Go Pro

Fulcrum Metals (FMET) Competitors

GBX 7.37 -0.53 (-6.71%)
As of 11:25 AM Eastern

FMET vs. POG, COBR, ZNWD, AAU, and HE1

Should you buy Fulcrum Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fulcrum Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fulcrum Metals include Petropavlovsk (POG), Cobra Resources (COBR), Zinnwald Lithium (ZNWD), Ariana Resources (AAU), and Helium One Global (HE1). These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Fulcrum Metals compare to Petropavlovsk?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Petropavlovsk (LON:POG) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Fulcrum Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Petropavlovsk. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fulcrum Metals and 0 mentions for Petropavlovsk. Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Petropavlovsk's score of 0.00 indicating that Fulcrum Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Positive
Petropavlovsk Neutral

Petropavlovsk has higher revenue and earnings than Fulcrum Metals. Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petropavlovsk, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Petropavlovsk£817.75M0.00N/A£0.01N/A

Petropavlovsk's return on equity of 0.00% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Petropavlovsk N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Petropavlovsk beats Fulcrum Metals on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Metals compare to Cobra Resources?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Cobra Resources (LON:COBR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Cobra Resources' return on equity of 2.71% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Cobra Resources N/A 2.71%-14.34%

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.143, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cobra Resources has a beta of 0.468, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cobra Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Fulcrum Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cobra Resources and 1 mentions for Fulcrum Metals. Cobra Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Fulcrum Metals' score of 1.11 indicating that Cobra Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cobra Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cobra Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Cobra ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.19M£0.02192.90

Summary

Cobra Resources beats Fulcrum Metals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Metals compare to Zinnwald Lithium?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Zinnwald Lithium (LON:ZNWD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.143, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zinnwald Lithium has a beta of 0.452, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Zinnwald Lithium's return on equity of 0.37% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Zinnwald Lithium N/A 0.37%-4.46%

Zinnwald Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulcrum Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Zinnwald LithiumN/AN/A-£3.03K-£0.56N/A

In the previous week, Fulcrum Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Zinnwald Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fulcrum Metals and 0 mentions for Zinnwald Lithium. Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Zinnwald Lithium's score of 0.00 indicating that Fulcrum Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Positive
Zinnwald Lithium Neutral

0.0% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 17.1% of Fulcrum Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fulcrum Metals beats Zinnwald Lithium on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Metals compare to Ariana Resources?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Ariana Resources (LON:AAU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Ariana Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Fulcrum Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ariana Resources and 1 mentions for Fulcrum Metals. Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Ariana Resources' score of 0.49 indicating that Fulcrum Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ariana Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

0.7% of Ariana Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.1% of Fulcrum Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Ariana Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.143, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ariana Resources has a beta of 0.854, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Fulcrum Metals' return on equity of -13.40% beat Ariana Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Ariana Resources N/A -28.28%-5.54%

Ariana Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulcrum Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Ariana ResourcesN/AN/A£537.40-£0.01N/A

Summary

Fulcrum Metals and Ariana Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Metals compare to Helium One Global?

Helium One Global (LON:HE1) and Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Fulcrum Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Helium One Global's net margin of -3,040.18%. Helium One Global's return on equity of -8.84% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Helium One Global-3,040.18% -8.84% -4.28%
Fulcrum Metals N/A -13.40%N/A

In the previous week, Fulcrum Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Helium One Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fulcrum Metals and 0 mentions for Helium One Global. Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Helium One Global's score of 0.00 indicating that Fulcrum Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Helium One Global Neutral
Fulcrum Metals Positive

Helium One Global has a beta of 0.069, suggesting that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.143, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Helium One Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Helium One Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Fulcrum Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helium One Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Helium One GlobalN/AN/A-£34.00M-£0.09N/A
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A

Summary

Fulcrum Metals beats Helium One Global on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fulcrum Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FMET and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FMET and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FMET vs. The Competition

MetricFulcrum MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.32M£3.73B£4.80B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A5.28%4.75%6.13%
P/E Ratio-11.2022.3720.89369.49
Price / SalesN/A8,797.095,224.2283,955.53
Price / CashN/A29.2026.7127.89
Price / Book1.2310.228.627.07
Net Income-£1.06M£122.62M£155.10M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.23%5.07%4.28%1.18%
1 Month Performance-5.51%0.93%1.23%0.90%
1 Year Performance107.02%51.78%41.72%75.31%

Fulcrum Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FMET
Fulcrum Metals
N/AGBX 7.37
-6.7%
N/A+125.5%£11.32MN/AN/A5
POG
Petropavlovsk
N/AN/AN/AN/A£47.51M£817.75M120.008,860
COBR
Cobra Resources
N/AGBX 3.97
-1.9%
N/A+59.6%£42.03MN/A198.25N/A
ZNWD
Zinnwald Lithium
N/AGBX 8.65
flat
N/AN/A£41.05MN/AN/A23
AAU
Ariana Resources
N/AGBX 1.43
-1.4%
N/A-13.4%£38.48MN/AN/A8

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FMET) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners