Go Pro

Triad Group (TRD) Competitors

Triad Group logo
GBX 405.85 -4.15 (-1.01%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:28 PM Eastern

TRD vs. KCT, RCN, ECK, FDM, and IBPO

Should you buy Triad Group stock or one of its competitors? Triad Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Kin and Carta (KCT), Redcentric (RCN), Eckoh (ECK), FDM Group (FDM), and iEnergizer (IBPO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it services" industry.

How does Triad Group compare to Kin and Carta?

Triad Group (LON:TRD) and Kin and Carta (LON:KCT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Triad Group has a beta of 0.889, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kin and Carta has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Triad Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Kin and Carta pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Triad Group pays out 70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kin and Carta pays out -1,818.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Triad Group has a net margin of 6.86% compared to Kin and Carta's net margin of -9.77%. Triad Group's return on equity of 35.58% beat Kin and Carta's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Triad Group6.86% 35.58% -10.50%
Kin and Carta -9.77%-18.78%2.70%

0.6% of Triad Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of Kin and Carta shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.5% of Triad Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Kin and Carta shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Triad Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kin and Carta'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Triad Group Neutral
Kin and Carta Neutral

Triad Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kin and Carta. Kin and Carta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triad Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Triad Group£24.79M2.86-£1.01M£9.8841.08
Kin and Carta£192.01M0.00-£18.77M-£0.11N/A

Summary

Triad Group beats Kin and Carta on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Triad Group compare to Redcentric?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and Triad Group (LON:TRD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Redcentric has a beta of 0.204, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triad Group has a beta of 0.889, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Triad Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Redcentric. Triad Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric£132.66M1.29-£3.37M£1.5071.67
Triad Group£24.79M2.86-£1.01M£9.8841.08

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Triad Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Triad Group pays out 70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Redcentric had 5 more articles in the media than Triad Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for Triad Group. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Triad Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redcentric Positive
Triad Group Neutral

14.4% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Triad Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Triad Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Triad Group has a net margin of 6.86% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. Triad Group's return on equity of 35.58% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redcentric2.14% 4.57% 1.10%
Triad Group 6.86%35.58%-10.50%

Summary

Triad Group beats Redcentric on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Triad Group compare to Eckoh?

Eckoh (LON:ECK) and Triad Group (LON:TRD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Eckoh has higher revenue and earnings than Triad Group. Eckoh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triad Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eckoh£37.97M0.00£2.04M£0.65N/A
Triad Group£24.79M2.86-£1.01M£9.8841.08

61.2% of Eckoh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Triad Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Eckoh shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Triad Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Eckoh's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Triad Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Eckoh Neutral
Triad Group Neutral

Eckoh has a beta of 0.09, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triad Group has a beta of 0.889, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Eckoh has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Triad Group's net margin of 6.86%. Triad Group's return on equity of 35.58% beat Eckoh's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eckoh12.21% 10.44% 5.18%
Triad Group 6.86%35.58%-10.50%

Eckoh pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Triad Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Eckoh pays out 153.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Triad Group pays out 70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Triad Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Eckoh and Triad Group tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Triad Group compare to FDM Group?

FDM Group (LON:FDM) and Triad Group (LON:TRD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Triad Group. Triad Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FDM Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FDM Group£159.06M0.78£30.43M£2.3049.57
Triad Group£24.79M2.86-£1.01M£9.8841.08

FDM Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. Triad Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. FDM Group pays out 434.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Triad Group pays out 70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, FDM Group had 1 more articles in the media than Triad Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for FDM Group and 0 mentions for Triad Group. FDM Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Triad Group's score of 0.00 indicating that FDM Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FDM Group Positive
Triad Group Neutral

FDM Group has a beta of 1.114, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triad Group has a beta of 0.889, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

FDM Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 142.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.00%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Triad Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FDM Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Triad Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

42.6% of FDM Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Triad Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.8% of FDM Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Triad Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Triad Group has a net margin of 6.86% compared to FDM Group's net margin of 1.57%. Triad Group's return on equity of 35.58% beat FDM Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FDM Group1.57% 4.84% 21.43%
Triad Group 6.86%35.58%-10.50%

Summary

FDM Group beats Triad Group on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Triad Group compare to iEnergizer?

iEnergizer (LON:IBPO) and Triad Group (LON:TRD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

iEnergizer has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triad Group has a beta of 0.889, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

iEnergizer pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share. Triad Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. iEnergizer pays out 8,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Triad Group pays out 70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Triad Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

iEnergizer has a net margin of 28.23% compared to Triad Group's net margin of 6.86%. iEnergizer's return on equity of 159.59% beat Triad Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iEnergizer28.23% 159.59% 22.71%
Triad Group 6.86%35.58%-10.50%

iEnergizer has higher revenue and earnings than Triad Group. iEnergizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triad Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iEnergizer£288.19M0.00£81.37M£0.30N/A
Triad Group£24.79M2.86-£1.01M£9.8841.08

In the previous week, iEnergizer's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Triad Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
iEnergizer Neutral
Triad Group Neutral

15.1% of iEnergizer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Triad Group shares are held by institutional investors. 82.7% of iEnergizer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Triad Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

iEnergizer beats Triad Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Triad Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRD vs. The Competition

MetricTriad GroupIT Services IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£71.54M£11.08B£29.55B£2.54B
Dividend Yield2.20%2.80%2.75%6.17%
P/E Ratio41.0814.2673.35367.57
Price / Sales2.8662.10598.8683,481.74
Price / Cash3.5342.1550.3527.89
Price / Book19.8824.959.447.19
Net Income-£1.01M£273.31M£679.74M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.67%-1.25%-1.29%0.30%
1 Month Performance14.58%5.45%4.03%3.31%
1 Year Performance37.00%30.28%189.70%22.13%

Triad Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRD
Triad Group
N/AGBX 405.85
-1.0%
N/A+37.0%£71.54M£24.79M41.08115
KCT
Kin and Carta
N/AN/AN/AN/A£224.56M£192.01MN/A1,822
RCN
Redcentric
N/AGBX 107.50
-0.9%
N/A-22.1%£171.27M£132.66M71.67638
ECK
Eckoh
N/AN/AN/AN/A£168.40M£37.97M82.48188
FDM
FDM Group
4.0091 of 5 stars
GBX 114
+0.4%
GBX 142.50
+25.0%
-17.1%£124.22M£159.06M49.575,637

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TRD) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners