Free Trial

Sun Life Financial (SLF) Competitors

Sun Life Financial logo
C$96.35 +0.50 (+0.52%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

SLF vs. MFC, L, GWO, PRU, and ALS

Should you be buying Sun Life Financial stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Sun Life Financial include Manulife Financial (MFC), Loblaw Companies (L), Great-West Lifeco (GWO), Perseus Mining (PRU), and Altius Minerals (ALS). These companies are all part of the "insurance" industry.

How does Sun Life Financial compare to Manulife Financial?

Sun Life Financial (TSE:SLF) and Manulife Financial (TSE:MFC) are both large-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Manulife Financial has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Sun Life Financial's net margin of 9.12%. Sun Life Financial's return on equity of 12.98% beat Manulife Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sun Life Financial9.12% 12.98% 0.81%
Manulife Financial 10.91%11.34%0.55%

Sun Life Financial pays an annual dividend of C$3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of C$1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Sun Life Financial pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manulife Financial pays out 57.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Sun Life Financial currently has a consensus price target of C$101.60, suggesting a potential upside of 5.45%. Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of C$56.63, suggesting a potential upside of 3.59%. Given Sun Life Financial's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Sun Life Financial is more favorable than Manulife Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sun Life Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Manulife Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

32.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.4% of Manulife Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sun Life Financial had 13 more articles in the media than Manulife Financial. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Sun Life Financial and 3 mentions for Manulife Financial. Manulife Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Sun Life Financial's score of 0.52 indicating that Manulife Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sun Life Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Manulife Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Manulife Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Sun Life Financial. Manulife Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sun Life Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sun Life FinancialC$35.87B1.49C$3.76BC$5.3717.94
Manulife FinancialC$53.01B1.72C$5.64BC$3.0717.80

Sun Life Financial has a beta of 0.728508, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.736888, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Manulife Financial beats Sun Life Financial on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sun Life Financial compare to Loblaw Companies?

Sun Life Financial (TSE:SLF) and Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) are both large-cap insurance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Sun Life Financial has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Loblaw Companies' net margin of 4.29%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 24.88% beat Sun Life Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sun Life Financial9.12% 12.98% 0.81%
Loblaw Companies 4.29%24.88%5.89%

Sun Life Financial pays an annual dividend of C$3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Sun Life Financial pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Sun Life Financial currently has a consensus price target of C$101.60, suggesting a potential upside of 5.45%. Loblaw Companies has a consensus price target of C$69.25, suggesting a potential upside of 17.25%. Given Loblaw Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Loblaw Companies is more favorable than Sun Life Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sun Life Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

32.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.3% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Loblaw Companies had 2 more articles in the media than Sun Life Financial. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Loblaw Companies and 16 mentions for Sun Life Financial. Sun Life Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.19 indicating that Sun Life Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sun Life Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Loblaw Companies
2 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Sun Life Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Loblaw Companies. Sun Life Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sun Life FinancialC$35.87B1.49C$3.76BC$5.3717.94
Loblaw CompaniesC$64.48B1.07C$2.23BC$2.3025.68

Sun Life Financial has a beta of 0.728508, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.308197, suggesting that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sun Life Financial beats Loblaw Companies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sun Life Financial compare to Great-West Lifeco?

Sun Life Financial (TSE:SLF) and Great-West Lifeco (TSE:GWO) are both large-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Sun Life Financial pays an annual dividend of C$3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Great-West Lifeco pays an annual dividend of C$2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Sun Life Financial pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great-West Lifeco pays out 53.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Sun Life Financial has a beta of 0.728508, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great-West Lifeco has a beta of 0.593339, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Great-West Lifeco has a net margin of 12.86% compared to Sun Life Financial's net margin of 9.12%. Great-West Lifeco's return on equity of 15.17% beat Sun Life Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sun Life Financial9.12% 12.98% 0.81%
Great-West Lifeco 12.86%15.17%0.73%

In the previous week, Great-West Lifeco had 5 more articles in the media than Sun Life Financial. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Great-West Lifeco and 16 mentions for Sun Life Financial. Great-West Lifeco's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Sun Life Financial's score of 0.52 indicating that Great-West Lifeco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sun Life Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Great-West Lifeco
3 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Great-West Lifeco has higher revenue and earnings than Sun Life Financial. Great-West Lifeco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sun Life Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sun Life FinancialC$35.87B1.49C$3.76BC$5.3717.94
Great-West LifecoC$36.28B1.88C$4.07BC$4.6516.33

Sun Life Financial currently has a consensus price target of C$101.60, suggesting a potential upside of 5.45%. Great-West Lifeco has a consensus price target of C$77.18, suggesting a potential upside of 1.65%. Given Sun Life Financial's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sun Life Financial is more favorable than Great-West Lifeco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sun Life Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Great-West Lifeco
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

32.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.6% of Great-West Lifeco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 70.7% of Great-West Lifeco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Great-West Lifeco beats Sun Life Financial on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sun Life Financial compare to Perseus Mining?

Sun Life Financial (TSE:SLF) and Perseus Mining (TSE:PRU) are both insurance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Sun Life Financial currently has a consensus price target of C$101.60, suggesting a potential upside of 5.45%. Given Sun Life Financial's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sun Life Financial is more favorable than Perseus Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sun Life Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Perseus Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.67

32.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.1% of Perseus Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Perseus Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sun Life Financial has a beta of 0.728508, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Perseus Mining has a beta of 1.925141, suggesting that its stock price is 93% more volatile than the broader market.

Perseus Mining has a net margin of 28.13% compared to Sun Life Financial's net margin of 9.12%. Perseus Mining's return on equity of 21.69% beat Sun Life Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sun Life Financial9.12% 12.98% 0.81%
Perseus Mining 28.13%21.69%16.07%

Sun Life Financial pays an annual dividend of C$3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Perseus Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Sun Life Financial pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Perseus Mining pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Sun Life Financial had 16 more articles in the media than Perseus Mining. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Sun Life Financial and 0 mentions for Perseus Mining. Sun Life Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Perseus Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Sun Life Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sun Life Financial Positive
Perseus Mining Neutral

Sun Life Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Perseus Mining. Sun Life Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perseus Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sun Life FinancialC$35.87B1.49C$3.76BC$5.3717.94
Perseus MiningC$1.27B5.88C$546.57MC$0.2621.44

Summary

Perseus Mining beats Sun Life Financial on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sun Life Financial compare to Altius Minerals?

Altius Minerals (TSE:ALS) and Sun Life Financial (TSE:SLF) are both insurance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Altius Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$48.36, suggesting a potential downside of 12.24%. Sun Life Financial has a consensus target price of C$101.60, suggesting a potential upside of 5.45%. Given Sun Life Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sun Life Financial is more favorable than Altius Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Altius Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Sun Life Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

22.7% of Altius Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.0% of Altius Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Sun Life Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Altius Minerals has a beta of 0.358327, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sun Life Financial has a beta of 0.728508, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Altius Minerals has a net margin of 614.83% compared to Sun Life Financial's net margin of 9.12%. Altius Minerals' return on equity of 41.51% beat Sun Life Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Altius Minerals614.83% 41.51% 2.60%
Sun Life Financial 9.12%12.98%0.81%

Altius Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Sun Life Financial pays an annual dividend of C$3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Altius Minerals pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sun Life Financial pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Sun Life Financial had 14 more articles in the media than Altius Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Sun Life Financial and 2 mentions for Altius Minerals. Sun Life Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Altius Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Sun Life Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Altius Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sun Life Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Sun Life Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Altius Minerals. Altius Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sun Life Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Altius MineralsC$53.75M57.14C$13.64MC$6.348.69
Sun Life FinancialC$35.87B1.49C$3.76BC$5.3717.94

Summary

Sun Life Financial beats Altius Minerals on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sun Life Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SLF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SLF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SLF vs. The Competition

MetricSun Life FinancialInsurance IndustryFinancial SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$53.39BC$22.74BC$5.67BC$11.90B
Dividend Yield3.88%4.99%5.26%6.24%
P/E Ratio17.9429.4115.9032.79
Price / Sales1.4935.67922.9012.50
Price / Cash0.441.8448.8182.42
Price / Book2.062.844.424.60
Net IncomeC$3.76BC$1.57BC$1.15BC$299.62M
7 Day PerformanceN/AN/A0.05%12.57%
1 Month Performance6.74%2.28%2.70%2.98%
1 Year Performance11.34%30.49%22.73%58.56%

Sun Life Financial Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SLF
Sun Life Financial
2.0445 of 5 stars
C$96.35
+0.5%
C$101.60
+5.4%
+10.8%C$53.39BC$35.87B17.9429,200
MFC
Manulife Financial
2.9285 of 5 stars
C$52.63
-0.5%
C$56.63
+7.6%
+27.6%C$88.01BC$53.01B17.1440,000
L
Loblaw Companies
3.3697 of 5 stars
C$61.77
-1.4%
C$92.63
+50.0%
-72.1%C$72.39BC$63.90B27.8212,000
GWO
Great-West Lifeco
2.2321 of 5 stars
C$71.41
+0.1%
C$69.11
-3.2%
+46.1%C$64.72BC$39.10B16.7633,500
PRU
Perseus Mining
1.5035 of 5 stars
C$5.37
-2.5%
N/A+68.2%C$7.24BC$1.27B20.6739,900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:SLF) was last updated on 5/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners