Free Trial

Redcentric (RCN) Competitors

Redcentric logo
GBX 131 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:29 PM Eastern

RCN vs. FDP, KCT, ECK, FDM, and IBPO

Should you be buying Redcentric stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Redcentric include FD Technologies (FDP), Kin and Carta (KCT), Eckoh (ECK), FDM Group (FDM), and iEnergizer (IBPO). These companies are all part of the "information technology services" industry.

How does Redcentric compare to FD Technologies?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and FD Technologies (LON:FDP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

FD Technologies has a net margin of 203.17% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. FD Technologies' return on equity of 96.98% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redcentric2.14% 4.57% 1.10%
FD Technologies 203.17%96.98%0.25%

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. FD Technologies pays an annual dividend of GBX 28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FD Technologies pays out -19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Redcentric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FD Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FD Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redcentric Neutral
FD Technologies Neutral

Redcentric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FD Technologies. FD Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric£132.66M1.57-£3.37M£1.5087.33
FD Technologies£196.89M2.77-£32.27M-£144.37N/A

15.6% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of FD Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of FD Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Redcentric has a beta of 0.169, indicating that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FD Technologies has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

FD Technologies beats Redcentric on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Kin and Carta?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and Kin and Carta (LON:KCT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Kin and Carta pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kin and Carta pays out -1,818.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

15.6% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of Kin and Carta shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Kin and Carta shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Redcentric has a net margin of 2.14% compared to Kin and Carta's net margin of -9.77%. Redcentric's return on equity of 4.57% beat Kin and Carta's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redcentric2.14% 4.57% 1.10%
Kin and Carta -9.77%-18.78%2.70%

In the previous week, Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kin and Carta'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redcentric Neutral
Kin and Carta Neutral

Redcentric has a beta of 0.169, meaning that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kin and Carta has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Redcentric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kin and Carta. Kin and Carta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric£132.66M1.57-£3.37M£1.5087.33
Kin and Carta£192.01M0.00-£18.77M-£0.11N/A

Summary

Redcentric beats Kin and Carta on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Eckoh?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and Eckoh (LON:ECK) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Eckoh has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. Eckoh's return on equity of 10.44% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redcentric2.14% 4.57% 1.10%
Eckoh 12.21%10.44%5.18%

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Eckoh pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Eckoh pays out 153.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Eckoh has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Redcentric. Eckoh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric£132.66M1.57-£3.37M£1.5087.33
Eckoh£37.97M0.00£2.04M£0.65N/A

15.6% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.2% of Eckoh shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Eckoh shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Eckoh'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redcentric Neutral
Eckoh Neutral

Redcentric has a beta of 0.169, meaning that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Eckoh has a beta of 0.09, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Redcentric and Eckoh tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to FDM Group?

FDM Group (LON:FDM) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

FDM Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.1%. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. FDM Group pays out 355.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

FDM Group has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. FDM Group's return on equity of 10.20% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FDM Group3.19% 10.20% 21.43%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. FDM Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FDM Group£177.73M0.67£30.43M£5.2020.80
Redcentric£132.66M1.57-£3.37M£1.5087.33

In the previous week, FDM Group had 1 more articles in the media than Redcentric. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for FDM Group and 0 mentions for Redcentric. FDM Group's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Redcentric's score of 0.00 indicating that FDM Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FDM Group Positive
Redcentric Neutral

42.2% of FDM Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. 17.8% of FDM Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FDM Group has a beta of 1.057, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.169, meaning that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500.

FDM Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 145, suggesting a potential upside of 34.07%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Redcentric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FDM Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Redcentric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

FDM Group beats Redcentric on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to iEnergizer?

iEnergizer (LON:IBPO) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap information technology services industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

iEnergizer has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.169, meaning that its share price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500.

iEnergizer pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. iEnergizer pays out 8,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

iEnergizer has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. iEnergizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iEnergizer£288.19M0.00£81.37M£0.30N/A
Redcentric£132.66M1.57-£3.37M£1.5087.33

iEnergizer has a net margin of 28.23% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. iEnergizer's return on equity of 159.59% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iEnergizer28.23% 159.59% 22.71%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

15.1% of iEnergizer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. 82.7% of iEnergizer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, iEnergizer's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Redcentric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
iEnergizer Neutral
Redcentric Neutral

Summary

iEnergizer beats Redcentric on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Redcentric News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RCN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RCN vs. The Competition

MetricRedcentricInformation Technology Services IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£208.70M£1.79B£37.11B£2.73B
Dividend Yield3.04%3.64%3.16%6.11%
P/E Ratio87.338.1377.89365.28
Price / Sales1.5783.85617.3987,989.37
Price / Cash68.5321.2346.3127.89
Price / Book3.823.699.177.39
Net Income-£3.37M£112.05M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance7.95%1.77%4.88%0.88%
1 Month Performance14.91%5.27%14.33%5.27%
1 Year Performance4.80%-3.49%168.78%80.43%

Redcentric Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RCN
Redcentric
N/AGBX 131
flat
N/AN/A£208.70M£132.66M87.33638
FDP
FD Technologies
0.1494 of 5 stars
GBX 2,450
flat
N/AN/A£544.43M£196.89MN/A40,100
KCT
Kin and Carta
N/AN/AN/AN/A£224.56M£192.01MN/A1,822
ECK
Eckoh
N/AN/AN/AN/A£168.40M£37.97M82.48188
FDM
FDM Group
4.4814 of 5 stars
GBX 111.23
+0.2%
GBX 145
+30.4%
N/A£121.62M£177.73M21.395,637

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:RCN) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners