Free Trial

Pine Cliff Energy (PNE) Competitors

Pine Cliff Energy logo
C$0.60 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/12/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

PNE vs. LGN, SNM, CEI, IPO, and RECO

Should you buy Pine Cliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pine Cliff Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pine Cliff Energy include Logan Energy (LGN), ShaMaran Petroleum (SNM), Coelacanth Energy (CEI), InPlay Oil (IPO), and Reconnaissance Energy Africa (RECO). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Logan Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Logan Energy (CVE:LGN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.031547, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Logan Energy has a beta of 5.153885, indicating that its stock price is 415% more volatile than the broader market.

Logan Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Logan Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.25-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Logan EnergyC$189.00M3.22C$19.98MC$0.0422.00

Logan Energy has a consensus target price of C$1.21, suggesting a potential upside of 37.78%. Given Logan Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Logan Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Logan Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.75

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Logan Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for Logan Energy. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Logan Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
Logan Energy Neutral

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.8% of Logan Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Logan Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Logan Energy has a net margin of 15.75% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.63%. Logan Energy's return on equity of 8.84% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
Logan Energy 15.75%8.84%0.29%

Summary

Logan Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and ShaMaran Petroleum (CVE:SNM) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than ShaMaran Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for ShaMaran Petroleum. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat ShaMaran Petroleum's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
ShaMaran Petroleum Neutral

ShaMaran Petroleum has a net margin of 28.64% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.63%. ShaMaran Petroleum's return on equity of 18.59% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
ShaMaran Petroleum 28.64%18.59%2.76%

ShaMaran Petroleum has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ShaMaran Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.25-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
ShaMaran PetroleumC$157.02M3.67C$51.66MC$0.0212.50

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.031547, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ShaMaran Petroleum has a beta of 1.835381, meaning that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ShaMaran Petroleum beats Pine Cliff Energy on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Coelacanth Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Coelacanth Energy (CVE:CEI) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to Coelacanth Energy's net margin of -7.45%. Coelacanth Energy's return on equity of -2.18% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
Coelacanth Energy -7.45%-2.18%-3.98%

Coelacanth Energy has a consensus price target of C$1.10, suggesting a potential upside of 34.15%. Given Coelacanth Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Coelacanth Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Coelacanth Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Coelacanth Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pine Cliff Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.25-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Coelacanth EnergyC$49.97M10.40-C$6.75MN/AN/A

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.6% of Coelacanth Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.031547, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coelacanth Energy has a beta of 0.255163, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Coelacanth Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for Coelacanth Energy. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Coelacanth Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
Coelacanth Energy Neutral

Summary

Coelacanth Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to InPlay Oil?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and InPlay Oil (TSE:IPO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -6.63% compared to InPlay Oil's net margin of -12.40%. InPlay Oil's return on equity of -10.86% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
InPlay Oil -12.40%-10.86%4.44%

InPlay Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InPlay Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.25-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
InPlay OilC$340.91M1.36C$18.77M-C$1.37N/A

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of InPlay Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.3% of InPlay Oil shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.031547, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, InPlay Oil has a beta of 0.341638, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Pine Cliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. InPlay Oil pays an annual dividend of C$1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Pine Cliff Energy pays out -75.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. InPlay Oil pays out -78.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. InPlay Oil is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

InPlay Oil has a consensus target price of C$16.38, suggesting a potential downside of 1.30%. Given InPlay Oil's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe InPlay Oil is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
InPlay Oil
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than InPlay Oil. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for InPlay Oil. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat InPlay Oil's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
InPlay Oil Neutral

Summary

InPlay Oil beats Pine Cliff Energy on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Reconnaissance Energy Africa?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Reconnaissance Energy Africa (CVE:RECO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Reconnaissance Energy Africa had 1 more articles in the media than Pine Cliff Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Reconnaissance Energy Africa and 2 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Reconnaissance Energy Africa's score of 0.40 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Reconnaissance Energy Africa
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of 0.031547, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Reconnaissance Energy Africa has a beta of -0.193057, meaning that its stock price is 119% less volatile than the broader market.

Pine Cliff Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Reconnaissance Energy Africa. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Reconnaissance Energy Africa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.21M1.25-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Reconnaissance Energy AfricaN/AN/A-C$23.91M-C$0.04N/A

Reconnaissance Energy Africa has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -6.63%. Reconnaissance Energy Africa's return on equity of -6.97% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-6.63% -31.31% -1.78%
Reconnaissance Energy Africa N/A -6.97%-8.04%

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Reconnaissance Energy Africa shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Reconnaissance Energy Africa shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pine Cliff Energy beats Reconnaissance Energy Africa on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pine Cliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PNE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PNE vs. The Competition

MetricPine Cliff EnergyOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$215.28MC$1.96BC$10.12BC$12.19B
Dividend Yield2.50%7.56%10.42%6.19%
P/E Ratio-30.0031.7420.2836.94
Price / Sales1.252,463.78752.2810.45
Price / Cash13.1285.5337.2682.29
Price / Book6.532.404.254.47
Net Income-C$15.17MC$82.07MC$4.24BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-4.76%-1.79%-1.16%0.65%
1 Month Performance-1.64%-5.06%-3.37%-0.08%
1 Year Performance-6.25%40.02%37.21%41.90%

Pine Cliff Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PNE
Pine Cliff Energy
N/AC$0.60
flat
N/A-6.3%C$215.28MC$172.21MN/A79
LGN
Logan Energy
1.8794 of 5 stars
C$0.91
+1.1%
C$1.21
+33.2%
+33.3%C$629.33MC$189.00M22.75N/A
SNM
ShaMaran Petroleum
N/AC$0.20
flat
N/A+11.1%C$575.70MC$157.02M12.503,530
CEI
Coelacanth Energy
0.4943 of 5 stars
C$0.83
flat
C$1.10
+32.5%
-6.8%C$525.94MC$49.97MN/A9
IPO
InPlay Oil
0.4975 of 5 stars
C$17.04
+1.9%
C$16.38
-3.9%
+62.6%C$477.22MC$340.91MN/A25

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PNE) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners