Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CRE or QLT?

Conduit has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quilter. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Conduit £836.30M 0.84 £267.22M £74.00 6.39 Quilter £9.34B 0.28 £49.61M £8.60 22.26

Is CRE or QLT more profitable?

Conduit has a net margin of 12.89% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Conduit's return on equity of 11.14% beat Quilter's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Conduit 12.89% 11.14% 8.83% Quilter 1.28% 8.35% 0.21%

Do analysts recommend CRE or MNKS?

Conduit currently has a consensus price target of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.42%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than Monks. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Monks 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CRE or MNKS?

Monks has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Conduit. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Conduit £836.30M 0.84 £267.22M £74.00 6.39 Monks £488.88M 5.16 £589.71M £280.98 5.74

Is CRE or MNKS more profitable?

Monks has a net margin of 95.29% compared to Conduit's net margin of 12.89%. Monks' return on equity of 19.34% beat Conduit's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Conduit 12.89% 11.14% 8.83% Monks 95.29% 19.34% 9.21%

Do analysts recommend CRE or HICL?

Conduit currently has a consensus price target of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.42%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 HICL Infrastructure 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CRE or HICL?

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Conduit £836.30M 0.84 £267.22M £74.00 6.39 HICL Infrastructure £277.40M 9.08 £101.36M £13.80 9.74

Which has better valuation & earnings, TCAP or CRE?

Conduit has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TP ICAP Group. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TP ICAP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TP ICAP Group £2.35B 1.06 £97.91M £24.20 14.05 Conduit £836.30M 0.84 £267.22M £74.00 6.39

Is TCAP or CRE more profitable?

Conduit has a net margin of 12.89% compared to TP ICAP Group's net margin of 7.69%. Conduit's return on equity of 11.14% beat TP ICAP Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TP ICAP Group 7.69% 9.39% 1.61% Conduit 12.89% 11.14% 8.83%

Do analysts recommend INPP or CRE?

Conduit has a consensus price target of GBX 536.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.42%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Conduit is more favorable than International Public Partnerships. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score International Public Partnerships 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Conduit 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Conduit (CRE) Competitors

GBX 473 +6.50 (+1.39%)

As of 12:52 PM Eastern

Compare

CRE vs. QLT, MNKS, HICL, TCAP, and INPP

Should you buy Conduit stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Conduit with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Conduit include Quilter (QLT), Monks (MNKS), HICL Infrastructure (HICL), TP ICAP Group (TCAP), and International Public Partnerships (INPP). These companies are all part of the "financial services" sector.

How does Conduit compare to Quilter?

Conduit (LON:CRE) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Conduit pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conduit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

43.9% of Conduit shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Quilter shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Conduit shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quilter shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Conduit has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quilter. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Conduit	£836.30M	0.84	£267.22M	£74.00	6.39
Quilter	£9.34B	0.28	£49.61M	£8.60	22.26

Conduit currently has a consensus price target of GBX 536.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.42%. Quilter has a consensus price target of GBX 203.71, indicating a potential upside of 6.43%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than Quilter.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Quilter	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

In the previous week, Quilter had 3 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quilter and 0 mentions for Conduit. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Conduit's score of 0.00 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Conduit	Neutral
Quilter	Positive

Conduit has a beta of 0.589, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.823, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Conduit has a net margin of 12.89% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Conduit's return on equity of 11.14% beat Quilter's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Conduit	12.89%	11.14%	8.83%
Quilter	1.28%	8.35%	0.21%

Summary

Conduit beats Quilter on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to Monks?

Conduit (LON:CRE) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

43.9% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Conduit shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Conduit has a beta of 0.589, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.9407833, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Conduit currently has a consensus price target of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.42%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than Monks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Monks	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Monks had 10 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Monks and 0 mentions for Conduit. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Conduit's score of 0.00 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Conduit	Neutral
Monks	Positive

Monks has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Conduit. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Conduit	£836.30M	0.84	£267.22M	£74.00	6.39
Monks	£488.88M	5.16	£589.71M	£280.98	5.74

Monks has a net margin of 95.29% compared to Conduit's net margin of 12.89%. Monks' return on equity of 19.34% beat Conduit's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Conduit	12.89%	11.14%	8.83%
Monks	95.29%	19.34%	9.21%

Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Conduit pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monks pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Monks beats Conduit on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to HICL Infrastructure?

Conduit (LON:CRE) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Conduit	£836.30M	0.84	£267.22M	£74.00	6.39
HICL Infrastructure	£277.40M	9.08	£101.36M	£13.80	9.74

Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Conduit pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conduit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Conduit. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Conduit's score of 0.00 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Conduit	Neutral
HICL Infrastructure	Neutral

Conduit has a beta of 0.589, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.50760293, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

HICL Infrastructure has a net margin of 96.11% compared to Conduit's net margin of 12.89%. Conduit's return on equity of 11.14% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Conduit	12.89%	11.14%	8.83%
HICL Infrastructure	96.11%	8.83%	0.58%

43.9% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Conduit shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Conduit currently has a consensus price target of GBX 536.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.42%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
HICL Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Conduit beats HICL Infrastructure on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to TP ICAP Group?

TP ICAP Group (LON:TCAP) and Conduit (LON:CRE) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

TP ICAP Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. TP ICAP Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conduit pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conduit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

TP ICAP Group has a beta of 0.375, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduit has a beta of 0.589, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Conduit has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TP ICAP Group. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TP ICAP Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TP ICAP Group	£2.35B	1.06	£97.91M	£24.20	14.05
Conduit	£836.30M	0.84	£267.22M	£74.00	6.39

In the previous week, TP ICAP Group had 1 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TP ICAP Group and 0 mentions for Conduit. TP ICAP Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Conduit'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
TP ICAP Group	Neutral
Conduit	Neutral

TP ICAP Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 365.25, indicating a potential upside of 7.43%. Conduit has a consensus target price of GBX 536.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.42%. Given Conduit's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Conduit is more favorable than TP ICAP Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TP ICAP Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Conduit has a net margin of 12.89% compared to TP ICAP Group's net margin of 7.69%. Conduit's return on equity of 11.14% beat TP ICAP Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TP ICAP Group	7.69%	9.39%	1.61%
Conduit	12.89%	11.14%	8.83%

49.4% of TP ICAP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.9% of Conduit shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of TP ICAP Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Conduit shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Conduit beats TP ICAP Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conduit compare to International Public Partnerships?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Conduit (LON:CRE) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 2 more articles in the media than Conduit. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 0 mentions for Conduit. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Conduit's score of 0.00 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships	Positive
Conduit	Neutral

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54675525, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conduit has a beta of 0.589, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Conduit has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Conduit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships	£267.76M	9.44	£43.53M	£14.28	9.87
Conduit	£836.30M	0.84	£267.22M	£74.00	6.39

Conduit has a consensus price target of GBX 536.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.42%. Given Conduit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Conduit is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
International Public Partnerships	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Conduit	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Conduit's net margin of 12.89%. Conduit's return on equity of 11.14% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships	97.32%	9.61%	0.63%
Conduit	12.89%	11.14%	8.83%

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Conduit pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conduit pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conduit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.9% of Conduit shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Conduit shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Conduit beats International Public Partnerships on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Conduit News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CRE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Conduit	Insurance Industry	Financial Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£700.60M	£32.39B	£5.96B	£2.77B
Dividend Yield	5.68%	4.75%	5.26%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	6.39	10.81	29.29	366.66
Price / Sales	0.84	42.37	1,107.34	85,978.63
Price / Cash	6.59	5.94	84.98	27.87
Price / Book	0.71	1.24	6.69	7.76
Net Income	£267.22M	£3.01B	£1.14B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	5.23%	3.19%	-0.33%	-0.71%
1 Month Performance	1.83%	0.44%	0.40%	-1.20%
1 Year Performance	21.91%	-4.07%	18.33%	65.93%

Conduit Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CRE Conduit	2.4056 of 5 stars	GBX 473 +1.4%	GBX 536.50 +13.4%	+18.7%	£700.60M	£836.30M	6.39	59
QLT Quilter	3.2428 of 5 stars	GBX 189.50 -0.6%	GBX 203.71 +7.5%	+21.9%	£2.59B	£9.34B	22.03	2,983
MNKS Monks	N/A	GBX 1,626 +0.9%	N/A	+27.2%	£2.55B	£488.88M	5.79	N/A
HICL HICL Infrastructure	1.4484 of 5 stars	GBX 135.80 +0.1%	N/A	+13.5%	£2.54B	£277.40M	9.84	N/A
TCAP TP ICAP Group	2.296 of 5 stars	GBX 347.20 +0.2%	GBX 365.25 +5.2%	+30.3%	£2.54B	£2.35B	14.35	5,208	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CRE) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Conduit (CRE) Competitors

CRE vs. QLT, MNKS, HICL, TCAP, and INPP

How does Conduit compare to Quilter?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to Monks?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to HICL Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to TP ICAP Group?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to International Public Partnerships?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRE vs. The Competition

Conduit Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Conduit (CRE) Competitors

CRE vs. QLT, MNKS, HICL, TCAP, and INPP

How does Conduit compare to Quilter?

Is CRE or QLT a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CRE or QLT?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CRE or QLT?

Do analysts rate CRE or QLT?

Does the media refer more to CRE or QLT?

Which has more risk & volatility, CRE or QLT?

Is CRE or QLT more profitable?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to Monks?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CRE or MNKS?

Which has more volatility & risk, CRE or MNKS?

Do analysts recommend CRE or MNKS?

Does the media prefer CRE or MNKS?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CRE or MNKS?

Is CRE or MNKS more profitable?

Is CRE or MNKS a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to HICL Infrastructure?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CRE or HICL?

Is CRE or HICL a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor CRE or HICL?

Which has more volatility & risk, CRE or HICL?

Is CRE or HICL more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CRE or HICL?

Do analysts recommend CRE or HICL?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to TP ICAP Group?

Is TCAP or CRE a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, TCAP or CRE?

Which has better valuation & earnings, TCAP or CRE?

Does the media favor TCAP or CRE?

Do analysts rate TCAP or CRE?

Is TCAP or CRE more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TCAP or CRE?

Summary

How does Conduit compare to International Public Partnerships?

Does the media prefer INPP or CRE?

Which has more risk and volatility, INPP or CRE?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, INPP or CRE?

Do analysts recommend INPP or CRE?

Is INPP or CRE more profitable?

Is INPP or CRE a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in INPP or CRE?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRE vs. The Competition

Conduit Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools