Go Pro
→ The end may be near for these iconic stocks (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free PNE Stock Alerts

Pine Cliff Energy (PNE) Competitors

Pine Cliff Energy logo
C$0.56 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

PNE vs. FEC, LGN, SNM, CEI, and IPO

Should you buy Pine Cliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pine Cliff Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pine Cliff Energy include Frontera Energy (FEC), Logan Energy (LGN), ShaMaran Petroleum (SNM), Coelacanth Energy (CEI), and InPlay Oil (IPO). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Frontera Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Frontera Energy (TSE:FEC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Frontera Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontera Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.17-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Frontera EnergyC$1.01B0.62C$63.72M-C$14.91N/A

Pine Cliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Frontera Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Pine Cliff Energy pays out -75.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Frontera Energy pays out -0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pine Cliff Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Frontera Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Pine Cliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Frontera Energy and 0 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy. Frontera Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Pine Cliff Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Frontera Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Neutral
Frontera Energy Positive

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Frontera Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.023028, indicating that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.379534, indicating that its stock price is 138% less volatile than the broader market.

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -147.46%. Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity of -31.31% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
Frontera Energy -147.46%-120.46%3.95%

Summary

Pine Cliff Energy beats Frontera Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Logan Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Logan Energy (CVE:LGN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Logan Energy has a net margin of 15.75% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.63%. Logan Energy's return on equity of 8.84% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
Logan Energy 15.75%8.84%0.29%

Logan Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Logan Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.17-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Logan EnergyC$189.00M3.73C$19.98MC$0.0425.50

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of Logan Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Logan Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Logan Energy has a consensus target price of C$1.35, indicating a potential upside of 32.35%. Given Logan Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Logan Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Logan Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Logan Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Neutral
Logan Energy Neutral

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.023028, meaning that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Logan Energy has a beta of -0.060032, meaning that its share price is 106% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Logan Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

ShaMaran Petroleum (CVE:SNM) and Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

ShaMaran Petroleum has a net margin of 28.64% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.63%. ShaMaran Petroleum's return on equity of 18.59% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ShaMaran Petroleum28.64% 18.59% 2.76%
Pine Cliff Energy -6.63%-31.31%-1.78%

1.8% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ShaMaran Petroleum has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ShaMaran Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ShaMaran PetroleumC$157.02M3.67C$51.66MC$0.0212.50
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.17-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A

In the previous week, ShaMaran Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pine Cliff Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ShaMaran Petroleum Neutral
Pine Cliff Energy Neutral

ShaMaran Petroleum has a beta of 1.835381, suggesting that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.023028, suggesting that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ShaMaran Petroleum beats Pine Cliff Energy on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Coelacanth Energy (CVE:CEI) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.023028, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coelacanth Energy has a beta of 0.209883, suggesting that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Coelacanth Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Pine Cliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Coelacanth Energy and 0 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy. Coelacanth Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.07 beat Pine Cliff Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Coelacanth Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Neutral
Coelacanth Energy Neutral

Coelacanth Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pine Cliff Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.17-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Coelacanth EnergyC$49.97M10.02-C$6.75MN/AN/A

Coelacanth Energy has a consensus target price of C$1.15, suggesting a potential upside of 45.57%. Given Coelacanth Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Coelacanth Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Coelacanth Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.6% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to Coelacanth Energy's net margin of -7.45%. Coelacanth Energy's return on equity of -2.18% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
Coelacanth Energy -7.45%-2.18%-3.98%

Summary

Coelacanth Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to InPlay Oil?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and InPlay Oil (TSE:IPO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.023028, indicating that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, InPlay Oil has a beta of 0.367996, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Pine Cliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. InPlay Oil pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Pine Cliff Energy pays out -75.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. InPlay Oil pays out -78.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. InPlay Oil is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of InPlay Oil shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.3% of InPlay Oil shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to InPlay Oil's net margin of -12.40%. InPlay Oil's return on equity of -10.86% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
InPlay Oil -12.40%-10.86%4.44%

InPlay Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InPlay Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.17-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
InPlay OilC$340.91M1.26C$18.77M-C$1.37N/A

InPlay Oil has a consensus price target of C$18.33, indicating a potential upside of 19.90%. Given InPlay Oil's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe InPlay Oil is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
InPlay Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, InPlay Oil had 1 more articles in the media than Pine Cliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for InPlay Oil and 0 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy. InPlay Oil's average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Pine Cliff Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that InPlay Oil is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Neutral
InPlay Oil Positive

Summary

InPlay Oil beats Pine Cliff Energy on 16 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pine Cliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PNE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PNE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPine Cliff EnergyOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$200.92MC$2.06BC$10.39BC$12.48B
Dividend Yield2.68%7.60%11.37%6.19%
P/E Ratio-28.0032.0819.8336.95
Price / Sales1.171,219.98388.939.44
Price / Cash13.1285.5336.9982.29
Price / Book6.092.334.144.39
Net Income-C$15.17MC$82.07MC$4.25BC$299.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/A2.93%1.41%0.61%
1 Month Performance-3.45%5.48%3.01%1.06%
1 Year Performance-24.32%37.75%29.33%30.89%

Pine Cliff Energy Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PNE
Pine Cliff Energy
N/AC$0.56
flat		N/A-23.3%C$200.92MC$172.21MN/A79
FEC
Frontera Energy
N/AC$9.21
+2.7%		N/A+40.7%C$641.73MC$1.01BN/A1,107
LGN
Logan Energy
2.1812 of 5 stars		C$0.93
+1.1%		C$1.35
+45.2%		+47.8%C$636.25MC$189.00M23.25N/A
SNM
ShaMaran Petroleum
N/AC$0.20
flat		N/A-9.1%C$575.70MC$157.02M12.503,530
CEI
Coelacanth Energy
0.7913 of 5 stars		C$0.79
+2.6%		C$1.15
+45.6%		-2.5%C$500.60MC$49.97MN/A9

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PNE) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Three oil giants buried the same discovery for 50 years
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel