Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free JIM Stock Alerts

Jarvis Securities (JIM) Competitors

Jarvis Securities logo
GBX 8.20 +0.20 (+2.50%)
As of 07/31/2026 10:02 AM Eastern
Compare

JIM vs. TAVI, KWG, KLSO, TERN, and CIN

Should you buy Jarvis Securities stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Jarvis Securities with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Jarvis Securities include Tavistock Investments (TAVI), Kingswood (KWG), Kelso Group (KLSO), Tern (TERN), and City of London Group (CIN). These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Jarvis Securities compare to Tavistock Investments?

Jarvis Securities (LON:JIM) and Tavistock Investments (LON:TAVI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Tavistock Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.03 beat Jarvis Securities' score of 0.00 indicating that Tavistock Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jarvis Securities Neutral
Tavistock Investments Neutral

1.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Tavistock Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 27.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 90.7% of Tavistock Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Jarvis Securities has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tavistock Investments has a beta of 0.02, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

Jarvis Securities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tavistock Investments. Jarvis Securities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tavistock Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jarvis Securities£12.70M0.29£3.10M£8.560.96
Tavistock Investments£24.10M0.57-£1.08M£0.913.39

Jarvis Securities pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 64.0%. Tavistock Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Jarvis Securities pays out 61.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tavistock Investments pays out 9.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Jarvis Securities has a net margin of 30.14% compared to Tavistock Investments' net margin of 24.32%. Jarvis Securities' return on equity of 66.17% beat Tavistock Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jarvis Securities30.14% 66.17% 32.97%
Tavistock Investments 24.32%14.74%-0.44%

Summary

Jarvis Securities beats Tavistock Investments on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jarvis Securities compare to Kingswood?

Jarvis Securities (LON:JIM) and Kingswood (LON:KWG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Jarvis Securities has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kingswood. Kingswood is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jarvis Securities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jarvis Securities£12.70M0.29£3.10M£8.560.96
Kingswood£81.02M0.17-£46.02M-£0.04N/A

Jarvis Securities has a net margin of 30.14% compared to Kingswood's net margin of -21.16%. Jarvis Securities' return on equity of 66.17% beat Kingswood's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jarvis Securities30.14% 66.17% 32.97%
Kingswood -21.16%-28.43%3.99%

Jarvis Securities has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kingswood has a beta of -0.21, indicating that its share price is 121% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Jarvis Securities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kingswood'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jarvis Securities Neutral
Kingswood Neutral

1.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of Kingswood shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Kingswood shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Jarvis Securities beats Kingswood on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jarvis Securities compare to Kelso Group?

Jarvis Securities (LON:JIM) and Kelso Group (LON:KLSO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Jarvis Securities has higher revenue and earnings than Kelso Group. Kelso Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jarvis Securities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jarvis Securities£12.70M0.29£3.10M£8.560.96
Kelso Group-£542.92K-25.97£2.11M-£0.15N/A

1.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Kelso Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.4% of Kelso Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kelso Group has a net margin of 59.53% compared to Jarvis Securities' net margin of 30.14%. Jarvis Securities' return on equity of 66.17% beat Kelso Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jarvis Securities30.14% 66.17% 32.97%
Kelso Group 59.53%-5.97%-0.99%

Jarvis Securities has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kelso Group has a beta of 1.563, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Jarvis Securities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kelso Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jarvis Securities Neutral
Kelso Group Neutral

Summary

Jarvis Securities beats Kelso Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jarvis Securities compare to Tern?

Jarvis Securities (LON:JIM) and Tern (LON:TERN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

1.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Tern shares are held by institutional investors. 27.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Tern shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Jarvis Securities has higher revenue and earnings than Tern. Tern is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jarvis Securities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jarvis Securities£12.70M0.29£3.10M£8.560.96
Tern£54K221.81-£16.02M-£0.81N/A

Jarvis Securities has a net margin of 30.14% compared to Tern's net margin of -9,424.35%. Jarvis Securities' return on equity of 66.17% beat Tern's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jarvis Securities30.14% 66.17% 32.97%
Tern -9,424.35%-59.29%-5.04%

In the previous week, Tern had 1 more articles in the media than Jarvis Securities. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tern and 0 mentions for Jarvis Securities. Jarvis Securities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tern'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jarvis Securities Neutral
Tern Neutral

Jarvis Securities has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tern has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Jarvis Securities beats Tern on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jarvis Securities compare to City of London Group?

City of London Group (LON:CIN) and Jarvis Securities (LON:JIM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Jarvis Securities has higher revenue and earnings than City of London Group. City of London Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jarvis Securities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London Group£2.95M0.00N/A-£20.00N/A
Jarvis Securities£12.70M0.29£3.10M£8.560.96

Jarvis Securities has a net margin of 30.14% compared to City of London Group's net margin of 0.00%. Jarvis Securities' return on equity of 66.17% beat City of London Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London GroupN/A N/A N/A
Jarvis Securities 30.14%66.17%32.97%

In the previous week, City of London Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jarvis Securities'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Group Neutral
Jarvis Securities Neutral

1.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.3% of Jarvis Securities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Jarvis Securities beats City of London Group on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Jarvis Securities News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for JIM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

JIM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricJarvis SecuritiesCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.58M£5.50B£13.65B£2.79B
Dividend Yield57.97%7.50%5.95%6.15%
P/E Ratio0.9636.7728.66368.29
Price / Sales0.291,129.60468.0183,501.30
Price / Cash16.8384.8844.5027.89
Price / Book0.653.683.687.04
Net Income£3.10M£417.14M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.50%7.75%3.63%6.05%
1 Month Performance2.50%-1.25%0.07%-0.22%
1 Year Performance-65.69%5.61%12.94%63.72%

Jarvis Securities Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
JIM
Jarvis Securities
N/AGBX 8.20
+2.5%		N/A-65.7%£3.58M£12.70M0.9654
TAVI
Tavistock Investments
N/AGBX 3.09
-0.4%		N/A-22.0%£13.62M£24.10M3.39161
KWG
Kingswood
N/AGBX 1.97
flat		N/A+2.6%£13.52M£81.02MN/A421
KLSO
Kelso Group
N/AGBX 2.89
-3.0%		N/A+2.3%£13.37M-£542.92KN/AN/A
TERN
Tern
N/AGBX 1.40
-6.7%		N/A+47.4%£11.98M£54KN/A8

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:JIM) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where to Put $100 Before Trump's New Tech Law Rolls Out
The Financial Times says a new tech law puts America 'on the verge of a financial revolution.' Yahoo Finance e...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
“The unseen winner of the AI race” is not SpaceX
Marc Chaikin - the analyst who called Nvidia before its historic run - says a tech firm labeled 'the unseen wi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel