Free Trial
Ends Tomorrow! Last Chance to Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Claim $100 Off
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Nativo Resources (NTVO) Competitors

GBX 0.38 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/22/2026 11:43 AM Eastern

NTVO vs. UFO, FMET, ROCK, FME, and CMRS

Should you buy Nativo Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nativo Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nativo Resources include Alien Metals (UFO), Fulcrum Metals (FMET), Rockfire Resources (ROCK), Future Metals (FME), and Critical Mineral Resources (CMRS). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does Nativo Resources compare to Alien Metals?

Alien Metals (LON:UFO) and Nativo Resources (LON:NTVO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Alien Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nativo Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alien Metals Neutral
Nativo Resources Neutral

Alien Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nativo Resources. Alien Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nativo Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alien MetalsN/AN/A-£2.66M-£0.02N/A
Nativo Resources£44K85.54-£2.74M-£15.00N/A

0.0% of Alien Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Nativo Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Alien Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 56.9% of Nativo Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Nativo Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Alien Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alien MetalsN/A -15.88% -8.65%
Nativo Resources N/A N/A -56.80%

Alien Metals has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nativo Resources has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Nativo Resources beats Alien Metals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nativo Resources compare to Fulcrum Metals?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Nativo Resources (LON:NTVO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Fulcrum Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nativo Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Neutral
Nativo Resources Neutral

Fulcrum Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nativo Resources. Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nativo Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£1.80N/A
Nativo Resources£44K85.54-£2.74M-£15.00N/A

0.4% of Nativo Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Fulcrum Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 56.9% of Nativo Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.185, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nativo Resources has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Nativo Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Fulcrum Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -50.52% N/A
Nativo Resources N/A N/A -56.80%

Summary

Nativo Resources beats Fulcrum Metals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nativo Resources compare to Rockfire Resources?

Nativo Resources (LON:NTVO) and Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Nativo Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Rockfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nativo ResourcesN/A N/A -56.80%
Rockfire Resources N/A -40.49%-24.89%

Nativo Resources has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rockfire Resources has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Nativo Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 0 mentions for Nativo Resources. Nativo Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Rockfire Resources' score of -0.54 indicating that Nativo Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nativo Resources Neutral
Rockfire Resources Negative

0.4% of Nativo Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 56.9% of Nativo Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Rockfire Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Rockfire Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nativo Resources. Rockfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nativo Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nativo Resources£44K85.54-£2.74M-£15.00N/A
Rockfire ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.05N/A

Summary

Nativo Resources beats Rockfire Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nativo Resources compare to Future Metals?

Nativo Resources (LON:NTVO) and Future Metals (LON:FME) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Nativo Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Future Metals' net margin of -1,051.73%. Nativo Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Future Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nativo ResourcesN/A N/A -56.80%
Future Metals -1,051.73%-11.89%-11.36%

Nativo Resources has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Future Metals has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Nativo Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Future Metals. Future Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nativo Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nativo Resources£44K85.54-£2.74M-£15.00N/A
Future Metals£155.84K67.65-£7.83M-£0.40N/A

0.4% of Nativo Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 56.9% of Nativo Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Future Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Nativo Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Future Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nativo Resources Neutral
Future Metals Neutral

Summary

Nativo Resources beats Future Metals on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nativo Resources compare to Critical Mineral Resources?

Nativo Resources (LON:NTVO) and Critical Mineral Resources (LON:CMRS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Critical Mineral Resources' return on equity of 2,402.74% beat Nativo Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nativo ResourcesN/A N/A -56.80%
Critical Mineral Resources N/A 2,402.74%-97.47%

0.4% of Nativo Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 56.9% of Nativo Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Critical Mineral Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Nativo Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Critical Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nativo Resources Neutral
Critical Mineral Resources Neutral

Critical Mineral Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nativo Resources. Critical Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nativo Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nativo Resources£44K85.54-£2.74M-£15.00N/A
Critical Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.71K-£1.10N/A

Nativo Resources has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Critical Mineral Resources has a beta of 2.402609, meaning that its stock price is 140% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Critical Mineral Resources beats Nativo Resources on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nativo Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NTVO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NTVO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NTVO vs. The Competition

MetricNativo ResourcesOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.76M£673.96M£4.79B£3.04B
Dividend YieldN/A6.05%5.01%6.10%
P/E Ratio-0.0313.3322.99365.89
Price / Sales85.543,819.636,750.3687,843.39
Price / CashN/A13.0427.2127.89
Price / BookN/A13.896.637.69
Net Income-£2.74M-£4.87M£157.11M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-6.25%-3.74%-1.45%8.05%
1 Month Performance31.12%-2.08%-1.15%3.28%
1 Year Performance-27.33%97.78%73.19%78.45%

Nativo Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NTVO
Nativo Resources
N/AGBX 0.38
flat
N/A-27.3%£3.76M£44KN/A8
UFO
Alien Metals
N/AGBX 0.12
flat
N/A+43.3%£13.93MN/AN/A10
FMET
Fulcrum Metals
N/AGBX 8.50
-3.4%
N/A+119.0%£12.53MN/AN/A5
ROCK
Rockfire Resources
N/AGBX 0.13
-0.8%
N/A+95.1%£11.20MN/AN/A2,140
FME
Future Metals
N/AGBX 1.10
-2.2%
N/A+117.8%£10.54M£155.84KN/A123,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:NTVO) was last updated on 5/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners