Go Pro

Fiske (FKE) Competitors

Fiske logo
GBX 69.50 +2.00 (+2.96%)
As of 09/2/2026 11:08 AM Eastern

FKE vs. CAV, PUAL, VSL, UTLI, and RMII

Should you buy Fiske stock or one of its competitors? Fiske's main competitors and comparable companies include Cavendish Financial (CAV), Puma Alpha Vct (PUAL), VPC Specialty Lending Investments (VSL), UIL Finance (UTLI), and Rm Infrastructure Income (RMII). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Fiske compare to Cavendish Financial?

Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) and Fiske (LON:FKE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Fiske has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cavendish Financial. Fiske is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.54-£3.62M£0.1561.53
Fiske£7.96M1.03N/A£2.6026.73

Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Fiske pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fiske pays out 42.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fiske'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial Neutral
Fiske Neutral

4.4% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of Fiske shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 50.3% of Fiske shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 1.088, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fiske has a beta of 0.213, meaning that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Fiske has a net margin of 3.86% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of 1.00%. Fiske's return on equity of 2.71% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial1.00% 1.45% -5.44%
Fiske 3.86%2.71%2.21%

Summary

Fiske beats Cavendish Financial on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fiske compare to Puma Alpha Vct?

Puma Alpha Vct (LON:PUAL) and Fiske (LON:FKE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Puma Alpha Vct's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fiske'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Puma Alpha Vct Neutral
Fiske Neutral

4.2% of Fiske shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Puma Alpha Vct shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 50.3% of Fiske shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fiske has a net margin of 3.86% compared to Puma Alpha Vct's net margin of 0.00%. Fiske's return on equity of 2.71% beat Puma Alpha Vct's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Puma Alpha VctN/A N/A N/A
Fiske 3.86%2.71%2.21%

Puma Alpha Vct is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiske, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Puma Alpha Vct-£3.22M-9.61N/A-£10.99N/A
Fiske£7.96M1.03N/A£2.6026.73

Summary

Fiske beats Puma Alpha Vct on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fiske compare to VPC Specialty Lending Investments?

Fiske (LON:FKE) and VPC Specialty Lending Investments (LON:VSL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

VPC Specialty Lending Investments has a net margin of 108.11% compared to Fiske's net margin of 3.86%. Fiske's return on equity of 2.71% beat VPC Specialty Lending Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fiske3.86% 2.71% 2.21%
VPC Specialty Lending Investments 108.11%-46.94%-3.93%

Fiske pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. VPC Specialty Lending Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 27.8%. Fiske pays out 42.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. VPC Specialty Lending Investments pays out -25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. VPC Specialty Lending Investments is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fiske has a beta of 0.213, meaning that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, VPC Specialty Lending Investments has a beta of 0.30362844, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

4.2% of Fiske shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.1% of VPC Specialty Lending Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.3% of Fiske shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of VPC Specialty Lending Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fiske has higher revenue and earnings than VPC Specialty Lending Investments. VPC Specialty Lending Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiske, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fiske£7.96M1.03N/A£2.6026.73
VPC Specialty Lending Investments-£31.41M-0.97-£31.27M-£11.87N/A

In the previous week, Fiske's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled VPC Specialty Lending Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fiske Neutral
VPC Specialty Lending Investments Neutral

Summary

Fiske beats VPC Specialty Lending Investments on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fiske compare to UIL Finance?

UIL Finance (LON:UTLI) and Fiske (LON:FKE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, UIL Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fiske'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
UIL Finance Neutral
Fiske Neutral

UIL Finance has a beta of 0.20071709, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fiske has a beta of 0.213, meaning that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

8.6% of UIL Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of Fiske shares are held by institutional investors. 50.3% of Fiske shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fiske has a net margin of 3.86% compared to UIL Finance's net margin of 0.00%. Fiske's return on equity of 2.71% beat UIL Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UIL FinanceN/A N/A 3.35%
Fiske 3.86%2.71%2.21%

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UIL Finance£3.70M7.31N/AN/AN/A
Fiske£7.96M1.03N/A£2.6026.73

Summary

Fiske beats UIL Finance on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fiske compare to Rm Infrastructure Income?

Rm Infrastructure Income (LON:RMII) and Fiske (LON:FKE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Rm Infrastructure Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiske, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rm Infrastructure Income-£6.14M-4.74N/A-£8.24N/A
Fiske£7.96M1.03N/A£2.6026.73

Fiske has a net margin of 3.86% compared to Rm Infrastructure Income's net margin of 0.00%. Fiske's return on equity of 2.71% beat Rm Infrastructure Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rm Infrastructure IncomeN/A N/A N/A
Fiske 3.86%2.71%2.21%

Rm Infrastructure Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Fiske pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Rm Infrastructure Income pays out -15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fiske pays out 42.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Rm Infrastructure Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

20.2% of Rm Infrastructure Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of Fiske shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Rm Infrastructure Income shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 50.3% of Fiske shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Rm Infrastructure Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fiske'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rm Infrastructure Income Neutral
Fiske Neutral

Summary

Fiske beats Rm Infrastructure Income on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fiske News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FKE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FKE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FKE vs. The Competition

MetricFiskeCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£8.22M£5.58B£13.97B£2.89B
Dividend Yield1.67%7.38%5.90%6.17%
P/E Ratio26.7331.3825.98364.79
Price / Sales1.031,300.71530.2683,676.88
Price / Cash2.2148.0437.9527.89
Price / BookN/A1.952.116.74
Net IncomeN/A£418.14M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.94%-0.50%-0.93%
1 Month Performance-6.59%0.65%1.28%1.95%
1 Year Performance-7.33%7.14%11.67%21.88%

Fiske Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FKE
Fiske
N/AGBX 69.50
+3.0%
N/A-7.2%£8.22M£7.96M26.7333
CAV
Cavendish Financial
N/AGBX 9.52
+2.9%
N/A-25.6%£31.06M£56.87M63.44157
PUAL
Puma Alpha Vct
N/AGBX 85.50
flat
N/AN/A£30.89M-£3.22MN/AN/A
VSL
VPC Specialty Lending Investments
N/AGBX 11
+4.0%
N/A-33.8%£30.61M-£31.41MN/AN/A
UTLI
UIL Finance
N/AGBX 132
flat
N/AN/A£30.06M£3.70MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FKE) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners