Do analysts rate CAML or GSCU?

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus price target of GBX 181.25, indicating a potential upside of 8.14%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Great Southern Copper. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Central Asia Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Great Southern Copper 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer CAML or CCZ?

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus target price of GBX 181.25, suggesting a potential upside of 8.14%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Castillo Copper. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Central Asia Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Castillo Copper 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, CAML or CCZ?

Central Asia Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Castillo Copper. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Central Asia Metals £229.86M 1.24 £47.93M -£42.56 N/A Castillo Copper £145.13K 0.00 -£1.46M N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer PXC or CAML?

Central Asia Metals has a consensus target price of GBX 181.25, suggesting a potential upside of 8.14%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Phoenix Copper. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Phoenix Copper 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Central Asia Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TKO or CAML?

Taseko Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taseko Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Taseko Mines £985.32M 2.50 £148.77M £5.00 135.00 Central Asia Metals £229.86M 1.24 £47.93M -£42.56 N/A

Central Asia Metals (CAML) Competitors

GBX 167.60 +9.80 (+6.21%)

As of 08/25/2026 11:58 AM Eastern

Compare

CAML vs. GSCU, CCZ, PXC, ANTO, and TKO

Should you buy Central Asia Metals stock or one of its competitors? Central Asia Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Great Southern Copper (GSCU), Castillo Copper (CCZ), Phoenix Copper (PXC), Antofagasta (ANTO), and Taseko Mines (TKO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Great Southern Copper?

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Great Southern Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Central Asia Metals	Positive
Great Southern Copper	Neutral

Great Southern Copper has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Central Asia Metals' return on equity of -22.86% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%
Great Southern Copper	N/A	-74.17%	-29.67%

Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.193, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, indicating that its share price is 141% less volatile than the broader market.

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus price target of GBX 181.25, indicating a potential upside of 8.14%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Great Southern Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Great Southern Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

30.8% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Central Asia Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Great Southern Copper. Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Central Asia Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.24	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A
Great Southern Copper	N/A	N/A	-£2.31B	-£0.41	N/A

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats Great Southern Copper on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Castillo Copper?

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and Castillo Copper (LON:CCZ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Castillo Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Central Asia Metals	Positive
Castillo Copper	Neutral

Central Asia Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Castillo Copper.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.24	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A
Castillo Copper	£145.13K	0.00	-£1.46M	N/A	N/A

Castillo Copper has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Castillo Copper's return on equity of -12.89% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%
Castillo Copper	N/A	-12.89%	-8.77%

30.8% of Central Asia Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 8.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.6% of Castillo Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.193, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Castillo Copper has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus target price of GBX 181.25, suggesting a potential upside of 8.14%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Castillo Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Castillo Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats Castillo Copper on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Phoenix Copper?

Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) and Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Central Asia Metals has a consensus target price of GBX 181.25, suggesting a potential upside of 8.14%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Phoenix Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Phoenix Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Phoenix Copper had 1 more articles in the media than Central Asia Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Phoenix Copper and 0 mentions for Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Phoenix Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Phoenix Copper	Neutral
Central Asia Metals	Positive

Central Asia Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Phoenix Copper. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Phoenix Copper	N/A	N/A	-£2.86M	-£1.93	N/A
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.24	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A

Phoenix Copper has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Phoenix Copper's return on equity of -10.97% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Phoenix Copper	N/A	-10.97%	-2.63%
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%

0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Central Asia Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 33.2% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.193, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats Phoenix Copper on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Antofagasta?

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Antofagasta has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 15.70% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%
Antofagasta	17.79%	15.70%	5.23%

Central Asia Metals presently has a consensus target price of GBX 181.25, indicating a potential upside of 8.14%. Antofagasta has a consensus target price of GBX 3,843.75, indicating a potential downside of 4.12%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Antofagasta.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Antofagasta	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

Central Asia Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.8%. Antofagasta pays an annual dividend of GBX 40.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Central Asia Metals pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Antofagasta pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Central Asia Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.193, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Antofagasta had 3 more articles in the media than Central Asia Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Antofagasta and 0 mentions for Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Antofagasta's score of 0.00 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Central Asia Metals	Positive
Antofagasta	Neutral

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.24	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A
Antofagasta	£9.30B	4.25	£955.17M	£134.80	29.74

30.8% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.0% of Antofagasta shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Antofagasta beats Central Asia Metals on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Taseko Mines?

Taseko Mines (LON:TKO) and Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Taseko Mines has a beta of 2.012, meaning that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.193, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Taseko Mines currently has a consensus target price of GBX 390, suggesting a potential downside of 42.22%. Central Asia Metals has a consensus target price of GBX 181.25, suggesting a potential upside of 8.14%. Given Central Asia Metals' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Taseko Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Taseko Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Central Asia Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

23.7% of Taseko Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Central Asia Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Taseko Mines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Taseko Mines' score of 0.00 indicating that Central Asia Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Taseko Mines	Neutral
Central Asia Metals	Positive

Taseko Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Central Asia Metals. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taseko Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Taseko Mines	£985.32M	2.50	£148.77M	£5.00	135.00
Central Asia Metals	£229.86M	1.24	£47.93M	-£42.56	N/A

Taseko Mines has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -32.74%. Taseko Mines' return on equity of 2.09% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Taseko Mines	1.60%	2.09%	3.36%
Central Asia Metals	-32.74%	-22.86%	9.30%

Summary

Taseko Mines beats Central Asia Metals on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Central Asia Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CAML vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Central Asia Metals	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£285.60M	£4.18B	£5.17B	£2.92B
Dividend Yield	7.69%	5.17%	4.68%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	-3.94	26.10	26.68	367.27
Price / Sales	1.24	7,993.71	4,754.28	83,460.69
Price / Cash	8.30	29.93	27.28	27.89
Price / Book	0.86	10.79	9.13	7.12
Net Income	£47.93M	£122.92M	£154.63M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	12.18%	3.14%	2.50%	0.70%
1 Month Performance	13.55%	14.40%	11.45%	3.13%
1 Year Performance	-0.68%	56.77%	44.54%	21.89%

Central Asia Metals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CAML Central Asia Metals	2.6052 of 5 stars	GBX 167.60 +6.2%	GBX 181.25 +8.1%	+0.6%	£285.60M	£229.86M	N/A	1,000
GSCU Great Southern Copper	N/A	GBX 2.34 -0.4%	N/A	+21.7%	£18.10M	N/A	N/A	9
CCZ Castillo Copper	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£9.36M	£145.13K	N/A	168,000	Gap Down High Trading Volume
PXC Phoenix Copper	N/A	GBX 0.67 +3.9%	N/A	-77.9%	£2.00M	N/A	N/A	18	Gap Up
ANTO Antofagasta	0.9811 of 5 stars	GBX 3,702 +4.1%	GBX 3,843.75 +3.8%	+85.0%	£36.50B	£9.30B	27.46	7,753	High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CAML) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Central Asia Metals (CAML) Competitors

CAML vs. GSCU, CCZ, PXC, ANTO, and TKO

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Great Southern Copper?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Castillo Copper?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Phoenix Copper?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Antofagasta?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Taseko Mines?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CAML vs. The Competition

Central Asia Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Central Asia Metals (CAML) Competitors

CAML vs. GSCU, CCZ, PXC, ANTO, and TKO

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Great Southern Copper?

Does the media refer more to CAML or GSCU?

Is CAML or GSCU more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, CAML or GSCU?

Do analysts rate CAML or GSCU?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CAML or GSCU?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CAML or GSCU?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Castillo Copper?

Does the media refer more to CAML or CCZ?

Which has better earnings & valuation, CAML or CCZ?

Is CAML or CCZ more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CAML or CCZ?

Which has more risk & volatility, CAML or CCZ?

Do analysts prefer CAML or CCZ?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Phoenix Copper?

Do analysts prefer PXC or CAML?

Does the media prefer PXC or CAML?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PXC or CAML?

Is PXC or CAML more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PXC or CAML?

Which has more volatility and risk, PXC or CAML?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Antofagasta?

Is CAML or ANTO more profitable?

Do analysts recommend CAML or ANTO?

Is CAML or ANTO a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, CAML or ANTO?

Does the media favor CAML or ANTO?

Which has better earnings & valuation, CAML or ANTO?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CAML or ANTO?

Summary

How does Central Asia Metals compare to Taseko Mines?

Which has more risk & volatility, TKO or CAML?

Do analysts rate TKO or CAML?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in TKO or CAML?

Does the media prefer TKO or CAML?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TKO or CAML?

Is TKO or CAML more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CAML vs. The Competition

Central Asia Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools