Go Pro
→ Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft just committed $700 billion (From True Market Insiders) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMPG Stock Alerts

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (CMPG) Competitors

GBX 322.80 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:32 PM Eastern
Compare

CMPG vs. TMPL, IHP, FCSS, TFG, and SDP

Should you buy CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth include Temple Bar (TMPL), IntegraFin (IHP), Fidelity China Special (FCSS), Tetragon Financial (TFG), and Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (SDP). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Temple Bar?

Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Temple Bar has a net margin of 82.15% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Temple Bar82.15% 27.93% 7.08%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth N/A N/A N/A

10.7% of Temple Bar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Temple Bar had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Temple Bar and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Temple Bar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Temple Bar Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral

Temple Bar has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Temple Bar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Temple Bar£281.60M4.28£154.90M£97.004.10
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.56N/A£17.1518.82

Summary

Temple Bar beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to IntegraFin?

IntegraFin (LON:IHP) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

IntegraFin currently has a consensus price target of GBX 423, suggesting a potential upside of 9.87%. Given IntegraFin's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe IntegraFin is more favorable than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IntegraFin
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

IntegraFin has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IntegraFin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IntegraFin£165.40M7.69£52.54M£19.1020.16
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.56N/A£17.1518.82

IntegraFin has a net margin of 28.60% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. IntegraFin's return on equity of 27.60% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IntegraFin28.60% 27.60% 20.29%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth N/A N/A N/A

43.3% of IntegraFin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 14.5% of IntegraFin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, IntegraFin had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for IntegraFin and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. IntegraFin's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that IntegraFin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
IntegraFin Positive
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral

Summary

IntegraFin beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Fidelity China Special?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) and Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fidelity China Special had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity China Special and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral
Fidelity China Special Positive

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.56N/A£17.1518.82
Fidelity China Special£146.54M8.01£997.06M£29.758.61

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 9.12% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthN/A N/A N/A
Fidelity China Special 81.41%9.12%N/A

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Tetragon Financial?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) and Tetragon Financial (LON:TFG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Tetragon Financial has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Tetragon Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.56N/A£17.1518.82
Tetragon Financial£751.20M0.01£12.66B£759.000.02

Tetragon Financial has a net margin of 71.13% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Tetragon Financial's return on equity of 29.65% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthN/A N/A N/A
Tetragon Financial 71.13%29.65%3.14%

0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Tetragon Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Tetragon Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Tetragon Financial had 2 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Tetragon Financial and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tetragon Financial's score of -0.23 indicating that CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral
Tetragon Financial Neutral

Summary

Tetragon Financial beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) and Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (LON:SDP) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.56N/A£17.1518.82
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund£191.10M5.66£121.21M£135.646.30

In the previous week, Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund Positive

0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a net margin of 95.12% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's return on equity of 20.01% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthN/A N/A N/A
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund 95.12%20.01%-1.73%

Summary

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMPG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMPG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMPG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£306.21M£2.45B£6.20B£2.83B
Dividend YieldN/A5.99%5.22%6.15%
P/E Ratio18.8260.9529.50369.52
Price / Sales14.561,796.621,755.9386,119.00
Price / CashN/A60.3388.7427.87
Price / BookN/A1.416.707.84
Net IncomeN/A£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.69%0.82%0.82%0.86%
1 Month Performance-0.04%1.06%1.94%-0.47%
1 Year Performance20.90%24.40%25.35%70.60%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMPG
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth
N/AGBX 322.80
flat		N/A+20.9%£306.21M£21.03M18.82N/A
TMPL
Temple Bar
N/AGBX 393
flat		N/A+21.2%£1.19B£281.60M4.05N/A
IHP
IntegraFin
3.9391 of 5 stars		GBX 352
-0.4%		GBX 423
+20.2%		+22.0%£1.16B£165.40M18.433,520
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 247
+0.8%		N/A+1.0%£1.13B£559.02M2.19N/A
TFG
Tetragon Financial
N/AGBX 12.81
-1.5%		N/A-18.7%£1.09B£751.20M0.02N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CMPG) was last updated on 7/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Three companies about to leapfrog Nvidia [And transform the entire industry]
The government just committed $200 billion to building computer chips on American soil - one of the largest te...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Sell Tesla, Buy the New King of FSD Cars
In 2023, Marc Chaikin's system flagged an automotive stock as bearish - and it fell 35% shortly after. Today, ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft just committed $700 billion
Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft have committed $700 billion this year alone to AI infrastructure - more th...
True Market Insiders | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Warsh Fed and what it could mean for your savings
The Fed just changed hands, and Reagan Gold Group says there may be a short window before the impact shows up ...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
“By July 30, Elon Musk’s Prophecy Will Fulfill Itself”
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin - the duo who identified Nvidia a decade ago - are forecasting that Elon Musk's AI...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
$2 an acre. They paid $412.
Government land listed at $2 an acre sold for $412 - 206 times asking price. Demand got so intense the feds do...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel