Critical Mineral Resources (CMRS) Competitors

Critical Mineral Resources logo
GBX 1.86 -0.04 (-1.84%)
As of 06/23/2026 09:53 AM Eastern

CMRS vs. PDL, UFO, FMET, ROCK, and FME

Should you buy Critical Mineral Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Critical Mineral Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Critical Mineral Resources include Petra Diamonds (PDL), Alien Metals (UFO), Fulcrum Metals (FMET), Rockfire Resources (ROCK), and Future Metals (FME). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Petra Diamonds?

Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Critical Mineral Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petra Diamonds. Critical Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petra Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petra Diamonds£192M0.13-£11.38M-£84.51N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.40N/A

Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Petra Diamonds' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petra Diamonds Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

8.4% of Petra Diamonds shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 26.7% of Petra Diamonds shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Critical Mineral Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -40.03%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petra Diamonds-40.03% -139.96% -9.26%
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 2,402.74%-97.47%

Summary

Petra Diamonds and Critical Mineral Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Alien Metals?

Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) and Alien Metals (LON:UFO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Alien Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.40N/A
Alien MetalsN/AN/A-£2.66M-£0.02N/A

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Alien Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/A 2,402.74% -97.47%
Alien Metals N/A -15.88%-8.65%

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Alien Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Alien Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alien Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Alien Metals and 0 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. Alien Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Critical Mineral Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Alien Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral
Alien Metals Neutral

Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alien Metals has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Alien Metals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Fulcrum Metals?

Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) and Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/A 2,402.74% -97.47%
Fulcrum Metals N/A -50.52%N/A

Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.40N/A
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£1.80N/A

Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.123, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Critical Mineral Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fulcrum Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral
Fulcrum Metals Neutral

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.4% of Fulcrum Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Fulcrum Metals on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Rockfire Resources?

Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rockfire Resources Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of Rockfire Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Rockfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rockfire ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.03N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.40N/A

Rockfire Resources has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rockfire ResourcesN/A -40.49% -24.89%
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 2,402.74%-97.47%

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Rockfire Resources on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Future Metals?

Future Metals (LON:FME) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Critical Mineral Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Future Metals' net margin of -1,051.73%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Future Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Future Metals-1,051.73% -11.89% -11.36%
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 2,402.74%-97.47%

Future Metals has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Future Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Future Metals and 0 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. Future Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Future Metals Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Future Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Critical Mineral Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Future Metals. Future Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Future Metals£155.84K67.65-£7.83M-£0.40N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.40N/A

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Future Metals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Critical Mineral Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMRS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMRS vs. The Competition

MetricCritical Mineral ResourcesOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.37M£614.07M£4.75B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A6.08%5.00%6.16%
P/E Ratio-1.3312.6222.86366.30
Price / SalesN/A3,700.895,542.1886,148.41
Price / CashN/A13.0427.0527.85
Price / Book-9.2056.218.817.83
Net Income-£1.71K-£4.87M£157.26M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.15%-5.63%-3.18%-0.94%
1 Month Performance-25.40%-9.84%-4.25%-0.74%
1 Year Performance55.42%63.97%51.56%68.82%

Critical Mineral Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMRS
Critical Mineral Resources
N/AGBX 1.87
-1.8%
N/A+51.0%£6.37MN/AN/A2
PDL
Petra Diamonds
N/AGBX 6.50
-4.4%
N/A-48.7%£21.80M£192MN/A2,870
UFO
Alien Metals
N/AGBX 0.13
flat
N/A+53.3%£15.17MN/AN/A10
FMET
Fulcrum Metals
N/AGBX 9.04
-0.2%
N/A+87.8%£13.84MN/AN/A5
ROCK
Rockfire Resources
N/AGBX 0.15
-2.6%
N/A+65.9%£13.22MN/AN/A2,140

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CMRS) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners