Go Pro
→ ALT SL: New Patent Reveals Elon Musk’s Next Breakthrough: M.A.G.I. (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMPG Stock Alerts

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (CMPG) Competitors

GBX 318.40 -1.60 (-0.50%)
As of 10:00 AM Eastern
Compare

CMPG vs. TMPL, JFJ, FCSS, GSS, and EDIN

Should you buy CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth include Temple Bar (TMPL), JPMorgan Japanese (JFJ), Fidelity China Special (FCSS), Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS), and Edinburgh Investment (EDIN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Temple Bar?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) and Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Temple Bar had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Temple Bar and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Temple Bar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral
Temple Bar Neutral

0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Temple Bar shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Temple Bar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Temple Bar has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Temple Bar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.40N/A£17.1518.57
Temple Bar£281.60M4.48£154.90M£97.004.29

Temple Bar has a net margin of 82.15% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Temple Bar's return on equity of 27.93% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthN/A N/A N/A
Temple Bar 82.15%27.93%7.08%

Summary

Temple Bar beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to JPMorgan Japanese?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) and JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan Japanese has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. JPMorgan Japanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.40N/A£17.1518.57
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M4.80£194.81M£149.065.21

JPMorgan Japanese has a net margin of 96.52% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity of 20.00% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthN/A N/A N/A
JPMorgan Japanese 96.52%20.00%8.06%

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Japanese'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan Japanese beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Fidelity China Special?

Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity China Special Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity China Special£146.54M8.00£997.06M£29.758.64
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.40N/A£17.1518.57

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 9.12% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity China Special81.41% 9.12% N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.40N/A£17.1518.57

0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Emerging Markets FundN/A N/A N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth N/A N/A N/A

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth compare to Edinburgh Investment?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) and Edinburgh Investment (LON:EDIN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Edinburgh Investment has a net margin of 89.72% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Edinburgh Investment's return on equity of 7.03% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthN/A N/A N/A
Edinburgh Investment 89.72%7.03%6.69%

In the previous week, Edinburgh Investment had 3 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Edinburgh Investment and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Edinburgh Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that Edinburgh Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Neutral
Edinburgh Investment Very Positive

Edinburgh Investment has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Edinburgh Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth£21.03M14.40N/A£17.1518.57
Edinburgh Investment£79.43M13.48£180.50M£55.9115.11

0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of Edinburgh Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Edinburgh Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Edinburgh Investment beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMPG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMPG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMPG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCT Global Managed Portfolio GrowthAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£302.83M£2.40B£6.14B£2.82B
Dividend YieldN/A6.06%5.27%6.15%
P/E Ratio18.5760.8229.16367.99
Price / Sales14.401,802.541,705.3083,997.84
Price / CashN/A60.5088.7327.89
Price / BookN/A1.306.677.31
Net IncomeN/A£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.81%-0.86%-0.62%0.30%
1 Month Performance-1.79%-0.80%-0.29%0.31%
1 Year Performance17.08%6.06%12.97%67.61%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMPG
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth
N/AGBX 318.40
-0.5%		N/A+17.7%£302.83M£21.03M18.57N/A
TMPL
Temple Bar
N/AGBX 398.54
-1.0%		N/A+19.5%£1.21B£281.60M4.11N/A
JFJ
JPMorgan Japanese
N/AGBX 782
-3.0%		N/A+23.2%£1.19B£245.55M5.25N/A
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 251
-3.5%		N/A-7.3%£1.14B£146.54M8.44N/A
GSS
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.06B£250.40M6.181,626

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CMPG) was last updated on 7/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX pays a 10X launch penalty
SpaceX burns roughly $200,000 in fuel per Falcon 9 launch - about $20 million across 100 missions. One unde...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
A 50-year dollar arrangement just ended - what it means for you
In 1974, Henry Kissinger helped create the U.S.-Saudi Arabia Joint Commission on Economic Cooperation - a litt...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
How the JPMorgan $8,000 Gold Call Exposed the Biggest Mistake in Most Retirement Accounts
JPMorgan has raised its 2026 gold forecast to $6,300, with a credible path to $8,000, and now calls gold a cor...
Golden Crest Metals | Sponsoredtc pixel
This tiny piece of glass could be bigger than GPUs
Jensen Huang says AI can't scale without it. Google Ventures calls it the future of AI compute. Sequoia Capita...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
What Elon told his top shareholders in Texas
Late last year, Elon Musk gathered top shareholders at Tesla's Texas Gigafactory to unveil a plan to double Am...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel