Does the media refer more to PDL or CMRS?

In the previous week, Petra Diamonds and Petra Diamonds both had 1 articles in the media. Petra Diamonds' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Critical Mineral Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Petra Diamonds is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Petra Diamonds 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Critical Mineral Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CMRS or FMET?

Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Critical Mineral Resources N/A N/A -£1.71K -£1.40 N/A Fulcrum Metals N/A N/A -£1.06M -£0.66 N/A

Is CMRS or FMET more profitable?

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Critical Mineral Resources N/A 1,095.86% -97.47% Fulcrum Metals N/A -13.40% N/A

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ROCK or CMRS?

Rockfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Rockfire Resources N/A N/A -£2.26M -£0.03 N/A Critical Mineral Resources N/A N/A -£1.71K -£1.40 N/A

Is ROCK or CMRS more profitable?

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Rockfire Resources N/A -40.49% -24.89% Critical Mineral Resources N/A 1,095.86% -97.47%

Does the media refer more to ROCK or CMRS?

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 1 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. Rockfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Critical Mineral Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Rockfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Rockfire Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Critical Mineral Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, UFO or CMRS?

Alien Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alien Metals N/A N/A -£2.66M -£0.01 N/A Critical Mineral Resources N/A N/A -£1.71K -£1.40 N/A

Is UFO or CMRS more profitable?

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Alien Metals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alien Metals N/A -15.88% -8.65% Critical Mineral Resources N/A 1,095.86% -97.47%

Critical Mineral Resources (CMRS) Competitors

GBX 2.07 +0.07 (+3.50%)

As of 11:02 AM Eastern

Compare

CMRS vs. PDL, FMET, ROCK, UFO, and FME

Should you buy Critical Mineral Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Critical Mineral Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Critical Mineral Resources include Petra Diamonds (PDL), Fulcrum Metals (FMET), Rockfire Resources (ROCK), Alien Metals (UFO), and Future Metals (FME). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Petra Diamonds?

Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Petra Diamonds and Petra Diamonds both had 1 articles in the media. Petra Diamonds' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Critical Mineral Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Petra Diamonds is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Petra Diamonds	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Critical Mineral Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Critical Mineral Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -104.34%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Petra Diamonds	-104.34%	-333.85%	-9.26%
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	1,095.86%	-97.47%

Critical Mineral Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petra Diamonds. Critical Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petra Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Petra Diamonds	£192M	0.12	-£11.38M	-£84.51	N/A
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	N/A	-£1.71K	-£1.40	N/A

8.5% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.7% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Petra Diamonds beats Critical Mineral Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Fulcrum Metals?

Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) and Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and earnings.

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Fulcrum Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	N/A	-£1.71K	-£1.40	N/A
Fulcrum Metals	N/A	N/A	-£1.06M	-£0.66	N/A

In the previous week, Critical Mineral Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Fulcrum Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources and 0 mentions for Fulcrum Metals. Critical Mineral Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fulcrum Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Critical Mineral Resources	Neutral
Fulcrum Metals	Neutral

Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, suggesting that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.143, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	1,095.86%	-97.47%
Fulcrum Metals	N/A	-13.40%	N/A

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Fulcrum Metals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Rockfire Resources?

Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Rockfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Rockfire Resources	N/A	N/A	-£2.26M	-£0.03	N/A
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	N/A	-£1.71K	-£1.40	N/A

0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.0% of Rockfire Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 1 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. Rockfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Critical Mineral Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Rockfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Rockfire Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Critical Mineral Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Rockfire Resources has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, suggesting that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Rockfire Resources	N/A	-40.49%	-24.89%
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	1,095.86%	-97.47%

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Rockfire Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Alien Metals?

Alien Metals (LON:UFO) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Critical Mineral Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Alien Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources and 0 mentions for Alien Metals. Alien Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Alien Metals	Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources	Neutral

0.0% of Alien Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Alien Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Alien Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alien Metals	N/A	-15.88%	-8.65%
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	1,095.86%	-97.47%

Alien Metals has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

Alien Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alien Metals	N/A	N/A	-£2.66M	-£0.01	N/A
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	N/A	-£1.71K	-£1.40	N/A

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Alien Metals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Future Metals?

Future Metals (LON:FME) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Critical Mineral Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Future Metals. Future Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Future Metals	£155.84K	67.65	-£7.83M	-£0.40	N/A
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	N/A	-£1.71K	-£1.40	N/A

Future Metals has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Critical Mineral Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Future Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources and 0 mentions for Future Metals. Future Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Future Metals	Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources	Neutral

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Future Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Critical Mineral Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Future Metals' net margin of -1,051.73%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Future Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Future Metals	-1,051.73%	-11.89%	-11.36%
Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	1,095.86%	-97.47%

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Future Metals on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Critical Mineral Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMRS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CMRS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Critical Mineral Resources	Other Precious Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£7.07M	£565.57M	£4.55B	£2.79B
Dividend Yield	N/A	6.09%	5.03%	6.12%
P/E Ratio	-1.48	12.24	20.94	368.63
Price / Sales	N/A	3,590.34	6,459.86	84,796.26
Price / Cash	N/A	13.04	26.46	27.87
Price / Book	-10.21	58.78	8.78	7.77
Net Income	-£1.71K	-£4.87M	£157.11M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	3.50%	-0.61%	0.23%	1.32%
1 Month Performance	-0.96%	-9.30%	-5.47%	-0.69%
1 Year Performance	69.67%	46.21%	38.64%	62.54%

Critical Mineral Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CMRS Critical Mineral Resources	N/A	GBX 2.07 +3.5%	N/A	+71.9%	£7.07M	N/A	N/A	2	News Coverage
PDL Petra Diamonds	N/A	GBX 7 +3.9%	N/A	-37.7%	£23.48M	£192M	N/A	2,870	Gap Down
FMET Fulcrum Metals	N/A	GBX 7.67 -5.3%	N/A	+63.4%	£11.78M	N/A	N/A	5	Gap Down
ROCK Rockfire Resources	N/A	GBX 0.13 +3.2%	N/A	+0.0%	£11.29M	N/A	N/A	2,140	News Coverage Gap Down
UFO Alien Metals	N/A	GBX 0.09 +2.2%	N/A	+12.4%	£11.02M	N/A	N/A	10	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CMRS) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Critical Mineral Resources (CMRS) Competitors

CMRS vs. PDL, FMET, ROCK, UFO, and FME

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Petra Diamonds?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Fulcrum Metals?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Rockfire Resources?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Alien Metals?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Future Metals?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMRS vs. The Competition

Critical Mineral Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Critical Mineral Resources (CMRS) Competitors

CMRS vs. PDL, FMET, ROCK, UFO, and FME

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Petra Diamonds?

Does the media refer more to PDL or CMRS?

Is PDL or CMRS more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, PDL or CMRS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PDL or CMRS?

Which has more risk and volatility, PDL or CMRS?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Fulcrum Metals?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CMRS or FMET?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CMRS or FMET?

Does the media favor CMRS or FMET?

Which has more risk and volatility, CMRS or FMET?

Is CMRS or FMET more profitable?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Rockfire Resources?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ROCK or CMRS?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ROCK or CMRS?

Does the media refer more to ROCK or CMRS?

Which has more risk and volatility, ROCK or CMRS?

Is ROCK or CMRS more profitable?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Alien Metals?

Does the media prefer UFO or CMRS?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in UFO or CMRS?

Is UFO or CMRS more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, UFO or CMRS?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, UFO or CMRS?

Summary

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Future Metals?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FME or CMRS?

Which has more risk & volatility, FME or CMRS?

Does the media refer more to FME or CMRS?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FME or CMRS?

Is FME or CMRS more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CMRS vs. The Competition

Critical Mineral Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools