Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TKO or ANTO?

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Taseko Mines. Antofagasta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taseko Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Taseko Mines £770.85M 2.60 £148.77M £5.00 109.70 Antofagasta £8.62B 4.29 £955.17M £134.80 27.81

Does the media prefer TKO or ANTO?

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 2 more articles in the media than Taseko Mines. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Antofagasta and 2 mentions for Taseko Mines. Antofagasta's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Taseko Mines' score of 0.12 indicating that Antofagasta is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Taseko Mines 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Antofagasta 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ANTO or ATYM?

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Atalaya Mining. Atalaya Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Antofagasta £8.62B 4.29 £955.17M £134.80 27.81 Atalaya Mining £469.50M 2.64 £33.29M £55.80 14.47

Does the media prefer CAML or ANTO?

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 1 more articles in the media than Central Asia Metals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Antofagasta and 3 mentions for Central Asia Metals. Antofagasta's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Central Asia Metals' score of 0.57 indicating that Antofagasta is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Central Asia Metals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Antofagasta 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate ANTO or GRX?

Antofagasta currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,756.25, indicating a potential upside of 0.19%. Given Antofagasta's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than GreenX Metals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Antofagasta 3 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.88 GreenX Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, ANTO or GRX?

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than GreenX Metals. GreenX Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Antofagasta £8.62B 4.29 £955.17M £134.80 27.81 GreenX Metals £244.87K 611.54 -£9.45M -£4.27 N/A

Is ANTO or GRX more profitable?

Antofagasta has a net margin of 15.90% compared to GreenX Metals' net margin of -4,413.50%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 10.67% beat GreenX Metals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Antofagasta 15.90% 10.67% 5.23% GreenX Metals -4,413.50% -113.12% -14.69%

Do analysts prefer ANTO or MOD?

Antofagasta presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,756.25, suggesting a potential upside of 0.19%. Given Antofagasta's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than Mod Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Antofagasta 3 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.88 Mod Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Antofagasta (ANTO) Competitors

GBX 3,749.11 -28.89 (-0.76%)

As of 12:03 PM Eastern

Compare

ANTO vs. TKO, ATYM, CAML, GRX, and MOD

Should you buy Antofagasta stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Antofagasta with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Antofagasta include Taseko Mines (TKO), Atalaya Mining (ATYM), Central Asia Metals (CAML), GreenX Metals (GRX), and Mod Resources (MOD). These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Antofagasta compare to Taseko Mines?

Taseko Mines (LON:TKO) and Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 2 more articles in the media than Taseko Mines. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Antofagasta and 2 mentions for Taseko Mines. Antofagasta's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Taseko Mines' score of 0.12 indicating that Antofagasta is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Taseko Mines	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Antofagasta	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Antofagasta has a net margin of 15.90% compared to Taseko Mines' net margin of 2.00%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 10.67% beat Taseko Mines' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Taseko Mines	2.00%	2.27%	3.36%
Antofagasta	15.90%	10.67%	5.23%

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Taseko Mines. Antofagasta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taseko Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Taseko Mines	£770.85M	2.60	£148.77M	£5.00	109.70
Antofagasta	£8.62B	4.29	£955.17M	£134.80	27.81

Taseko Mines has a beta of 2.012, indicating that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Taseko Mines presently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential downside of 28.90%. Antofagasta has a consensus price target of GBX 3,756.25, indicating a potential upside of 0.19%. Given Antofagasta's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than Taseko Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Taseko Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

23.2% of Taseko Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.0% of Antofagasta shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Taseko Mines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Antofagasta beats Taseko Mines on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Antofagasta compare to Atalaya Mining?

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and Atalaya Mining (LON:ATYM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, meaning that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Atalaya Mining has a beta of 1.482, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

27.0% of Antofagasta shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Atalaya Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 31.4% of Atalaya Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Atalaya Mining. Atalaya Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Antofagasta	£8.62B	4.29	£955.17M	£134.80	27.81
Atalaya Mining	£469.50M	2.64	£33.29M	£55.80	14.47

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 4 more articles in the media than Atalaya Mining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Antofagasta and 0 mentions for Atalaya Mining. Antofagasta's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Atalaya Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Antofagasta is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Antofagasta	Positive
Atalaya Mining	Neutral

Antofagasta presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,756.25, indicating a potential upside of 0.19%. Atalaya Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 962.50, indicating a potential upside of 19.22%. Given Atalaya Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Atalaya Mining is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
Atalaya Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Atalaya Mining has a net margin of 17.64% compared to Antofagasta's net margin of 15.90%. Atalaya Mining's return on equity of 13.33% beat Antofagasta's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Antofagasta	15.90%	10.67%	5.23%
Atalaya Mining	17.64%	13.33%	2.82%

Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 40.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Atalaya Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Antofagasta pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Atalaya Mining pays out 12.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Antofagasta and Atalaya Mining tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Antofagasta compare to Central Asia Metals?

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

32.5% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.0% of Antofagasta shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Central Asia Metals presently has a consensus target price of GBX 188.75, suggesting a potential upside of 37.77%. Antofagasta has a consensus target price of GBX 3,756.25, suggesting a potential upside of 0.19%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

Central Asia Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 40.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Central Asia Metals pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Antofagasta pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Central Asia Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.02	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A
Antofagasta	£8.62B	4.29	£955.17M	£134.80	27.81

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 1 more articles in the media than Central Asia Metals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Antofagasta and 3 mentions for Central Asia Metals. Antofagasta's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Central Asia Metals' score of 0.57 indicating that Antofagasta is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Central Asia Metals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Antofagasta	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Antofagasta has a net margin of 15.90% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 10.67% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%
Antofagasta	15.90%	10.67%	5.23%

Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.184, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Antofagasta beats Central Asia Metals on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Antofagasta compare to GreenX Metals?

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and GreenX Metals (LON:GRX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GreenX Metals has a beta of 1.001, indicating that its stock price is 0% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 4 more articles in the media than GreenX Metals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Antofagasta and 0 mentions for GreenX Metals. Antofagasta's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat GreenX Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Antofagasta is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Antofagasta	Positive
GreenX Metals	Neutral

Antofagasta has a net margin of 15.90% compared to GreenX Metals' net margin of -4,413.50%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 10.67% beat GreenX Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Antofagasta	15.90%	10.67%	5.23%
GreenX Metals	-4,413.50%	-113.12%	-14.69%

27.0% of Antofagasta shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of GreenX Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of GreenX Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Antofagasta currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,756.25, indicating a potential upside of 0.19%. Given Antofagasta's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than GreenX Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
GreenX Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than GreenX Metals. GreenX Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Antofagasta	£8.62B	4.29	£955.17M	£134.80	27.81
GreenX Metals	£244.87K	611.54	-£9.45M	-£4.27	N/A

Summary

Antofagasta beats GreenX Metals on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Antofagasta compare to Mod Resources?

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and Mod Resources (LON:MOD) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Antofagasta has a net margin of 15.90% compared to Mod Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 10.67% beat Mod Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Antofagasta	15.90%	10.67%	5.23%
Mod Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Antofagasta presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,756.25, suggesting a potential upside of 0.19%. Given Antofagasta's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than Mod Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
Mod Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Mod Resources. Mod Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Antofagasta	£8.62B	4.29	£955.17M	£134.80	27.81
Mod Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	-£1.30	N/A

27.0% of Antofagasta shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 4 more articles in the media than Mod Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Antofagasta and 0 mentions for Mod Resources. Antofagasta's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Mod Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Antofagasta is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Antofagasta	Positive
Mod Resources	Neutral

Summary

Antofagasta beats Mod Resources on 13 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Antofagasta News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ANTO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ANTO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Antofagasta	Copper Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£36.96B	£5.11B	£4.51B	£2.77B
Dividend Yield	1.29%	4.28%	5.03%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	27.81	22.65	20.79	368.18
Price / Sales	4.29	4,188.74	5,823.40	84,613.91
Price / Cash	4.93	31.36	24.17	27.87
Price / Book	3.01	3.37	8.68	7.49
Net Income	£955.17M	-£78.74M	£157.11M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-3.99%	-2.17%	-2.62%	-0.48%
1 Month Performance	-7.29%	-4.50%	-4.45%	-1.00%
1 Year Performance	98.63%	78.20%	37.38%	61.74%

Antofagasta Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ANTO Antofagasta	1.5054 of 5 stars	GBX 3,749.11 -0.8%	GBX 3,756.25 +0.2%	+100.2%	£36.96B	£8.62B	27.81	7,753
TKO Taseko Mines	0.2535 of 5 stars	GBX 493 -2.4%	GBX 390 -20.9%	+101.6%	£1.80B	£770.85M	98.60	N/A	Gap Down
ATYM Atalaya Mining	N/A	GBX 770.50 -2.3%	GBX 962.50 +24.9%	+64.1%	£1.18B	£469.50M	13.81	477
CAML Central Asia Metals	3.529 of 5 stars	GBX 131.60 +1.9%	GBX 188.75 +43.4%	-5.3%	£224.26M	£229.86M	N/A	1,000
GRX GreenX Metals	N/A	GBX 46.73 +0.5%	N/A	+29.2%	£145.77M	£244.87K	N/A	N/A	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ANTO) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Antofagasta (ANTO) Competitors

ANTO vs. TKO, ATYM, CAML, GRX, and MOD

How does Antofagasta compare to Taseko Mines?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Atalaya Mining?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Central Asia Metals?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to GreenX Metals?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Mod Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ANTO vs. The Competition

Antofagasta Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Antofagasta (ANTO) Competitors

ANTO vs. TKO, ATYM, CAML, GRX, and MOD

How does Antofagasta compare to Taseko Mines?

Does the media prefer TKO or ANTO?

Is TKO or ANTO more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TKO or ANTO?

Which has more risk & volatility, TKO or ANTO?

Do analysts recommend TKO or ANTO?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in TKO or ANTO?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Atalaya Mining?

Which has more risk and volatility, ANTO or ATYM?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ANTO or ATYM?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ANTO or ATYM?

Does the media refer more to ANTO or ATYM?

Do analysts recommend ANTO or ATYM?

Is ANTO or ATYM more profitable?

Is ANTO or ATYM a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Central Asia Metals?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CAML or ANTO?

Do analysts recommend CAML or ANTO?

Is CAML or ANTO a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CAML or ANTO?

Does the media prefer CAML or ANTO?

Is CAML or ANTO more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, CAML or ANTO?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to GreenX Metals?

Which has more risk & volatility, ANTO or GRX?

Does the media refer more to ANTO or GRX?

Is ANTO or GRX more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ANTO or GRX?

Do analysts rate ANTO or GRX?

Which has better valuation and earnings, ANTO or GRX?

Summary

How does Antofagasta compare to Mod Resources?

Is ANTO or MOD more profitable?

Do analysts prefer ANTO or MOD?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ANTO or MOD?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ANTO or MOD?

Does the media prefer ANTO or MOD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ANTO vs. The Competition

Antofagasta Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools