NEO vs. LIF, EFX, TIXT, CHR, FC, MAX, PMTS, TGL, BRAG, and NYX
Should you be buying Neo Performance Materials stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Neo Performance Materials include Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (LIF), Enerflex (EFX), TELUS International (Cda) (TIXT), Chorus Aviation (CHR), Firm Capital Mortgage Investment (FC), Midas Gold Corp. (MAX.TO) (MAX), CPI Card Group (PMTS), TransGlobe Energy (TGL), Bragg Gaming Group Inc. (BRAG.V) (BRAG), and NYX Gaming Group (NYX). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.
Neo Performance Materials vs. Its Competitors
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.
In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 6 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 1 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$2.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 88.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Neo Performance Materials pays out -525.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.
21.6% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.5% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty currently has a consensus price target of C$33.50, suggesting a potential upside of 23.12%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$17.25, suggesting a potential upside of 1.29%. Given Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 94.67% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -0.48%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 29.05% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.
Summary
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty and Neo Performance Materials tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Neo Performance Materials News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NEO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NEO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Neo Performance Materials Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (TSE:NEO) was last updated on 8/16/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat All Access