Free Trial

Manulife Financial (MFC) Competitors

Manulife Financial logo
C$56.32 +0.85 (+1.53%)
As of 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

MFC vs. L, GWO, SLF, PRU, and ALS

Should you buy Manulife Financial stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Manulife Financial with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Manulife Financial include Loblaw Companies (L), Great-West Lifeco (GWO), Sun Life Financial (SLF), Perseus Mining (PRU), and Altius Minerals (ALS). These companies are all part of the "insurance" industry.

How does Manulife Financial compare to Loblaw Companies?

Manulife Financial (TSE:MFC) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap insurance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

Manulife Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Loblaw Companies. Manulife Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Manulife FinancialC$53.19B1.76C$5.64BC$3.4716.23
Loblaw CompaniesC$64.48B1.17C$2.23BC$2.3028.26

In the previous week, Manulife Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Loblaw Companies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Manulife Financial and 2 mentions for Loblaw Companies. Loblaw Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Manulife Financial's score of -0.04 indicating that Loblaw Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Manulife Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Loblaw Companies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Manulife Financial currently has a consensus price target of C$57.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.21%. Loblaw Companies has a consensus price target of C$69.25, suggesting a potential upside of 6.54%. Given Loblaw Companies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Manulife Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Manulife Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.734573, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.148973, indicating that its share price is 85% less volatile than the broader market.

Manulife Financial has a net margin of 11.97% compared to Loblaw Companies' net margin of 4.29%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 24.88% beat Manulife Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Manulife Financial11.97% 12.65% 0.55%
Loblaw Companies 4.29%24.88%5.89%

33.4% of Manulife Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.4% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of C$1.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Manulife Financial pays out 52.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Manulife Financial beats Loblaw Companies on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manulife Financial compare to Great-West Lifeco?

Great-West Lifeco (TSE:GWO) and Manulife Financial (TSE:MFC) are both large-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

9.7% of Great-West Lifeco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.4% of Manulife Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 70.7% of Great-West Lifeco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Manulife Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Great-West Lifeco. Manulife Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great-West Lifeco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great-West LifecoC$36.28B2.06C$4.07BC$4.6517.93
Manulife FinancialC$53.19B1.76C$5.64BC$3.4716.23

Great-West Lifeco has a beta of 0.690435, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.734573, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Great-West Lifeco has a net margin of 12.86% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 11.97%. Great-West Lifeco's return on equity of 15.17% beat Manulife Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great-West Lifeco12.86% 15.17% 0.73%
Manulife Financial 11.97%12.65%0.55%

Great-West Lifeco currently has a consensus price target of C$77.18, indicating a potential downside of 7.44%. Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of C$57.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.21%. Given Manulife Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Manulife Financial is more favorable than Great-West Lifeco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great-West Lifeco
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Manulife Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Manulife Financial had 2 more articles in the media than Great-West Lifeco. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Manulife Financial and 1 mentions for Great-West Lifeco. Great-West Lifeco's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Manulife Financial's score of -0.04 indicating that Great-West Lifeco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great-West Lifeco
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Manulife Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Great-West Lifeco pays an annual dividend of C$2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of C$1.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Great-West Lifeco pays out 53.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manulife Financial pays out 52.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Manulife Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Manulife Financial beats Great-West Lifeco on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manulife Financial compare to Sun Life Financial?

Sun Life Financial (TSE:SLF) and Manulife Financial (TSE:MFC) are both large-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Manulife Financial has a net margin of 11.97% compared to Sun Life Financial's net margin of 9.12%. Sun Life Financial's return on equity of 12.98% beat Manulife Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sun Life Financial9.12% 12.98% 0.81%
Manulife Financial 11.97%12.65%0.55%

Sun Life Financial pays an annual dividend of C$3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of C$1.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Sun Life Financial pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manulife Financial pays out 52.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Manulife Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Sun Life Financial. Manulife Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sun Life Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sun Life FinancialC$35.87B1.65C$3.76BC$5.3719.93
Manulife FinancialC$53.19B1.76C$5.64BC$3.4716.23

31.7% of Sun Life Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.4% of Manulife Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Sun Life Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Manulife Financial. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Sun Life Financial and 3 mentions for Manulife Financial. Sun Life Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Manulife Financial's score of -0.04 indicating that Sun Life Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sun Life Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Manulife Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Sun Life Financial presently has a consensus price target of C$101.60, suggesting a potential downside of 5.08%. Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of C$57.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.21%. Given Manulife Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Manulife Financial is more favorable than Sun Life Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sun Life Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Manulife Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Sun Life Financial has a beta of 0.844836, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.734573, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Manulife Financial beats Sun Life Financial on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manulife Financial compare to Perseus Mining?

Manulife Financial (TSE:MFC) and Perseus Mining (TSE:PRU) are both insurance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Manulife Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Perseus Mining. Manulife Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perseus Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Manulife FinancialC$53.19B1.76C$5.64BC$3.4716.23
Perseus MiningC$1.27B5.14C$546.57MC$0.2618.75

Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.734573, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Perseus Mining has a beta of 1.724568, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Manulife Financial presently has a consensus price target of C$57.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.21%. Given Manulife Financial's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Manulife Financial is more favorable than Perseus Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Manulife Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Perseus Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.67

Perseus Mining has a net margin of 27.92% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 11.97%. Perseus Mining's return on equity of 16.92% beat Manulife Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Manulife Financial11.97% 12.65% 0.55%
Perseus Mining 27.92%16.92%16.07%

Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of C$1.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Perseus Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Manulife Financial pays out 52.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Perseus Mining pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Manulife Financial had 3 more articles in the media than Perseus Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Manulife Financial and 0 mentions for Perseus Mining. Perseus Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Manulife Financial's score of -0.04 indicating that Perseus Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Manulife Financial Neutral
Perseus Mining Neutral

33.4% of Manulife Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.1% of Perseus Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Perseus Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Perseus Mining beats Manulife Financial on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manulife Financial compare to Altius Minerals?

Altius Minerals (TSE:ALS) and Manulife Financial (TSE:MFC) are both insurance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Altius Minerals has a net margin of 543.91% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 11.97%. Altius Minerals' return on equity of 32.43% beat Manulife Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Altius Minerals543.91% 32.43% 2.60%
Manulife Financial 11.97%12.65%0.55%

Altius Minerals has a beta of 0.386456, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.734573, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Manulife Financial had 3 more articles in the media than Altius Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Manulife Financial and 0 mentions for Altius Minerals. Altius Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Manulife Financial's score of -0.04 indicating that Altius Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Altius Minerals Neutral
Manulife Financial Neutral

23.3% of Altius Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.4% of Manulife Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Altius Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Manulife Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Altius Minerals. Altius Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manulife Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Altius MineralsC$63.30M51.28C$13.64MC$6.269.30
Manulife FinancialC$53.19B1.76C$5.64BC$3.4716.23

Altius Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$53.36, indicating a potential downside of 8.37%. Manulife Financial has a consensus target price of C$57.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.21%. Given Manulife Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Manulife Financial is more favorable than Altius Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Altius Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Manulife Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Altius Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of C$1.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Altius Minerals pays out 6.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manulife Financial pays out 52.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Manulife Financial beats Altius Minerals on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Manulife Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MFC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MFC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MFC vs. The Competition

MetricManulife FinancialInsurance IndustryFinancial SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$93.81BC$22.86BC$5.88BC$12.89B
Dividend Yield3.38%4.80%5.30%6.20%
P/E Ratio16.236.7616.3537.12
Price / Sales1.7635.141,103.9910.45
Price / Cash1.701.4888.9882.29
Price / Book1.781.516.574.47
Net IncomeC$5.64BC$6.79BC$1.13BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance4.30%1.50%1.17%0.87%
1 Month Performance3.11%-0.25%1.59%-1.10%
1 Year Performance33.02%16.95%20.26%42.15%

Manulife Financial Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MFC
Manulife Financial
2.2634 of 5 stars
C$56.32
+1.5%
C$57.00
+1.2%
+28.8%C$93.81BC$53.19B16.2340,000
L
Loblaw Companies
1.1964 of 5 stars
C$64.73
-1.2%
C$69.25
+7.0%
-70.9%C$76.27BC$64.48B28.1412,000
GWO
Great-West Lifeco
1.7144 of 5 stars
C$80.15
-2.1%
C$77.18
-3.7%
+64.1%C$73.52BC$36.28B17.2433,500
SLF
Sun Life Financial
1.7489 of 5 stars
C$102.68
-0.1%
C$101.60
-1.1%
+21.1%C$56.98BC$35.87B19.1229,200
PRU
Perseus Mining
1.347 of 5 stars
C$4.68
+0.2%
N/A+46.2%C$6.69BC$1.27B18.0139,900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:MFC) was last updated on 6/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners