Fresnillo (FRES) Competitors

Tharisa presently has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.92%. Fresnillo has a consensus price target of GBX 3,988, suggesting a potential upside of 39.05%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Fresnillo.

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Tharisa. Tharisa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tharisa has a beta of 0.684, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fresnillo has a beta of 0.745, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 16.17%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Tharisa's return on equity.

In the previous week, Tharisa's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fresnillo'saverage media sentiment score.

1.7% of Tharisa shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.8% of Fresnillo shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tharisa pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Fresnillo pays an annual dividend of GBX 47.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Tharisa pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fresnillo pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tharisa is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fresnillo currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,988, indicating a potential upside of 39.05%. Empire Metals has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 87.88%. Given Empire Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Empire Metals is more favorable than Fresnillo.

13.8% of Fresnillo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Empire Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fresnillo has a beta of 0.745, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Empire Metals has a beta of 2.186, meaning that its share price is 119% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Empire Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Fresnillo. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Empire Metals and 0 mentions for Fresnillo. Fresnillo's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Empire Metals' score of -1.00 indicating that Fresnillo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Empire Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Empire Metals' return on equity.

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Empire Metals. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

13.8% of Fresnillo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Sylvania Platinum shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Sylvania Platinum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fresnillo currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,988, suggesting a potential upside of 39.05%. Sylvania Platinum has a consensus price target of GBX 172, suggesting a potential upside of 95.74%. Given Sylvania Platinum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sylvania Platinum is more favorable than Fresnillo.

Fresnillo pays an annual dividend of GBX 47.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Sylvania Platinum pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Fresnillo pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sylvania Platinum pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Sylvania Platinum. Sylvania Platinum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Sylvania Platinum had 4 more articles in the media than Fresnillo. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Sylvania Platinum and 0 mentions for Fresnillo. Sylvania Platinum's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Fresnillo's score of 0.00 indicating that Sylvania Platinum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Sylvania Platinum's net margin of 23.16%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Sylvania Platinum's return on equity.

Fresnillo has a beta of 0.745, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sylvania Platinum has a beta of 1.7676816, meaning that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Fresnillo has a net margin of 30.66% compared to Eurasia Mining's net margin of -21.65%. Fresnillo's return on equity of 32.98% beat Eurasia Mining's return on equity.

Eurasia Mining has a beta of 0.384, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fresnillo has a beta of 0.745, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Eurasia Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.8% of Fresnillo shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.9% of Eurasia Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.0% of Fresnillo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fresnillo has a consensus price target of GBX 3,988, indicating a potential upside of 39.05%. Given Fresnillo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Eurasia Mining.

Fresnillo has higher revenue and earnings than Eurasia Mining. Eurasia Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fresnillo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Eurasia Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Fresnillo. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Eurasia Mining and 0 mentions for Fresnillo. Eurasia Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fresnillo'saverage media sentiment score.