CompaniesC$65.07B1.09C$2.23BC$2.3625.95
MetroC$22.48B0.84C$957.36MC$4.2121.33

Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.143525, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Metro has a beta of 0.178598, suggesting that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 3 more articles in the media than Metro. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 2 mentions for Metro. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of -0.30 beat Metro's score of -0.55 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Loblaw Companies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Metro
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Metro on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Loblaw Companies compare to Empire?

Empire (TSE:EMP.A) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Empire has a beta of -0.204775, suggesting that its share price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.143525, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Empire pays an annual dividend of C$0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Empire pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 2 more articles in the media than Empire. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 3 mentions for Empire. Empire's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Loblaw Companies' score of -0.30 indicating that Empire is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Empire
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Loblaw Companies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Loblaw Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Empire. Loblaw Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Empire, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EmpireC$31.95B0.34C$672MC$0.8656.00
Loblaw CompaniesC$65.07B1.09C$2.23BC$2.3625.95

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Empire's net margin of 2.18%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Empire's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Empire2.18% 12.94% 4.60%
Loblaw Companies 4.32%25.25%5.89%

Empire currently has a consensus target price of C$55.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.20%. Loblaw Companies has a consensus target price of C$71.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.94%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Empire.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Empire
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

22.6% of Empire shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Empire shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Loblaw Companies beats Empire on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Loblaw Companies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for L and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding L and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

L vs. The Competition

MetricLoblaw CompaniesConsumer Staples Distribution & Retail IndustryConsumer Staples SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$70.77BC$26.91BC$16.12BC$12.62B
Dividend Yield1.03%3.53%3.20%6.22%
P/E Ratio25.9516.0813.7039.23
Price / Sales1.098.38262,948.8910.34
Price / Cash23.1842.6756.1982.29
Price / Book6.384.125.084.83
Net IncomeC$2.23BC$884.06MC$836.78MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.59%-0.54%1.78%1.79%
1 Month Performance-4.83%1.76%2.87%5.57%
1 Year Performance7.89%-5.07%14.59%35.29%

Loblaw Companies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
L
Loblaw Companies
2.7398 of 5 stars
C$61.37
-0.3%
C$71.00
+15.7%
+8.2%C$70.92BC$65.07B26.0012,000
ATD
Alimentation Couche-Tard
2.9491 of 5 stars
C$90.47
-1.6%
C$101.20
+11.9%
+23.4%C$83.05BC$76.51B26.85150,000
ATD.B
Alimentation Couche-Tard
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$52.83BC$53.19B16.01130,000
ATD.A
Alimentation Couche-Tard
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$52.79BC$53.19B15.99130,000
MRU
Metro
2.2793 of 5 stars
C$87.90
-0.2%
C$102.33
+16.4%
-9.6%C$18.39BC$22.48B20.8897,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:L) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners