Go Pro

Fresnillo (FRES) Competitors

Fresnillo logo
GBX 2,876.57 +3.57 (+0.12%)
As of 08/14/2026 12:36 PM Eastern

FRES vs. GLEN, WPM, AAL, ANTO, and VALT

Should you buy Fresnillo stock or one of its competitors? Fresnillo's main competitors and comparable companies include Glencore (GLEN), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Anglo American (AAL), Antofagasta (ANTO), and Valt Technology Services (VALT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Fresnillo compare to Glencore?

Fresnillo (LON:FRES) and Glencore (LON:GLEN) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Glencore had 4 more articles in the media than Fresnillo. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Glencore and 1 mentions for Fresnillo. Glencore's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Fresnillo's score of 0.00 indicating that Glencore is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fresnillo
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Glencore
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Fresnillo pays an annual dividend of GBX 47.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Glencore pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Fresnillo pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Glencore pays out 335.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Fresnillo has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Glencore. Fresnillo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glencore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fresnillo£6.01B3.53£310.64M£187.8015.32
Glencore£304.57B0.21-£682.18M£3.00183.38

Fresnillo presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,490, indicating a potential upside of 21.32%. Glencore has a consensus price target of GBX 660, indicating a potential upside of 19.97%. Given Fresnillo's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Glencore.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fresnillo
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Glencore
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Fresnillo has a net margin of 37.72% compared to Glencore's net margin of 1.78%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 46.50% beat Glencore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fresnillo37.72% 46.50% 4.20%
Glencore 1.78%13.34%2.54%

13.2% of Fresnillo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.7% of Glencore shares are held by institutional investors. 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Glencore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fresnillo has a beta of 0.702, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glencore has a beta of 0.514, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fresnillo beats Glencore on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fresnillo compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Wheaton Precious Metals (LON:WPM) and Fresnillo (LON:FRES) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

61.7% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.2% of Fresnillo shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Fresnillo. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 1 mentions for Fresnillo. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Fresnillo's score of 0.00 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fresnillo
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Wheaton Precious Metals presently has a consensus target price of £117, indicating a potential upside of 18.62%. Fresnillo has a consensus target price of GBX 3,490, indicating a potential upside of 21.32%. Given Fresnillo's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fresnillo
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 69 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Fresnillo pays an annual dividend of GBX 47.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fresnillo pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 1.187, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fresnillo has a beta of 0.702, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fresnillo. Fresnillo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals£3.17B14.12£754.42M£395.7024.93
Fresnillo£6.01B3.53£310.64M£187.8015.32

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Fresnillo's net margin of 37.72%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 46.50% beat Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals64.66% 22.96% 5.35%
Fresnillo 37.72%46.50%4.20%

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Fresnillo on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fresnillo compare to Anglo American?

Anglo American (LON:AAL) and Fresnillo (LON:FRES) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

46.7% of Anglo American shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.2% of Fresnillo shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Anglo American shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fresnillo has a net margin of 37.72% compared to Anglo American's net margin of -13.97%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 46.50% beat Anglo American's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Anglo American-13.97% -15.45% 5.94%
Fresnillo 37.72%46.50%4.20%

Anglo American has a beta of 0.973, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fresnillo has a beta of 0.702, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Anglo American pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Fresnillo pays an annual dividend of GBX 47.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Anglo American pays out -8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fresnillo pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Anglo American currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,921.43, suggesting a potential upside of 1.86%. Fresnillo has a consensus price target of GBX 3,490, suggesting a potential upside of 21.32%. Given Fresnillo's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Anglo American.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Anglo American
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Fresnillo
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Fresnillo has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Anglo American. Anglo American is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Anglo American£19.52B2.11-£2.07B-£252.00N/A
Fresnillo£6.01B3.53£310.64M£187.8015.32

In the previous week, Anglo American had 2 more articles in the media than Fresnillo. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Anglo American and 1 mentions for Fresnillo. Anglo American's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Fresnillo's score of 0.00 indicating that Anglo American is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Anglo American
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Fresnillo
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Anglo American and Fresnillo tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fresnillo compare to Antofagasta?

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and Fresnillo (LON:FRES) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and dividends.

Antofagasta currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,843.75, indicating a potential upside of 7.22%. Fresnillo has a consensus price target of GBX 3,490, indicating a potential upside of 21.32%. Given Fresnillo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Antofagasta
3 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.88
Fresnillo
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 9 more articles in the media than Fresnillo. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Antofagasta and 1 mentions for Fresnillo. Antofagasta's average media sentiment score of 0.16 beat Fresnillo's score of 0.00 indicating that Antofagasta is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Antofagasta
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Fresnillo
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

27.0% of Antofagasta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.2% of Fresnillo shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Fresnillo. Fresnillo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Antofagasta£8.62B4.10£955.17M£134.8026.59
Fresnillo£6.01B3.53£310.64M£187.8015.32

Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 40.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Fresnillo pays an annual dividend of GBX 47.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Antofagasta pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fresnillo pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fresnillo is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fresnillo has a beta of 0.702, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Fresnillo has a net margin of 37.72% compared to Antofagasta's net margin of 17.79%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 46.50% beat Antofagasta's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Antofagasta17.79% 15.70% 5.23%
Fresnillo 37.72%46.50%4.20%

Summary

Antofagasta beats Fresnillo on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fresnillo compare to Valt Technology Services?

Valt Technology Services (LON:VALT) and Fresnillo (LON:FRES) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

40.7% of Valt Technology Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.2% of Fresnillo shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Valt Technology Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fresnillo had 1 more articles in the media than Valt Technology Services. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fresnillo and 0 mentions for Valt Technology Services. Valt Technology Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fresnillo'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Valt Technology Services Neutral
Fresnillo Neutral

Fresnillo has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Valt Technology Services. Valt Technology Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Valt Technology Services£155.80B0.11N/A£13.81 thousand0.47
Fresnillo£6.01B3.53£310.64M£187.8015.32

Valt Technology Services presently has a consensus target price of GBX 7,450, suggesting a potential upside of 15.33%. Fresnillo has a consensus target price of GBX 3,490, suggesting a potential upside of 21.32%. Given Fresnillo's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Valt Technology Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Valt Technology Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fresnillo
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Valt Technology Services pays an annual dividend of GBX 2,616.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 40.5%. Fresnillo pays an annual dividend of GBX 47.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Valt Technology Services pays out 18.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fresnillo pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Valt Technology Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fresnillo has a net margin of 37.72% compared to Valt Technology Services' net margin of 0.00%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 46.50% beat Valt Technology Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Valt Technology ServicesN/A N/A N/A
Fresnillo 37.72%46.50%4.20%

Summary

Fresnillo beats Valt Technology Services on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fresnillo News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRES and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRES and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRES vs. The Competition

MetricFresnilloMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£21.20B£3.77B£4.85B£2.53B
Dividend Yield3.80%5.23%4.72%6.10%
P/E Ratio15.3223.6725.58368.50
Price / Sales3.537,610.144,521.3383,338.70
Price / Cash5.4729.6927.1227.89
Price / Book5.0910.418.857.18
Net Income£310.64M£122.18M£154.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.44%1.28%0.96%0.91%
1 Month Performance17.17%10.78%8.66%2.92%
1 Year Performance69.65%54.75%43.25%64.34%

Fresnillo Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRES
Fresnillo
3.0178 of 5 stars
GBX 2,876.57
+0.1%
GBX 3,490
+21.3%
+69.6%£21.20B£6.01B15.327,231
GLEN
Glencore
3.4838 of 5 stars
GBX 573.31
+0.8%
GBX 1,813.33
+216.3%
+82.4%£67.18B£304.57B191.1083,426
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
3.0121 of 5 stars
GBX 9,865.55
+1.5%
£117
+18.6%
+40.9%£44.80B£3.17B24.9342
AAL
Anglo American
1.3873 of 5 stars
GBX 4,021
-0.5%
GBX 3,921.43
-2.5%
+76.6%£43.08B£19.52BN/A129,700
ANTO
Antofagasta
1.607 of 5 stars
GBX 4,025
+0.2%
GBX 3,831.25
-4.8%
+68.9%£39.68B£8.62B29.867,753

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FRES) was last updated on 8/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners