Free Trial
→ From the man who predicted 2008 crash… (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMRS Stock Alerts

Critical Mineral Resources (CMRS) Competitors

Critical Mineral Resources logo
GBX 2.55 +0.15 (+6.25%)
As of 11:10 AM Eastern
Compare

CMRS vs. UFO, ROCK, FMET, FME, and GEMD

Should you be buying Critical Mineral Resources stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Critical Mineral Resources include Alien Metals (UFO), Rockfire Resources (ROCK), Fulcrum Metals (FMET), Future Metals (FME), and Gem Diamonds (GEMD). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Alien Metals?

Alien Metals (LON:UFO) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Alien Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alien MetalsN/A -15.88% -8.65%
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 2,402.74%-97.47%

0.0% of Alien Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Alien Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Alien Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alien Metals Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

Alien Metals has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.796, meaning that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Alien Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alien MetalsN/AN/A-£2.66M-£0.02N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.10N/A

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Alien Metals on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Rockfire Resources?

Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) and Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/A 2,402.74% -97.47%
Rockfire Resources N/A -40.49%-24.89%

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 0 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. Critical Mineral Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Rockfire Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral
Rockfire Resources Neutral

Critical Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rockfire Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.10N/A
Rockfire ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.05N/A

Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.796, meaning that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rockfire Resources has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

2.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Rockfire Resources on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Fulcrum Metals?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

2.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Fulcrum Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -50.52% N/A
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 2,402.74%-97.47%

Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£1.80N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.10N/A

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.185, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.796, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Fulcrum Metals on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Future Metals?

Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) and Future Metals (LON:FME) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

2.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Future Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Future Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Future Metals and 0 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. Future Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Critical Mineral Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Future Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral
Future Metals Positive

Critical Mineral Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Future Metals' net margin of -1,051.73%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Future Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/A 2,402.74% -97.47%
Future Metals -1,051.73%-11.89%-11.36%

Critical Mineral Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Future Metals. Future Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.10N/A
Future Metals£155.84K67.65-£7.83M-£0.40N/A

Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.796, suggesting that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Future Metals has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Future Metals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Gem Diamonds?

Gem Diamonds (LON:GEMD) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Gem Diamonds' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gem Diamonds Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

4.4% of Gem Diamonds shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.5% of Gem Diamonds shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gem Diamonds has higher revenue and earnings than Critical Mineral Resources. Critical Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gem Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gem Diamonds£98.41M0.05£1.14M-£74.40N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.10N/A

Critical Mineral Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gem Diamonds' net margin of -105.83%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Gem Diamonds' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gem Diamonds-105.83% -83.59% 2.31%
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 2,402.74%-97.47%

Gem Diamonds has a beta of 1.196, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.796, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gem Diamonds beats Critical Mineral Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Critical Mineral Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMRS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMRS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCritical Mineral ResourcesOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£8.71M£737.21M£4.91B£2.75B
Dividend YieldN/A6.01%4.96%6.14%
P/E Ratio-2.3212.6723.04365.56
Price / SalesN/A3,832.887,495.2088,645.93
Price / CashN/A13.0424.4627.89
Price / Book-12.5713.836.997.47
Net Income-£1.71K-£4.87M£159.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-5.56%5.51%3.43%7.44%
1 Month Performance14.97%2.05%3.65%2.91%
1 Year Performance107.32%126.61%83.15%89.20%

Critical Mineral Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMRS
Critical Mineral Resources
N/AGBX 2.55
+6.3%		N/A+124.9%£8.71MN/AN/A2
UFO
Alien Metals
N/AGBX 0.14
+3.0%		N/A+66.7%£16.14MN/AN/A10
ROCK
Rockfire Resources
N/AGBX 0.14
+1.4%		N/A+35.2%£12.25MN/AN/A2,140
FMET
Fulcrum Metals
N/AGBX 7.53
-2.9%		N/A+98.5%£11.09MN/AN/A5
FME
Future Metals
N/AGBX 1.10
-2.2%		N/A+120.0%£10.54M£155.84KN/A123,200

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CMRS) was last updated on 5/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Iran broke the petrodollar…
For 50 years, every barrel of oil settled in dollars - that rule is what made the dollar the world's reserve c...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
BSEM: From OTC to Nasdaq Contender!
BioStem Technologies (OTC: BSEM) has posted seven consecutive profitable quarters and just released audited fi...
Huge Alerts | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s ‘iPhone’ Could 10x Apple’s iPhone
Early Apple investors saw peak gains as high as 7,537% after the iPhone launched. Now, multiple insider source...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
No. You’re not imagining it…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
"Computers are about to become obsolete" - George Gilder. Here’s why.
George Gilder predicted the iPhone 16 years early, called Netflix a decade before it dominated streaming, and ...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel