Go Pro
→ These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000] (From Golden Portfolio) (Ad)tc pixel Free TM1 Stock Alerts

Technology Minerals (TM1) Competitors

Technology Minerals logo
GBX 0.05 0.00 (-1.89%)
As of 04:38 AM Eastern
Compare

TM1 vs. GSP, KDNC, FAR, CTL, and RMR

Should you buy Technology Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Technology Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Gensource Potash (GSP), Cadence Minerals (KDNC), Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR), CleanTech Lithium (CTL), and Rome Resources (RMR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Technology Minerals compare to Gensource Potash?

Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) and Gensource Potash (LON:GSP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Technology Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Gensource Potash. Technology Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gensource Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Technology Minerals£2.30M2.82-£4.70M-£0.60N/A
Gensource PotashN/AN/A-£6.58M-£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Technology Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gensource Potash'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Technology Minerals Neutral
Gensource Potash Neutral

Technology Minerals' return on equity of -22.75% beat Gensource Potash's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Technology MineralsN/A -22.75% -10.63%
Gensource Potash N/A -45.96%-10.31%

Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gensource Potash has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Summary

Technology Minerals beats Gensource Potash on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Technology Minerals compare to Cadence Minerals?

Cadence Minerals (LON:KDNC) and Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

0.0% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Technology Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cadence Minerals has a beta of 1.798, suggesting that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cadence Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Technology Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cadence Minerals Neutral
Technology Minerals Neutral

Technology Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Minerals. Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Technology Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cadence MineralsN/AN/A-£5.72M-£0.53N/A
Technology Minerals£2.30M2.82-£4.70M-£0.60N/A

Cadence Minerals has a net margin of 875.38% compared to Technology Minerals' net margin of 0.00%. Cadence Minerals' return on equity of -9.74% beat Technology Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cadence Minerals875.38% -9.74% -3.99%
Technology Minerals N/A -22.75%-10.63%

Summary

Cadence Minerals beats Technology Minerals on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Technology Minerals compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Technology Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Technology Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Technology MineralsN/A -22.75% -10.63%
Ferro-Alloy Resources -185.72%283.86%-21.47%

Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.819, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Technology Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources and 0 mentions for Technology Minerals. Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Technology Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Technology Minerals Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral

Technology Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Technology Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Technology Minerals£2.30M2.82-£4.70M-£0.60N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M4.85-£9.69M-£1.70N/A

1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Technology Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 701.71%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Technology Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Technology Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Technology Minerals on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Technology Minerals compare to CleanTech Lithium?

Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) and CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

CleanTech Lithium has a consensus price target of GBX 17, indicating a potential upside of 161.54%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Technology Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Technology Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CleanTech Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.9% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Technology Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of CleanTech Lithium shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CleanTech Lithium's return on equity of -16.51% beat Technology Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Technology MineralsN/A -22.75% -10.63%
CleanTech Lithium N/A -16.51%-13.50%

Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 179% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CleanTech Lithium had 2 more articles in the media than Technology Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CleanTech Lithium and 0 mentions for Technology Minerals. CleanTech Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Technology Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that CleanTech Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Technology Minerals Neutral
CleanTech Lithium Neutral

CleanTech Lithium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Technology Minerals. CleanTech Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Technology Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Technology Minerals£2.30M2.82-£4.70M-£0.60N/A
CleanTech LithiumN/AN/A-£2.19M-£2.20N/A

Summary

CleanTech Lithium beats Technology Minerals on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Technology Minerals compare to Rome Resources?

Rome Resources (LON:RMR) and Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

4.1% of Rome Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 16.6% of Rome Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Technology Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Rome Resources has a beta of 0.551, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Rome Resources' return on equity of -9.76% beat Technology Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rome ResourcesN/A -9.76% -3.97%
Technology Minerals N/A -22.75%-10.63%

In the previous week, Rome Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Technology Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rome Resources Neutral
Technology Minerals Neutral

Rome Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Technology Minerals. Rome Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Technology Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rome ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.02N/A
Technology Minerals£2.30M2.82-£4.70M-£0.60N/A

Summary

Rome Resources beats Technology Minerals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Technology Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TM1 and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TM1 and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TM1 vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTechnology MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£6.50M£4.10B£5.12B£2.90B
Dividend YieldN/A5.18%4.68%6.17%
P/E Ratio-0.0925.7026.61367.68
Price / Sales2.827,479.474,446.5183,309.11
Price / Cash15.2526.6824.7127.89
Price / Book0.0510.719.027.27
Net Income-£4.70M£122.81M£154.52M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A2.84%2.36%0.57%
1 Month PerformanceN/A13.09%10.54%3.17%
1 Year PerformanceN/A57.88%45.70%22.21%

Technology Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TM1
Technology Minerals
N/AGBX 0.05
-1.9%		N/A-47.0%£6.50M£2.30MN/A5
GSP
Gensource Potash
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.61MN/AN/AN/A
KDNC
Cadence Minerals
N/AGBX 5.51
-12.0%		N/A+193.2%£22.78MN/AN/A6
FAR
Ferro-Alloy Resources
1.7096 of 5 stars		GBX 3.80
flat		GBX 30
+689.5%		-58.5%£22.34M£4.53MN/A1,000
CTL
CleanTech Lithium
2.4052 of 5 stars		GBX 6
+4.3%		GBX 17
+183.3%		+10.7%£21.78MN/AN/A20

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TM1) was last updated on 8/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A Simple Guide to Options Trading While It's Still Free
A free copy of Options Trading Made Simple is available now but wont stay that way for long. Chris Rowe cal...
True Market Insiders | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today
In 2014, Marc Chaikin pointed readers toward Nvidia. Now the 60-year Wall Street veteran and creator of the Ch...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
A $382 trillion migration and the position no one is talking about
Trump just signed a law requiring America's entire $382 trillion financial system to migrate to a new money ne...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America grew this stake 139%
Bank of America raised its stake in a small gold company by 139%. Jane Street increased its position by 159%, ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
I found Rolls-Royce at $2 - now I see the same setup again
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce under $2 - a misunderstood aerospace name the market had wri...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Free Stock Pick: The Company First in Line for America’s New Super Fuel
The U.S. Army and Department of Energy are launching Project Janus - a high-priority initiative ordered by Pre...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel