Go Pro

Empire Metals (EEE) Competitors

Empire Metals logo
GBX 40.75 +1.95 (+5.03%)
As of 12:44 PM Eastern

EEE vs. GMET, THS, SLP, EUA, and GEM

Should you buy Empire Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Empire Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Empire Metals include Golden Metal Resources (GMET), Tharisa (THS), Sylvania Platinum (SLP), Eurasia Mining (EUA), and Gemfields Group (GEM). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does Empire Metals compare to Golden Metal Resources?

Golden Metal Resources (LON:GMET) and Empire Metals (LON:EEE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Golden Metal Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Empire Metals. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golden Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Metal Resources-£2K-146,106.00-£1.53M-£4.00N/A
Empire MetalsN/AN/A-£3.47M-£0.52N/A

Empire Metals has a consensus price target of GBX 62, suggesting a potential upside of 52.15%. Given Empire Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Empire Metals is more favorable than Golden Metal Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golden Metal Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Empire Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Golden Metal Resources has a beta of 0.969, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Empire Metals has a beta of 2.17, suggesting that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Golden Metal Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Empire Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Metal Resources Neutral
Empire Metals Neutral

4.9% of Golden Metal Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Empire Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Golden Metal Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Empire Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Golden Metal Resources' net margin of -2,826.67%. Empire Metals' return on equity of -24.90% beat Golden Metal Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden Metal Resources-2,826.67% -25.01% -10.19%
Empire Metals N/A -24.90%-25.26%

Summary

Empire Metals beats Golden Metal Resources on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Empire Metals compare to Tharisa?

Tharisa (LON:THS) and Empire Metals (LON:EEE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Empire Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tharisa has a beta of 0.693, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Empire Metals has a beta of 2.17, indicating that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the broader market.

Tharisa presently has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 58.34%. Empire Metals has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 52.15%. Given Tharisa's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Empire Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Empire Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Tharisa had 1 more articles in the media than Empire Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tharisa and 0 mentions for Empire Metals. Tharisa's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Empire Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tharisa Neutral
Empire Metals Neutral

Tharisa has a net margin of 16.17% compared to Empire Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Empire Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tharisa16.17% 14.75% 5.09%
Empire Metals N/A -24.90%-25.26%

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Empire Metals. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tharisa£748.73M0.44£96.84M£39.302.85
Empire MetalsN/AN/A-£3.47M-£0.52N/A

Summary

Tharisa beats Empire Metals on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Empire Metals compare to Sylvania Platinum?

Sylvania Platinum (LON:SLP) and Empire Metals (LON:EEE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Sylvania Platinum's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Empire Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Sylvania Platinum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sylvania Platinum Positive
Empire Metals Neutral

Sylvania Platinum has a net margin of 23.16% compared to Empire Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Sylvania Platinum's return on equity of 14.10% beat Empire Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sylvania Platinum23.16% 14.10% 1.69%
Empire Metals N/A -24.90%-25.26%

Sylvania Platinum has higher revenue and earnings than Empire Metals. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sylvania Platinum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sylvania Platinum£156.52M1.48£8.54M£13.936.44
Empire MetalsN/AN/A-£3.47M-£0.52N/A

Sylvania Platinum currently has a consensus price target of GBX 174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 94.54%. Empire Metals has a consensus price target of GBX 62, suggesting a potential upside of 52.15%. Given Sylvania Platinum's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Sylvania Platinum is more favorable than Empire Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sylvania Platinum
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Empire Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Sylvania Platinum has a beta of 1.7602932, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Empire Metals has a beta of 2.17, suggesting that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the broader market.

17.0% of Sylvania Platinum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Empire Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Sylvania Platinum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sylvania Platinum beats Empire Metals on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Empire Metals compare to Eurasia Mining?

Eurasia Mining (LON:EUA) and Empire Metals (LON:EEE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Eurasia Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Empire Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Eurasia Mining Neutral
Empire Metals Neutral

Empire Metals has a consensus target price of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 52.15%. Given Empire Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Empire Metals is more favorable than Eurasia Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eurasia Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Empire Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Eurasia Mining has a net margin of 82.10% compared to Empire Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Eurasia Mining's return on equity of 19.91% beat Empire Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eurasia Mining82.10% 19.91% -3.34%
Empire Metals N/A -24.90%-25.26%

Eurasia Mining has a beta of 0.477, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Empire Metals has a beta of 2.17, suggesting that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Eurasia Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Empire Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.9% of Eurasia Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Eurasia Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Empire Metals. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eurasia Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eurasia Mining£5.42M13.07-£422.17K£0.1516.00
Empire MetalsN/AN/A-£3.47M-£0.52N/A

Summary

Eurasia Mining beats Empire Metals on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Empire Metals compare to Gemfields Group?

Empire Metals (LON:EEE) and Gemfields Group (LON:GEM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Empire Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gemfields Group. Empire Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gemfields Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Empire MetalsN/AN/A-£3.47M-£0.52N/A
Gemfields Group£135.11M0.40-£15.03M-£2.60N/A

0.2% of Empire Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of Gemfields Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Empire Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.6% of Gemfields Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Empire Metals currently has a consensus price target of GBX 62, indicating a potential upside of 52.15%. Gemfields Group has a consensus price target of GBX 13, indicating a potential upside of 312.70%. Given Gemfields Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gemfields Group is more favorable than Empire Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Empire Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gemfields Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Empire Metals has a beta of 2.17, meaning that its share price is 117% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gemfields Group has a beta of 0.064, meaning that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gemfields Group had 1 more articles in the media than Empire Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gemfields Group and 0 mentions for Empire Metals. Empire Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gemfields Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Empire Metals Neutral
Gemfields Group Neutral

Empire Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gemfields Group's net margin of -28.03%. Gemfields Group's return on equity of -11.19% beat Empire Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Empire MetalsN/A -24.90% -25.26%
Gemfields Group -28.03%-11.19%2.46%

Summary

Gemfields Group beats Empire Metals on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Empire Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EEE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EEE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EEE vs. The Competition

MetricEmpire MetalsOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£300.56M£557.86M£4.55B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A6.10%5.04%6.13%
P/E Ratio-78.3712.2420.94368.63
Price / SalesN/A3,590.346,459.9584,796.26
Price / Cash2.4313.0426.4627.87
Price / Book27.2158.788.787.77
Net Income-£3.47M-£4.87M£157.11M£5.89B
7 Day Performance9.10%-0.61%0.23%1.32%
1 Month Performance16.43%-9.30%-5.47%-0.69%
1 Year Performance40.76%46.21%38.64%62.54%

Empire Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EEE
Empire Metals
1.3844 of 5 stars
GBX 40.75
+5.0%
GBX 62
+52.1%
+28.8%£300.56MN/AN/A3
GMET
Golden Metal Resources
N/AGBX 187.50
+2.7%
N/A+154.2%£365.27M-£2KN/A5
THS
Tharisa
2.9402 of 5 stars
GBX 114
-0.4%
GBX 177.50
+55.7%
+30.1%£337.77M£748.73M2.907,500
SLP
Sylvania Platinum
4.4742 of 5 stars
GBX 87.50
+3.6%
GBX 174.50
+99.4%
+33.9%£226.47M£156.52M6.28160
EUA
Eurasia Mining
N/AGBX 2.40
-3.2%
N/A-47.1%£70.69M£5.42M15.97116

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:EEE) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners