Do analysts recommend GMET or FRES?

Fresnillo has a consensus price target of GBX 3,988, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Given Fresnillo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Golden Metal Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Golden Metal Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Fresnillo 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FRES or THS?

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Tharisa. Tharisa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Fresnillo £4.56B 5.27 £310.64M £187.80 17.38 Tharisa £748.73M 0.47 £96.84M £39.30 3.04

Is FRES or THS more profitable?

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 16.17%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Tharisa's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Fresnillo 30.66% 32.98% 4.20% Tharisa 16.17% 14.75% 5.09%

Does the media favor FRES or THS?

In the previous week, Fresnillo and Fresnillo both had 1 articles in the media. Fresnillo's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Tharisa's score of 0.00 indicating that Fresnillo is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fresnillo 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Tharisa 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Is EEE or FRES more profitable?

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Empire Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Empire Metals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Empire Metals N/A -24.90% -25.26% Fresnillo 30.66% 32.98% 4.20%

Does the media favor EEE or FRES?

In the previous week, Empire Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Fresnillo. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Empire Metals and 1 mentions for Fresnillo. Fresnillo's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Empire Metals' score of 0.38 indicating that Fresnillo is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Empire Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fresnillo 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, FRES or SLP?

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Sylvania Platinum. Sylvania Platinum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Fresnillo £4.56B 5.27 £310.64M £187.80 17.38 Sylvania Platinum £156.52M 1.57 £8.54M £13.93 6.81

Does the media refer more to FRES or SLP?

In the previous week, Fresnillo and Fresnillo both had 1 articles in the media. Fresnillo's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Sylvania Platinum's score of 0.37 indicating that Fresnillo is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fresnillo 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Sylvania Platinum 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate EUA or FRES?

Fresnillo has a consensus target price of GBX 3,988, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Given Fresnillo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Eurasia Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Eurasia Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Fresnillo 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, EUA or FRES?

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Eurasia Mining. Eurasia Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Eurasia Mining £6.64M 11.50 -£422.17K -£0.05 N/A Fresnillo £4.56B 5.27 £310.64M £187.80 17.38

Does the media prefer EUA or FRES?

In the previous week, Eurasia Mining and Eurasia Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Fresnillo's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Eurasia Mining's score of 0.67 indicating that Fresnillo is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Eurasia Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Fresnillo 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Fresnillo (FRES) Competitors

GBX 3,264 +64.00 (+2.00%)

As of 12:24 PM Eastern

Compare

FRES vs. GMET, THS, EEE, SLP, and EUA

Should you buy Fresnillo stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fresnillo with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fresnillo include Golden Metal Resources (GMET), Tharisa (THS), Empire Metals (EEE), Sylvania Platinum (SLP), and Eurasia Mining (EUA). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does Fresnillo compare to Golden Metal Resources?

Golden Metal Resources (LON:GMET) and Fresnillo (LON:FRES) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Golden Metal Resources has a beta of 0.909, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fresnillo has a beta of 0.732, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

3.7% of Golden Metal Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.8% of Fresnillo shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Golden Metal Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fresnillo has a consensus price target of GBX 3,988, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Given Fresnillo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Golden Metal Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golden Metal Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Fresnillo	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Golden Metal Resources' net margin of -2,826.67%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Golden Metal Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golden Metal Resources	-2,826.67%	-25.01%	-10.19%
Fresnillo	30.66%	32.98%	4.20%

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Metal Resources. Golden Metal Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golden Metal Resources	-£2K	-228,311.90	-£1.53M	-£4.00	N/A
Fresnillo	£4.56B	5.27	£310.64M	£187.80	17.38

In the previous week, Fresnillo had 1 more articles in the media than Golden Metal Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fresnillo and 0 mentions for Golden Metal Resources. Fresnillo's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Golden Metal Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Fresnillo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Golden Metal Resources	Neutral
Fresnillo	Positive

Summary

Fresnillo beats Golden Metal Resources on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fresnillo compare to Tharisa?

Fresnillo (LON:FRES) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

13.8% of Fresnillo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Tharisa shares are held by institutional investors. 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Tharisa shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 16.17%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Tharisa's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fresnillo	30.66%	32.98%	4.20%
Tharisa	16.17%	14.75%	5.09%

Fresnillo has a beta of 0.732, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tharisa has a beta of 0.684, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fresnillo and Fresnillo both had 1 articles in the media. Fresnillo's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Tharisa's score of 0.00 indicating that Fresnillo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fresnillo	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Tharisa	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Fresnillo pays an annual dividend of GBX 47.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Tharisa pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Fresnillo pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tharisa pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tharisa is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fresnillo currently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,988, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Tharisa has a consensus target price of GBX 177.50, suggesting a potential upside of 48.54%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Fresnillo.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fresnillo	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Tharisa	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Tharisa. Tharisa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fresnillo	£4.56B	5.27	£310.64M	£187.80	17.38
Tharisa	£748.73M	0.47	£96.84M	£39.30	3.04

Summary

Fresnillo beats Tharisa on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fresnillo compare to Empire Metals?

Empire Metals (LON:EEE) and Fresnillo (LON:FRES) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Empire Metals presently has a consensus price target of GBX 62, suggesting a potential upside of 74.65%. Fresnillo has a consensus price target of GBX 3,988, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Given Empire Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Empire Metals is more favorable than Fresnillo.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Empire Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Fresnillo	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Empire Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Empire Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Empire Metals	N/A	-24.90%	-25.26%
Fresnillo	30.66%	32.98%	4.20%

0.2% of Empire Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.8% of Fresnillo shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Empire Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Fresnillo. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Empire Metals and 1 mentions for Fresnillo. Fresnillo's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Empire Metals' score of 0.38 indicating that Fresnillo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Empire Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fresnillo	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Empire Metals. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Empire Metals	N/A	N/A	-£3.47M	-£0.52	N/A
Fresnillo	£4.56B	5.27	£310.64M	£187.80	17.38

Empire Metals has a beta of 2.197, suggesting that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fresnillo has a beta of 0.732, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fresnillo beats Empire Metals on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fresnillo compare to Sylvania Platinum?

Fresnillo (LON:FRES) and Sylvania Platinum (LON:SLP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Fresnillo presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,988, indicating a potential upside of 22.18%. Sylvania Platinum has a consensus price target of GBX 172, indicating a potential upside of 81.32%. Given Sylvania Platinum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sylvania Platinum is more favorable than Fresnillo.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fresnillo	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Sylvania Platinum	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Fresnillo pays an annual dividend of GBX 47.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Sylvania Platinum pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Fresnillo pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sylvania Platinum pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

13.8% of Fresnillo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Sylvania Platinum shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Sylvania Platinum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Sylvania Platinum's net margin of 23.16%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Sylvania Platinum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fresnillo	30.66%	32.98%	4.20%
Sylvania Platinum	23.16%	14.10%	1.69%

In the previous week, Fresnillo and Fresnillo both had 1 articles in the media. Fresnillo's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Sylvania Platinum's score of 0.37 indicating that Fresnillo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fresnillo	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Sylvania Platinum	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Sylvania Platinum. Sylvania Platinum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fresnillo	£4.56B	5.27	£310.64M	£187.80	17.38
Sylvania Platinum	£156.52M	1.57	£8.54M	£13.93	6.81

Fresnillo has a beta of 0.732, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sylvania Platinum has a beta of 1.7676816, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fresnillo beats Sylvania Platinum on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fresnillo compare to Eurasia Mining?

Eurasia Mining (LON:EUA) and Fresnillo (LON:FRES) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Eurasia Mining and Eurasia Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Fresnillo's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Eurasia Mining's score of 0.67 indicating that Fresnillo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Eurasia Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Fresnillo	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

0.0% of Eurasia Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.8% of Fresnillo shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.9% of Eurasia Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Eurasia Mining has a beta of 0.384, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fresnillo has a beta of 0.732, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Fresnillo has a consensus target price of GBX 3,988, suggesting a potential upside of 22.18%. Given Fresnillo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Eurasia Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Eurasia Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Fresnillo	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Eurasia Mining. Eurasia Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eurasia Mining	£6.64M	11.50	-£422.17K	-£0.05	N/A
Fresnillo	£4.56B	5.27	£310.64M	£187.80	17.38

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Eurasia Mining's net margin of -21.65%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Eurasia Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eurasia Mining	-21.65%	-7.12%	-3.34%
Fresnillo	30.66%	32.98%	4.20%

Summary

Fresnillo beats Eurasia Mining on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fresnillo News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRES and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FRES vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Fresnillo	Other Precious Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£24.05B	£682.86M	£4.93B	£2.81B
Dividend Yield	3.17%	6.07%	4.98%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	17.38	13.17	23.81	366.63
Price / Sales	5.27	3,720.49	5,921.97	86,437.67
Price / Cash	5.47	13.04	24.28	27.85
Price / Book	5.77	61.83	9.40	7.86
Net Income	£310.64M	-£4.87M	£156.77M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	13.81%	7.63%	3.71%	0.76%
1 Month Performance	-2.59%	-6.51%	-1.95%	1.58%
1 Year Performance	130.35%	75.16%	58.86%	73.17%

Fresnillo Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FRES Fresnillo	3.5317 of 5 stars	GBX 3,264 +2.0%	GBX 3,988 +22.2%	+123.3%	£24.05B	£4.56B	17.38	7,231	News Coverage
GMET Golden Metal Resources	N/A	GBX 208.78 -5.6%	N/A	+290.7%	£405.67M	-£2K	N/A	5	High Trading Volume
THS Tharisa	3.0589 of 5 stars	GBX 120 -5.9%	GBX 177.50 +47.9%	+43.4%	£355.55M	£748.73M	3.05	7,500	Gap Down High Trading Volume
EEE Empire Metals	1.8043 of 5 stars	GBX 33 -1.8%	GBX 62 +87.9%	+94.4%	£243.40M	N/A	N/A	3	Negative News
SLP Sylvania Platinum	4.8816 of 5 stars	GBX 87.87 -6.0%	GBX 172 +95.7%	+36.3%	£227.43M	£156.52M	6.31	160	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FRES) was last updated on 6/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Fresnillo (FRES) Competitors

FRES vs. GMET, THS, EEE, SLP, and EUA

How does Fresnillo compare to Golden Metal Resources?

Summary

How does Fresnillo compare to Tharisa?

Summary

How does Fresnillo compare to Empire Metals?

Summary

How does Fresnillo compare to Sylvania Platinum?

Summary

How does Fresnillo compare to Eurasia Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FRES vs. The Competition

Fresnillo Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Fresnillo (FRES) Competitors

FRES vs. GMET, THS, EEE, SLP, and EUA

How does Fresnillo compare to Golden Metal Resources?

Which has more volatility & risk, GMET or FRES?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in GMET or FRES?

Do analysts recommend GMET or FRES?

Is GMET or FRES more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GMET or FRES?

Does the media refer more to GMET or FRES?

Summary

How does Fresnillo compare to Tharisa?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in FRES or THS?

Is FRES or THS more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, FRES or THS?

Does the media favor FRES or THS?

Is FRES or THS a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate FRES or THS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FRES or THS?

Summary

How does Fresnillo compare to Empire Metals?

Do analysts recommend EEE or FRES?

Is EEE or FRES more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of EEE or FRES?

Does the media favor EEE or FRES?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, EEE or FRES?

Which has more volatility and risk, EEE or FRES?

Summary

How does Fresnillo compare to Sylvania Platinum?

Do analysts prefer FRES or SLP?

Is FRES or SLP a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FRES or SLP?

Is FRES or SLP more profitable?

Does the media refer more to FRES or SLP?

Which has better earnings & valuation, FRES or SLP?

Which has more volatility and risk, FRES or SLP?

Summary

How does Fresnillo compare to Eurasia Mining?

Does the media prefer EUA or FRES?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in EUA or FRES?

Which has more risk & volatility, EUA or FRES?

Do analysts rate EUA or FRES?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, EUA or FRES?

Is EUA or FRES more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FRES vs. The Competition

Fresnillo Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools