Go Pro
→ Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free PNE Stock Alerts

Pine Cliff Energy (PNE) Competitors

Pine Cliff Energy logo
C$0.56 +0.01 (+1.82%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern
Compare

PNE vs. TET, LGN, FEC, SNM, and GTE

Should you buy Pine Cliff Energy stock or one of its competitors? Pine Cliff Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Paramount Resources TEC (TET), Logan Energy (LGN), Frontera Energy (FEC), ShaMaran Petroleum (SNM), and Gran Tierra Energy (GTE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Paramount Resources TEC?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Paramount Resources TEC (TSE:TET) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Paramount Resources TEC has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -5.45%. Paramount Resources TEC's return on equity of 0.00% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-5.45% -27.35% -1.78%
Paramount Resources TEC N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Paramount Resources TEC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for Paramount Resources TEC. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Paramount Resources TEC's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
Paramount Resources TEC Neutral

Paramount Resources TEC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pine Cliff Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.90M1.16-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Paramount Resources TECN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Pine Cliff Energy beats Paramount Resources TEC on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Logan Energy?

Logan Energy (CVE:LGN) and Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

Logan Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$1.38, indicating a potential upside of 17.95%. Given Logan Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Logan Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Logan Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.40
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

3.1% of Logan Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of Logan Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Logan Energy has a beta of -0.049683, indicating that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of -0.037445, indicating that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

Logan Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Logan Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Logan EnergyC$229.76M3.52C$19.98MC$0.0619.50
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.90M1.16-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A

Logan Energy has a net margin of 18.40% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -5.45%. Logan Energy's return on equity of 11.28% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Logan Energy18.40% 11.28% 0.29%
Pine Cliff Energy -5.45%-27.35%-1.78%

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Logan Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 1 mentions for Logan Energy. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Logan Energy's score of 0.71 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Logan Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pine Cliff Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Logan Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Frontera Energy?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and Frontera Energy (TSE:FEC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Frontera Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontera Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.90M1.16-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
Frontera EnergyC$1.01B0.61C$63.72M-C$8.65N/A

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -5.45% compared to Frontera Energy's net margin of -119.59%. Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity of -27.35% beat Frontera Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-5.45% -27.35% -1.78%
Frontera Energy -119.59%-94.31%3.95%

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Frontera Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for Frontera Energy. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Frontera Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
Frontera Energy Neutral

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Frontera Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Frontera Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of -0.037445, meaning that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontera Energy has a beta of -0.471162, meaning that its stock price is 147% less volatile than the broader market.

Pine Cliff Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Frontera Energy pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Pine Cliff Energy pays out -75.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Frontera Energy pays out -1.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pine Cliff Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Pine Cliff Energy beats Frontera Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to ShaMaran Petroleum?

Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) and ShaMaran Petroleum (CVE:SNM) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and risk.

ShaMaran Petroleum has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ShaMaran Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.90M1.16-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A
ShaMaran PetroleumC$157.02M3.67C$51.66MC$0.0212.50

ShaMaran Petroleum has a net margin of 28.64% compared to Pine Cliff Energy's net margin of -5.45%. ShaMaran Petroleum's return on equity of 18.59% beat Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pine Cliff Energy-5.45% -27.35% -1.78%
ShaMaran Petroleum 28.64%18.59%2.76%

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 2 more articles in the media than ShaMaran Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 0 mentions for ShaMaran Petroleum. Pine Cliff Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat ShaMaran Petroleum's score of 0.00 indicating that Pine Cliff Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pine Cliff Energy Positive
ShaMaran Petroleum Neutral

Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of -0.037445, meaning that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ShaMaran Petroleum has a beta of 1.835381, meaning that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of ShaMaran Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ShaMaran Petroleum beats Pine Cliff Energy on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pine Cliff Energy compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Gran Tierra Energy (TSE:GTE) and Pine Cliff Energy (TSE:PNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

Pine Cliff Energy has a net margin of -5.45% compared to Gran Tierra Energy's net margin of -39.99%. Pine Cliff Energy's return on equity of -27.35% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gran Tierra Energy-39.99% -122.13% 8.16%
Pine Cliff Energy -5.45%-27.35%-1.78%

9.2% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Pine Cliff Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of -0.441043, indicating that its share price is 144% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pine Cliff Energy has a beta of -0.037445, indicating that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

Gran Tierra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pine Cliff Energy. Pine Cliff Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gran Tierra Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gran Tierra EnergyC$638.42M0.77C$37.65M-C$7.22N/A
Pine Cliff EnergyC$172.90M1.16-C$15.17M-C$0.02N/A

Gran Tierra Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$12.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.01%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Pine Cliff Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gran Tierra Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Pine Cliff Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Pine Cliff Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Gran Tierra Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pine Cliff Energy and 1 mentions for Gran Tierra Energy. Gran Tierra Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Pine Cliff Energy's score of 1.02 indicating that Gran Tierra Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gran Tierra Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pine Cliff Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Gran Tierra Energy beats Pine Cliff Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pine Cliff Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PNE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PNE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPine Cliff EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$197.34MC$11.62BC$10.16BC$12.57B
Dividend Yield2.73%11.21%11.47%6.25%
P/E Ratio-28.0018.8222.0439.47
Price / Sales1.16625.04511.279.82
Price / Cash13.1239.9136.2682.29
Price / Book10.143.333.124.71
Net Income-C$15.17MC$5.27BC$4.33BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.45%1.47%1.37%-1.21%
1 Month Performance1.82%7.06%6.54%4.89%
1 Year Performance-5.08%37.10%38.64%28.63%

Pine Cliff Energy Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PNE
Pine Cliff Energy
N/AC$0.56
+1.8%		N/A-9.8%C$197.34MC$172.90MN/A79
TET
Paramount Resources TEC
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$782.03MN/AN/A147,000
LGN
Logan Energy
2.9045 of 5 stars		C$1.07
-0.9%		C$1.38
+29.0%		+51.3%C$740.03MC$229.76M17.83N/A
FEC
Frontera Energy
N/AC$8.38
+0.7%		N/A+43.1%C$593.04MC$1.01BN/A1,107
SNM
ShaMaran Petroleum
N/AC$0.20
flat		N/A-7.0%C$575.70MC$157.02M12.503,530

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PNE) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel