Fiske (FKE) Competitors

Fiske has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cavendish Financial. Cavendish Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiske, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fiske has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cavendish Financial has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

4.2% of Fiske shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.2% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.3% of Fiske shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 85.6% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fiske has a net margin of 3.86% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of -17.16%. Fiske's return on equity of 2.71% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Fiske pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Fiske pays out 42.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cavendish Financial pays out -6,666.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Fiske's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cavendish Financial'saverage media sentiment score.

In the previous week, Fiske's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cenkos Securities'average media sentiment score.

Fiske has a net margin of 3.86% compared to Cenkos Securities' net margin of -11.15%. Fiske's return on equity of 2.71% beat Cenkos Securities' return on equity.

Fiske has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cenkos Securities. Cenkos Securities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiske, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fiske has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenkos Securities has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Fiske pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Cenkos Securities pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share. Fiske pays out 42.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenkos Securities pays out -8,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

4.2% of Fiske shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.4% of Cenkos Securities shares are held by institutional investors. 50.3% of Fiske shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 36.7% of Cenkos Securities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tavistock Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Fiske. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tavistock Investments and 0 mentions for Fiske. Tavistock Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Fiske's score of 0.00 indicating that Tavistock Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Fiske has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tavistock Investments. Tavistock Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiske, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tavistock Investments has a net margin of 24.32% compared to Fiske's net margin of 3.86%. Tavistock Investments' return on equity of 14.74% beat Fiske's return on equity.

Tavistock Investments has a beta of 0.02, meaning that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fiske has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

1.3% of Tavistock Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of Fiske shares are owned by institutional investors. 90.7% of Tavistock Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 50.3% of Fiske shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tavistock Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Fiske pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Tavistock Investments pays out 9.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fiske pays out 42.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tavistock Investments is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fiske has higher revenue and earnings than WH Ireland Group. WH Ireland Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiske, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, WH Ireland Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fiske'saverage media sentiment score.

21.1% of WH Ireland Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of Fiske shares are held by institutional investors. 7.8% of WH Ireland Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 50.3% of Fiske shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WH Ireland Group has a net margin of 165.91% compared to Fiske's net margin of 3.86%. Fiske's return on equity of 2.71% beat WH Ireland Group's return on equity.

WH Ireland Group has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fiske has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.