Do analysts rate FAR or CMRS?

Ferro-Alloy Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 757.14%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Critical Mineral Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ferro-Alloy Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Critical Mineral Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, GSP or CMRS?

Critical Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gensource Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gensource Potash N/A N/A -£6.58M -£0.01 N/A Critical Mineral Resources N/A N/A -£1.71K -£1.40 N/A

Is GSP or CMRS more profitable?

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Gensource Potash's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Gensource Potash N/A -45.96% -10.31% Critical Mineral Resources N/A 1,095.86% -97.47%

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CMRS or KDNC?

Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Critical Mineral Resources N/A N/A -£1.71K -£1.40 N/A Cadence Minerals N/A N/A -£5.72M -£0.53 N/A

Do analysts rate CTL or CMRS?

CleanTech Lithium presently has a consensus price target of GBX 17, indicating a potential upside of 142.86%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Critical Mineral Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CleanTech Lithium 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Critical Mineral Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CTL or CMRS?

CleanTech Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CleanTech Lithium N/A N/A -£2.19M -£2.20 N/A Critical Mineral Resources N/A N/A -£1.71K -£1.40 N/A

Is CTL or CMRS more profitable?

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat CleanTech Lithium's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CleanTech Lithium N/A -16.51% -13.50% Critical Mineral Resources N/A 1,095.86% -97.47%

Critical Mineral Resources (CMRS) Competitors

GBX 2 +0.03 (+1.27%)

As of 03:54 AM Eastern

Compare

CMRS vs. FAR, GSP, KDNC, PDL, and CTL

Should you buy Critical Mineral Resources stock or one of its competitors? Critical Mineral Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR), Gensource Potash (GSP), Cadence Minerals (KDNC), Petra Diamonds (PDL), and CleanTech Lithium (CTL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Critical Mineral Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ferro-Alloy Resources	-185.72%	283.86%	-21.47%
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	1,095.86%	-97.47%

Ferro-Alloy Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 757.14%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Critical Mineral Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ferro-Alloy Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Critical Mineral Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ferro-Alloy Resources	Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources	Neutral

Critical Mineral Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ferro-Alloy Resources	£4.53M	5.84	-£9.69M	-£1.70	N/A
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	N/A	-£1.71K	-£1.40	N/A

0.5% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 59.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.819, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.891, meaning that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Ferro-Alloy Resources on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Gensource Potash?

Gensource Potash (LON:GSP) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Gensource Potash's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gensource Potash	N/A	-45.96%	-10.31%
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	1,095.86%	-97.47%

In the previous week, Gensource Potash's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gensource Potash	Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources	Neutral

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.2% of Gensource Potash shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gensource Potash has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.891, suggesting that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

Critical Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gensource Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gensource Potash	N/A	N/A	-£6.58M	-£0.01	N/A
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	N/A	-£1.71K	-£1.40	N/A

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Gensource Potash on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Cadence Minerals?

Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) and Cadence Minerals (LON:KDNC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.891, indicating that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Minerals has a beta of 1.817, indicating that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	N/A	-£1.71K	-£1.40	N/A
Cadence Minerals	N/A	N/A	-£5.72M	-£0.53	N/A

Cadence Minerals has a net margin of 875.38% compared to Critical Mineral Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Cadence Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	1,095.86%	-97.47%
Cadence Minerals	875.38%	-9.74%	-3.99%

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Critical Mineral Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cadence Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Critical Mineral Resources	Neutral
Cadence Minerals	Neutral

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Cadence Minerals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Petra Diamonds?

Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) and Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Critical Mineral Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -104.34%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	1,095.86%	-97.47%
Petra Diamonds	-104.34%	-333.85%	-9.26%

In the previous week, Critical Mineral Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petra Diamonds'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Critical Mineral Resources	Neutral
Petra Diamonds	Neutral

Critical Mineral Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Petra Diamonds. Critical Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petra Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	N/A	-£1.71K	-£1.40	N/A
Petra Diamonds	£192M	0.12	-£11.38M	-£84.51	N/A

Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.891, meaning that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources and Petra Diamonds tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to CleanTech Lithium?

CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat CleanTech Lithium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CleanTech Lithium	N/A	-16.51%	-13.50%
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	1,095.86%	-97.47%

In the previous week, CleanTech Lithium had 2 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CleanTech Lithium and 0 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. CleanTech Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Critical Mineral Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that CleanTech Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CleanTech Lithium	Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources	Neutral

CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.79, suggesting that its share price is 179% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.891, suggesting that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

CleanTech Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CleanTech Lithium	N/A	N/A	-£2.19M	-£2.20	N/A
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	N/A	-£1.71K	-£1.40	N/A

0.9% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CleanTech Lithium presently has a consensus price target of GBX 17, indicating a potential upside of 142.86%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Critical Mineral Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CleanTech Lithium	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Critical Mineral Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats CleanTech Lithium on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Critical Mineral Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMRS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CMRS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Critical Mineral Resources	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£6.83M	£3.89B	£4.86B	£2.89B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.20%	4.71%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	-1.43	25.84	25.81	366.69
Price / Sales	N/A	28,918.61	17,180.21	89,983.40
Price / Cash	N/A	26.50	24.50	27.89
Price / Book	-9.86	12.12	10.07	6.43
Net Income	-£1.71K	£127.53M	£158.14M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-2.39%	82.23%	61.10%	0.84%
1 Month Performance	3.36%	-2.04%	-2.12%	-0.16%
1 Year Performance	-47.86%	34.39%	28.11%	19.40%

Critical Mineral Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CMRS Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	GBX 2 +1.3%	N/A	-48.5%	£6.83M	N/A	N/A	5
FAR Ferro-Alloy Resources	N/A	GBX 3.59 +4.1%	GBX 30 +735.7%	-56.7%	£27.12M	£4.53M	N/A	1,000	High Trading Volume
GSP Gensource Potash	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£23.61M	N/A	N/A	N/A
KDNC Cadence Minerals	N/A	GBX 5.50 +7.3%	N/A	+49.3%	£22.74M	N/A	N/A	6	Gap Up High Trading Volume
PDL Petra Diamonds	N/A	GBX 6.18 -11.7%	N/A	-66.0%	£21.92M	£192M	N/A	2,870	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CMRS) was last updated on 9/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Critical Mineral Resources (CMRS) Competitors

CMRS vs. FAR, GSP, KDNC, PDL, and CTL

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Gensource Potash?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Cadence Minerals?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Petra Diamonds?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to CleanTech Lithium?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMRS vs. The Competition

Critical Mineral Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Critical Mineral Resources (CMRS) Competitors

CMRS vs. FAR, GSP, KDNC, PDL, and CTL

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Is FAR or CMRS more profitable?

Do analysts rate FAR or CMRS?

Does the media prefer FAR or CMRS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FAR or CMRS?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FAR or CMRS?

Which has more volatility and risk, FAR or CMRS?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Gensource Potash?

Is GSP or CMRS more profitable?

Does the media refer more to GSP or CMRS?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of GSP or CMRS?

Which has more risk and volatility, GSP or CMRS?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, GSP or CMRS?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Cadence Minerals?

Which has more volatility & risk, CMRS or KDNC?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CMRS or KDNC?

Is CMRS or KDNC more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CMRS or KDNC?

Does the media favor CMRS or KDNC?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Petra Diamonds?

Is CMRS or PDL more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CMRS or PDL?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CMRS or PDL?

Which has more risk & volatility, CMRS or PDL?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CMRS or PDL?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to CleanTech Lithium?

Is CTL or CMRS more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CTL or CMRS?

Which has more volatility & risk, CTL or CMRS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CTL or CMRS?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CTL or CMRS?

Do analysts rate CTL or CMRS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMRS vs. The Competition

Critical Mineral Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools