Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it? (From Awesomely, LLC) (Ad)tc pixel Free QBT Stock Alerts

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (QBT) Competitors

Quantum Blockchain Technologies logo
GBX 0.36 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 11:57 AM Eastern
Compare

QBT vs. CNKS, TAVI, WHI, FKE, and MAC

Should you buy Quantum Blockchain Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quantum Blockchain Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quantum Blockchain Technologies include Cenkos Securities (CNKS), Tavistock Investments (TAVI), WH Ireland Group (WHI), Fiske (FKE), and Marechale Capital (MAC). These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Cenkos Securities?

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) and Cenkos Securities (LON:CNKS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Cenkos Securities. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies and 0 mentions for Cenkos Securities. Cenkos Securities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Quantum Blockchain Technologies' score of -0.13 indicating that Cenkos Securities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral
Cenkos Securities Neutral

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.356, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenkos Securities has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Cenkos Securities has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Quantum Blockchain Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenkos Securities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.22N/A
Cenkos Securities£20.09M0.00-£2.24M-£0.05N/A

0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.4% of Cenkos Securities shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.7% of Cenkos Securities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cenkos Securities' net margin of -11.15%. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 0.06% beat Cenkos Securities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/A 0.06% -43.01%
Cenkos Securities -11.15%-9.19%-5.02%

Summary

Cenkos Securities beats Quantum Blockchain Technologies on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Tavistock Investments?

Tavistock Investments (LON:TAVI) and Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and valuation.

1.3% of Tavistock Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 90.7% of Tavistock Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tavistock Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Quantum Blockchain Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tavistock Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tavistock Investments£24.10M0.55-£1.08M£0.913.30
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.22N/A

Tavistock Investments has a net margin of 24.32% compared to Quantum Blockchain Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. Tavistock Investments' return on equity of 14.74% beat Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tavistock Investments24.32% 14.74% -0.44%
Quantum Blockchain Technologies N/A 0.06%-43.01%

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Tavistock Investments. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies and 0 mentions for Tavistock Investments. Tavistock Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Quantum Blockchain Technologies' score of -0.13 indicating that Tavistock Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tavistock Investments Positive
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral

Tavistock Investments has a beta of 0.02, meaning that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.356, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tavistock Investments beats Quantum Blockchain Technologies on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to WH Ireland Group?

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) and WH Ireland Group (LON:WHI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.356, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WH Ireland Group has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than WH Ireland Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies and 0 mentions for WH Ireland Group. WH Ireland Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Quantum Blockchain Technologies' score of -0.13 indicating that WH Ireland Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral
WH Ireland Group Neutral

WH Ireland Group has a net margin of 165.91% compared to Quantum Blockchain Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 0.06% beat WH Ireland Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/A 0.06% -43.01%
WH Ireland Group 165.91%-168.27%-2.03%

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than WH Ireland Group. Quantum Blockchain Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WH Ireland Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.22N/A
WH Ireland Group-£56K-155.19-£7.87M-£3.82N/A

0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.1% of WH Ireland Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.8% of WH Ireland Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

WH Ireland Group beats Quantum Blockchain Technologies on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Fiske?

Fiske (LON:FKE) and Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

4.2% of Fiske shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.3% of Fiske shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Fiske. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies and 0 mentions for Fiske. Fiske's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Quantum Blockchain Technologies' score of -0.13 indicating that Fiske is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fiske Neutral
Quantum Blockchain Technologies Neutral

Fiske has a net margin of 3.86% compared to Quantum Blockchain Technologies' net margin of 0.00%. Fiske's return on equity of 2.71% beat Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fiske3.86% 2.71% 2.21%
Quantum Blockchain Technologies N/A 0.06%-43.01%

Fiske has a beta of 0.197, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.356, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Fiske has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Quantum Blockchain Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiske, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fiske£7.96M0.97N/A£2.6025.00
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.22N/A

Summary

Fiske beats Quantum Blockchain Technologies on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Blockchain Technologies compare to Marechale Capital?

Quantum Blockchain Technologies (LON:QBT) and Marechale Capital (LON:MAC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a beta of 0.356, suggesting that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marechale Capital has a beta of 1.021, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quantum Blockchain Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Marechale Capital. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quantum Blockchain Technologies and 1 mentions for Marechale Capital. Marechale Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Quantum Blockchain Technologies' score of -0.13 indicating that Marechale Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Blockchain Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Marechale Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Marechale Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Blockchain Technologies. Quantum Blockchain Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marechale Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/AN/A-£3.83M-£0.22N/A
Marechale Capital£372.85K22.42-£181.28K-£32.00N/A

Quantum Blockchain Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Marechale Capital's net margin of -89.94%. Quantum Blockchain Technologies' return on equity of 0.06% beat Marechale Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum Blockchain TechnologiesN/A 0.06% -43.01%
Marechale Capital -89.94%-11.00%-5.40%

0.0% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Marechale Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Quantum Blockchain Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.3% of Marechale Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Marechale Capital beats Quantum Blockchain Technologies on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Blockchain Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QBT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QBT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricQuantum Blockchain TechnologiesCapital Markets IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.79M£1.70B£6.01B£2.77B
Dividend Yield5.13%6.17%5.26%6.16%
P/E Ratio-1.619.8116.20366.61
Price / SalesN/A236.361,454.1786,103.13
Price / Cash12.7511.8885.1427.87
Price / Book-1.333.356.657.85
Net Income-£3.83M£142.57M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.28%0.40%-0.50%-0.97%
1 Month Performance-2.70%12.95%0.69%-0.79%
1 Year Performance-51.02%82.49%19.23%68.88%

Quantum Blockchain Technologies Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QBT
Quantum Blockchain Technologies
N/AGBX 0.36
flat		N/A-60.2%£5.79MN/AN/A4
CNKS
Cenkos Securities
N/AN/AN/AN/A£16.44M£20.09MN/A97
TAVI
Tavistock Investments
N/AGBX 3.30
+4.5%		N/A-41.2%£14.55M£24.10M3.63161
WHI
WH Ireland Group
N/AGBX 3.75
flat		N/AN/A£8.69M-£56KN/A133
FKE
Fiske
N/AGBX 68
+4.6%		N/A+1.6%£8.04M£7.96M26.1533

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:QBT) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The 0DTE trade most investors get wrong
Zero-days-to-expiration trades happen every single day - and most traders either ignore them or use them wrong...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Firm That Predicted 2008, 2020, 2022: Right Now Looks Worse
The firm that predicted the dot-com crash, the 2008 financial crisis, the 2020 COVID crash, and the 2022 bear ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Treasury just bought its own debt
On April 16th, the U.S. Treasury executed a $15 billion buyback of its own debt - the largest in history - whi...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
PH: Do THESE 4 things to your bank account now …
In a few short months, the US government could gain unprecedented powers over personal bank accounts - includi...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Nearly 40% of Americans now hold a positive view of socialism - and former hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson s...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel