Free Trial

Jarvis Securities (JIM) Competitors

Jarvis Securities logo
GBX 3.22 -0.53 (-14.13%)
As of 03:33 AM Eastern

JIM vs. DGN, TEK, TSI, DP3J, and IVPB

Should you buy Jarvis Securities stock or one of its competitors? Jarvis Securities's main competitors and comparable companies include Asia Dragon (DGN), Tekcapital (TEK), Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L) (TSI), Downing Three VCT Plc 'J' (DP3J), and Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc (IVPB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Jarvis Securities compare to Asia Dragon?

Asia Dragon (LON:DGN) and Jarvis Securities (LON:JIM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Asia Dragon has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jarvis Securities has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Asia Dragon pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Jarvis Securities pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 163.0%. Asia Dragon pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jarvis Securities pays out 61.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Asia Dragon has higher revenue and earnings than Jarvis Securities. Asia Dragon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jarvis Securities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Asia Dragon£73.02M0.00£58.92M£37.72N/A
Jarvis Securities£12.70M0.11£3.10M£8.560.38

Asia Dragon has a net margin of 80.69% compared to Jarvis Securities' net margin of 30.14%. Jarvis Securities' return on equity of 66.17% beat Asia Dragon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Asia Dragon80.69% 10.05% -3.76%
Jarvis Securities 30.14%66.17%32.97%

In the previous week, Asia Dragon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jarvis Securities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Asia Dragon Neutral
Jarvis Securities Neutral

74.0% of Asia Dragon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Asia Dragon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Asia Dragon beats Jarvis Securities on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jarvis Securities compare to Tekcapital?

Jarvis Securities (LON:JIM) and Tekcapital (LON:TEK) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Jarvis Securities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tekcapital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jarvis Securities Neutral
Tekcapital Neutral

1.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Tekcapital shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Tekcapital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tekcapital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jarvis Securities. Tekcapital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jarvis Securities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jarvis Securities£12.70M0.11£3.10M£8.560.38
Tekcapital£281.86K18.98£19.73M£44.000.04

Tekcapital has a net margin of 43,011.88% compared to Jarvis Securities' net margin of 30.14%. Tekcapital's return on equity of 93.86% beat Jarvis Securities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jarvis Securities30.14% 66.17% 32.97%
Tekcapital 43,011.88%93.86%14.01%

Jarvis Securities has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tekcapital has a beta of 0.821, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tekcapital beats Jarvis Securities on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jarvis Securities compare to Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L)?

Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L) (LON:TSI) and Jarvis Securities (LON:JIM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Jarvis Securities has higher revenue and earnings than Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L).

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Jarvis Securities£12.70M0.11£3.10M£8.560.38

Jarvis Securities has a net margin of 30.14% compared to Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Jarvis Securities' return on equity of 66.17% beat Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L)N/A N/A N/A
Jarvis Securities 30.14%66.17%32.97%

1.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are held by institutional investors. 27.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jarvis Securities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L) Neutral
Jarvis Securities Neutral

Summary

Jarvis Securities beats Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L) on 7 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jarvis Securities compare to Downing Three VCT Plc 'J'?

Downing Three VCT Plc 'J' (LON:DP3J) and Jarvis Securities (LON:JIM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Downing Three VCT Plc 'J''s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jarvis Securities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Downing Three VCT Plc 'J' Neutral
Jarvis Securities Neutral

1.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Downing Three VCT Plc 'J' pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share. Jarvis Securities pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 163.0%. Jarvis Securities pays out 61.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Jarvis Securities has higher revenue and earnings than Downing Three VCT Plc 'J'.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Downing Three VCT Plc 'J'N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Jarvis Securities£12.70M0.11£3.10M£8.560.38

Jarvis Securities has a net margin of 30.14% compared to Downing Three VCT Plc 'J''s net margin of 0.00%. Jarvis Securities' return on equity of 66.17% beat Downing Three VCT Plc 'J''s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Downing Three VCT Plc 'J'N/A N/A N/A
Jarvis Securities 30.14%66.17%32.97%

Summary

Jarvis Securities beats Downing Three VCT Plc 'J' on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jarvis Securities compare to Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc?

Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc (LON:IVPB) and Jarvis Securities (LON:JIM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Jarvis Securities has a net margin of 30.14% compared to Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc's net margin of 0.00%. Jarvis Securities' return on equity of 66.17% beat Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Invesco Select Balanced Risk AllocN/A N/A N/A
Jarvis Securities 30.14%66.17%32.97%

Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share. Jarvis Securities pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 163.0%. Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc pays out 5,714.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Jarvis Securities pays out 61.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jarvis Securities is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

20.6% of Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are held by institutional investors. 44.9% of Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jarvis Securities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc Neutral
Jarvis Securities Neutral

Jarvis Securities has higher revenue and earnings than Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc. Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jarvis Securities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Invesco Select Balanced Risk AllocN/AN/AN/A£0.07N/A
Jarvis Securities£12.70M0.11£3.10M£8.560.38

Summary

Jarvis Securities beats Invesco Select Balanced Risk Alloc on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Jarvis Securities News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for JIM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

JIM vs. The Competition

MetricJarvis SecuritiesCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.44M£5.42B£14.15B£2.84B
Dividend Yield57.97%5.52%4.88%5.10%
P/E Ratio0.3822.5819.5223.38
Price / Sales0.117.644.855.03
Price / Cash16.8329.7220.3220.23
Price / Book0.261.801.812.45
Net Income£3.10M£419.50M£1.32B£5.88B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.39%0.21%0.82%
1 Month Performance-59.14%-1.70%-0.50%-1.82%
1 Year Performance-82.11%-1.72%4.81%7.18%

Jarvis Securities Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
JIM
Jarvis Securities
N/AGBX 3.22
-14.1%
N/A-83.2%£1.44M£12.70M0.3856
DGN
Asia Dragon
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.61M£73.02M0.11N/A
TEK
Tekcapital
N/AGBX 2.17
-5.5%
N/A-81.5%£6.20M£281.86K0.055
TSI
Two Shields Investments Plc (TSI.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.15MN/AN/A3
DP3J
Downing Three VCT Plc 'J'
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.11MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:JIM) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners