Go Pro

Petra Diamonds (PDL) Competitors

Petra Diamonds logo
GBX 6.60 -0.46 (-6.52%)
As of 11:42 AM Eastern

PDL vs. EUA, GEM, COBR, FMET, and ROCK

Should you buy Petra Diamonds stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Petra Diamonds with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Petra Diamonds include Eurasia Mining (EUA), Gemfields Group (GEM), Cobra Resources (COBR), Fulcrum Metals (FMET), and Rockfire Resources (ROCK). These companies are all part of the "other precious metals & mining" industry.

How does Petra Diamonds compare to Eurasia Mining?

Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) and Eurasia Mining (LON:EUA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Petra Diamonds had 1 more articles in the media than Eurasia Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Petra Diamonds and 0 mentions for Eurasia Mining. Petra Diamonds' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Eurasia Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Petra Diamonds is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petra Diamonds Positive
Eurasia Mining Neutral

Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eurasia Mining has a beta of 0.477, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Eurasia Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petra Diamonds. Petra Diamonds is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eurasia Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petra Diamonds£192M0.12-£11.38M-£84.51N/A
Eurasia Mining£5.42M13.07-£422.17K£0.1516.00

8.5% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Eurasia Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.7% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Eurasia Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Eurasia Mining has a net margin of 82.10% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -104.34%. Eurasia Mining's return on equity of 19.91% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petra Diamonds-104.34% -333.85% -9.26%
Eurasia Mining 82.10%19.91%-3.34%

Summary

Eurasia Mining beats Petra Diamonds on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petra Diamonds compare to Gemfields Group?

Gemfields Group (LON:GEM) and Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

10.6% of Gemfields Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.6% of Gemfields Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.7% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gemfields Group and Gemfields Group both had 1 articles in the media. Petra Diamonds' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Gemfields Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Petra Diamonds is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gemfields Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Petra Diamonds
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gemfields Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 13, indicating a potential upside of 312.70%. Given Gemfields Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gemfields Group is more favorable than Petra Diamonds.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gemfields Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Petra Diamonds
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Petra Diamonds has higher revenue and earnings than Gemfields Group. Gemfields Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petra Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gemfields Group£135.11M0.40-£15.03M-£2.60N/A
Petra Diamonds£192M0.12-£11.38M-£84.51N/A

Gemfields Group has a beta of 0.064, indicating that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Gemfields Group has a net margin of -28.03% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -104.34%. Gemfields Group's return on equity of -11.19% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gemfields Group-28.03% -11.19% 2.46%
Petra Diamonds -104.34%-333.85%-9.26%

Summary

Gemfields Group beats Petra Diamonds on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petra Diamonds compare to Cobra Resources?

Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) and Cobra Resources (LON:COBR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

Cobra Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -104.34%. Cobra Resources' return on equity of 2.71% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petra Diamonds-104.34% -333.85% -9.26%
Cobra Resources N/A 2.71%-14.34%

8.5% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.7% of Petra Diamonds shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Cobra Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cobra Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petra Diamonds. Petra Diamonds is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cobra Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petra Diamonds£192M0.12-£11.38M-£84.51N/A
Cobra ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.19M£0.02207.50

In the previous week, Petra Diamonds and Petra Diamonds both had 1 articles in the media. Cobra Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Petra Diamonds' score of 0.67 indicating that Cobra Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Petra Diamonds
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cobra Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cobra Resources has a beta of 0.468, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cobra Resources beats Petra Diamonds on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petra Diamonds compare to Fulcrum Metals?

Fulcrum Metals (LON:FMET) and Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Petra Diamonds had 1 more articles in the media than Fulcrum Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Petra Diamonds and 0 mentions for Fulcrum Metals. Petra Diamonds' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Fulcrum Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Petra Diamonds is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fulcrum Metals Neutral
Petra Diamonds Positive

Fulcrum Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -104.34%. Fulcrum Metals' return on equity of -13.40% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fulcrum MetalsN/A -13.40% N/A
Petra Diamonds -104.34%-333.85%-9.26%

Fulcrum Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Petra Diamonds. Fulcrum Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petra Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fulcrum MetalsN/AN/A-£1.06M-£0.66N/A
Petra Diamonds£192M0.12-£11.38M-£84.51N/A

8.5% of Petra Diamonds shares are held by institutional investors. 17.1% of Fulcrum Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.7% of Petra Diamonds shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fulcrum Metals has a beta of 1.143, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Petra Diamonds beats Fulcrum Metals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Petra Diamonds compare to Rockfire Resources?

Rockfire Resources (LON:ROCK) and Petra Diamonds (LON:PDL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Rockfire Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Petra Diamonds. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Rockfire Resources and 1 mentions for Petra Diamonds. Rockfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Petra Diamonds' score of 0.67 indicating that Rockfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rockfire Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Petra Diamonds
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Rockfire Resources has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petra Diamonds has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Rockfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Petra Diamonds shares are held by institutional investors. 6.0% of Rockfire Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.7% of Petra Diamonds shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Rockfire Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Petra Diamonds' net margin of -104.34%. Rockfire Resources' return on equity of -40.49% beat Petra Diamonds' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rockfire ResourcesN/A -40.49% -24.89%
Petra Diamonds -104.34%-333.85%-9.26%

Rockfire Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Petra Diamonds. Rockfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petra Diamonds, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rockfire ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.03N/A
Petra Diamonds£192M0.12-£11.38M-£84.51N/A

Summary

Rockfire Resources and Petra Diamonds tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Petra Diamonds News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PDL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PDL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PDL vs. The Competition

MetricPetra DiamondsOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£22.14M£557.86M£4.55B£2.78B
Dividend Yield1.53%6.10%5.04%6.13%
P/E Ratio-0.0812.2420.94368.63
Price / Sales0.123,590.346,459.9584,796.26
Price / Cash0.6713.0426.4627.87
Price / Book0.0658.788.787.77
Net Income-£11.38M-£4.87M£157.11M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.08%-0.61%0.23%1.32%
1 Month Performance6.45%-9.30%-5.47%-0.69%
1 Year Performance-44.77%46.21%38.64%62.54%

Petra Diamonds Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PDL
Petra Diamonds
N/AGBX 6.60
-6.5%
N/A-37.7%£22.14M£192MN/A2,870
EUA
Eurasia Mining
N/AGBX 2.44
-1.4%
N/A-47.1%£73.05M£5.42M16.27116
GEM
Gemfields Group
1.9458 of 5 stars
GBX 3.25
flat
GBX 13
+300.0%
-47.0%£53.96M£135.11MN/A3,474
COBR
Cobra Resources
N/AGBX 4.24
+1.0%
N/A+81.0%£44.52MN/A212.00N/A
FMET
Fulcrum Metals
N/AGBX 8
flat
N/A+63.4%£12.29MN/AN/A5

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PDL) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners