Free Trial
→ Read this or regret it forever (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free GSCU Stock Alerts

Great Southern Copper (GSCU) Competitors

Great Southern Copper logo
GBX 2.69 -0.21 (-7.31%)
As of 05/15/2026 11:42 AM Eastern
Compare

GSCU vs. MOD, CCZ, ANTO, TKO, and ATYM

Should you buy Great Southern Copper stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Great Southern Copper with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Great Southern Copper include Mod Resources (MOD), Castillo Copper (CCZ), Antofagasta (ANTO), Taseko Mines (TKO), and Atalaya Mining (ATYM). These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Great Southern Copper compare to Mod Resources?

Mod Resources (LON:MOD) and Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Mod Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mod ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Great Southern Copper N/A -134.62%-29.67%

0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mod Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mod ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£1.30N/A
Great Southern CopperN/AN/A-£2.31B-£0.89N/A

In the previous week, Great Southern Copper had 1 more articles in the media than Mod Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Great Southern Copper and 0 mentions for Mod Resources. Mod Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Great Southern Copper'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mod Resources Neutral
Great Southern Copper Neutral

Summary

Great Southern Copper beats Mod Resources on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Southern Copper compare to Castillo Copper?

Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) and Castillo Copper (LON:CCZ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Castillo Copper's return on equity of -12.89% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern CopperN/A -134.62% -29.67%
Castillo Copper N/A -12.89%-8.77%

0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.6% of Castillo Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Castillo Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Great Southern Copper.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern CopperN/AN/A-£2.31B-£0.89N/A
Castillo Copper£145.13K0.00-£1.46MN/AN/A

In the previous week, Great Southern Copper had 1 more articles in the media than Castillo Copper. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Great Southern Copper and 0 mentions for Castillo Copper. Great Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Castillo Copper'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Copper Neutral
Castillo Copper Neutral

Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 141% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castillo Copper has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Castillo Copper beats Great Southern Copper on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Southern Copper compare to Antofagasta?

Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) and Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of Antofagasta shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Antofagasta has a consensus price target of GBX 3,493.75, suggesting a potential downside of 8.75%. Given Antofagasta's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than Great Southern Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Southern Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Antofagasta
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Antofagasta has a net margin of 15.90% compared to Great Southern Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 10.67% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern CopperN/A -134.62% -29.67%
Antofagasta 15.90%10.67%5.23%

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Great Southern Copper. Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern CopperN/AN/A-£2.31B-£0.89N/A
Antofagasta£8.62B4.38£955.17M£134.8028.40

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 1 more articles in the media than Great Southern Copper. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Antofagasta and 1 mentions for Great Southern Copper. Antofagasta's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Great Southern Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Antofagasta is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Copper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Antofagasta
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, suggesting that its share price is 141% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antofagasta has a beta of 1.349, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Antofagasta beats Great Southern Copper on 15 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Southern Copper compare to Taseko Mines?

Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) and Taseko Mines (LON:TKO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Taseko Mines has a net margin of 2.00% compared to Great Southern Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Taseko Mines' return on equity of 2.27% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern CopperN/A -134.62% -29.67%
Taseko Mines 2.00%2.27%3.36%

Taseko Mines has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential downside of 31.70%. Given Taseko Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Taseko Mines is more favorable than Great Southern Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Southern Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Taseko Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Great Southern Copper and Great Southern Copper both had 1 articles in the media. Great Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Taseko Mines'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Copper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Taseko Mines
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Taseko Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Taseko Mines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, meaning that its stock price is 141% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Taseko Mines has a beta of 2.017, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the broader market.

Taseko Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Great Southern Copper. Taseko Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Southern Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern CopperN/AN/A-£2.31B-£0.89N/A
Taseko Mines£770.85M2.71£148.77M-£9.00N/A

Summary

Taseko Mines beats Great Southern Copper on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Southern Copper compare to Atalaya Mining?

Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) and Atalaya Mining (LON:ATYM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Atalaya Mining has a net margin of 17.72% compared to Great Southern Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Atalaya Mining's return on equity of 14.96% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern CopperN/A -134.62% -29.67%
Atalaya Mining 17.72%14.96%2.82%

Atalaya Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 955, suggesting a potential upside of 17.06%. Given Atalaya Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Atalaya Mining is more favorable than Great Southern Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Southern Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Atalaya Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

In the previous week, Great Southern Copper had 1 more articles in the media than Atalaya Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Great Southern Copper and 0 mentions for Atalaya Mining. Great Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Atalaya Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Copper Neutral
Atalaya Mining Neutral

0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.7% of Atalaya Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 31.4% of Atalaya Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, meaning that its stock price is 141% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atalaya Mining has a beta of 1.485, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

Atalaya Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Great Southern Copper. Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atalaya Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern CopperN/AN/A-£2.31B-£0.89N/A
Atalaya Mining£482.92M2.60£33.29M£58.3013.99

Summary

Atalaya Mining beats Great Southern Copper on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Great Southern Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSCU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GSCU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GSCU vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGreat Southern CopperCopper IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£20.30M£5.32B£4.84B£2.60B
Dividend YieldN/A4.07%4.99%6.15%
P/E Ratio-3.0319.9323.10365.91
Price / SalesN/A4,177.296,705.6588,030.08
Price / CashN/A31.3627.1627.89
Price / Book0.003.526.987.74
Net Income-£2.31B-£78.74M£159.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.00%2.21%-1.21%0.21%
1 Month Performance-17.55%0.16%0.01%1.56%
1 Year Performance-28.42%140.46%81.53%77.95%

Great Southern Copper Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GSCU
Great Southern Copper
N/AGBX 2.69
-7.3%		N/A-31.8%£20.30MN/AN/A9
MOD
Mod Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£76.53MN/AN/A11,100
CCZ
Castillo Copper
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.36M£145.13KN/A168,000
ANTO
Antofagasta
1.2523 of 5 stars		GBX 4,187
-2.6%		GBX 3,493.75
-16.6%		+106.3%£41.28B£8.62B31.067,753
TKO
Taseko Mines
0.2061 of 5 stars		GBX 585
+3.5%		GBX 390
-33.3%		N/A£2.14B£770.85MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GSCU) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX is chump change compared to Elon’s $20T ‘iPhone’
Early Apple investors saw peak gains as high as 7,537% after the iPhone launched. Now, multiple insider source...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
The cat is out the bag
Almost 80,000 tech jobs vanished in the first three months of 2026. Meta cut 14,000 roles, Microsoft offered s...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your safe trade formula
Veteran trader Bill Poulos is giving away his Safe Trade Options Formula at no cost - a 5-part checklist built...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Oil is settling in yuan now - here's what that means for gold
Saudi Arabia has terminated its 1974 petrodollar agreement with the United States - the deal that forced every...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trading legend: “I made millions for CEO clients just repeating this 1 secret”
TradeSmith Senior Analyst Jeff Clark has guided readers through 300-plus winning trades over 9 years - across ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Distracted Americans set to miss out on quadrillions
Technology expert and Washington D.C. insider Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla, and Nvidia early - s...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel