Free Trial

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (ATR) Competitors

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. logo
GBX 673 -7.00 (-1.03%)
As of 05/15/2026 12:25 PM Eastern

ATR vs. ENQ, MNKS, INPP, HICL, and BPT

Should you buy Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. include EnQuest (ENQ), Monks (MNKS), International Public Partnerships (INPP), HICL Infrastructure (HICL), and Bridgepoint Group (BPT).

How does Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. compare to EnQuest?

EnQuest (LON:ENQ) and Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (LON:ATR) are both small-cap rubber and plastic products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a net margin of 254.00% compared to EnQuest's net margin of 0.22%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s return on equity of 13.06% beat EnQuest's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EnQuest0.22% 0.54% 7.54%
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. 254.00%13.06%4.75%

EnQuest presently has a consensus target price of GBX 22.40, indicating a potential upside of 13.82%. Given EnQuest's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe EnQuest is more favorable than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EnQuest
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

EnQuest pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.83 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. EnQuest pays out 826.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays out 16.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

38.0% of EnQuest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.9% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of EnQuest shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, EnQuest had 3 more articles in the media than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for EnQuest and 0 mentions for Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. EnQuest's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s score of 0.00 indicating that EnQuest is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
EnQuest Positive
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. Neutral

EnQuest has a beta of 0.025, meaning that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a beta of 1.0190377, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EnQuest. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EnQuest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EnQuest£1.12B0.33£25.24M£0.10196.80
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.£66.61M9.40£66.84M£68.579.81

Summary

EnQuest beats Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. compare to Monks?

Monks (LON:MNKS) and Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (LON:ATR) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Monks has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Monks£488.88M5.11£589.71M£280.985.65
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.£66.61M9.40£66.84M£68.579.81

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a net margin of 254.00% compared to Monks' net margin of 95.29%. Monks' return on equity of 19.34% beat Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Monks95.29% 19.34% 9.21%
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. 254.00%13.06%4.75%

Monks has a beta of 0.93763095, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a beta of 1.0190377, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Monks had 15 more articles in the media than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Monks and 0 mentions for Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Monks' score of -0.55 indicating that Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Monks Negative
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. Neutral

10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.9% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Monks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Monks pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays out 16.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Monks beats Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. compare to International Public Partnerships?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (LON:ATR) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has lower revenue, but higher earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M8.62£43.53M£14.289.00
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.£66.61M9.40£66.84M£68.579.81

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.9% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a net margin of 254.00% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 97.32%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s return on equity of 13.06% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. 254.00%13.06%4.75%

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays out 16.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.365, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a beta of 1.0190377, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 2 more articles in the media than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 0 mentions for Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s score of 0.00 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships Positive
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. Neutral

Summary

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. beats International Public Partnerships on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. compare to HICL Infrastructure?

HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) and Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (LON:ATR) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

HICL Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HICL Infrastructure£125.10M18.63£101.36M£6.2019.94
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.£66.61M9.40£66.84M£68.579.81

28.7% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.9% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a net margin of 254.00% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 43.50%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s return on equity of 13.06% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HICL Infrastructure43.50% 3.99% 0.58%
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. 254.00%13.06%4.75%

HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. HICL Infrastructure pays out 133.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays out 16.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.442, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a beta of 1.0190377, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 4 more articles in the media than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s score of 0.00 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
HICL Infrastructure Positive
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. Neutral

Summary

HICL Infrastructure beats Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (LON:ATR) and Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays out 16.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bridgepoint Group pays out 189.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a net margin of 254.00% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 7.68%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s return on equity of 13.06% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.254.00% 13.06% 4.75%
Bridgepoint Group 7.68%4.25%3.47%

13.9% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bridgepoint Group. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.£66.61M9.40£66.84M£68.579.81
Bridgepoint Group£476M4.80£45.58M£4.9053.27

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group had 1 more articles in the media than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Bridgepoint Group and 0 mentions for Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bridgepoint Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. Neutral
Bridgepoint Group Neutral

Bridgepoint Group has a consensus price target of GBX 385, suggesting a potential upside of 47.51%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a beta of 1.0190377, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.358, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ATR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ATR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ATR vs. The Competition

MetricSchroder Asian Total Return Inv.Asset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£626.19M£2.35B£5.16B£2.60B
Dividend Yield1.71%5.97%5.25%6.15%
P/E Ratio9.8125.1415.93365.91
Price / Sales9.402,063.581,023.0988,030.08
Price / Cash89.0360.1791.0127.89
Price / Book1.371.356.597.74
Net Income£66.84M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.15%-0.71%-0.26%0.21%
1 Month Performance10.52%1.69%1.19%1.56%
1 Year Performance43.80%12.04%18.11%77.95%

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ATR
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.
N/AGBX 673
-1.0%
N/A+42.6%£626.19M£66.61M9.8113,500
ENQ
EnQuest
2.9951 of 5 stars
GBX 18.70
+4.6%
GBX 22.40
+19.8%
+61.8%£348.02M£1.12B187.00681
MNKS
Monks
N/AGBX 1,562
-0.9%
N/A+27.9%£2.46B£488.88M5.56N/A
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 132.70
-0.9%
N/A+13.2%£2.38B£267.76M9.29N/A
HICL
HICL Infrastructure
N/AGBX 124.70
-1.5%
N/A+9.0%£2.35B£125.10M20.11N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ATR) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners