Antofagasta Competitors

Anglo American (LON:AAL) and Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Anglo American and Antofagasta, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Anglo American currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,770, indicating a potential downside of 15.17%. Antofagasta has a consensus target price of GBX 1,051.25, indicating a potential downside of 45.39%. Given Anglo American's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Anglo American is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Anglo American and Antofagasta's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Anglo American is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Anglo American pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Anglo American pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Antofagasta pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Anglo American and Antofagasta's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Anglo American beats Antofagasta on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Glencore (LON:GLEN) and Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Glencore and Antofagasta, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Glencore currently has a consensus price target of GBX 300.22, suggesting a potential downside of 3.22%. Antofagasta has a consensus price target of GBX 1,051.25, suggesting a potential downside of 45.39%. Given Glencore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Glencore is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Glencore and Antofagasta's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Glencore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Glencore and Antofagasta's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Glencore beats Antofagasta on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and South32 (LON:S32) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Antofagasta and South32's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Antofagasta and South32, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Antofagasta currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,051.25, indicating a potential downside of 45.39%. South32 has a consensus target price of GBX 122.50, indicating a potential downside of 26.73%. Given South32's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe South32 is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Antofagasta and South32's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

South32 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. South32 pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Antofagasta pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. South32 pays out -1.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. South32 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

South32 beats Antofagasta on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and Polymetal International (LON:POLY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Antofagasta and Polymetal International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Antofagasta currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,051.25, suggesting a potential downside of 45.39%. Polymetal International has a consensus target price of GBX 1,957, suggesting a potential upside of 22.85%. Given Polymetal International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Polymetal International is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Dividends

Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Polymetal International pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Antofagasta pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polymetal International pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Antofagasta and Polymetal International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Polymetal International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Antofagasta and Polymetal International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Polymetal International beats Antofagasta on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and Fresnillo (LON:FRES) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Antofagasta and Fresnillo, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Antofagasta currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,051.25, suggesting a potential downside of 45.39%. Fresnillo has a consensus target price of GBX 1,065, suggesting a potential upside of 17.94%. Given Fresnillo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fresnillo is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Dividends

Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Fresnillo pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Antofagasta pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fresnillo pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Antofagasta and Fresnillo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Antofagasta and Fresnillo's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fresnillo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Antofagasta beats Fresnillo on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

KAZ Minerals (LON:KAZ) and Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for KAZ Minerals and Antofagasta, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

KAZ Minerals currently has a consensus target price of GBX 672.50, indicating a potential downside of 20.79%. Antofagasta has a consensus target price of GBX 1,051.25, indicating a potential downside of 45.39%. Given KAZ Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe KAZ Minerals is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares KAZ Minerals and Antofagasta's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

KAZ Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

KAZ Minerals pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. KAZ Minerals pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Antofagasta pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KAZ Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares KAZ Minerals and Antofagasta's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

KAZ Minerals beats Antofagasta on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.