Do analysts recommend CAML or GRX?

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus target price of GBX 188.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.02%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than GreenX Metals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Central Asia Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 GreenX Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts rate CAML or GSCU?

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus target price of GBX 188.75, suggesting a potential upside of 27.02%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Great Southern Copper. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Central Asia Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 Great Southern Copper 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media refer more to CAML or GSCU?

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Great Southern Copper. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Central Asia Metals and 3 mentions for Great Southern Copper. Great Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Central Asia Metals' score of 0.17 indicating that Great Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Central Asia Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Great Southern Copper 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CAML or CCZ?

Central Asia Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Castillo Copper. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Central Asia Metals £229.86M 1.10 £47.93M -£42.56 N/A Castillo Copper £145.13K 0.00 -£1.46M N/A N/A

Central Asia Metals (CAML) Competitors

GBX 148.60 -5.40 (-3.51%)

As of 06/3/2026 11:58 AM Eastern

Compare

CAML vs. GRX, MOD, GSCU, CCZ, and ANTO

Should you buy Central Asia Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Central Asia Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Central Asia Metals include GreenX Metals (GRX), Mod Resources (MOD), Great Southern Copper (GSCU), Castillo Copper (CCZ), and Antofagasta (ANTO). These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Central Asia Metals compare to GreenX Metals?

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and GreenX Metals (LON:GRX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus target price of GBX 188.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.02%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than GreenX Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
GreenX Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals had 5 more articles in the media than GreenX Metals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Central Asia Metals and 0 mentions for GreenX Metals. Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat GreenX Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Central Asia Metals	Neutral
GreenX Metals	Neutral

Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.176, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GreenX Metals has a beta of 0.982, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Central Asia Metals has a net margin of -32.74% compared to GreenX Metals' net margin of -989.60%. Central Asia Metals' return on equity of -22.86% beat GreenX Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%
GreenX Metals	-989.60%	-113.12%	-14.69%

Central Asia Metals has higher revenue and earnings than GreenX Metals. GreenX Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Central Asia Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.10	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A
GreenX Metals	£244.87K	654.53	-£9.45M	-£4.27	N/A

34.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of GreenX Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of GreenX Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats GreenX Metals on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Mod Resources?

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and Mod Resources (LON:MOD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

Mod Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Mod Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%
Mod Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Central Asia Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Mod Resources. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mod Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.10	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A
Mod Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	-£1.30	N/A

Central Asia Metals presently has a consensus price target of GBX 188.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.02%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Mod Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Mod Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

34.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals had 5 more articles in the media than Mod Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Central Asia Metals and 0 mentions for Mod Resources. Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Mod Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Central Asia Metals	Neutral
Mod Resources	Neutral

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats Mod Resources on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Great Southern Copper?

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

34.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus target price of GBX 188.75, suggesting a potential upside of 27.02%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Great Southern Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Great Southern Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Great Southern Copper. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Central Asia Metals and 3 mentions for Great Southern Copper. Great Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Central Asia Metals' score of 0.17 indicating that Great Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Central Asia Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Great Southern Copper	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.176, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, suggesting that its share price is 141% less volatile than the broader market.

Central Asia Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Great Southern Copper. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Southern Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.10	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A
Great Southern Copper	N/A	N/A	-£2.31B	-£0.89	N/A

Great Southern Copper has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Central Asia Metals' return on equity of -22.86% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%
Great Southern Copper	N/A	-134.62%	-29.67%

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats Great Southern Copper on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Castillo Copper?

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and Castillo Copper (LON:CCZ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and valuation.

Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.176, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castillo Copper has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Central Asia Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Castillo Copper.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.10	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A
Castillo Copper	£145.13K	0.00	-£1.46M	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals had 5 more articles in the media than Castillo Copper. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Central Asia Metals and 0 mentions for Castillo Copper. Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Castillo Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Central Asia Metals	Neutral
Castillo Copper	Neutral

Central Asia Metals presently has a consensus target price of GBX 188.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.02%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Castillo Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Castillo Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

34.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.6% of Castillo Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Castillo Copper has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Castillo Copper's return on equity of -12.89% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%
Castillo Copper	N/A	-12.89%	-8.77%

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats Castillo Copper on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Antofagasta?

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

26.8% of Antofagasta shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Antofagasta has a net margin of 15.90% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 10.67% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Antofagasta	15.90%	10.67%	5.23%
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%

Antofagasta presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,518.75, indicating a potential downside of 17.96%. Central Asia Metals has a consensus price target of GBX 188.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.02%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Antofagasta has a beta of 1.349, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.176, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 40.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Central Asia Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.2%. Antofagasta pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Central Asia Metals pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Central Asia Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals had 5 more articles in the media than Antofagasta. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Central Asia Metals and 0 mentions for Antofagasta. Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Antofagasta's score of 0.00 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Antofagasta	Neutral
Central Asia Metals	Neutral

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Antofagasta	£8.62B	4.91	£955.17M	£134.80	31.82
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.10	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats Antofagasta on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Central Asia Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CAML vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Central Asia Metals	Copper Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£253.23M	£6.16B	£4.97B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	7.72%	4.06%	4.95%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	-3.49	22.16	23.42	364.74
Price / Sales	1.10	4,502.24	6,527.01	87,565.33
Price / Cash	8.30	31.36	27.43	27.85
Price / Book	0.76	3.76	9.44	7.71
Net Income	£47.93M	-£78.74M	£156.62M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-4.62%	1.73%	-0.46%	0.20%
1 Month Performance	N/A	N/A	17.05%	N/A
1 Year Performance	-10.05%	137.46%	68.94%	75.12%

Central Asia Metals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CAML Central Asia Metals	2.77 of 5 stars	GBX 148.60 -3.5%	GBX 188.75 +27.0%	-8.9%	£253.23M	£229.86M	N/A	1,000	News Coverage Analyst Forecast
GRX GreenX Metals	N/A	GBX 48 -1.0%	N/A	+47.1%	£149.44M	£244.87K	N/A	N/A
MOD Mod Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£76.53M	N/A	N/A	11,100	High Trading Volume
GSCU Great Southern Copper	N/A	GBX 2.58 +0.2%	N/A	-22.7%	£19.40M	N/A	N/A	9	News Coverage Insider Trade Gap Down
CCZ Castillo Copper	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£9.36M	£145.13K	N/A	168,000	Gap Down High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CAML) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Central Asia Metals (CAML) Competitors

CAML vs. GRX, MOD, GSCU, CCZ, and ANTO

How does Central Asia Metals compare to GreenX Metals?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Mod Resources?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Great Southern Copper?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Castillo Copper?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Antofagasta?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CAML vs. The Competition

Central Asia Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Central Asia Metals (CAML) Competitors

CAML vs. GRX, MOD, GSCU, CCZ, and ANTO

How does Central Asia Metals compare to GreenX Metals?

Do analysts recommend CAML or GRX?

Does the media prefer CAML or GRX?

Which has more volatility and risk, CAML or GRX?

Is CAML or GRX more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CAML or GRX?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CAML or GRX?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Mod Resources?

Is CAML or MOD more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CAML or MOD?

Do analysts rate CAML or MOD?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CAML or MOD?

Does the media prefer CAML or MOD?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Great Southern Copper?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CAML or GSCU?

Do analysts rate CAML or GSCU?

Does the media refer more to CAML or GSCU?

Which has more volatility and risk, CAML or GSCU?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CAML or GSCU?

Is CAML or GSCU more profitable?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Castillo Copper?

Which has more volatility and risk, CAML or CCZ?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CAML or CCZ?

Does the media refer more to CAML or CCZ?

Do analysts recommend CAML or CCZ?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CAML or CCZ?

Is CAML or CCZ more profitable?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Antofagasta?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ANTO or CAML?

Is ANTO or CAML more profitable?

Do analysts rate ANTO or CAML?

Which has more risk & volatility, ANTO or CAML?

Is ANTO or CAML a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor ANTO or CAML?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ANTO or CAML?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CAML vs. The Competition

Central Asia Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools