Free Trial

Pine Cliff Energy (PNE) Competitors

Pine Cliff Energy logo
C$0.64 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern

PNE vs. LGN, SNM, IPO, RECO, and CEI

Should you be buying Pine Cliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Pine Cliff Energy include Logan Energy (LGN), ShaMaran Petroleum (SNM), InPlay Oil (IPO), Reconnaissance Energy Africa (RECO), and Coelacanth Energy (CEI). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Logan Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Logan Energy (CVE:LGN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Logan Energy has a net margin of 21.88% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.91%. Logan Energy's return on equity of 12.67% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.91% -31.28% -1.78%
Logan Energy 21.88%12.67%0.29%

0.5% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.8% of Logan Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Logan Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.044399, indicating that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Logan Energy has a beta of 5.153885, indicating that its stock price is 415% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Logan Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Logan Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$177.85M1.29-C$15.17M-C$0.03N/A
Logan EnergyC$176.11M3.93C$19.98MC$0.0616.67

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy and Pine Cliff Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.36 equaled Logan Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Logan Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pine Cliff Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$0.95, indicating a potential upside of 48.44%. Logan Energy has a consensus price target of C$1.21, indicating a potential upside of 21.25%. Given Pine Cliff Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Pine Cliff Energy is more favorable than Logan Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Logan Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.75

Summary

Logan Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

ShaMaran Petroleum (CVE:SNM) and Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Pine Cliff Energy has a consensus target price of C$0.95, indicating a potential upside of 48.44%. Given Pine Cliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pine Cliff Energy is more favorable than ShaMaran Petroleum.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ShaMaran Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

ShaMaran Petroleum has a beta of 1.835381, suggesting that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.044399, suggesting that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the S&P 500.

ShaMaran Petroleum has a net margin of 17.45% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.91%. ShaMaran Petroleum's return on equity of 11.72% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ShaMaran Petroleum17.45% 11.72% 2.76%
Pine Cliff Energy -6.91%-31.28%-1.78%

In the previous week, ShaMaran Petroleum and ShaMaran Petroleum both had 1 articles in the media. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat ShaMaran Petroleum's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ShaMaran Petroleum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pine Cliff Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ShaMaran Petroleum has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ShaMaran Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ShaMaran PetroleumC$154.87M3.72C$51.66MC$0.0120.00
Pine Cliff EnergyC$177.85M1.29-C$15.17M-C$0.03N/A

1.8% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ShaMaran Petroleum beats Pine Cliff Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to InPlay Oil?

InPlay Oil (TSE:IPO) and Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

InPlay Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. InPlay Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pine Cliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
InPlay OilC$291.41M1.71C$18.77M-C$0.32N/A
Pine Cliff EnergyC$177.85M1.29-C$15.17M-C$0.03N/A

0.9% of InPlay Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.3% of InPlay Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

InPlay Oil has a net margin of -2.79% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.91%. InPlay Oil's return on equity of -2.22% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InPlay Oil-2.79% -2.22% 4.44%
Pine Cliff Energy -6.91%-31.28%-1.78%

InPlay Oil has a beta of 0.552348, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.044399, suggesting that its share price is 96% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, InPlay Oil and InPlay Oil both had 1 articles in the media. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat InPlay Oil's score of 0.50 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
InPlay Oil Positive
Pine Cliff Energy Positive

InPlay Oil presently has a consensus target price of C$15.70, indicating a potential downside of 12.34%. Pine Cliff Energy has a consensus target price of C$0.95, indicating a potential upside of 48.44%. Given Pine Cliff Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pine Cliff Energy is more favorable than InPlay Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
InPlay Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

InPlay Oil pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Pine Cliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. InPlay Oil pays out -337.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pine Cliff Energy pays out -75.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. InPlay Oil is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

InPlay Oil beats Pine Cliff Energy on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Reconnaissance Energy Africa?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Reconnaissance Energy Africa (CVE:RECO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.044399, suggesting that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Reconnaissance Energy Africa has a beta of -0.106449, suggesting that its stock price is 111% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Pine Cliff Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Reconnaissance Energy Africa. Reconnaissance Energy Africa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pine Cliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$177.85M1.29-C$15.17M-C$0.03N/A
Reconnaissance Energy AfricaN/AN/A-C$23.91M-C$0.05N/A

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Reconnaissance Energy Africa. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for Reconnaissance Energy Africa. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Reconnaissance Energy Africa's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
Reconnaissance Energy Africa Neutral

Reconnaissance Energy Africa has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.91%. Reconnaissance Energy Africa's return on equity of -7.90% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.91% -31.28% -1.78%
Reconnaissance Energy Africa N/A -7.90%-8.04%

0.5% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Reconnaissance Energy Africa shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Reconnaissance Energy Africa shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pine Cliff Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$0.95, suggesting a potential upside of 48.44%. Given Pine Cliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pine Cliff Energy is more favorable than Reconnaissance Energy Africa.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Reconnaissance Energy Africa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Pine Cliff Energy beats Reconnaissance Energy Africa on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Coelacanth Energy (CVE:CEI) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.044399, suggesting that its share price is 96% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Coelacanth Energy has a beta of 0.309113, suggesting that its share price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Coelacanth Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Coelacanth Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pine Cliff Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$177.85M1.29-C$15.17M-C$0.03N/A
Coelacanth EnergyC$30.47M14.96-C$6.75M-C$0.02N/A

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Coelacanth Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for Coelacanth Energy. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Coelacanth Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
Coelacanth Energy Neutral

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.91% compared to Coelacanth Energy's net margin of -36.19%. Coelacanth Energy's return on equity of -6.74% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.91% -31.28% -1.78%
Coelacanth Energy -36.19%-6.74%-3.98%

0.5% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.6% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pine Cliff Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$0.95, suggesting a potential upside of 48.44%. Coelacanth Energy has a consensus target price of C$1.10, suggesting a potential upside of 29.41%. Given Pine Cliff Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Pine Cliff Energy is more favorable than Coelacanth Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Coelacanth Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Summary

Coelacanth Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pine Cliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PNE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PNE vs. The Competition

MetricPine Cliff EnergyOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$229.63MC$2.07BC$10.78BC$11.72B
Dividend Yield2.42%7.55%10.18%6.22%
P/E Ratio-21.3316.2015.6823.83
Price / Sales1.293,481.171,019.7913.46
Price / Cash13.1285.5437.4082.69
Price / Book6.482.494.444.48
Net Income-C$15.17MC$82.07MC$4.24BC$300.68M
7 Day Performance4.92%1.32%1.71%0.12%
1 Month Performance-3.03%5.33%5.34%2.88%
1 Year Performance23.08%74.01%66.09%57.78%

Pine Cliff Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PNE
Pine Cliff Energy
2.3084 of 5 stars
C$0.64
flat
C$0.95
+48.4%
N/AC$229.63MC$177.85MN/A79
LGN
Logan Energy
3.2483 of 5 stars
C$0.97
+3.2%
C$1.21
+25.0%
N/AC$650.08MC$176.11M16.17N/A
SNM
ShaMaran Petroleum
N/AC$0.20
flat
N/AN/AC$575.66MC$154.87M20.003,530
IPO
InPlay Oil
0.9672 of 5 stars
C$17.13
+2.3%
C$15.70
-8.3%
N/AC$477.57MC$291.41MN/A25
RECO
Reconnaissance Energy Africa
N/AC$1.17
-3.3%
N/AN/AC$461.95MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PNE) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners