Go Pro

Cott (PRM) Competitors

Cott logo
C$15.95 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/25/2026 03:57 PM Eastern

PRM vs. IAM, NIF.UN, M, MMP.UN, and XTD

Should you buy Cott stock or one of its competitors? Cott's main competitors and comparable companies include Integrated Asset Management (IAM), Noranda Income Fund (NIF.UN), Mosaic Capital (M), Precious Metals And Mng Unt (MMP.UN), and TDb Split (XTD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Cott compare to Integrated Asset Management?

Cott (TSE:PRM) and Integrated Asset Management (TSE:IAM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Integrated Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than Cott. Integrated Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CottC$5.55M3.74C$1.08MC$3.594.44
Integrated Asset ManagementC$18.31M0.00C$3.05MC$0.11N/A

Integrated Asset Management has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cott's net margin of -425.93%. Cott's return on equity of 28.02% beat Integrated Asset Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cott-425.93% 28.02% N/A
Integrated Asset Management N/A N/A N/A

Cott pays an annual dividend of C$1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Integrated Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.11 per share. Cott pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Integrated Asset Management pays out 100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Given Integrated Asset Management's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Integrated Asset Management is more favorable than Cott.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cott
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Integrated Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Cott's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Integrated Asset Management'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cott Neutral
Integrated Asset Management Neutral

Summary

Cott and Integrated Asset Management tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cott compare to Noranda Income Fund?

Noranda Income Fund (TSE:NIF.UN) and Cott (TSE:PRM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Noranda Income Fund has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Cott's net margin of -425.93%. Cott's return on equity of 28.02% beat Noranda Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Noranda Income Fund1.45% 6.26% 7.05%
Cott -425.93%28.02%N/A

Noranda Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Cott. Noranda Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Noranda Income FundC$887.61M0.00C$12.88MC$0.35N/A
CottC$5.55M3.74C$1.08MC$3.594.44

In the previous week, Noranda Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cott'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Noranda Income Fund Neutral
Cott Neutral

8.2% of Noranda Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 12.6% of Noranda Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Noranda Income Fund has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cott has a beta of -0.340821, suggesting that its stock price is 134% less volatile than the broader market.

Given Noranda Income Fund's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Noranda Income Fund is more favorable than Cott.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Noranda Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cott
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Noranda Income Fund beats Cott on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cott compare to Mosaic Capital?

Cott (TSE:PRM) and Mosaic Capital (CVE:M) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Mosaic Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Cott. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mosaic Capital and 0 mentions for Cott. Mosaic Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Cott's score of 0.00 indicating that Mosaic Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cott Neutral
Mosaic Capital Neutral

Mosaic Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cott's net margin of -425.93%. Cott's return on equity of 28.02% beat Mosaic Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cott-425.93% 28.02% N/A
Mosaic Capital N/A N/A N/A

Cott has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mosaic Capital. Mosaic Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CottC$5.55M3.74C$1.08MC$3.594.44
Mosaic CapitalC$332.38M0.18-C$15.15M-C$1.42N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cott
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Mosaic Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Cott beats Mosaic Capital on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cott compare to Precious Metals And Mng Unt?

Precious Metals And Mng Unt (TSE:MMP.UN) and Cott (TSE:PRM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Cott has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Precious Metals And Mng Unt. Cott is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Precious Metals And Mng Unt, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Precious Metals And Mng UntC$8.50M5.78-C$3.29MC$0.816.03
CottC$5.55M3.74C$1.08MC$3.594.44

Precious Metals And Mng Unt pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Cott pays an annual dividend of C$1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Precious Metals And Mng Unt pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cott pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Precious Metals And Mng Unt
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cott
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Precious Metals And Mng Unt has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cott's net margin of -425.93%. Cott's return on equity of 28.02% beat Precious Metals And Mng Unt's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Precious Metals And Mng UntN/A -14.96% -9.19%
Cott -425.93%28.02%N/A

Precious Metals And Mng Unt has a beta of 0.843557, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cott has a beta of -0.340821, suggesting that its stock price is 134% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Precious Metals And Mng Unt's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cott'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Precious Metals And Mng Unt Neutral
Cott Neutral

Summary

Precious Metals And Mng Unt and Cott tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cott compare to TDb Split?

Cott (TSE:PRM) and TDb Split (TSE:XTD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Cott pays an annual dividend of C$1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. TDb Split pays an annual dividend of C$0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Cott pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TDb Split pays out 7.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, TDb Split had 1 more articles in the media than Cott. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TDb Split and 0 mentions for Cott. TDb Split's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Cott's score of 0.00 indicating that TDb Split is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cott Neutral
TDb Split Neutral

Cott has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TDb Split. TDb Split is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CottC$5.55M3.74C$1.08MC$3.594.44
TDb SplitC$42.41M1.11-C$603.21KC$7.121.22

Cott has a beta of -0.340821, indicating that its stock price is 134% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TDb Split has a beta of 2.593964, indicating that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cott
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
TDb Split
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

TDb Split has a net margin of 839.33% compared to Cott's net margin of -425.93%. TDb Split's return on equity of 87.37% beat Cott's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cott-425.93% 28.02% N/A
TDb Split 839.33%87.37%-3.87%

Summary

TDb Split beats Cott on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cott News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PRM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PRM vs. The Competition

MetricCottCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$20.80MC$5.72BC$14.08BC$12.63B
Dividend Yield10.66%7.40%5.89%6.22%
P/E Ratio4.4432.3026.6238.97
Price / Sales3.741,242.87520.2010.61
Price / CashN/A48.3338.5082.29
Price / Book1.072.142.194.83
Net IncomeC$1.08MC$417.46MC$1.31BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance3.04%0.63%1.46%0.65%
1 Month Performance10.00%2.40%3.02%5.50%
1 Year Performance30.74%7.78%11.51%32.69%

Cott Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PRM
Cott
N/AC$15.95
flat
N/A+34.0%C$20.80MC$5.55M4.44240
IAM
Integrated Asset Management
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$75.96MC$18.31M24.9156
NIF.UN
Noranda Income Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$73.86MC$887.61M5.63537
M
Mosaic Capital
N/AC$5.50
+0.5%
N/A+0.0%C$58.88MC$332.38MN/A88,900
MMP.UN
Precious Metals And Mng Unt
N/AC$4.71
+1.9%
N/A+82.8%C$47.25MC$8.50M5.80N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PRM) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners