Free Trial

Redcentric (RCN) Competitors

Redcentric logo
GBX 127 -3.00 (-2.31%)
As of 12:27 PM Eastern

RCN vs. FDP, KCT, ECK, FDM, and IBPO

Should you buy Redcentric stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Redcentric with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Redcentric include FD Technologies (FDP), Kin and Carta (KCT), Eckoh (ECK), FDM Group (FDM), and iEnergizer (IBPO). These companies are all part of the "information technology services" industry.

How does Redcentric compare to FD Technologies?

Redcentric (LON:RCN) and FD Technologies (LON:FDP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

15.6% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of FD Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of FD Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Redcentric has a beta of 0.227, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FD Technologies has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Redcentric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FD Technologies. FD Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redcentric£132.66M1.53-£3.37M£1.5084.67
FD Technologies£196.89M2.77-£32.27M-£144.37N/A

Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. FD Technologies pays an annual dividend of GBX 28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FD Technologies pays out -19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

FD Technologies has a net margin of 203.17% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. FD Technologies' return on equity of 96.98% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redcentric2.14% 4.57% 1.10%
FD Technologies 203.17%96.98%0.25%

In the previous week, Redcentric had 1 more articles in the media than FD Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for FD Technologies. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat FD Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redcentric Positive
FD Technologies Neutral

Summary

Redcentric beats FD Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Kin and Carta?

Kin and Carta (LON:KCT) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Redcentric has a net margin of 2.14% compared to Kin and Carta's net margin of -9.77%. Redcentric's return on equity of 4.57% beat Kin and Carta's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kin and Carta-9.77% -18.78% 2.70%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

97.1% of Kin and Carta shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Kin and Carta shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kin and Carta has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.227, indicating that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Kin and Carta pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Kin and Carta pays out -1,818.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Redcentric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kin and Carta. Kin and Carta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kin and Carta£192.01M0.00-£18.77M-£0.11N/A
Redcentric£132.66M1.53-£3.37M£1.5084.67

In the previous week, Redcentric had 1 more articles in the media than Kin and Carta. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for Kin and Carta. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Kin and Carta's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kin and Carta Neutral
Redcentric Positive

Summary

Redcentric beats Kin and Carta on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to Eckoh?

Eckoh (LON:ECK) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Eckoh has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Redcentric. Eckoh is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eckoh£37.97M0.00£2.04M£0.65N/A
Redcentric£132.66M1.53-£3.37M£1.5084.67

Eckoh pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Eckoh pays out 153.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Redcentric had 1 more articles in the media than Eckoh. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for Eckoh. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Eckoh's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Eckoh Neutral
Redcentric Positive

Eckoh has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. Eckoh's return on equity of 10.44% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eckoh12.21% 10.44% 5.18%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

61.2% of Eckoh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of Redcentric shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Eckoh shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Eckoh has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.227, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Redcentric beats Eckoh on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to FDM Group?

FDM Group (LON:FDM) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

FDM Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 145, suggesting a potential upside of 22.88%. Given FDM Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FDM Group is more favorable than Redcentric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FDM Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Redcentric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

FDM Group has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. FDM Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FDM Group£177.73M0.73£30.43M£5.2022.69
Redcentric£132.66M1.53-£3.37M£1.5084.67

FDM Group has a beta of 1.057, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.227, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FDM Group and FDM Group both had 1 articles in the media. FDM Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Redcentric's score of 0.59 indicating that FDM Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FDM Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Redcentric
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

42.7% of FDM Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. 17.8% of FDM Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FDM Group has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. FDM Group's return on equity of 10.20% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FDM Group3.19% 10.20% 21.43%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

FDM Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.7%. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. FDM Group pays out 355.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

FDM Group beats Redcentric on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redcentric compare to iEnergizer?

iEnergizer (LON:IBPO) and Redcentric (LON:RCN) are both small-cap information technology services industry companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

iEnergizer has a net margin of 28.23% compared to Redcentric's net margin of 2.14%. iEnergizer's return on equity of 159.59% beat Redcentric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iEnergizer28.23% 159.59% 22.71%
Redcentric 2.14%4.57%1.10%

iEnergizer has higher revenue and earnings than Redcentric. iEnergizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redcentric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iEnergizer£288.19M0.00£81.37M£0.30N/A
Redcentric£132.66M1.53-£3.37M£1.5084.67

iEnergizer has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redcentric has a beta of 0.227, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

iEnergizer pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share. Redcentric pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. iEnergizer pays out 8,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric pays out 240.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Redcentric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

15.1% of iEnergizer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of Redcentric shares are held by institutional investors. 82.7% of iEnergizer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Redcentric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Redcentric had 1 more articles in the media than iEnergizer. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Redcentric and 0 mentions for iEnergizer. Redcentric's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat iEnergizer's score of 0.00 indicating that Redcentric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iEnergizer Neutral
Redcentric Positive

Summary

iEnergizer beats Redcentric on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Redcentric News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RCN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RCN vs. The Competition

MetricRedcentricInformation Technology Services IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£202.34M£1.81B£40.29B£2.81B
Dividend Yield3.04%3.56%3.18%6.06%
P/E Ratio84.678.3879.89365.76
Price / Sales1.5393.28624.0187,755.03
Price / Cash68.5321.2348.6827.89
Price / Book3.714.0010.717.79
Net Income-£3.37M£112.05M£1.06B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.71%1.48%3.71%0.87%
1 Month Performance1.60%8.31%12.68%11.27%
1 Year Performance3.32%4.67%170.16%78.56%

Redcentric Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RCN
Redcentric
N/AGBX 127
-2.3%
N/A+3.4%£202.34M£132.66M84.67638
FDP
FD Technologies
N/AGBX 2,450
flat
N/A+0.6%£544.43M£196.89MN/A40,100
KCT
Kin and Carta
N/AN/AN/AN/A£224.56M£192.01MN/A1,822
ECK
Eckoh
N/AN/AN/AN/A£168.40M£37.97M82.48188
FDM
FDM Group
4.4278 of 5 stars
GBX 112.80
-1.6%
GBX 145
+28.5%
-49.6%£125.30M£177.73M21.695,637

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:RCN) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners