Go Pro
→ Why I'm sending this one to my own family (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free PNE Stock Alerts

Pine Cliff Energy (PNE) Competitors

Pine Cliff Energy logo
C$0.52 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

PNE vs. LGN, SNM, FEC, CEI, and GTE

Should you buy Pine Cliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? Pine Cliff Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Logan Energy (LGN), ShaMaran Petroleum (SNM), Frontera Energy (FEC), Coelacanth Energy (CEI), and Gran Tierra Energy (GTE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Logan Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Logan Energy (CVE:LGN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy and Pine Cliff Energy both had 3 articles in the media. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Logan Energy's score of 0.93 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Logan Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Logan Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Logan Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.08-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Logan EnergyC$189.00M4.01C$19.98MC$0.0427.38

Logan Energy has a net margin of 18.40% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.63%. Logan Energy's return on equity of 11.28% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
Logan Energy 18.40%11.28%0.29%

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of -0.004543, suggesting that its share price is 100% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Logan Energy has a beta of -0.049683, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of Logan Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Logan Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Logan Energy has a consensus price target of C$1.38, suggesting a potential upside of 26.03%. Given Logan Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Logan Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Logan Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.40

Summary

Logan Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and ShaMaran Petroleum (CVE:SNM) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

ShaMaran Petroleum has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ShaMaran Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.08-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
ShaMaran PetroleumC$157.02M3.67C$51.66MC$0.0212.50

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of -0.004543, indicating that its share price is 100% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ShaMaran Petroleum has a beta of 1.835381, indicating that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 3 more articles in the media than ShaMaran Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for ShaMaran Petroleum. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat ShaMaran Petroleum's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
ShaMaran Petroleum Neutral

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ShaMaran Petroleum has a net margin of 28.64% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.63%. ShaMaran Petroleum's return on equity of 18.59% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
ShaMaran Petroleum 28.64%18.59%2.76%

Summary

ShaMaran Petroleum beats Pine Cliff Energy on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Frontera Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Frontera Energy (TSE:FEC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Frontera Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontera Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.08-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Frontera EnergyC$1.01B0.59C$63.72M-C$14.91N/A

Pine Cliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Frontera Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Pine Cliff Energy pays out -75.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Frontera Energy pays out -0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pine Cliff Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Frontera Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for Frontera Energy. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Frontera Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
Frontera Energy Neutral

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity of -31.31% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
Frontera Energy -147.46%-120.46%3.95%

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Frontera Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of -0.004543, meaning that its stock price is 100% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.362905, meaning that its stock price is 136% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pine Cliff Energy beats Frontera Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Coelacanth Energy (CVE:CEI) and Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Coelacanth Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 1 mentions for Coelacanth Energy. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Coelacanth Energy's score of 0.55 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Coelacanth Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pine Cliff Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to Coelacanth Energy's net margin of -7.45%. Coelacanth Energy's return on equity of -2.18% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Coelacanth Energy-7.45% -2.18% -3.98%
Pine Cliff Energy -6.63%-31.31%-1.78%

1.7% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 31.6% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Coelacanth Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pine Cliff Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Coelacanth EnergyC$49.97M10.15-C$6.75MN/AN/A
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.08-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A

Coelacanth Energy has a beta of 0.192479, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of -0.004543, suggesting that its share price is 100% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Coelacanth Energy and Pine Cliff Energy tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Gran Tierra Energy (TSE:GTE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Gran Tierra Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 1 mentions for Gran Tierra Energy. Gran Tierra Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Pine Cliff Energy's score of 0.93 indicating that Gran Tierra Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gran Tierra Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of -0.004543, indicating that its stock price is 100% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of -0.509185, indicating that its stock price is 151% less volatile than the broader market.

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gran Tierra Energy has a consensus target price of C$12.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.11%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gran Tierra Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Gran Tierra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gran Tierra Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.08-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Gran Tierra EnergyC$638.42M0.71C$37.65M-C$7.22N/A

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to Gran Tierra Energy's net margin of -39.99%. Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity of -31.31% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
Gran Tierra Energy -39.99%-122.13%8.16%

Summary

Gran Tierra Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pine Cliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PNE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PNE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPine Cliff EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$186.57MC$11.14BC$9.73BC$12.54B
Dividend Yield2.94%11.34%11.58%6.20%
P/E Ratio-26.0016.2720.0730.69
Price / Sales1.08480.34392.789.75
Price / Cash13.1239.7136.0882.29
Price / Book5.663.152.974.64
Net Income-C$15.17MC$5.27BC$4.32BC$299.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/A3.25%3.58%0.94%
1 Month Performance-5.45%4.32%4.37%3.90%
1 Year Performance-18.75%35.30%38.78%36.05%

Pine Cliff Energy Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PNE
Pine Cliff Energy
N/AC$0.52
flat		N/A-17.5%C$186.57MC$172.21MN/A79
LGN
Logan Energy
3.1901 of 5 stars		C$0.92
flat		C$1.35
+46.7%		+56.9%C$636.25MC$189.00M23.00N/A
SNM
ShaMaran Petroleum
N/AC$0.20
flat		N/A-4.8%C$575.70MC$157.02M12.503,530
FEC
Frontera Energy
N/AC$8.19
flat		N/A+33.2%C$570.66MC$1.01BN/A1,107
CEI
Coelacanth Energy
N/AC$0.76
flat		N/A-2.4%C$481.59MC$49.97MN/A9

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PNE) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
After KDA, PRE, and OCEAN—this is the one
17,556% on KDA. Here's what I'm buying now. It's a coin under $1.00 that most investors have never heard of...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why I'm sending this one to my own family
Behind the Markets editor Kelly Maguire says she has never sent an email quite like this one. A sealed congres...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Wall Street is staring at the wrong AI trade
Anthropic just signed a 9.1 billion dollar, 20 year data center agreement covering 191 megawatts of capacity, ...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel