Do analysts prefer INPP or CRE?

Conduit has a consensus price target of GBX 545.50, indicating a potential upside of 22.04%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Conduit is more favorable than International Public Partnerships. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score International Public Partnerships 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Does the media refer more to INPP or CRE?

In the previous week, Conduit had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Conduit and 1 mentions for International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Conduit's score of -0.09 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment International Public Partnerships 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Conduit 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend HICL or CRE?

Conduit has a consensus price target of GBX 545.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.04%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score HICL Infrastructure 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, HICL or CRE?

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HICL Infrastructure £277.40M 9.31 £101.36M £13.80 10.05 Conduit £797.80M 0.78 £267.22M £135.00 3.31

Does the media refer more to HICL or CRE?

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 3 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 2 mentions for Conduit. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Conduit's score of -0.09 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HICL Infrastructure 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Conduit 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, CRE or TCAP?

Conduit has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TP ICAP Group. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TP ICAP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Conduit £797.80M 0.78 £267.22M £135.00 3.31 TP ICAP Group £2.35B 1.01 £97.91M £24.20 13.54

Is CRE or TCAP more profitable?

Conduit has a net margin of 20.91% compared to TP ICAP Group's net margin of 7.69%. Conduit's return on equity of 18.89% beat TP ICAP Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Conduit 20.91% 18.89% 8.83% TP ICAP Group 7.69% 9.39% 1.61%

Does the media prefer CRE or TCAP?

In the previous week, TP ICAP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for TP ICAP Group and 2 mentions for Conduit. TP ICAP Group's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Conduit's score of -0.09 indicating that TP ICAP Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Conduit 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TP ICAP Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate MNKS or CRE?

Conduit has a consensus target price of GBX 545.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.04%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than Monks. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Monks 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MNKS or CRE?

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Conduit. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Monks £635.93M 3.91 £589.71M £368.55 4.38 Conduit £797.80M 0.78 £267.22M £135.00 3.31

Is MNKS or CRE more profitable?

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Conduit's net margin of 20.91%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Conduit's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Monks 96.74% 24.22% 9.21% Conduit 20.91% 18.89% 8.83%

Does the media refer more to MNKS or CRE?

In the previous week, Monks had 7 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Monks and 2 mentions for Conduit. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Conduit's score of -0.09 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Monks 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Conduit 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CRE or OMU?

Conduit presently has a consensus target price of GBX 545.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.04%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than Old Mutual. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Old Mutual 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CRE or OMU?

Old Mutual has higher revenue and earnings than Conduit. Old Mutual is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Conduit £797.80M 0.78 £267.22M £135.00 3.31 Old Mutual £273.62B 0.01 £60.20B £189.80 0.31

Is CRE or OMU more profitable?

Conduit has a net margin of 20.91% compared to Old Mutual's net margin of 3.40%. Conduit's return on equity of 18.89% beat Old Mutual's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Conduit 20.91% 18.89% 8.83% Old Mutual 3.40% 13.89% 0.84%

Conduit (CRE) Competitors

GBX 447 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 08/6/2026 12:03 PM Eastern

Compare

CRE vs. INPP, HICL, TCAP, MNKS, and OMU

Should you buy Conduit stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Conduit with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Conduit include International Public Partnerships (INPP), HICL Infrastructure (HICL), TP ICAP Group (TCAP), Monks (MNKS), and Old Mutual (OMU).

How does Conduit compare to International Public Partnerships?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Conduit (LON:CRE) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Conduit's net margin of 20.91%. Conduit's return on equity of 18.89% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships	97.32%	9.61%	0.63%
Conduit	20.91%	18.89%	8.83%

Conduit has a consensus price target of GBX 545.50, indicating a potential upside of 22.04%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Conduit is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
International Public Partnerships	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships	£267.76M	9.64	£43.53M	£14.28	10.10
Conduit	£797.80M	0.78	£267.22M	£135.00	3.31

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Conduit shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduit has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Conduit had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Conduit and 1 mentions for International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Conduit's score of -0.09 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Conduit	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 34.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conduit pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conduit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Conduit beats International Public Partnerships on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to HICL Infrastructure?

HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) and Conduit (LON:CRE) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

28.0% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Conduit shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

HICL Infrastructure has a net margin of 88.60% compared to Conduit's net margin of 20.91%. Conduit's return on equity of 18.89% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HICL Infrastructure	88.60%	8.82%	0.58%
Conduit	20.91%	18.89%	8.83%

Conduit has a consensus price target of GBX 545.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.04%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HICL Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HICL Infrastructure	£277.40M	9.31	£101.36M	£13.80	10.05
Conduit	£797.80M	0.78	£267.22M	£135.00	3.31

HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 34.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conduit pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conduit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.504, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduit has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 3 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 2 mentions for Conduit. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Conduit's score of -0.09 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HICL Infrastructure	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Conduit	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Conduit beats HICL Infrastructure on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to TP ICAP Group?

Conduit (LON:CRE) and TP ICAP Group (LON:TCAP) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, TP ICAP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for TP ICAP Group and 2 mentions for Conduit. TP ICAP Group's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Conduit's score of -0.09 indicating that TP ICAP Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Conduit	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TP ICAP Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 34.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. TP ICAP Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Conduit pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TP ICAP Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conduit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Conduit has a net margin of 20.91% compared to TP ICAP Group's net margin of 7.69%. Conduit's return on equity of 18.89% beat TP ICAP Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Conduit	20.91%	18.89%	8.83%
TP ICAP Group	7.69%	9.39%	1.61%

47.5% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of TP ICAP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Conduit shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of TP ICAP Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Conduit has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TP ICAP Group. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TP ICAP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Conduit	£797.80M	0.78	£267.22M	£135.00	3.31
TP ICAP Group	£2.35B	1.01	£97.91M	£24.20	13.54

Conduit has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TP ICAP Group has a beta of 0.356, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Conduit presently has a consensus price target of GBX 545.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.04%. TP ICAP Group has a consensus price target of GBX 362.33, suggesting a potential upside of 10.60%. Given Conduit's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Conduit is more favorable than TP ICAP Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
TP ICAP Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Conduit beats TP ICAP Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to Monks?

Monks (LON:MNKS) and Conduit (LON:CRE) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Monks had 7 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Monks and 2 mentions for Conduit. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Conduit's score of -0.09 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Monks	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Conduit	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Conduit has a consensus target price of GBX 545.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.04%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than Monks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Monks	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Monks has a beta of 0.944, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduit has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Conduit's net margin of 20.91%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Conduit's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%
Conduit	20.91%	18.89%	8.83%

Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 34.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conduit pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Conduit. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Monks	£635.93M	3.91	£589.71M	£368.55	4.38
Conduit	£797.80M	0.78	£267.22M	£135.00	3.31

10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Conduit shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Conduit shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Monks beats Conduit on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to Old Mutual?

Conduit (LON:CRE) and Old Mutual (LON:OMU) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Conduit has a net margin of 20.91% compared to Old Mutual's net margin of 3.40%. Conduit's return on equity of 18.89% beat Old Mutual's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Conduit	20.91%	18.89%	8.83%
Old Mutual	3.40%	13.89%	0.84%

Conduit presently has a consensus target price of GBX 545.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.04%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than Old Mutual.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Old Mutual	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

47.5% of Conduit shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.5% of Old Mutual shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Conduit shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Old Mutual shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Old Mutual has higher revenue and earnings than Conduit. Old Mutual is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Conduit	£797.80M	0.78	£267.22M	£135.00	3.31
Old Mutual	£273.62B	0.01	£60.20B	£189.80	0.31

In the previous week, Conduit had 2 more articles in the media than Old Mutual. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Conduit and 0 mentions for Old Mutual. Old Mutual's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Conduit's score of -0.09 indicating that Old Mutual is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Conduit	Neutral
Old Mutual	Positive

Conduit has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Old Mutual has a beta of 0.611, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 34.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Old Mutual pays an annual dividend of GBX 90.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 155.0%. Conduit pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Old Mutual pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Conduit beats Old Mutual on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Conduit News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CRE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Conduit	Insurance Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£625.99M	£19.68B	£14.07B	£2.87B
Dividend Yield	5.88%	3.27%	5.91%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	3.31	16.20	29.30	369.09
Price / Sales	0.78	21.47	509.72	83,955.92
Price / Cash	6.59	12.76	39.25	27.89
Price / Book	0.67	9.90	3.73	7.07
Net Income	£267.22M	£1.80B	£1.31B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	3.11%	1.56%	1.16%	1.51%
1 Month Performance	6.18%	1.67%	0.92%	1.18%
1 Year Performance	43.73%	13.24%	13.24%	74.23%

Conduit Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CRE Conduit	3.9503 of 5 stars	GBX 447 flat	GBX 545.50 +22.0%	+45.1%	£625.99M	£797.80M	3.31	59
INPP International Public Partnerships	N/A	GBX 142.75 +0.8%	N/A	+17.2%	£2.56B	£267.76M	10.00	N/A
HICL HICL Infrastructure	1.679 of 5 stars	GBX 135.81 -0.1%	N/A	+14.9%	£2.54B	£277.40M	9.84	N/A
TCAP TP ICAP Group	3.4813 of 5 stars	GBX 345.33 +0.6%	GBX 365.25 +5.8%	+16.2%	£2.52B	£2.35B	14.27	5,208	News Coverage Positive News
MNKS Monks	N/A	GBX 1,566 -1.0%	N/A	+18.5%	£2.41B	£635.93M	4.25	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CRE) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Conduit (CRE) Competitors

CRE vs. INPP, HICL, TCAP, MNKS, and OMU

How does Conduit compare to International Public Partnerships?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to HICL Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to TP ICAP Group?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to Monks?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to Old Mutual?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRE vs. The Competition

Conduit Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Conduit (CRE) Competitors

CRE vs. INPP, HICL, TCAP, MNKS, and OMU

How does Conduit compare to International Public Partnerships?

Is INPP or CRE more profitable?

Do analysts prefer INPP or CRE?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, INPP or CRE?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of INPP or CRE?

Which has more volatility & risk, INPP or CRE?

Does the media refer more to INPP or CRE?

Is INPP or CRE a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to HICL Infrastructure?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in HICL or CRE?

Is HICL or CRE more profitable?

Do analysts recommend HICL or CRE?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, HICL or CRE?

Is HICL or CRE a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, HICL or CRE?

Does the media refer more to HICL or CRE?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to TP ICAP Group?

Does the media prefer CRE or TCAP?

Is CRE or TCAP a better dividend stock?

Is CRE or TCAP more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CRE or TCAP?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CRE or TCAP?

Which has more volatility and risk, CRE or TCAP?

Do analysts recommend CRE or TCAP?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to Monks?

Does the media refer more to MNKS or CRE?

Do analysts rate MNKS or CRE?

Which has more volatility and risk, MNKS or CRE?

Is MNKS or CRE more profitable?

Is MNKS or CRE a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MNKS or CRE?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MNKS or CRE?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to Old Mutual?

Is CRE or OMU more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CRE or OMU?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CRE or OMU?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CRE or OMU?

Does the media favor CRE or OMU?

Which has more volatility & risk, CRE or OMU?

Is CRE or OMU a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRE vs. The Competition

Conduit Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools