Empire Metals (EEE) Competitors

Empire Metals logo
GBX 40 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 04:27 AM Eastern

EEE vs. GMET, THS, SLP, EUA, and GEM

Should you buy Empire Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Empire Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Empire Metals include Golden Metal Resources (GMET), Tharisa (THS), Sylvania Platinum (SLP), Eurasia Mining (EUA), and Gemfields Group (GEM). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does Empire Metals compare to Golden Metal Resources?

Empire Metals (LON:EEE) and Golden Metal Resources (LON:GMET) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

Golden Metal Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Empire Metals. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golden Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Empire MetalsN/AN/A-£3.47M-£0.52N/A
Golden Metal Resources-£2K-229,526.33-£1.53M-£4.00N/A

Empire Metals currently has a consensus price target of GBX 62, suggesting a potential upside of 55.00%. Given Empire Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Empire Metals is more favorable than Golden Metal Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Empire Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Golden Metal Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

0.2% of Empire Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of Golden Metal Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Golden Metal Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Empire Metals has a beta of 2.197, suggesting that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golden Metal Resources has a beta of 0.909, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Empire Metals had 5 more articles in the media than Golden Metal Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Empire Metals and 0 mentions for Golden Metal Resources. Golden Metal Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Empire Metals' score of -0.06 indicating that Golden Metal Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Empire Metals Neutral
Golden Metal Resources Neutral

Empire Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Golden Metal Resources' net margin of -2,826.67%. Empire Metals' return on equity of -24.90% beat Golden Metal Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Empire MetalsN/A -24.90% -25.26%
Golden Metal Resources -2,826.67%-25.01%-10.19%

Summary

Empire Metals beats Golden Metal Resources on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Empire Metals compare to Tharisa?

Tharisa (LON:THS) and Empire Metals (LON:EEE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Empire Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Empire Metals had 4 more articles in the media than Tharisa. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Empire Metals and 1 mentions for Tharisa. Tharisa's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Empire Metals' score of -0.06 indicating that Tharisa is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tharisa
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Empire Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Tharisa has a net margin of 16.17% compared to Empire Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Empire Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tharisa16.17% 14.75% 5.09%
Empire Metals N/A -24.90%-25.26%

Tharisa presently has a consensus target price of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.64%. Empire Metals has a consensus target price of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 55.00%. Given Tharisa's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Empire Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Empire Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Tharisa has a beta of 0.684, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Empire Metals has a beta of 2.197, indicating that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Empire Metals. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tharisa£748.73M0.45£96.84M£39.302.87
Empire MetalsN/AN/A-£3.47M-£0.52N/A

Summary

Tharisa beats Empire Metals on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Empire Metals compare to Sylvania Platinum?

Sylvania Platinum (LON:SLP) and Empire Metals (LON:EEE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

Sylvania Platinum has a net margin of 23.16% compared to Empire Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Sylvania Platinum's return on equity of 14.10% beat Empire Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sylvania Platinum23.16% 14.10% 1.69%
Empire Metals N/A -24.90%-25.26%

16.7% of Sylvania Platinum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Empire Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Sylvania Platinum shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sylvania Platinum has higher revenue and earnings than Empire Metals. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sylvania Platinum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sylvania Platinum£156.52M1.44£8.54M£13.936.25
Empire MetalsN/AN/A-£3.47M-£0.52N/A

Sylvania Platinum has a beta of 1.7676816, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Empire Metals has a beta of 2.197, indicating that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

Sylvania Platinum currently has a consensus price target of GBX 172, indicating a potential upside of 97.70%. Empire Metals has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 55.00%. Given Sylvania Platinum's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sylvania Platinum is more favorable than Empire Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sylvania Platinum
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Empire Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Empire Metals had 4 more articles in the media than Sylvania Platinum. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Empire Metals and 1 mentions for Sylvania Platinum. Sylvania Platinum's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Empire Metals' score of -0.06 indicating that Sylvania Platinum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sylvania Platinum
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Empire Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Sylvania Platinum beats Empire Metals on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Empire Metals compare to Eurasia Mining?

Eurasia Mining (LON:EUA) and Empire Metals (LON:EEE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Empire Metals has a consensus target price of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 55.00%. Given Empire Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Empire Metals is more favorable than Eurasia Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eurasia Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Empire Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Eurasia Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Empire Metals. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eurasia Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eurasia Mining£6.64M11.12-£422.17K-£0.05N/A
Empire MetalsN/AN/A-£3.47M-£0.52N/A

In the previous week, Empire Metals had 5 more articles in the media than Eurasia Mining. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Empire Metals and 0 mentions for Eurasia Mining. Eurasia Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Empire Metals' score of -0.06 indicating that Eurasia Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Eurasia Mining Neutral
Empire Metals Neutral

Empire Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Eurasia Mining's net margin of -21.65%. Eurasia Mining's return on equity of -7.12% beat Empire Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eurasia Mining-21.65% -7.12% -3.34%
Empire Metals N/A -24.90%-25.26%

Eurasia Mining has a beta of 0.504, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Empire Metals has a beta of 2.197, suggesting that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Eurasia Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Empire Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Eurasia Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Eurasia Mining beats Empire Metals on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Empire Metals compare to Gemfields Group?

Empire Metals (LON:EEE) and Gemfields Group (LON:GEM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

0.2% of Empire Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Gemfields Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.6% of Gemfields Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Empire Metals currently has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 55.00%. Gemfields Group has a consensus price target of GBX 13, indicating a potential upside of 251.35%. Given Gemfields Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gemfields Group is more favorable than Empire Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Empire Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gemfields Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Empire Metals had 5 more articles in the media than Gemfields Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Empire Metals and 0 mentions for Gemfields Group. Gemfields Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Empire Metals' score of -0.06 indicating that Gemfields Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Empire Metals Neutral
Gemfields Group Neutral

Empire Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gemfields Group's net margin of -28.03%. Gemfields Group's return on equity of -11.19% beat Empire Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Empire MetalsN/A -24.90% -25.26%
Gemfields Group -28.03%-11.19%2.46%

Empire Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gemfields Group. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gemfields Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Empire MetalsN/AN/A-£3.47M-£0.52N/A
Gemfields Group£135.11M0.47-£15.03M-£2.60N/A

Empire Metals has a beta of 2.197, suggesting that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gemfields Group has a beta of 0.064, suggesting that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gemfields Group beats Empire Metals on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Empire Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EEE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EEE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EEE vs. The Competition

MetricEmpire MetalsOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£295.02M£609.60M£4.73B£2.79B
Dividend YieldN/A6.08%5.00%6.16%
P/E Ratio-76.9212.6322.90366.40
Price / SalesN/A3,697.835,611.5086,135.43
Price / Cash2.4313.0427.0527.85
Price / Book26.7156.218.817.87
Net Income-£3.47M-£4.87M£157.26M£5.89B
7 Day Performance10.65%-5.95%-3.10%-0.79%
1 Month Performance19.94%-10.13%-4.15%-0.60%
1 Year Performance33.33%63.95%51.76%69.52%

Empire Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EEE
Empire Metals
1.765 of 5 stars
GBX 40
flat
GBX 62
+55.0%
+47.1%£295.02MN/AN/A3
GMET
Golden Metal Resources
N/AGBX 220
+8.6%
N/A+347.5%£427.48M-£2KN/A5
THS
Tharisa
3.1176 of 5 stars
GBX 116.50
+0.9%
GBX 177.50
+52.4%
+43.0%£345.18M£748.73M2.967,500
SLP
Sylvania Platinum
4.5446 of 5 stars
GBX 88
+3.5%
GBX 172
+95.5%
+32.3%£227.77M£156.52M6.32160
EUA
Eurasia Mining
N/AGBX 2.42
+0.6%
N/A-29.5%£71.28M£6.64MN/A116

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:EEE) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners