Go Pro

BlackRock Latin American (BRLA) Competitors

GBX 415 -9.00 (-2.12%)
As of 11:52 AM Eastern

BRLA vs. CCJI, EAT, SSIT, CTPE, and CHRY

Should you buy BlackRock Latin American stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares BlackRock Latin American with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with BlackRock Latin American include CC Japan Income & Growth (CCJI), European Assets Trust (EAT), Seraphim Space Investment Trust (SSIT), CT Private Equity Trust (CTPE), and Chrysalis Investments (CHRY).

How does BlackRock Latin American compare to CC Japan Income & Growth?

CC Japan Income & Growth (LON:CCJI) and BlackRock Latin American (LON:BRLA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

CC Japan Income & Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. BlackRock Latin American pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. CC Japan Income & Growth pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BlackRock Latin American pays out 11.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

8.6% of CC Japan Income & Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of BlackRock Latin American shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of CC Japan Income & Growth shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of BlackRock Latin American shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CC Japan Income & Growth had 1 more articles in the media than BlackRock Latin American. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CC Japan Income & Growth and 0 mentions for BlackRock Latin American. CC Japan Income & Growth's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat BlackRock Latin American's score of 0.00 indicating that CC Japan Income & Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CC Japan Income & Growth Positive
BlackRock Latin American Neutral

CC Japan Income & Growth has a beta of 0.9677016, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock Latin American has a beta of 0.652, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

CC Japan Income & Growth has higher revenue and earnings than BlackRock Latin American. BlackRock Latin American is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CC Japan Income & Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CC Japan Income & Growth£107.73M3.33£60.67M£77.933.41
BlackRock Latin American£63.00M1.46-£30.52M£209.451.98

CC Japan Income & Growth has a net margin of 95.52% compared to BlackRock Latin American's net margin of 95.32%. BlackRock Latin American's return on equity of 37.51% beat CC Japan Income & Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CC Japan Income & Growth95.52% 30.46% N/A
BlackRock Latin American 95.32%37.51%19.32%

Summary

CC Japan Income & Growth beats BlackRock Latin American on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BlackRock Latin American compare to European Assets Trust?

BlackRock Latin American (LON:BRLA) and European Assets Trust (LON:EAT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

European Assets Trust has a net margin of 338.94% compared to BlackRock Latin American's net margin of 95.32%. BlackRock Latin American's return on equity of 37.51% beat European Assets Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Latin American95.32% 37.51% 19.32%
European Assets Trust 338.94%3.92%6.15%

European Assets Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BlackRock Latin American. BlackRock Latin American is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than European Assets Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Latin American£63.00M1.46-£30.52M£209.451.98
European Assets Trust£25.97M13.85£27.91M£6.7214.86

BlackRock Latin American has a beta of 0.652, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, European Assets Trust has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, BlackRock Latin American's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled European Assets Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Latin American Neutral
European Assets Trust Neutral

BlackRock Latin American pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. European Assets Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. BlackRock Latin American pays out 11.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. European Assets Trust pays out 0.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

4.9% of BlackRock Latin American shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of European Assets Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of BlackRock Latin American shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of European Assets Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

European Assets Trust beats BlackRock Latin American on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BlackRock Latin American compare to Seraphim Space Investment Trust?

Seraphim Space Investment Trust (LON:SSIT) and BlackRock Latin American (LON:BRLA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Seraphim Space Investment Trust has a beta of 2.2839735, suggesting that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock Latin American has a beta of 0.652, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Seraphim Space Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BlackRock Latin American'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seraphim Space Investment Trust Neutral
BlackRock Latin American Neutral

7.9% of Seraphim Space Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of BlackRock Latin American shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Seraphim Space Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of BlackRock Latin American shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Seraphim Space Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,940.84% compared to BlackRock Latin American's net margin of 95.32%. BlackRock Latin American's return on equity of 37.51% beat Seraphim Space Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seraphim Space Investment Trust1,940.84% 20.81% N/A
BlackRock Latin American 95.32%37.51%19.32%

Seraphim Space Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than BlackRock Latin American. BlackRock Latin American is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seraphim Space Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seraphim Space Investment Trust£99.56M3.85£6.88M£41.263.92
BlackRock Latin American£63.00M1.46-£30.52M£209.451.98

Summary

Seraphim Space Investment Trust beats BlackRock Latin American on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BlackRock Latin American compare to CT Private Equity Trust?

BlackRock Latin American (LON:BRLA) and CT Private Equity Trust (LON:CTPE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

BlackRock Latin American pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. CT Private Equity Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 28.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. BlackRock Latin American pays out 11.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Private Equity Trust pays out 81.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. BlackRock Latin American is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

4.9% of BlackRock Latin American shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.8% of CT Private Equity Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of BlackRock Latin American shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Private Equity Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, BlackRock Latin American's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Private Equity Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Latin American Neutral
CT Private Equity Trust Neutral

CT Private Equity Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BlackRock Latin American. BlackRock Latin American is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Private Equity Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Latin American£63.00M1.46-£30.52M£209.451.98
CT Private Equity Trust£25.83M13.98£5.40M£34.3114.72

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BlackRock Latin American
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CT Private Equity Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

BlackRock Latin American has a beta of 0.652, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Private Equity Trust has a beta of 0.95239913, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Latin American has a net margin of 95.32% compared to CT Private Equity Trust's net margin of 65.42%. BlackRock Latin American's return on equity of 37.51% beat CT Private Equity Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Latin American95.32% 37.51% 19.32%
CT Private Equity Trust 65.42%4.94%1.91%

Summary

BlackRock Latin American beats CT Private Equity Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BlackRock Latin American compare to Chrysalis Investments?

BlackRock Latin American (LON:BRLA) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

4.9% of BlackRock Latin American shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of BlackRock Latin American shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BlackRock Latin American
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 1 more articles in the media than BlackRock Latin American. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for BlackRock Latin American. BlackRock Latin American's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chrysalis Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Latin American Neutral
Chrysalis Investments Neutral

BlackRock Latin American has a beta of 0.652, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3326553, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to BlackRock Latin American's net margin of 95.32%. BlackRock Latin American's return on equity of 37.51% beat Chrysalis Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Latin American95.32% 37.51% 19.32%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%15.84%N/A

Chrysalis Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BlackRock Latin American. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Latin American, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Latin American£63.00M1.46-£30.52M£209.451.98
Chrysalis Investments-£112.98M-3.14£97.18M-£24.85N/A

Summary

BlackRock Latin American and Chrysalis Investments tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get BlackRock Latin American News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BRLA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BRLA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BRLA vs. The Competition

MetricBlackRock Latin AmericanCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£91.67M£5.51B£13.96B£2.83B
Dividend Yield5.34%7.51%5.96%6.15%
P/E Ratio1.9836.8728.79368.41
Price / Sales1.461,120.25464.7383,654.70
Price / Cash1,865.0048.0429.9527.89
Price / Book0.853.723.717.06
Net Income-£30.52M£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.72%0.63%0.83%0.21%
1 Month Performance-3.04%-0.63%0.83%0.22%
1 Year Performance18.23%6.33%13.80%64.12%

BlackRock Latin American Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BRLA
BlackRock Latin American
N/AGBX 415
-2.1%
N/A+20.8%£91.67M£63.00M1.98N/A
CCJI
CC Japan Income & Growth
N/AGBX 268
+1.1%
N/A+31.8%£361.08M£107.73M3.44N/A
EAT
European Assets Trust
N/AGBX 99.88
flat
N/AN/A£359.63M£25.97M14.86N/A
SSIT
Seraphim Space Investment Trust
N/AGBX 151.40
+0.8%
N/A+79.8%£359.12M£99.56M3.67N/A
CTPE
CT Private Equity Trust
N/AGBX 500
flat
N/A+0.8%£357.52M£25.83M14.57N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BRLA) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners