Go Pro

Roots (ROOT) Competitors

Roots logo
C$4.06 +0.37 (+10.03%)
As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

ROOT vs. FL, ROO, ATZ, KITS, and ACQ

Should you buy Roots stock or one of its competitors? Roots's main competitors and comparable companies include Foot Locker (FL), Roots (ROO), Aritzia (ATZ), Kits Eyecare (KITS), and AutoCanada (ACQ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialty retail" industry.

How does Roots compare to Foot Locker?

Foot Locker (TSE:FL) and Roots (TSE:ROOT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Roots has higher revenue and earnings than Foot Locker.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foot LockerN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
RootsC$280.27M0.57C$2.89MC$0.0667.67

Roots has a consensus target price of C$4.05, indicating a potential downside of 0.25%. Given Foot Locker's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Foot Locker is more favorable than Roots.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Foot Locker
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Roots
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Roots has a net margin of 0.90% compared to Foot Locker's net margin of 0.00%. Roots' return on equity of 1.70% beat Foot Locker's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foot LockerN/A N/A N/A
Roots 0.90%1.70%2.29%

0.0% of Roots shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Roots shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Roots had 2 more articles in the media than Foot Locker. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Roots and 0 mentions for Foot Locker. Foot Locker's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Roots' score of -1.17 indicating that Foot Locker is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Foot Locker Neutral
Roots Negative

Summary

Roots beats Foot Locker on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roots compare to Roots?

Roots (TSE:ROO) and Roots (TSE:ROOT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability and risk.

Roots has higher revenue and earnings than Roots.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RootsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
RootsC$280.27M0.57C$2.89MC$0.0667.67

Roots has a net margin of 0.90% compared to Roots' net margin of 0.00%. Roots' return on equity of 1.70% beat Roots' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RootsN/A N/A N/A
Roots 0.90%1.70%2.29%

Roots has a consensus target price of C$4.05, indicating a potential downside of 0.25%. Given Roots' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Roots is more favorable than Roots.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Roots
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Roots
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Roots and Roots both had 2 articles in the media. Roots' average media sentiment score of -0.64 beat Roots' score of -1.17 indicating that Roots is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Roots
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Roots
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

0.0% of Roots shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Roots shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Roots beats Roots on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roots compare to Aritzia?

Roots (TSE:ROOT) and Aritzia (TSE:ATZ) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Roots has a beta of -0.163565, suggesting that its stock price is 116% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aritzia has a beta of 2.097809, suggesting that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Aritzia has higher revenue and earnings than Roots. Aritzia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Roots, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RootsC$280.27M0.57C$2.89MC$0.0667.67
AritziaC$3.99B3.77C$140.00MC$3.8334.25

Roots currently has a consensus price target of C$4.05, suggesting a potential downside of 0.25%. Aritzia has a consensus price target of C$183.13, suggesting a potential upside of 39.59%. Given Aritzia's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Aritzia is more favorable than Roots.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Roots
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Aritzia
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

0.0% of Roots shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.6% of Aritzia shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Roots shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Aritzia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Aritzia has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Roots' net margin of 0.90%. Aritzia's return on equity of 34.33% beat Roots' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Roots0.90% 1.70% 2.29%
Aritzia 11.45%34.33%5.67%

In the previous week, Roots had 2 more articles in the media than Aritzia. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Roots and 0 mentions for Aritzia. Aritzia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Roots' score of -1.17 indicating that Aritzia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Roots Negative
Aritzia Neutral

Summary

Aritzia beats Roots on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roots compare to Kits Eyecare?

Roots (TSE:ROOT) and Kits Eyecare (TSE:KITS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Roots presently has a consensus target price of C$4.05, suggesting a potential downside of 0.25%. Kits Eyecare has a consensus target price of C$20.69, suggesting a potential upside of 36.01%. Given Kits Eyecare's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kits Eyecare is more favorable than Roots.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Roots
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Kits Eyecare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Kits Eyecare has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Roots. Roots is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kits Eyecare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RootsC$280.27M0.57C$2.89MC$0.0667.67
Kits EyecareC$222.18M2.33C$5.44MC$0.1695.06

0.0% of Roots shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.6% of Kits Eyecare shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Roots shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Roots has a net margin of 0.90% compared to Kits Eyecare's net margin of 0.00%. Roots' return on equity of 1.70% beat Kits Eyecare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Roots0.90% 1.70% 2.29%
Kits Eyecare N/A N/A N/A

Roots has a beta of -0.163565, meaning that its stock price is 116% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kits Eyecare has a beta of 0.064624, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Roots had 1 more articles in the media than Kits Eyecare. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Roots and 1 mentions for Kits Eyecare. Kits Eyecare's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Roots' score of -1.17 indicating that Kits Eyecare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Roots
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Kits Eyecare
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Kits Eyecare beats Roots on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Roots compare to AutoCanada?

AutoCanada (TSE:ACQ) and Roots (TSE:ROOT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

AutoCanada presently has a consensus price target of C$23.43, indicating a potential upside of 5.49%. Roots has a consensus price target of C$4.05, indicating a potential downside of 0.25%. Given AutoCanada's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe AutoCanada is more favorable than Roots.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AutoCanada
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Roots
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

AutoCanada has a beta of 1.668305, meaning that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Roots has a beta of -0.163565, meaning that its share price is 116% less volatile than the broader market.

39.8% of AutoCanada shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Roots shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AutoCanada shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Roots shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Roots has a net margin of 0.90% compared to AutoCanada's net margin of 0.63%. AutoCanada's return on equity of 6.64% beat Roots' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AutoCanada0.63% 6.64% 2.67%
Roots 0.90%1.70%2.29%

In the previous week, AutoCanada had 2 more articles in the media than Roots. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for AutoCanada and 2 mentions for Roots. AutoCanada's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Roots' score of -1.17 indicating that AutoCanada is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AutoCanada
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Roots
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Roots has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AutoCanada. AutoCanada is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Roots, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AutoCanadaC$4.93B0.10-C$50.70MC$1.2717.49
RootsC$280.27M0.57C$2.89MC$0.0667.67

Summary

AutoCanada beats Roots on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Roots News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ROOT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ROOT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ROOT vs. The Competition

MetricRootsSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$159.14MC$11.45BC$13.23BC$12.56B
Dividend YieldN/A115.28%55.79%6.21%
P/E Ratio67.6726.2746.9239.07
Price / Sales0.5718.7988.5710.02
Price / Cash14.2213.6519.1482.29
Price / Book1.075.854.354.79
Net IncomeC$2.89MC$438.66MC$445.73MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance17.00%-1.32%-0.26%0.82%
1 Month Performance20.83%2.31%2.74%5.39%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-4.12%-1.57%35.05%

Roots Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ROOT
Roots
0.141 of 5 stars
C$4.06
+10.0%
C$4.05
-0.2%
+26.1%C$159.14MC$280.27M67.67760
FL
Foot Locker
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$0.00N/AN/A49,900
ROO
Roots
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$0.00N/AN/AN/A
ATZ
Aritzia
2.8658 of 5 stars
C$131.19
+0.6%
C$183.13
+39.6%
+65.2%C$15.03BC$3.99B34.258,300
KITS
Kits Eyecare
1.3384 of 5 stars
C$15.21
-0.5%
C$20.69
+36.0%
N/AC$517.23MC$222.18M95.06N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:ROOT) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners