Go Pro

Fulcrum Metals (FMET) Competitors

GBX 8.50 +0.50 (+6.25%)
As of 03:34 AM Eastern

FMET vs. POG, COBR, AAU, ZNWD, and HE1

Should you buy Fulcrum Metals stock or one of its competitors? Fulcrum Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Petropavlovsk (POG), Cobra Resources (COBR), Ariana Resources (AAU), Zinnwald Lithium (ZNWD), and Helium One Global (HE1). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Fulcrum Metals compare to Petropavlovsk?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Petropavlovsk (LON:POG) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Petropavlovsk's return on equity of 0.00% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Petropavlovsk N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petropavlovsk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Neutral
Petropavlovsk Neutral

Petropavlovsk has higher revenue and earnings than Fulcrum Metals. Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petropavlovsk, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Petropavlovsk£817.75M0.00N/A£0.01N/A

Summary

Petropavlovsk beats Fulcrum Metals on 4 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Metals compare to Cobra Resources?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Cobra Resources (LON:COBR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Cobra Resources' return on equity of 2.71% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Cobra Resources N/A 2.71%-14.34%

In the previous week, Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cobra Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Neutral
Cobra Resources Neutral

Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cobra Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Cobra ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.19M£0.02205.00

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.139, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cobra Resources has a beta of 0.463, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fulcrum Metals and Cobra Resources tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Metals compare to Ariana Resources?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Ariana Resources (LON:AAU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ariana Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Neutral
Ariana Resources Neutral

Fulcrum Metals' return on equity of -13.40% beat Ariana Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Ariana Resources N/A -28.28%-5.54%

0.7% of Ariana Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 16.9% of Fulcrum Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Ariana Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ariana Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulcrum Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Ariana ResourcesN/AN/A£537.40-£0.01N/A

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.139, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ariana Resources has a beta of 0.854, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fulcrum Metals and Ariana Resources tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Metals compare to Zinnwald Lithium?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Zinnwald Lithium (LON:ZNWD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.139, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zinnwald Lithium has a beta of 0.452, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Zinnwald Lithium's return on equity of 0.37% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Zinnwald Lithium N/A 0.37%-4.46%

Zinnwald Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fulcrum Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Zinnwald LithiumN/AN/A-£3.03K-£0.56N/A

0.0% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Fulcrum Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Zinnwald Lithium shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zinnwald Lithium'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Neutral
Zinnwald Lithium Neutral

Summary

Fulcrum Metals and Zinnwald Lithium tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fulcrum Metals compare to Helium One Global?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Helium One Global (LON:HE1) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.139, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helium One Global has a beta of 0.069, indicating that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the broader market.

Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helium One Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Helium One GlobalN/AN/A-£34.00M-£0.09N/A

In the previous week, Helium One Global had 1 more articles in the media than Fulcrum Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Helium One Global and 0 mentions for Fulcrum Metals. Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Helium One Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Neutral
Helium One Global Neutral

2.1% of Helium One Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Fulcrum Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Helium One Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fulcrum Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Helium One Global's net margin of -3,040.18%. Helium One Global's return on equity of -8.84% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Helium One Global -3,040.18%-8.84%-4.28%

Summary

Fulcrum Metals and Helium One Global tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fulcrum Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FMET and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FMET vs. The Competition

MetricFulcrum MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£13.26M£4.05B£5.06B£2.91B
Dividend YieldN/A5.17%4.67%6.18%
P/E Ratio-12.9225.5826.19366.73
Price / SalesN/A8,520.665,072.5683,698.00
Price / CashN/A29.6827.0927.89
Price / Book1.4212.7310.626.85
Net Income-£1.06M£125.14M£156.32M£5.89B
7 Day Performance9.68%-0.17%-0.23%5.79%
1 Month Performance15.07%21.45%16.27%2.49%
1 Year Performance129.36%57.53%45.21%22.13%

Fulcrum Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FMET
Fulcrum Metals
N/AGBX 8.50
+6.3%
N/A+123.1%£13.26MN/AN/A5
POG
Petropavlovsk
N/AN/AN/AN/A£47.51M£817.75M120.008,860
COBR
Cobra Resources
N/AGBX 4.18
+2.0%
N/A-4.3%£45.38MN/A209.00N/A
AAU
Ariana Resources
N/AGBX 1.58
+1.9%
N/A-15.9%£42.52MN/AN/A8
ZNWD
Zinnwald Lithium
N/AGBX 8.65
flat
N/AN/A£41.05MN/AN/A23

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FMET) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners