Go Pro
→ Earth's biggest energy source: near Grand Canyon (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free QBT Stock Alerts

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (QBT) Competitors

Quantum Blockchain Technologies logo
GBX 0.26 -0.01 (-2.22%)
As of 10:59 AM Eastern
Compare

QBT vs. PMGR, KRM, AMP, DVNO, and FWD

Should you buy Quantum Blockchain Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Quantum Blockchain Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust (PMGR), KRM22 (KRM), Amphion Innovations (AMP), Develop North (DVNO), and Forward Partners Group (FWD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust?

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) and Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust (LON:PMGR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.6% of Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust. Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quantum Blockchain Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.21N/A
Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust-£5.42M-3.85-£4.43M-£37.40N/A

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies and 0 mentions for Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral
Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust Neutral

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.318, meaning that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust has a net margin of 133.20% compared to Quantum Blockchain Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 57.70% beat Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/A 57.70% -43.01%
Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust 133.20%-30.10%7.85%

Summary

Quantum Blockchain Technologies beats Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to KRM22?

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) and KRM22 (LON:KRM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to KRM22's net margin of -27.23%. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 57.70% beat KRM22's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/A 57.70% -43.01%
KRM22 -27.23%-140.94%-24.65%

KRM22 has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. KRM22 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quantum Blockchain Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.21N/A
KRM22£7.44M2.95-£2.54M-£5.10N/A

0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of KRM22 shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of KRM22 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than KRM22. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies and 0 mentions for KRM22. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled KRM22'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral
KRM22 Neutral

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.318, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KRM22 has a beta of -0.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Quantum Blockchain Technologies beats KRM22 on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Amphion Innovations?

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) and Amphion Innovations (LON:AMP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.2% of Amphion Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Amphion Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Amphion Innovations has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Amphion Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quantum Blockchain Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.21N/A
Amphion Innovations£15.04M1.20N/A-£2.00N/A

Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 57.70% beat Amphion Innovations' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/A 57.70% -43.01%
Amphion Innovations N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Amphion Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies and 1 mentions for Amphion Innovations. Amphion Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Quantum Blockchain Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Amphion Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Blockchain Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Amphion Innovations
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Quantum Blockchain Technologies beats Amphion Innovations on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Develop North?

Develop North (LON:DVNO) and Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Develop North. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies and 0 mentions for Develop North. Develop North's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Quantum Blockchain Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Develop North Neutral
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Develop North's net margin of -9.88%. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 57.70% beat Develop North's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Develop North-9.88% -1.33% 1.11%
Quantum Blockchain Technologies N/A 57.70%-43.01%

Develop North has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Quantum Blockchain Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Develop North, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Develop North£1.32M14.25£846.72K£1.6643.37
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.21N/A

0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Develop North shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Develop North has a beta of 0.10354676, indicating that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.318, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Quantum Blockchain Technologies beats Develop North on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Forward Partners Group?

Forward Partners Group (LON:FWD) and Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Forward Partners Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies and 0 mentions for Forward Partners Group. Forward Partners Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Quantum Blockchain Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Forward Partners Group Neutral
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral

Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 57.70% beat Forward Partners Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Forward Partners GroupN/A -23.68% -9.96%
Quantum Blockchain Technologies N/A 57.70%-43.01%

Forward Partners Group has a beta of 0.11, indicating that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.318, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

51.3% of Forward Partners Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Forward Partners Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Forward Partners Group. Quantum Blockchain Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forward Partners Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forward Partners Group£362K50.51-£24.31M-£18.00N/A
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.21N/A

Summary

Quantum Blockchain Technologies beats Forward Partners Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Blockchain Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QBT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricQuantum Blockchain TechnologiesCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.28M£5.67B£14.19B£2.91B
Dividend Yield5.13%7.39%5.89%6.18%
P/E Ratio-1.2531.3826.04366.81
Price / SalesN/A1,285.62530.0883,826.73
Price / Cash12.7548.0438.3727.89
Price / Book-0.991.982.126.81
Net Income-£3.83M£418.80M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-19.39%-0.61%0.15%5.65%
1 Month Performance-21.76%0.51%1.44%2.36%
1 Year Performance-59.57%7.52%11.95%21.77%

Quantum Blockchain Technologies Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QBT
Quantum Blockchain Technologies
N/AGBX 0.27
-1.5%		N/A-60.0%£4.28MN/AN/A4
PMGR
Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust
N/AGBX 114.50
flat		N/AN/A£20.88M-£5.42MN/AN/A
KRM
KRM22
N/AGBX 35
+3.6%		N/A-17.8%£20.76M£7.44MN/A45
AMP
Amphion Innovations
N/AGBX 2.82
+0.8%		N/A+10.0%£20.43M£15.04MN/A13,500
DVNO
Develop North
N/AGBX 74.50
flat		N/A-14.3%£19.39M£1.32M44.88N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:QBT) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Gold Explorer Sits Between Barrick’s Nevada Giants
Barrick Mining has spent decades building one of Nevada's richest gold districts, anchored by Fourmile, Goldru...
Wall Street Logic | Sponsoredtc pixel
The 2026 beginners Guide to Gold IRAs
Gold trades near record highs while silver just topped $81 an ounce for the first time ever. Thousands of A...
Goldco Direct, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
How Long Does $2.5M Last in Retirement?
Having $2.5 million saved puts you ahead of most Americans, but how long it lasts depends on the decisions you...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Are you leaving Social Security money on the table?
Most retirement plans still have gaps in them... The quiet ones that don't show up until it's too late to fix....
Money Pickle | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
A Simple Guide to Options Trading While It's Still Free
A free copy of Options Trading Made Simple is available now but wont stay that way for long. Chris Rowe cal...
True Market Insiders | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America grew this stake 139%
Bank of America raised its stake in a small gold company by 139%. Jane Street increased its position by 159%, ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
American retirees will miss THIS. Big Banks just moved in.
Central banks spent nearly $130 billion on physical gold last year, on top of $145 billion the year before. Q1...
Cedar Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel