Capita (CPI) Competitors

Capita logo
GBX 319.50 +3.00 (+0.95%)
As of 06/19/2026 12:14 PM Eastern

CPI vs. JSG, RWS, DWF, RST, and FRAN

Should you buy Capita stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Capita with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Capita include Johnson Service Group (JSG), RWS (RWS), DWF Group (DWF), Restore (RST), and Franchise Brands (FRAN). These companies are all part of the "specialty business services" industry.

How does Capita compare to Johnson Service Group?

Johnson Service Group (LON:JSG) and Capita (LON:CPI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Johnson Service Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capita. Capita is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Johnson Service Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Johnson Service Group£535.40M1.09£31.14M£9.2016.84
Capita£2.31B0.17-£40.73M-£144.13N/A

In the previous week, Capita had 3 more articles in the media than Johnson Service Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Capita and 0 mentions for Johnson Service Group. Capita's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Johnson Service Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Capita is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Johnson Service Group Neutral
Capita Neutral

40.0% of Johnson Service Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.9% of Capita shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Johnson Service Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Capita shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Johnson Service Group has a net margin of 6.93% compared to Capita's net margin of -7.45%. Johnson Service Group's return on equity of 13.04% beat Capita's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Johnson Service Group6.93% 13.04% 6.40%
Capita -7.45%-142.88%1.57%

Johnson Service Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 178.33, indicating a potential upside of 15.13%. Capita has a consensus target price of GBX 464.20, indicating a potential upside of 45.29%. Given Capita's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capita is more favorable than Johnson Service Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Johnson Service Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Capita
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Johnson Service Group has a beta of 1.037, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capita has a beta of 0.898, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Johnson Service Group beats Capita on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capita compare to RWS?

Capita (LON:CPI) and RWS (LON:RWS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

26.9% of Capita shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.5% of RWS shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Capita shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of RWS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Capita had 2 more articles in the media than RWS. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Capita and 1 mentions for RWS. RWS's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Capita's score of 0.29 indicating that RWS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capita
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
RWS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Capita presently has a consensus target price of GBX 464.20, indicating a potential upside of 45.29%. RWS has a consensus target price of GBX 172.50, indicating a potential upside of 126.68%. Given RWS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe RWS is more favorable than Capita.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capita
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
RWS
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

RWS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capita. RWS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capita, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capita£2.31B0.17-£40.73M-£144.13N/A
RWS£706.10M0.40-£36.98M-£27.00N/A

Capita has a beta of 0.898, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RWS has a beta of 0.535, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Capita has a net margin of -7.45% compared to RWS's net margin of -13.60%. RWS's return on equity of -12.70% beat Capita's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capita-7.45% -142.88% 1.57%
RWS -13.60%-12.70%3.42%

Summary

RWS beats Capita on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capita compare to DWF Group?

DWF Group (LON:DWF) and Capita (LON:CPI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Capita had 3 more articles in the media than DWF Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Capita and 0 mentions for DWF Group. Capita's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat DWF Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Capita is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
DWF Group Neutral
Capita Neutral

DWF Group has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capita has a beta of 0.898, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

DWF Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capita. Capita is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DWF Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DWF Group£451.64M0.00£12.45M£0.04N/A
Capita£2.31B0.17-£40.73M-£144.13N/A

36.2% of DWF Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.9% of Capita shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.9% of DWF Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Capita shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

DWF Group has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Capita's net margin of -7.45%. DWF Group's return on equity of 19.89% beat Capita's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DWF Group2.76% 19.89% 5.74%
Capita -7.45%-142.88%1.57%

Capita has a consensus target price of GBX 464.20, suggesting a potential upside of 45.29%. Given Capita's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capita is more favorable than DWF Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DWF Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Capita
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

DWF Group beats Capita on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capita compare to Restore?

Capita (LON:CPI) and Restore (LON:RST) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

In the previous week, Capita had 1 more articles in the media than Restore. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Capita and 2 mentions for Restore. Restore's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Capita's score of 0.29 indicating that Restore is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capita
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Restore
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

26.9% of Capita shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.2% of Restore shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Capita shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of Restore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capita has a beta of 0.898, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restore has a beta of 0.122, indicating that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Capita presently has a consensus price target of GBX 464.20, suggesting a potential upside of 45.29%. Restore has a consensus price target of GBX 367.33, suggesting a potential upside of 39.67%. Given Capita's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Capita is more favorable than Restore.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capita
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Restore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Restore has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capita. Restore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capita, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capita£2.31B0.17-£40.73M-£144.13N/A
Restore£304.70M1.15£3.74M-£4.70N/A

Restore has a net margin of 0.43% compared to Capita's net margin of -7.45%. Restore's return on equity of 0.58% beat Capita's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capita-7.45% -142.88% 1.57%
Restore 0.43%0.58%3.37%

Summary

Restore beats Capita on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capita compare to Franchise Brands?

Franchise Brands (LON:FRAN) and Capita (LON:CPI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

18.9% of Franchise Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.9% of Capita shares are held by institutional investors. 32.0% of Franchise Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Capita shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Franchise Brands currently has a consensus target price of GBX 197.50, suggesting a potential upside of 37.27%. Capita has a consensus target price of GBX 464.20, suggesting a potential upside of 45.29%. Given Capita's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capita is more favorable than Franchise Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franchise Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Capita
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Franchise Brands has a net margin of 6.32% compared to Capita's net margin of -7.45%. Franchise Brands' return on equity of 4.06% beat Capita's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franchise Brands6.32% 4.06% 3.24%
Capita -7.45%-142.88%1.57%

Franchise Brands has a beta of 0.472, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capita has a beta of 0.898, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Franchise Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Capita. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Franchise Brands and 3 mentions for Capita. Franchise Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Capita's score of 0.29 indicating that Franchise Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Franchise Brands
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Capita
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Franchise Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capita. Capita is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franchise Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franchise Brands£142.15M1.94£7.75M£4.6431.01
Capita£2.31B0.17-£40.73M-£144.13N/A

Summary

Franchise Brands beats Capita on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capita News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CPI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CPI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CPI vs. The Competition

MetricCapitaSpecialty Business Services IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£382.70M£4.99B£9.64B£2.88B
Dividend Yield6.80%4.83%3.55%6.15%
P/E Ratio-2.2228.2425.92366.85
Price / Sales0.1793.904,969.0386,443.43
Price / Cash1.0740.5427.9927.85
Price / Book31.657.274.698.01
Net Income-£40.73M£144.67M£792.17M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-8.45%-0.82%1.53%0.08%
1 Month Performance-13.43%-2.26%1.80%1.15%
1 Year Performance14.31%0.41%26.36%72.12%

Capita Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CPI
Capita
4.6064 of 5 stars
GBX 319.50
+0.9%
GBX 464.20
+45.3%
+14.5%£382.70M£2.31BN/A43,000
JSG
Johnson Service Group
N/AGBX 152.20
+1.7%
GBX 178.33
+17.2%
+9.1%£575.30M£535.40M16.546,165
RWS
RWS
3.3134 of 5 stars
GBX 101.60
-1.4%
GBX 172.50
+69.8%
-14.9%£377.09M£690.10MN/A7,040
DWF
DWF Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£340.61M£451.64M2,490.004,340
RST
Restore
3.6941 of 5 stars
GBX 252.55
-0.2%
GBX 367.33
+45.4%
-0.7%£337.48M£304.70MN/A2,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CPI) was last updated on 6/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners