Do analysts recommend HICL or CRE?

Conduit has a consensus target price of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score HICL Infrastructure 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HICL or CRE?

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HICL Infrastructure £277.40M 9.08 £101.36M £13.80 9.77 Conduit £836.30M 0.77 £267.22M £74.00 5.93

Does the media favor HICL or CRE?

In the previous week, Conduit had 1 more articles in the media than HICL Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conduit and 3 mentions for HICL Infrastructure. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Conduit's score of 0.48 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HICL Infrastructure 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Conduit 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend INPP or CRE?

Conduit has a consensus target price of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Conduit is more favorable than International Public Partnerships. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score International Public Partnerships 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Does the media prefer INPP or CRE?

In the previous week, Conduit had 3 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conduit and 1 mentions for International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Conduit's score of 0.48 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment International Public Partnerships 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Conduit 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer MNKS or CRE?

Conduit has a consensus price target of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Conduit is more favorable than Monks. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Monks 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MNKS or CRE?

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Conduit. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Monks £635.93M 3.86 £589.71M £368.55 4.32 Conduit £836.30M 0.77 £267.22M £74.00 5.93

Is MNKS or CRE more profitable?

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Conduit's net margin of 12.89%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Conduit's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Monks 96.74% 24.22% 9.21% Conduit 12.89% 11.14% 8.83%

Does the media prefer MNKS or CRE?

In the previous week, Monks had 6 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Monks and 4 mentions for Conduit. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Conduit's score of 0.48 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Monks 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Conduit 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CRE or OMU?

Conduit presently has a consensus target price of GBX 536.50, indicating a potential upside of 22.35%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than Old Mutual. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Old Mutual 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CRE or OMU?

Old Mutual has higher revenue and earnings than Conduit. Old Mutual is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Conduit £836.30M 0.77 £267.22M £74.00 5.93 Old Mutual £273.62B 0.01 £60.20B £189.80 0.32

Is CRE or OMU more profitable?

Conduit has a net margin of 12.89% compared to Old Mutual's net margin of 3.40%. Old Mutual's return on equity of 13.89% beat Conduit's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Conduit 12.89% 11.14% 8.83% Old Mutual 3.40% 13.89% 0.84%

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AJB or CRE?

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than AJ Bell. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AJ Bell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio AJ Bell £347.57M 6.86 £81.11M £30.33 19.90 Conduit £836.30M 0.77 £267.22M £74.00 5.93

Is AJB or CRE more profitable?

AJ Bell has a net margin of 35.42% compared to Conduit's net margin of 12.89%. AJ Bell's return on equity of 57.35% beat Conduit's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets AJ Bell 35.42% 57.35% 36.07% Conduit 12.89% 11.14% 8.83%

Does the media prefer AJB or CRE?

In the previous week, Conduit had 3 more articles in the media than AJ Bell. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conduit and 1 mentions for AJ Bell. AJ Bell's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Conduit's score of 0.48 indicating that AJ Bell is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment AJ Bell 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Conduit 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Conduit (CRE) Competitors

GBX 438.50 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 11:58 AM Eastern

Compare

CRE vs. HICL, INPP, MNKS, OMU, and AJB

Should you buy Conduit stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Conduit with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Conduit include HICL Infrastructure (HICL), International Public Partnerships (INPP), Monks (MNKS), Old Mutual (OMU), and AJ Bell (AJB). These companies are all part of the "financial services" sector.

How does Conduit compare to HICL Infrastructure?

HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) and Conduit (LON:CRE) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and earnings.

Conduit has a consensus target price of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HICL Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

HICL Infrastructure has a net margin of 88.60% compared to Conduit's net margin of 12.89%. Conduit's return on equity of 11.14% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HICL Infrastructure	88.60%	8.82%	0.58%
Conduit	12.89%	11.14%	8.83%

HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conduit pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conduit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5035652, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduit has a beta of 0.589, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

28.5% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.6% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Conduit shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HICL Infrastructure	£277.40M	9.08	£101.36M	£13.80	9.77
Conduit	£836.30M	0.77	£267.22M	£74.00	5.93

In the previous week, Conduit had 1 more articles in the media than HICL Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conduit and 3 mentions for HICL Infrastructure. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Conduit's score of 0.48 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HICL Infrastructure	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Conduit	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Conduit beats HICL Infrastructure on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to International Public Partnerships?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Conduit (LON:CRE) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.359, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduit has a beta of 0.589, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.6% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Conduit shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conduit pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conduit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Conduit's net margin of 12.89%. Conduit's return on equity of 11.14% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships	97.32%	9.61%	0.63%
Conduit	12.89%	11.14%	8.83%

In the previous week, Conduit had 3 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conduit and 1 mentions for International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Conduit's score of 0.48 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Conduit	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Conduit has a consensus target price of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Conduit is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
International Public Partnerships	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships	£267.76M	9.44	£43.53M	£14.28	9.89
Conduit	£836.30M	0.77	£267.22M	£74.00	5.93

Summary

Conduit beats International Public Partnerships on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to Monks?

Monks (LON:MNKS) and Conduit (LON:CRE) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conduit pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduit has a beta of 0.589, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Conduit's net margin of 12.89%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Conduit's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%
Conduit	12.89%	11.14%	8.83%

In the previous week, Monks had 6 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Monks and 4 mentions for Conduit. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Conduit's score of 0.48 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Monks	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Conduit	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Conduit. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Monks	£635.93M	3.86	£589.71M	£368.55	4.32
Conduit	£836.30M	0.77	£267.22M	£74.00	5.93

Conduit has a consensus price target of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Conduit is more favorable than Monks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Monks	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

10.1% of Monks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.6% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Monks shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Conduit shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Monks beats Conduit on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to Old Mutual?

Conduit (LON:CRE) and Old Mutual (LON:OMU) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Conduit presently has a consensus target price of GBX 536.50, indicating a potential upside of 22.35%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than Old Mutual.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Old Mutual	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Old Mutual has higher revenue and earnings than Conduit. Old Mutual is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Conduit	£836.30M	0.77	£267.22M	£74.00	5.93
Old Mutual	£273.62B	0.01	£60.20B	£189.80	0.32

Conduit has a beta of 0.589, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Old Mutual has a beta of 0.611, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. Old Mutual pays an annual dividend of GBX 90.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 149.4%. Conduit pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Old Mutual pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Mutual is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

43.6% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.5% of Old Mutual shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Conduit shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Old Mutual shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Conduit has a net margin of 12.89% compared to Old Mutual's net margin of 3.40%. Old Mutual's return on equity of 13.89% beat Conduit's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Conduit	12.89%	11.14%	8.83%
Old Mutual	3.40%	13.89%	0.84%

In the previous week, Conduit had 4 more articles in the media than Old Mutual. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conduit and 0 mentions for Old Mutual. Conduit's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Old Mutual's score of 0.00 indicating that Conduit is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Conduit	Neutral
Old Mutual	Neutral

Summary

Conduit beats Old Mutual on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to AJ Bell?

AJ Bell (LON:AJB) and Conduit (LON:CRE) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than AJ Bell. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AJ Bell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AJ Bell	£347.57M	6.86	£81.11M	£30.33	19.90
Conduit	£836.30M	0.77	£267.22M	£74.00	5.93

AJ Bell presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,261.25, suggesting a potential upside of 108.99%. Conduit has a consensus price target of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Given AJ Bell's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AJ Bell is more favorable than Conduit.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AJ Bell	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

AJ Bell pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. AJ Bell pays out 47.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conduit pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

51.4% of AJ Bell shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.6% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. 24.3% of AJ Bell shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Conduit shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Conduit had 3 more articles in the media than AJ Bell. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conduit and 1 mentions for AJ Bell. AJ Bell's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Conduit's score of 0.48 indicating that AJ Bell is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
AJ Bell	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Conduit	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

AJ Bell has a net margin of 35.42% compared to Conduit's net margin of 12.89%. AJ Bell's return on equity of 57.35% beat Conduit's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AJ Bell	35.42%	57.35%	36.07%
Conduit	12.89%	11.14%	8.83%

AJ Bell has a beta of 0.866, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduit has a beta of 0.589, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

AJ Bell beats Conduit on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Conduit News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CRE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Conduit	Insurance Industry	Financial Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£646.76M	£34.48B	£6.14B	£2.77B
Dividend Yield	5.94%	4.74%	5.23%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	5.93	11.12	29.78	368.16
Price / Sales	0.77	39.18	1,181.81	84,554.80
Price / Cash	6.59	5.94	117.40	27.89
Price / Book	0.66	1.28	6.53	7.53
Net Income	£267.22M	£3.01B	£1.13B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	2.48%	1.24%	5.04%	5.85%
1 Month Performance	-3.20%	6.26%	5.43%	4.48%
1 Year Performance	12.01%	-13.14%	14.79%	62.28%

Conduit Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CRE Conduit	3.7711 of 5 stars	GBX 438.50 flat	GBX 536.50 +22.3%	+16.3%	£646.76M	£836.30M	5.93	59	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Gap Down
HICL HICL Infrastructure	1.7629 of 5 stars	GBX 135.40 +0.4%	N/A	+10.4%	£2.53B	£277.40M	9.81	N/A	News Coverage
INPP International Public Partnerships	N/A	GBX 141 +0.9%	N/A	+14.1%	£2.53B	£267.76M	9.87	N/A	Positive News
MNKS Monks	N/A	GBX 1,615.82 -1.0%	N/A	+23.5%	£2.49B	£635.93M	4.38	N/A
OMU Old Mutual	N/A	GBX 60.60 flat	N/A	+25.7%	£2.42B	£273.62B	0.32	29,861

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CRE) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Conduit (CRE) Competitors

CRE vs. HICL, INPP, MNKS, OMU, and AJB

How does Conduit compare to HICL Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to International Public Partnerships?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to Monks?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to Old Mutual?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to AJ Bell?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRE vs. The Competition

Conduit Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Conduit (CRE) Competitors

CRE vs. HICL, INPP, MNKS, OMU, and AJB

How does Conduit compare to HICL Infrastructure?

Do analysts recommend HICL or CRE?

Is HICL or CRE more profitable?

Is HICL or CRE a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, HICL or CRE?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in HICL or CRE?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HICL or CRE?

Does the media favor HICL or CRE?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to International Public Partnerships?

Which has more volatility & risk, INPP or CRE?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in INPP or CRE?

Is INPP or CRE a better dividend stock?

Is INPP or CRE more profitable?

Does the media prefer INPP or CRE?

Do analysts recommend INPP or CRE?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, INPP or CRE?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to Monks?

Is MNKS or CRE a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, MNKS or CRE?

Is MNKS or CRE more profitable?

Does the media prefer MNKS or CRE?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MNKS or CRE?

Do analysts prefer MNKS or CRE?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MNKS or CRE?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to Old Mutual?

Do analysts prefer CRE or OMU?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CRE or OMU?

Which has more volatility and risk, CRE or OMU?

Is CRE or OMU a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CRE or OMU?

Is CRE or OMU more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CRE or OMU?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to AJ Bell?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AJB or CRE?

Do analysts rate AJB or CRE?

Is AJB or CRE a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AJB or CRE?

Does the media prefer AJB or CRE?

Is AJB or CRE more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, AJB or CRE?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRE vs. The Competition

Conduit Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools