Albion Technology & Gen VCT (AATG) Competitors

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (LON:BGCG) and Albion Technology & Gen VCT (LON:AATG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, community ranking, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings and risk.

Is BGCG or AATG more profitable?

Albion Technology & Gen VCT has a net margin of 36.62% compared to Albion Technology & Gen VCT's net margin of 0.00%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's return on equity of 1.41% beat Albion Technology & Gen VCT's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust	N/A	-15.28%	-9.09%
Albion Technology & Gen VCT	36.62%	1.41%	0.87%

Does the MarketBeat Community prefer BGCG or AATG?

Albion Technology & Gen VCT received 37 more outperform votes than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust when rated by MarketBeat users.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust	N/A	N/A
Albion Technology & Gen VCT	Outperform Votes 37 56.92%	Underperform Votes 28 43.08%

Is BGCG or AATG a better dividend stock?

Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Albion Technology & Gen VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust pays out -1,363.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albion Technology & Gen VCT pays out 40,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of BGCG or AATG?

22.9% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Albion Technology & Gen VCT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Which has better valuation and earnings, BGCG or AATG?

Albion Technology & Gen VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albion Technology & Gen VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust	-£25.30M	-4.67	-£27.35M	-£0.44	-432.95
Albion Technology & Gen VCT	£5.03M	24.26	£1.84M	£0.01	6,900.00

Do analysts rate BGCG or AATG?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A
Albion Technology & Gen VCT	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A

Does the media favor BGCG or AATG?

In the previous week, Albion Technology & Gen VCT had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Albion Technology & Gen VCT and 2 mentions for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust. Albion Technology & Gen VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust's score of -0.27 indicating that Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Albion Technology & Gen VCT	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Albion Technology & Gen VCT beats Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.