Go Pro
→ Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMRS Stock Alerts

Critical Mineral Resources (CMRS) Competitors

Critical Mineral Resources logo
GBX 1.84 +0.09 (+5.37%)
As of 05:33 AM Eastern
Compare

CMRS vs. PDL, FMET, FME, ROCK, and UFO

Should you buy Critical Mineral Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Critical Mineral Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Critical Mineral Resources include Petra Diamonds (PDL), Fulcrum Metals (FMET), Future Metals (FME), Rockfire Resources (ROCK), and Alien Metals (UFO).

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Petra Diamonds?

Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Petra Diamonds had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Petra Diamonds and 0 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. Petra Diamonds' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petra Diamonds Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

8.5% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.7% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Critical Mineral Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petra Diamonds. Critical Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petra Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petra Diamonds£192M0.11-£11.38M-£84.51N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.40N/A

Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

Critical Mineral Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -104.34%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petra Diamonds-104.34% -333.85% -9.26%
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 1,095.86%-97.47%

Summary

Petra Diamonds beats Critical Mineral Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Fulcrum Metals?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Fulcrum Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fulcrum Metals and 0 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Critical Mineral Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Fulcrum Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Positive
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.40N/A

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 1,095.86%-97.47%

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.143, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.1% of Fulcrum Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fulcrum Metals and Critical Mineral Resources tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Future Metals?

Future Metals (LON:FME) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Future Metals had 4 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Future Metals and 0 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. Future Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Critical Mineral Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Future Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Future Metals Positive
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

Critical Mineral Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Future Metals' net margin of -1,051.73%. Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Future Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Future Metals-1,051.73% -11.89% -11.36%
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 1,095.86%-97.47%

Future Metals has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

Critical Mineral Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Future Metals. Future Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Future Metals£155.84K67.65-£7.83M-£0.40N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.40N/A

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Future Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Future Metals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Rockfire Resources?

Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rockfire ResourcesN/A -40.49% -24.89%
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 1,095.86%-97.47%

Rockfire Resources has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.0% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Critical Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 0 mentions for Critical Mineral Resources. Rockfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.07 beat Critical Mineral Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Rockfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rockfire Resources Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

Rockfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rockfire ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.03N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.40N/A

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Rockfire Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Critical Mineral Resources compare to Alien Metals?

Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) and Alien Metals (LON:UFO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Critical Mineral Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alien Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral
Alien Metals Neutral

3.3% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Alien Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Alien Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alien Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Critical Mineral Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.40N/A
Alien MetalsN/AN/A-£2.66M-£0.01N/A

Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 1.753, suggesting that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alien Metals has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 1,095.86% beat Alien Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/A 1,095.86% -97.47%
Alien Metals N/A -15.88%-8.65%

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Alien Metals on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Critical Mineral Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMRS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCritical Mineral ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.30M£3.65B£4.74B£2.86B
Dividend YieldN/A5.28%4.75%6.13%
P/E Ratio-1.3222.3520.90369.20
Price / SalesN/A7,936.014,714.3583,609.40
Price / CashN/A29.2026.7127.89
Price / Book-9.0910.428.787.12
Net Income-£1.71K£122.62M£155.10M£5.89B
7 Day Performance14.89%4.49%3.75%1.23%
1 Month Performance-19.83%0.45%0.73%0.97%
1 Year Performance14.18%50.89%40.85%75.28%

Critical Mineral Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMRS
Critical Mineral Resources
N/AGBX 1.84
+5.4%		N/A+14.3%£6.30MN/AN/A2
PDL
Petra Diamonds
N/AGBX 6.50
flat		N/A-46.7%£21.80M£192MN/A2,870
FMET
Fulcrum Metals
N/AGBX 7.39
+5.4%		N/A+125.5%£11.35MN/AN/A5
FME
Future Metals
N/AGBX 1.10
-2.2%		N/A+37.3%£10.54M£155.84KN/A123,200
ROCK
Rockfire Resources
N/AGBX 0.10
-1.9%		N/A+22.4%£8.93MN/AN/A2,140

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CMRS) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The dollar reset no one told you about
Porter Stansberry says a dollar reset is underway - one that has happened only once before in America's 250-ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Control 100 shares without spending thousands of dollars
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
A $5 stock inside Kennedy Space Center?
A small publicly traded company operates a specialized launch vehicle fleet inside the secure perimeter of Ken...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
A Secret Plan to End Trump in November?
A White House insider with close ties to the Trump family is speaking out about what he calls the biggest poli...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
ALT SL: New Patent Reveals Elon Musk’s Next Breakthrough: M.A.G.I.
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin - two investors who spotted Nvidia a decade ago - are now pointing to Elon Musk's ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel