Pine Cliff Energy (PNE) Competitors

C$0.58 -0.01 (-1.69%)

As of 05/25/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

PNE vs. LGN, SNM, CEI, IPO, and GTE

Should you buy Pine Cliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pine Cliff Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pine Cliff Energy include Logan Energy (LGN), ShaMaran Petroleum (SNM), Coelacanth Energy (CEI), InPlay Oil (IPO), and Gran Tierra Energy (GTE). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Logan Energy?

Logan Energy (CVE:LGN) and Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Logan Energy has a beta of 5.153885, meaning that its stock price is 415% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.044399, meaning that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

Logan Energy has a net margin of 15.75% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.63%. Logan Energy's return on equity of 8.84% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Logan Energy	15.75%	8.84%	0.29%
Pine Cliff Energy	-6.63%	-31.31%	-1.78%

In the previous week, Logan Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Pine Cliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Logan Energy and 0 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy. Logan Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Pine Cliff Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Logan Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Logan Energy	Very Positive
Pine Cliff Energy	Neutral

Logan Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Logan Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Logan Energy	C$189.00M	3.37	C$19.98M	C$0.04	23.00
Pine Cliff Energy	C$172.21M	1.21	-C$15.17M	-C$0.02	N/A

Logan Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$1.21, indicating a potential upside of 31.79%. Given Logan Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Logan Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Logan Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.75
Pine Cliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

3.0% of Logan Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Logan Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Logan Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 17 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and ShaMaran Petroleum (CVE:SNM) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

ShaMaran Petroleum has a net margin of 28.64% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.63%. ShaMaran Petroleum's return on equity of 18.59% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy	-6.63%	-31.31%	-1.78%
ShaMaran Petroleum	28.64%	18.59%	2.76%

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled ShaMaran Petroleum'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy	Neutral
ShaMaran Petroleum	Neutral

ShaMaran Petroleum has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ShaMaran Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff Energy	C$172.21M	1.21	-C$15.17M	-C$0.02	N/A
ShaMaran Petroleum	C$157.02M	3.76	C$51.66M	C$0.02	12.81

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.044399, indicating that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ShaMaran Petroleum has a beta of 1.835381, indicating that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ShaMaran Petroleum beats Pine Cliff Energy on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Coelacanth Energy (CVE:CEI) and Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Coelacanth Energy has a beta of 0.309113, indicating that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.044399, indicating that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

1.4% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 31.6% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Coelacanth Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$1.10, indicating a potential upside of 29.41%. Given Coelacanth Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Coelacanth Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Coelacanth Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Pine Cliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to Coelacanth Energy's net margin of -36.19%. Coelacanth Energy's return on equity of -6.74% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Coelacanth Energy	-36.19%	-6.74%	-3.98%
Pine Cliff Energy	-6.63%	-31.31%	-1.78%

In the previous week, Coelacanth Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Pine Cliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Coelacanth Energy and 0 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy. Coelacanth Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Pine Cliff Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Coelacanth Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Coelacanth Energy	Positive
Pine Cliff Energy	Neutral

Coelacanth Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pine Cliff Energy. Coelacanth Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pine Cliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Coelacanth Energy	C$30.47M	17.68	-C$6.75M	-C$0.02	N/A
Pine Cliff Energy	C$172.21M	1.21	-C$15.17M	-C$0.02	N/A

Summary

Coelacanth Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to InPlay Oil?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and InPlay Oil (TSE:IPO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of InPlay Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.3% of InPlay Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pine Cliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. InPlay Oil pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Pine Cliff Energy pays out -75.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. InPlay Oil pays out -78.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. InPlay Oil is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

InPlay Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InPlay Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff Energy	C$172.21M	1.21	-C$15.17M	-C$0.02	N/A
InPlay Oil	C$340.91M	1.40	C$18.77M	-C$1.37	N/A

InPlay Oil has a consensus price target of C$15.70, suggesting a potential downside of 7.70%. Given InPlay Oil's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe InPlay Oil is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
InPlay Oil	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled InPlay Oil'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy	Neutral
InPlay Oil	Neutral

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to InPlay Oil's net margin of -12.40%. InPlay Oil's return on equity of -10.86% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy	-6.63%	-31.31%	-1.78%
InPlay Oil	-12.40%	-10.86%	4.44%

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.044399, indicating that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, InPlay Oil has a beta of 0.552348, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

InPlay Oil beats Pine Cliff Energy on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Gran Tierra Energy (TSE:GTE) and Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

8.8% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gran Tierra Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Pine Cliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gran Tierra Energy and 0 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy. Gran Tierra Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Pine Cliff Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Gran Tierra Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gran Tierra Energy	Positive
Pine Cliff Energy	Neutral

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to Gran Tierra Energy's net margin of -48.52%. Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity of -31.31% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gran Tierra Energy	-48.52%	-107.11%	8.16%
Pine Cliff Energy	-6.63%	-31.31%	-1.78%

Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.195446, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.044399, indicating that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

Gran Tierra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gran Tierra Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gran Tierra Energy	C$600.60M	0.66	C$37.65M	-C$8.29	N/A
Pine Cliff Energy	C$172.21M	1.21	-C$15.17M	-C$0.02	N/A

Gran Tierra Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$11.83, indicating a potential upside of 5.19%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gran Tierra Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Pine Cliff Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Gran Tierra Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pine Cliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PNE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pine Cliff Energy	Oil & Gas E&P Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$208.10M	C$2.09B	C$10.59B	C$12.16B
Dividend Yield	2.54%	7.52%	10.23%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	-29.00	31.91	21.11	37.64
Price / Sales	1.21	3,621.78	1,036.93	11.68
Price / Cash	13.12	85.54	38.74	82.29
Price / Book	6.31	3.66	4.66	4.50
Net Income	-C$15.17M	C$82.07M	C$4.24B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-3.33%	-1.79%	-0.43%	2.48%
1 Month Performance	-6.45%	1.64%	2.28%	1.47%
1 Year Performance	-4.92%	56.79%	54.02%	53.55%

Pine Cliff Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PNE Pine Cliff Energy	N/A	C$0.58 -1.7%	N/A	+0.0%	C$208.10M	C$172.21M	N/A	79	Gap Up
LGN Logan Energy	3.3395 of 5 stars	C$0.94 -2.1%	C$1.21 +29.0%	+53.3%	C$663.91M	C$189.00M	23.50	N/A	High Trading Volume
SNM ShaMaran Petroleum	N/A	C$0.19 -2.6%	N/A	+10.8%	C$532.52M	C$157.02M	11.56	3,530
CEI Coelacanth Energy	0.8685 of 5 stars	C$0.83 -2.4%	C$1.10 +32.5%	-1.2%	C$525.94M	C$30.47M	N/A	9
IPO InPlay Oil	0.9209 of 5 stars	C$17.44 -4.0%	C$15.70 -10.0%	+106.9%	C$488.43M	C$340.91M	N/A	25	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PNE) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pine Cliff Energy (PNE) Competitors

PNE vs. LGN, SNM, CEI, IPO, and GTE

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Logan Energy?

Summary

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

Summary

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Summary

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to InPlay Oil?

Summary

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PNE vs. The Competition

Pine Cliff Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pine Cliff Energy (PNE) Competitors

PNE vs. LGN, SNM, CEI, IPO, and GTE

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Logan Energy?

Which has more volatility & risk, LGN or PNE?

Is LGN or PNE more profitable?

Does the media refer more to LGN or PNE?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, LGN or PNE?

Do analysts rate LGN or PNE?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in LGN or PNE?

Summary

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

Is PNE or SNM more profitable?

Does the media prefer PNE or SNM?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PNE or SNM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PNE or SNM?

Which has more volatility and risk, PNE or SNM?

Summary

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Which has more volatility and risk, CEI or PNE?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CEI or PNE?

Do analysts prefer CEI or PNE?

Is CEI or PNE more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CEI or PNE?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CEI or PNE?

Summary

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to InPlay Oil?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PNE or IPO?

Is PNE or IPO a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, PNE or IPO?

Do analysts rate PNE or IPO?

Does the media prefer PNE or IPO?

Is PNE or IPO more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, PNE or IPO?

Summary

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GTE or PNE?

Does the media refer more to GTE or PNE?

Is GTE or PNE more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, GTE or PNE?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, GTE or PNE?

Do analysts rate GTE or PNE?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PNE vs. The Competition

Pine Cliff Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools