Topaz Energy (TPZ) Competitors

Topaz Energy pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Keyera pays an annual dividend of C$2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Topaz Energy pays out 162.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Keyera pays out 112.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Keyera is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Keyera has higher revenue and earnings than Topaz Energy. Keyera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Topaz Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Topaz Energy has a beta of 0.210688, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Keyera has a beta of 0.521596, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Topaz Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$33.28, indicating a potential upside of 4.68%. Keyera has a consensus target price of C$53.55, indicating a potential upside of 9.03%. Given Keyera's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Keyera is more favorable than Topaz Energy.

Topaz Energy has a net margin of 39.18% compared to Keyera's net margin of 6.34%. Keyera's return on equity of 15.39% beat Topaz Energy's return on equity.

41.8% of Topaz Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.7% of Keyera shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.7% of Topaz Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Keyera shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Keyera had 3 more articles in the media than Topaz Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Keyera and 1 mentions for Topaz Energy. Keyera's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Topaz Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Keyera is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Gibson Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Topaz Energy. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Gibson Energy and 1 mentions for Topaz Energy. Gibson Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Topaz Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Gibson Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Topaz Energy has a beta of 0.210688, suggesting that its share price is 79% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gibson Energy has a beta of 0.204764, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500.

41.8% of Topaz Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.6% of Gibson Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.7% of Topaz Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Gibson Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gibson Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Topaz Energy. Gibson Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Topaz Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Topaz Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$33.28, indicating a potential upside of 4.68%. Gibson Energy has a consensus target price of C$27.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.20%. Given Topaz Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Topaz Energy is more favorable than Gibson Energy.

Topaz Energy has a net margin of 39.18% compared to Gibson Energy's net margin of 1.85%. Gibson Energy's return on equity of 22.62% beat Topaz Energy's return on equity.

Topaz Energy pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Gibson Energy pays an annual dividend of C$1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Topaz Energy pays out 162.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gibson Energy pays out 143.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gibson Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Topaz Energy pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (KML.TO) pays an annual dividend of C$0.98 per share. Topaz Energy pays out 162.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (KML.TO) pays out 248.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Topaz Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Topaz Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$33.28, indicating a potential upside of 4.68%. Given Topaz Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Topaz Energy is more favorable than Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (KML.TO).

41.8% of Topaz Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.7% of Topaz Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Topaz Energy has a net margin of 39.18% compared to Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (KML.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. Topaz Energy's return on equity of 9.77% beat Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (KML.TO)'s return on equity.

In the previous week, Topaz Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (KML.TO). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Topaz Energy and 0 mentions for Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (KML.TO). Topaz Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (KML.TO)'saverage media sentiment score.

Topaz Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (KML.TO). Kinder Morgan Canada Limited (KML.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Topaz Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure has a beta of -0.101396, suggesting that its share price is 110% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Topaz Energy has a beta of 0.210688, suggesting that its share price is 79% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure currently has a consensus target price of C$9.63, indicating a potential downside of 32.55%. Topaz Energy has a consensus target price of C$33.28, indicating a potential upside of 4.68%. Given Topaz Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Topaz Energy is more favorable than Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure.

1.3% of Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Topaz Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 35.7% of Topaz Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Topaz Energy has a net margin of 39.18% compared to Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure's net margin of -8.51%. Topaz Energy's return on equity of 9.77% beat Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure's return on equity.

In the previous week, Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure and Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure both had 1 articles in the media. Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Topaz Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Topaz Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure. Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Topaz Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.