Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free TM1 Stock Alerts

Technology Minerals (TM1) Competitors

Technology Minerals logo
GBX 0.05 +0.00 (+4.17%)
As of 11:56 AM Eastern
Compare

TM1 vs. FRG, THR, CRTX, URU, and JAY

Should you buy Technology Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Technology Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Technology Minerals include Firering Strategic Minerals (FRG), Thor Energy (THR), CRISM Therapeutics (CRTX), URU Metals (URU), and Bluejay Mining (JAY). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Technology Minerals compare to Firering Strategic Minerals?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Firering Strategic Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Technology Minerals. Firering Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Technology Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
Technology Minerals£2.30M0.68-£4.70M-£0.60N/A

8.4% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Technology Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Firering Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Technology Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
Technology Minerals Neutral

Firering Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Technology Minerals' return on equity of -22.75% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -49.09% -16.22%
Technology Minerals N/A -22.75%-10.63%

Summary

Technology Minerals beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Technology Minerals compare to Thor Energy?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Technology Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Thor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Technology Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Neutral
Technology Minerals Neutral

Thor Energy has a beta of 0.129, meaning that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Thor Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Technology Minerals. Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Technology Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Technology Minerals£2.30M0.68-£4.70M-£0.60N/A

Technology Minerals' return on equity of -22.75% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Technology Minerals N/A -22.75%-10.63%

Summary

Technology Minerals beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Technology Minerals compare to CRISM Therapeutics?

CRISM Therapeutics (LON:CRTX) and Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

0.3% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 50.5% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Technology Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CRISM Therapeutics has a beta of 0.599, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

CRISM Therapeutics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Technology Minerals. CRISM Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Technology Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISM Therapeutics£231K34.81-£792.20K-£5.10N/A
Technology Minerals£2.30M0.68-£4.70M-£0.60N/A

In the previous week, CRISM Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Technology Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CRISM Therapeutics Neutral
Technology Minerals Neutral

Technology Minerals' return on equity of -22.75% beat CRISM Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISM TherapeuticsN/A -139.63% -26.77%
Technology Minerals N/A -22.75%-10.63%

Summary

Technology Minerals beats CRISM Therapeutics on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Technology Minerals compare to URU Metals?

Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) and URU Metals (LON:URU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, URU Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Technology Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for URU Metals and 0 mentions for Technology Minerals. Technology Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat URU Metals' score of -0.54 indicating that Technology Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Technology Minerals Neutral
URU Metals Negative

Technology Minerals' return on equity of -22.75% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Technology MineralsN/A -22.75% -10.63%
URU Metals N/A -42.52%-16.40%

0.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.2% of Technology Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 65.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

URU Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Technology Minerals. Technology Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than URU Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Technology Minerals£2.30M0.68-£4.70M-£0.60N/A
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.002.56

Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, URU Metals has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

URU Metals beats Technology Minerals on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Technology Minerals compare to Bluejay Mining?

Bluejay Mining (LON:JAY) and Technology Minerals (LON:TM1) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Bluejay Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Technology Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bluejay Mining Neutral
Technology Minerals Neutral

5.0% of Bluejay Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 42.3% of Bluejay Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Technology Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bluejay Mining's return on equity of -4.56% beat Technology Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bluejay MiningN/A -4.56% -8.07%
Technology Minerals N/A -22.75%-10.63%

Bluejay Mining has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Technology Minerals has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Bluejay Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Technology Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bluejay Mining-£1.05K0.00-£1.81MN/AN/A
Technology Minerals£2.30M0.68-£4.70M-£0.60N/A

Summary

Bluejay Mining beats Technology Minerals on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Technology Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TM1 and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TM1 vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTechnology MineralsOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.51M£1.41B£4.53B£2.76B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%5.02%6.15%
P/E Ratio-0.0817.3720.10369.48
Price / Sales0.6849,714.785,997.1484,571.57
Price / Cash15.2524.6326.6027.87
Price / Book0.055.338.777.62
Net Income-£4.70M£70.60M£157.26M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-2.73%-1.31%-0.88%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-6.19%-4.02%-1.40%
1 Year PerformanceN/A72.04%41.75%61.52%

Technology Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TM1
Technology Minerals
N/AGBX 0.05
+4.2%		N/A+22.5%£1.51M£2.30MN/A5
FRG
Firering Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 0.92
+2.0%		N/A-61.0%£6.13MN/AN/AN/A
THR
Thor Energy
N/AGBX 0.57
-0.9%		N/A-7.3%£5.87MN/AN/A1,083
CRTX
CRISM Therapeutics
N/AGBX 10
+2.6%		N/A+6.0%£5.42M£25KN/A4
URU
URU Metals
N/AGBX 5.30
+2.9%		N/A+20.2%£4.99MN/A2.65N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TM1) was last updated on 7/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SpaceX is chump change compared to Elon’s $20T ‘iPhone’
Early Apple investors saw peak gains as high as 7,537% after the iPhone launched. Now, multiple insider source...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ray Dalio: Buy Gold. Get Paid.
Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, is urging investors to hold 15% of their portfolio in gold and c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
You missed this 4X text …
Since 2003, one private alert service has sent over 14,000 buy signals averaging 310% gains each - including t...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Free: The Crypto Summit That Could Change Your Life
The days when you could throw money at almost anything and watch it climb are gone. This is a market that rewa...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
These Wars Aren’t Really About What They Tell You…
Nearly 20% of the global oil supply moves through the Strait of Hormuz - and rising tensions involving Iran ar...
Cedar Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Is your retirement account safe from new tax rules
With Washington searching for new tax revenue, many retirement savers are taking a closer look at gold as a wa...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
$10B for a startup. $0 for the real deal.
A geothermal startup with almost no revenue just IPO'd at $10 billion - up 35% on day one. Meanwhile, the comp...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel