Antofagasta (ANTO) Competitors

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Atalaya Mining. Atalaya Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

50.2% of Atalaya Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.1% of Antofagasta shares are held by institutional investors. 31.4% of Atalaya Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Atalaya Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Antofagasta. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Atalaya Mining and 0 mentions for Antofagasta. Atalaya Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.21 indicating that Atalaya Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Atalaya Mining has a beta of 1.485, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Atalaya Mining has a net margin of 22.01% compared to Antofagasta's net margin of 17.79%. Atalaya Mining's return on equity of 16.00% beat Antofagasta's return on equity.

Atalaya Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,021.25, suggesting a potential upside of 4.25%. Antofagasta has a consensus price target of GBX 3,843.75, suggesting a potential upside of 1.28%. Given Atalaya Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Atalaya Mining is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Atalaya Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 64.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Atalaya Mining pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Antofagasta pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Antofagasta has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -16.88%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 15.70% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

30.8% of Central Asia Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.1% of Antofagasta shares are held by institutional investors. 8.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.193, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Central Asia Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 64.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Central Asia Metals pays out -63.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Antofagasta pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Central Asia Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Antofagasta. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Central Asia Metals and 0 mentions for Antofagasta. Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.21 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus price target of GBX 181.25, suggesting a potential upside of 7.00%. Antofagasta has a consensus price target of GBX 3,843.75, suggesting a potential upside of 1.28%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Antofagasta currently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,843.75, suggesting a potential upside of 1.28%. Given Antofagasta's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than Great Southern Copper.

In the previous week, Great Southern Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Antofagasta. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Great Southern Copper and 0 mentions for Antofagasta. Great Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.21 indicating that Great Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Antofagasta has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Great Southern Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 15.70% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, suggesting that its share price is 141% less volatile than the broader market.

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Great Southern Copper. Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

27.1% of Antofagasta shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

27.1% of Antofagasta shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.6% of Castillo Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Antofagasta has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Castillo Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 15.70% beat Castillo Copper's return on equity.

Antofagasta presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,843.75, suggesting a potential upside of 1.28%. Given Antofagasta's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than Castillo Copper.

Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castillo Copper has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Castillo Copper.

In the previous week, Castillo Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.21 indicating that Castillo Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.