Go Pro

Nano One Materials (NANO) Competitors

Nano One Materials logo
C$0.82 +0.03 (+3.80%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

NANO vs. NCE, TPS, VRT, BLDP, and LPS

Should you buy Nano One Materials stock or one of its competitors? Nano One Materials's main competitors and comparable companies include Nesscap Energy (NCE), Turbo Power Systems (TPS), Vertiv (VRT), Ballard Power Systems (BLDP), and Legend Power Systems (LPS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment" industry.

How does Nano One Materials compare to Nesscap Energy?

Nesscap Energy (CVE:NCE) and Nano One Materials (TSE:NANO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends and earnings.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nesscap EnergyN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Nano One MaterialsN/AN/AN/A-C$0.13N/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nesscap EnergyN/A N/A N/A
Nano One Materials N/A N/A N/A

4.3% of Nano One Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Nano One Materials had 4 more articles in the media than Nesscap Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Nano One Materials and 0 mentions for Nesscap Energy. Nano One Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Nesscap Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Nano One Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nesscap Energy Neutral
Nano One Materials Neutral

Summary

Nano One Materials beats Nesscap Energy on 3 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano One Materials compare to Turbo Power Systems?

Turbo Power Systems (TSE:TPS) and Nano One Materials (TSE:NANO) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

4.3% of Nano One Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Nano One Materials had 4 more articles in the media than Turbo Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Nano One Materials and 0 mentions for Turbo Power Systems. Nano One Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Turbo Power Systems' score of 0.00 indicating that Nano One Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Turbo Power Systems Neutral
Nano One Materials Neutral

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Turbo Power SystemsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Nano One MaterialsN/AN/AN/A-C$0.13N/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Turbo Power SystemsN/A N/A N/A
Nano One Materials N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Nano One Materials beats Turbo Power Systems on 3 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano One Materials compare to Vertiv?

Nano One Materials (TSE:NANO) and Vertiv (CNSX:VRT) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Nano One Materials had 1 more articles in the media than Vertiv. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Nano One Materials and 3 mentions for Vertiv. Vertiv's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Nano One Materials' score of 0.27 indicating that Vertiv is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nano One Materials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Vertiv
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

4.3% of Nano One Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nano One MaterialsN/A N/A N/A
Vertiv N/A N/A N/A

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nano One MaterialsN/AN/AN/A-C$0.13N/A
VertivN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Nano One Materials beats Vertiv on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano One Materials compare to Ballard Power Systems?

Nano One Materials (TSE:NANO) and Ballard Power Systems (TSE:BLDP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Nano One Materials has a beta of 0.138639, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ballard Power Systems has a beta of 1.113429, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Nano One Materials has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ballard Power Systems' net margin of -72.38%. Nano One Materials' return on equity of 0.00% beat Ballard Power Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nano One MaterialsN/A N/A N/A
Ballard Power Systems -72.38%-13.17%-9.42%

Nano One Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ballard Power Systems. Ballard Power Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nano One Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nano One MaterialsN/AN/AN/A-C$0.13N/A
Ballard Power SystemsC$106.16M10.62-C$231.90M-C$0.26N/A

In the previous week, Nano One Materials had 2 more articles in the media than Ballard Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Nano One Materials and 2 mentions for Ballard Power Systems. Nano One Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Ballard Power Systems' score of -0.17 indicating that Nano One Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nano One Materials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ballard Power Systems
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ballard Power Systems has a consensus target price of C$4.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.32%. Given Ballard Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ballard Power Systems is more favorable than Nano One Materials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nano One Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ballard Power Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

4.3% of Nano One Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.8% of Ballard Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 15.5% of Ballard Power Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nano One Materials beats Ballard Power Systems on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nano One Materials compare to Legend Power Systems?

Nano One Materials (TSE:NANO) and Legend Power Systems (CVE:LPS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

4.3% of Nano One Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Legend Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of Legend Power Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Nano One Materials had 3 more articles in the media than Legend Power Systems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Nano One Materials and 1 mentions for Legend Power Systems. Legend Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Nano One Materials' score of 0.27 indicating that Legend Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nano One Materials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Legend Power Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Nano One Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Legend Power Systems. Legend Power Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nano One Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nano One MaterialsN/AN/AN/A-C$0.13N/A
Legend Power SystemsC$1.87M17.85-C$3.56M-C$0.02N/A

Nano One Materials has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Legend Power Systems' net margin of -121.85%. Nano One Materials' return on equity of 0.00% beat Legend Power Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nano One MaterialsN/A N/A N/A
Legend Power Systems -121.85%-5,472.47%-65.54%

Nano One Materials has a beta of 0.138639, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Legend Power Systems has a beta of 0.725342, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Nano One Materials beats Legend Power Systems on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nano One Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NANO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NANO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NANO vs. The Competition

MetricNano One MaterialsElectrical Equipment IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$98.23MC$11.30BC$10.94BC$12.54B
Dividend YieldN/A2.32%96.89%6.20%
P/E Ratio-6.3146.6327.9930.69
Price / SalesN/A1,662.81341.769.75
Price / Cash14.9831.6524.9082.29
Price / Book2.315.514.594.64
Net IncomeN/AC$139.38MC$609.43MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance5.13%1.04%0.79%0.94%
1 Month Performance13.89%-1.65%3.21%3.90%
1 Year Performance-18.00%23.78%14.27%36.05%

Nano One Materials Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NANO
Nano One Materials
N/AC$0.82
+3.8%
N/A-21.8%C$98.23MN/AN/A38
NCE
Nesscap Energy
N/AC$0.04
+14.3%
N/A+0.0%C$22.99MN/AN/A147,000
TPS
Turbo Power Systems
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$0.00N/AN/A147,000
VRT
Vertiv
N/AN/AN/AN/A$0.00N/AN/A27,000
BLDP
Ballard Power Systems
1.727 of 5 stars
C$3.57
-3.8%
C$4.50
+26.1%
+43.5%C$1.08BC$106.16MN/A1,173

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:NANO) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners