Free Trial

FDM Group (FDM) Competitors

FDM Group logo
GBX 107 -3.60 (-3.25%)
As of 12:18 PM Eastern

FDM vs. KCT, RCN, ECK, IBPO, and NASA

Should you buy FDM Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FDM Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FDM Group include Kin and Carta (KCT), Redcentric (RCN), Eckoh (ECK), iEnergizer (IBPO), and Nasstar (NASA). These companies are all part of the "information technology services" industry.

How does FDM Group compare to Kin and Carta?

FDM Group (LON:FDM) and Kin and Carta (LON:KCT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

42.7% of FDM Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of Kin and Carta shares are held by institutional investors. 17.8% of FDM Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Kin and Carta shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FDM Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kin and Carta. Kin and Carta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FDM Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FDM Group£177.73M0.66£30.43M£5.2020.58
Kin and Carta£192.01M0.00-£18.77M-£0.11N/A

FDM Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 145, indicating a potential upside of 35.51%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Kin and Carta.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FDM Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Kin and Carta
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

FDM Group has a beta of 1.057, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kin and Carta has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

FDM Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.3%. Kin and Carta pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. FDM Group pays out 355.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kin and Carta pays out -1,818.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, FDM Group had 9 more articles in the media than Kin and Carta. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for FDM Group and 0 mentions for Kin and Carta. FDM Group's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Kin and Carta's score of 0.00 indicating that FDM Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FDM Group Very Positive
Kin and Carta Neutral

FDM Group has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Kin and Carta's net margin of -9.77%. FDM Group's return on equity of 10.20% beat Kin and Carta's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FDM Group3.19% 10.20% 21.43%
Kin and Carta -9.77%-18.78%2.70%

Summary

FDM Group beats Kin and Carta on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FDM Group compare to Redcentric?

FDM Group (LON:FDM) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. FDM Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FDM Group£177.73M0.66£30.43M£5.2020.58
Redcentric£132.66M1.51-£3.37M£1.5084.00

In the previous week, FDM Group had 7 more articles in the media than Redcentric. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for FDM Group and 2 mentions for Redcentric. FDM Group's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Redcentric's score of 0.20 indicating that FDM Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FDM Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Redcentric
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

FDM Group has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. FDM Group's return on equity of 10.20% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FDM Group3.19% 10.20% 21.43%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

FDM Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 145, indicating a potential upside of 35.51%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Redcentric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FDM Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Redcentric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

42.7% of FDM Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. 17.8% of FDM Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FDM Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.3%. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. FDM Group pays out 355.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

FDM Group has a beta of 1.057, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.227, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

FDM Group beats Redcentric on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FDM Group compare to Eckoh?

FDM Group (LON:FDM) and Eckoh (LON:ECK) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

42.7% of FDM Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.2% of Eckoh shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.8% of FDM Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Eckoh shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FDM Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.3%. Eckoh pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. FDM Group pays out 355.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Eckoh pays out 153.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, FDM Group had 9 more articles in the media than Eckoh. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for FDM Group and 0 mentions for Eckoh. FDM Group's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Eckoh's score of 0.00 indicating that FDM Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FDM Group Very Positive
Eckoh Neutral

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Eckoh. Eckoh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FDM Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FDM Group£177.73M0.66£30.43M£5.2020.58
Eckoh£37.97M0.00£2.04M£0.65N/A

FDM Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 145, suggesting a potential upside of 35.51%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Eckoh.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FDM Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Eckoh
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Eckoh has a net margin of 12.21% compared to FDM Group's net margin of 3.19%. Eckoh's return on equity of 10.44% beat FDM Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FDM Group3.19% 10.20% 21.43%
Eckoh 12.21%10.44%5.18%

FDM Group has a beta of 1.057, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eckoh has a beta of 0.09, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

FDM Group beats Eckoh on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FDM Group compare to iEnergizer?

iEnergizer (LON:IBPO) and FDM Group (LON:FDM) are both small-cap information technology services industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, FDM Group had 9 more articles in the media than iEnergizer. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for FDM Group and 0 mentions for iEnergizer. FDM Group's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat iEnergizer's score of 0.00 indicating that FDM Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iEnergizer Neutral
FDM Group Very Positive

15.1% of iEnergizer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of FDM Group shares are held by institutional investors. 82.7% of iEnergizer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of FDM Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

iEnergizer has a net margin of 28.23% compared to FDM Group's net margin of 3.19%. iEnergizer's return on equity of 159.59% beat FDM Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iEnergizer28.23% 159.59% 22.71%
FDM Group 3.19%10.20%21.43%

FDM Group has a consensus price target of GBX 145, suggesting a potential upside of 35.51%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FDM Group is more favorable than iEnergizer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iEnergizer
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FDM Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

iEnergizer pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share. FDM Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.3%. iEnergizer pays out 8,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FDM Group pays out 355.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FDM Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

iEnergizer has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FDM Group has a beta of 1.057, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

iEnergizer has higher revenue and earnings than FDM Group. iEnergizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FDM Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iEnergizer£288.19M0.00£81.37M£0.30N/A
FDM Group£177.73M0.66£30.43M£5.2020.58

Summary

FDM Group beats iEnergizer on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FDM Group compare to Nasstar?

Nasstar (LON:NASA) and FDM Group (LON:FDM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

FDM Group has a consensus target price of GBX 145, indicating a potential upside of 35.51%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Nasstar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nasstar
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FDM Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, FDM Group had 8 more articles in the media than Nasstar. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for FDM Group and 1 mentions for Nasstar. FDM Group's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Nasstar's score of 1.00 indicating that FDM Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nasstar
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FDM Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

42.7% of FDM Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.8% of FDM Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FDM Group has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Nasstar's net margin of 0.00%. FDM Group's return on equity of 10.20% beat Nasstar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NasstarN/A N/A N/A
FDM Group 3.19%10.20%21.43%

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Nasstar.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nasstar£25.97M0.00N/AN/AN/A
FDM Group£177.73M0.66£30.43M£5.2020.58

Summary

FDM Group beats Nasstar on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FDM Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FDM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FDM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FDM vs. The Competition

MetricFDM GroupInformation Technology Services IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£116.99M£1.77B£40.62B£2.78B
Dividend Yield8.85%3.54%3.06%6.12%
P/E Ratio20.588.3082.52363.21
Price / Sales0.6691.31634.0987,415.95
Price / Cash20.4921.2353.0327.85
Price / Book1.743.7610.217.74
Net Income£30.43M£112.05M£1.06B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.11%0.18%2.40%0.21%
1 Year Performance-52.65%6.60%170.15%74.70%

FDM Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FDM
FDM Group
4.7322 of 5 stars
GBX 107
-3.3%
GBX 145
+35.5%
-50.2%£116.99M£177.73M20.585,637
KCT
Kin and Carta
N/AN/AN/AN/A£224.56M£192.01MN/A1,822
RCN
Redcentric
N/AGBX 128
+0.4%
N/A+0.2%£203.93M£132.66M85.33638
ECK
Eckoh
N/AN/AN/AN/A£168.40M£37.97M82.48188
IBPO
iEnergizer
N/AN/AN/AN/A£113.70M£288.19M199.33N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FDM) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners