Free Trial

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (CMPG) Competitors

GBX 320.30 -2.70 (-0.84%)
As of 07:44 AM Eastern

CMPG vs. JFJ, TMPL, IHP, SDP, and VEIL

Should you buy CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth include JPMorgan Japanese (JFJ), Temple Bar (TMPL), IntegraFin (IHP), Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (SDP), and Vietnam Enterprise (VEIL). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to JPMorgan Japanese?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) and JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

JPMorgan Japanese has a net margin of 96.52% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthN/A N/A N/A
JPMorgan Japanese 96.52%20.00%8.06%

JPMorgan Japanese has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. JPMorgan Japanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.45N/A£17.1518.68
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M4.84£194.81M£149.065.19

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Japanese'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan Japanese beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Temple Bar?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) and Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Temple Bar shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Temple Bar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral
Temple Bar Neutral

Temple Bar has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Temple Bar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.45N/A£17.1518.68
Temple Bar£281.60M4.34£154.90M£97.004.16

Temple Bar has a net margin of 82.15% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthN/A N/A N/A
Temple Bar 82.15%27.93%7.08%

Summary

Temple Bar beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to IntegraFin?

IntegraFin (LON:IHP) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

IntegraFin has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IntegraFin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IntegraFin£165.40M7.15£52.54M£19.1018.74
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.45N/A£17.1518.68

In the previous week, IntegraFin's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
IntegraFin Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral

43.3% of IntegraFin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 14.5% of IntegraFin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

IntegraFin has a net margin of 28.60% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. IntegraFin's return on equity of 27.60% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IntegraFin28.60% 27.60% 20.29%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth N/A N/A N/A

IntegraFin presently has a consensus price target of GBX 423, indicating a potential upside of 18.16%. Given IntegraFin's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe IntegraFin is more favorable than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IntegraFin
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

IntegraFin beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (LON:SDP) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund£191.10M5.57£121.21M£135.646.21
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.45N/A£17.1518.68

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a net margin of 95.12% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's return on equity of 20.01% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund95.12% 20.01% -1.73%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

17.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Vietnam Enterprise?

Vietnam Enterprise (LON:VEIL) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Vietnam Enterprise had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Vietnam Enterprise and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Vietnam Enterprise's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vietnam Enterprise Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vietnam Enterprise. CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vietnam Enterprise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vietnam Enterprise£81.16M12.75-£4.24M£40.0018.83
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.45N/A£17.1518.68

Vietnam Enterprise has a net margin of 67.17% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Vietnam Enterprise's return on equity of 4.38% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vietnam Enterprise67.17% 4.38% -7.53%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth N/A N/A N/A

37.0% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Vietnam Enterprise beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMPG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMPG vs. The Competition

MetricCT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£303.84M£2.45B£5.89B£2.49B
Dividend YieldN/A6.03%5.28%6.13%
P/E Ratio18.6825.7816.36366.76
Price / Sales14.452,075.011,103.1586,680.88
Price / CashN/A60.3388.9827.87
Price / BookN/A1.376.577.84
Net IncomeN/A£265.36M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.82%0.34%1.10%-0.05%
1 Month Performance4.67%0.40%1.61%2.05%
1 Year Performance21.94%10.07%19.49%75.16%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMPG
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth
N/AGBX 320.30
-0.8%
N/A+21.0%£303.84M£21.03M18.68N/A
JFJ
JPMorgan Japanese
N/AGBX 786
-1.3%
N/A+21.2%£1.21B£245.55M5.27N/A
TMPL
Temple Bar
N/AGBX 391.50
-1.0%
N/A+24.9%£1.19B£281.60M4.04N/A
IHP
IntegraFin
N/AGBX 348
-1.0%
GBX 423
+21.6%
+7.3%£1.15B£165.40M18.223,520
SDP
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund
N/AGBX 838
-3.2%
N/A+49.7%£1.06B£191.10M6.18N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CMPG) was last updated on 6/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners