Free Trial
→ I have publicly predicted six major American crashes, before each one happened. (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free QBT Stock Alerts

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (QBT) Competitors

Quantum Blockchain Technologies logo
GBX 0.22 -0.01 (-5.96%)
As of 09:56 AM Eastern
Compare

QBT vs. AEET, CNKS, KZG, GVCT, and MAFL

Should you buy Quantum Blockchain Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Quantum Blockchain Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust (AEET), Cenkos Securities (CNKS), Kazera Global (KZG), Guinness VCT (GVCT), and Mineral & Financial Investments (MAFL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust?

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) and Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust (LON:AEET) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust Neutral

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust's net margin of -92.82%. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 66.94% beat Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/A 66.94% -43.01%
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust -92.82%-6.65%2.90%

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.301, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust has a beta of 0.053275883, suggesting that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quantum Blockchain Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.26N/A
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust-£568K-29.82£1.22M-£2.91N/A

Summary

Quantum Blockchain Technologies beats Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Cenkos Securities?

Cenkos Securities (LON:CNKS) and Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

32.4% of Cenkos Securities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 36.7% of Cenkos Securities shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cenkos Securities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Quantum Blockchain Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cenkos Securities Neutral
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral

Cenkos Securities has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.301, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cenkos Securities' net margin of -11.15%. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 66.94% beat Cenkos Securities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cenkos Securities-11.15% -9.19% -5.02%
Quantum Blockchain Technologies N/A 66.94%-43.01%

Cenkos Securities has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Quantum Blockchain Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenkos Securities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cenkos Securities£20.09M0.00-£2.24M-£0.05N/A
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.26N/A

Summary

Cenkos Securities beats Quantum Blockchain Technologies on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Kazera Global?

Kazera Global (LON:KZG) and Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

2.1% of Kazera Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.4% of Kazera Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kazera Global has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Kazera Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quantum Blockchain Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kazera Global£26K684.07-£2.74M-£0.43N/A
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.26N/A

In the previous week, Kazera Global had 1 more articles in the media than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Kazera Global and 0 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Kazera Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Quantum Blockchain Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kazera Global Neutral
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral

Kazera Global has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.301, indicating that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 66.94% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kazera Global-15,996.15% -89.18% -11.84%
Quantum Blockchain Technologies N/A 66.94%-43.01%

Summary

Kazera Global beats Quantum Blockchain Technologies on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Guinness VCT?

Guinness VCT (LON:GVCT) and Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Guinness VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Guinness VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quantum Blockchain Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Guinness VCT£37.29K436.48N/A-£2.10N/A
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.26N/A

In the previous week, Guinness VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Quantum Blockchain Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Guinness VCT Neutral
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral

Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 66.94% beat Guinness VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Guinness VCTN/A N/A N/A
Quantum Blockchain Technologies N/A 66.94%-43.01%

0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Guinness VCT shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Quantum Blockchain Technologies beats Guinness VCT on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Mineral & Financial Investments?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Mineral & Financial Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Quantum Blockchain Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Quantum Blockchain Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mineral & Financial Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.84£2.04M£8.404.91
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.26N/A

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Quantum Blockchain Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 66.94% beat Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments125.37% 23.41% 11.52%
Quantum Blockchain Technologies N/A 66.94%-43.01%

Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.681, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.301, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Quantum Blockchain Technologies on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Blockchain Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QBT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QBT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricQuantum Blockchain TechnologiesCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.86M£5.14B£13.64B£2.84B
Dividend Yield5.13%7.65%6.11%6.25%
P/E Ratio-0.8629.9924.77366.84
Price / SalesN/A1,144.98480.7088,476.70
Price / Cash12.7547.4742.3427.83
Price / Book-0.823.462.716.89
Net Income-£3.83M£415.07M£1.32B£5.88B
7 Day Performance-7.92%-0.65%-0.04%0.43%
1 Month Performance-15.00%-1.29%-1.71%-0.04%
1 Year Performance-68.43%8.32%10.83%22.73%

Quantum Blockchain Technologies Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QBT
Quantum Blockchain Technologies
N/AGBX 0.22
-6.0%		N/A-65.0%£3.86MN/AN/A4
AEET
Aquila Energy Efficiency Trust
N/AGBX 21.27
-10.6%		N/A-20.1%£17.32M-£568KN/A700
CNKS
Cenkos Securities
N/AN/AN/AN/A£16.44M£20.09MN/A97
KZG
Kazera Global
N/AGBX 1.41
-0.8%		N/A+19.5%£16.32M£26KN/A29
GVCT
Guinness VCT
N/AGBX 91.50
+2.8%		N/AN/A£16.28M£37.29KN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:QBT) was last updated on 10/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A new income category is drawing serious money - here's why
Forbes recently called a new category of exchange-traded income funds a 'golden era,' and Bloomberg noted the ...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s issues shocking Executive Order on U.S. Dollar
Three days into his second term, President Trump signed Executive Order 14178 a move the press barely covered....
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Undiscovered Sub-$1 Gold-Silver Royalty Stock Takes Flight
A small-cap gold and silver royalty company is generating record revenue from producing mines, yet shares stil...
Digest Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon says the ‘S’ word
Elon Musk and Sam Altman have sued each other and feuded for years. Yet within days of one another, both men d...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Federal Reserve Reveals Disturbing New Plan To Control Your Money
Docket No. OP-1670 is drawing attention for what it reveals about the Federal Reserve's next move. Buried on p...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel