Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ANTO or TKO?

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Taseko Mines. Antofagasta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taseko Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Antofagasta £9.30B 4.14 £955.17M £134.80 28.97 Taseko Mines £985.32M 2.39 £148.77M £5.00 128.60

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ATYM or ANTO?

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Atalaya Mining. Atalaya Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Atalaya Mining £469.50M 3.17 £33.29M £55.80 17.34 Antofagasta £9.30B 4.14 £955.17M £134.80 28.97

Does the media prefer ATYM or ANTO?

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 6 more articles in the media than Atalaya Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Antofagasta and 1 mentions for Atalaya Mining. Atalaya Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.10 indicating that Atalaya Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Atalaya Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Antofagasta 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor CAML or ANTO?

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 6 more articles in the media than Central Asia Metals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Antofagasta and 1 mentions for Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.10 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Central Asia Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Antofagasta 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer ANTO or GSCU?

Antofagasta presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,843.75, indicating a potential downside of 1.57%. Given Antofagasta's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than Great Southern Copper. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Antofagasta 3 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.88 Great Southern Copper 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media refer more to ANTO or GSCU?

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 6 more articles in the media than Great Southern Copper. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Antofagasta and 1 mentions for Great Southern Copper. Great Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.10 indicating that Great Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Antofagasta 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Great Southern Copper 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate CCZ or ANTO?

Antofagasta has a consensus price target of GBX 3,843.75, indicating a potential downside of 1.57%. Given Castillo Copper's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Castillo Copper is more favorable than Antofagasta. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Castillo Copper 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Antofagasta 3 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.88

Which has better valuation & earnings, CCZ or ANTO?

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Castillo Copper. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Castillo Copper £145.13K 0.00 -£1.46M N/A N/A Antofagasta £9.30B 4.14 £955.17M £134.80 28.97

Antofagasta (ANTO) Competitors

GBX 3,905 +199.00 (+5.37%)

As of 08/21/2026 12:28 PM Eastern

Compare

ANTO vs. TKO, ATYM, CAML, GSCU, and CCZ

Should you buy Antofagasta stock or one of its competitors? Antofagasta's main competitors and comparable companies include Taseko Mines (TKO), Atalaya Mining (ATYM), Central Asia Metals (CAML), Great Southern Copper (GSCU), and Castillo Copper (CCZ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Antofagasta compare to Taseko Mines?

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and Taseko Mines (LON:TKO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Antofagasta has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Taseko Mines' net margin of 1.60%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 15.70% beat Taseko Mines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Antofagasta	17.79%	15.70%	5.23%
Taseko Mines	1.60%	2.09%	3.36%

27.0% of Antofagasta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.7% of Taseko Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Taseko Mines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Taseko Mines has a beta of 2.012, indicating that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market.

Antofagasta presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,843.75, suggesting a potential downside of 1.57%. Taseko Mines has a consensus target price of GBX 390, suggesting a potential downside of 39.35%. Given Antofagasta's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than Taseko Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
Taseko Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Taseko Mines. Antofagasta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taseko Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Antofagasta	£9.30B	4.14	£955.17M	£134.80	28.97
Taseko Mines	£985.32M	2.39	£148.77M	£5.00	128.60

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 7 more articles in the media than Taseko Mines. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Antofagasta and 0 mentions for Taseko Mines. Taseko Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.10 indicating that Taseko Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Antofagasta	Neutral
Taseko Mines	Neutral

Summary

Antofagasta beats Taseko Mines on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Antofagasta compare to Atalaya Mining?

Atalaya Mining (LON:ATYM) and Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and dividends.

Atalaya Mining has a net margin of 22.01% compared to Antofagasta's net margin of 17.79%. Atalaya Mining's return on equity of 16.00% beat Antofagasta's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Atalaya Mining	22.01%	16.00%	2.82%
Antofagasta	17.79%	15.70%	5.23%

Atalaya Mining presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,021.25, suggesting a potential upside of 5.53%. Antofagasta has a consensus target price of GBX 3,843.75, suggesting a potential downside of 1.57%. Given Atalaya Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Atalaya Mining is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Atalaya Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

Atalaya Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 40.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Atalaya Mining pays out 12.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Antofagasta pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Atalaya Mining. Atalaya Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Atalaya Mining	£469.50M	3.17	£33.29M	£55.80	17.34
Antofagasta	£9.30B	4.14	£955.17M	£134.80	28.97

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 6 more articles in the media than Atalaya Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Antofagasta and 1 mentions for Atalaya Mining. Atalaya Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.10 indicating that Atalaya Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Atalaya Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Antofagasta	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

48.8% of Atalaya Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.0% of Antofagasta shares are held by institutional investors. 31.4% of Atalaya Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Atalaya Mining has a beta of 1.485, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Atalaya Mining beats Antofagasta on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Antofagasta compare to Central Asia Metals?

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

30.8% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.0% of Antofagasta shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Central Asia Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 40.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Central Asia Metals pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Antofagasta pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Central Asia Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.193, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Antofagasta has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 15.70% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%
Antofagasta	17.79%	15.70%	5.23%

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 6 more articles in the media than Central Asia Metals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Antofagasta and 1 mentions for Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.10 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Central Asia Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Antofagasta	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.16	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A
Antofagasta	£9.30B	4.14	£955.17M	£134.80	28.97

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus price target of GBX 181.25, suggesting a potential upside of 16.19%. Antofagasta has a consensus price target of GBX 3,843.75, suggesting a potential downside of 1.57%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

Summary

Antofagasta beats Central Asia Metals on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Antofagasta compare to Great Southern Copper?

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 6 more articles in the media than Great Southern Copper. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Antofagasta and 1 mentions for Great Southern Copper. Great Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.10 indicating that Great Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Antofagasta	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Great Southern Copper	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Antofagasta presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,843.75, indicating a potential downside of 1.57%. Given Antofagasta's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than Great Southern Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
Great Southern Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Antofagasta has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Great Southern Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 15.70% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Antofagasta	17.79%	15.70%	5.23%
Great Southern Copper	N/A	-74.17%	-29.67%

Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, suggesting that its share price is 141% less volatile than the broader market.

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Great Southern Copper. Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Antofagasta	£9.30B	4.14	£955.17M	£134.80	28.97
Great Southern Copper	N/A	N/A	-£2.31B	-£0.41	N/A

27.0% of Antofagasta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Great Southern Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Antofagasta beats Great Southern Copper on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Antofagasta compare to Castillo Copper?

Castillo Copper (LON:CCZ) and Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Antofagasta has a consensus price target of GBX 3,843.75, indicating a potential downside of 1.57%. Given Castillo Copper's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Castillo Copper is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Castillo Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 7 more articles in the media than Castillo Copper. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Antofagasta and 0 mentions for Castillo Copper. Castillo Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.10 indicating that Castillo Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Castillo Copper	Neutral
Antofagasta	Neutral

Castillo Copper has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

27.0% of Antofagasta shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.6% of Castillo Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Antofagasta has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Castillo Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 15.70% beat Castillo Copper's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Castillo Copper	N/A	-12.89%	-8.77%
Antofagasta	17.79%	15.70%	5.23%

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Castillo Copper.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Castillo Copper	£145.13K	0.00	-£1.46M	N/A	N/A
Antofagasta	£9.30B	4.14	£955.17M	£134.80	28.97

Summary

Antofagasta beats Castillo Copper on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Antofagasta News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ANTO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ANTO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Antofagasta	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£36.54B	£4.11B	£5.13B	£2.54B
Dividend Yield	1.56%	5.18%	4.68%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	28.97	23.59	25.07	367.57
Price / Sales	4.14	8,034.25	4,779.85	83,481.74
Price / Cash	4.93	26.68	24.71	27.89
Price / Book	3.14	10.70	9.02	7.19
Net Income	£955.17M	£122.81M	£154.52M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	8.93%	3.27%	2.58%	0.30%
1 Month Performance	7.84%	12.55%	10.17%	3.31%
1 Year Performance	80.20%	57.65%	45.55%	22.13%

Antofagasta Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ANTO Antofagasta	1.1504 of 5 stars	GBX 3,905 +5.4%	GBX 3,843.75 -1.6%	+80.2%	£36.54B	£9.30B	28.97	7,753	Gap Up
TKO Taseko Mines	0.2599 of 5 stars	GBX 643 +2.1%	GBX 390 -39.3%	+174.8%	£2.35B	£985.32M	128.60	N/A	Gap Down
ATYM Atalaya Mining	1.6583 of 5 stars	GBX 967.76 +3.0%	GBX 1,021.25 +5.5%	+86.5%	£1.49B	£469.50M	17.34	477	News Coverage High Trading Volume
CAML Central Asia Metals	3.2104 of 5 stars	GBX 156 +3.9%	GBX 181.25 +16.2%	-6.4%	£265.84M	£229.86M	N/A	1,000
GSCU Great Southern Copper	N/A	GBX 2.50 +8.5%	N/A	+8.5%	£19.30M	N/A	N/A	9	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ANTO) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Antofagasta (ANTO) Competitors

ANTO vs. TKO, ATYM, CAML, GSCU, and CCZ

How does Antofagasta compare to Taseko Mines?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Atalaya Mining?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Central Asia Metals?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Great Southern Copper?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Castillo Copper?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ANTO vs. The Competition

Antofagasta Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Antofagasta (ANTO) Competitors

ANTO vs. TKO, ATYM, CAML, GSCU, and CCZ

How does Antofagasta compare to Taseko Mines?

Is ANTO or TKO more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ANTO or TKO?

Which has more volatility and risk, ANTO or TKO?

Do analysts recommend ANTO or TKO?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ANTO or TKO?

Does the media favor ANTO or TKO?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Atalaya Mining?

Is ATYM or ANTO more profitable?

Do analysts prefer ATYM or ANTO?

Is ATYM or ANTO a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ATYM or ANTO?

Does the media prefer ATYM or ANTO?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ATYM or ANTO?

Which has more risk and volatility, ATYM or ANTO?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Central Asia Metals?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CAML or ANTO?

Is CAML or ANTO a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, CAML or ANTO?

Is CAML or ANTO more profitable?

Does the media favor CAML or ANTO?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CAML or ANTO?

Do analysts recommend CAML or ANTO?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Great Southern Copper?

Does the media refer more to ANTO or GSCU?

Do analysts prefer ANTO or GSCU?

Is ANTO or GSCU more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, ANTO or GSCU?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ANTO or GSCU?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ANTO or GSCU?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Castillo Copper?

Do analysts rate CCZ or ANTO?

Does the media refer more to CCZ or ANTO?

Which has more risk and volatility, CCZ or ANTO?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CCZ or ANTO?

Is CCZ or ANTO more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CCZ or ANTO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ANTO vs. The Competition

Antofagasta Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools