Go Pro

FRP Advisory Group (FRP) Competitors

FRP Advisory Group logo
GBX 118 -1.00 (-0.84%)
As of 04:12 AM Eastern

FRP vs. GROW, FCSS, EDIN, GSS, and AGT

Should you buy FRP Advisory Group stock or one of its competitors? FRP Advisory Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Molten Ventures (GROW), Fidelity China Special (FCSS), Edinburgh Investment (EDIN), Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS), and AVI Global Trust (AGT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does FRP Advisory Group compare to Molten Ventures?

FRP Advisory Group (LON:FRP) and Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

FRP Advisory Group has a beta of 0.269, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9564402, indicating that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FRP Advisory Group and FRP Advisory Group both had 4 articles in the media. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat FRP Advisory Group's score of -0.28 indicating that Molten Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FRP Advisory Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Molten Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

FRP Advisory Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 220, suggesting a potential upside of 84.18%. Molten Ventures has a consensus price target of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential downside of 5.61%. Given FRP Advisory Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe FRP Advisory Group is more favorable than Molten Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FRP Advisory Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

FRP Advisory Group has higher revenue and earnings than Molten Ventures. Molten Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FRP Advisory Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FRP Advisory Group£177M1.67£23.15M£10.2611.64
Molten Ventures£148M7.89-£33.58M£69.009.81

20.7% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.5% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 75.09% compared to FRP Advisory Group's net margin of 14.80%. FRP Advisory Group's return on equity of 24.47% beat Molten Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FRP Advisory Group14.80% 24.47% 15.94%
Molten Ventures 75.09%9.21%-3.46%

Summary

FRP Advisory Group and Molten Ventures tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FRP Advisory Group compare to Fidelity China Special?

FRP Advisory Group (LON:FRP) and Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 81.41% compared to FRP Advisory Group's net margin of 14.80%. FRP Advisory Group's return on equity of 24.47% beat Fidelity China Special's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FRP Advisory Group14.80% 24.47% 15.94%
Fidelity China Special 81.41%9.12%N/A

FRP Advisory Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. FRP Advisory Group pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity China Special pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

FRP Advisory Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 220, indicating a potential upside of 84.18%. Given FRP Advisory Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe FRP Advisory Group is more favorable than Fidelity China Special.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FRP Advisory Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fidelity China Special
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

FRP Advisory Group has a beta of 0.269, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.919, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FRP Advisory Group had 4 more articles in the media than Fidelity China Special. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for FRP Advisory Group and 0 mentions for Fidelity China Special. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat FRP Advisory Group's score of -0.28 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FRP Advisory Group Neutral
Fidelity China Special Neutral

20.7% of FRP Advisory Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of FRP Advisory Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity China Special has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FRP Advisory Group. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FRP Advisory Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FRP Advisory Group£177M1.67£23.15M£10.2611.64
Fidelity China Special£146.54M7.77£997.06M£29.758.42

Summary

FRP Advisory Group beats Fidelity China Special on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FRP Advisory Group compare to Edinburgh Investment?

Edinburgh Investment (LON:EDIN) and FRP Advisory Group (LON:FRP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Edinburgh Investment has a net margin of 89.72% compared to FRP Advisory Group's net margin of 14.80%. FRP Advisory Group's return on equity of 24.47% beat Edinburgh Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Edinburgh Investment89.72% 7.03% 6.69%
FRP Advisory Group 14.80%24.47%15.94%

Edinburgh Investment has a beta of 0.965, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FRP Advisory Group has a beta of 0.269, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Edinburgh Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FRP Advisory Group. FRP Advisory Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Edinburgh Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Edinburgh Investment£79.43M12.91£180.50M£55.9114.80
FRP Advisory Group£177M1.67£23.15M£10.2611.64

In the previous week, Edinburgh Investment had 2 more articles in the media than FRP Advisory Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Edinburgh Investment and 4 mentions for FRP Advisory Group. Edinburgh Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat FRP Advisory Group's score of -0.28 indicating that Edinburgh Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Edinburgh Investment
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FRP Advisory Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

9.7% of Edinburgh Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.7% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Edinburgh Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Edinburgh Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 30.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. FRP Advisory Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Edinburgh Investment pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FRP Advisory Group pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FRP Advisory Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

FRP Advisory Group has a consensus target price of GBX 220, indicating a potential upside of 84.18%. Given FRP Advisory Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FRP Advisory Group is more favorable than Edinburgh Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Edinburgh Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FRP Advisory Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

FRP Advisory Group beats Edinburgh Investment on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FRP Advisory Group compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) and FRP Advisory Group (LON:FRP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

FRP Advisory Group has a net margin of 14.80% compared to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. FRP Advisory Group's return on equity of 24.47% beat Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Emerging Markets FundN/A N/A N/A
FRP Advisory Group 14.80%24.47%15.94%

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. FRP Advisory Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FRP Advisory Group pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, FRP Advisory Group had 4 more articles in the media than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for FRP Advisory Group and 0 mentions for Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat FRP Advisory Group's score of -0.28 indicating that Genesis Emerging Markets Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund Neutral
FRP Advisory Group Neutral

FRP Advisory Group has a consensus price target of GBX 220, indicating a potential upside of 84.18%. Given FRP Advisory Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FRP Advisory Group is more favorable than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FRP Advisory Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

FRP Advisory Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FRP Advisory Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A
FRP Advisory Group£177M1.67£23.15M£10.2611.64

20.7% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

FRP Advisory Group beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FRP Advisory Group compare to AVI Global Trust?

FRP Advisory Group (LON:FRP) and AVI Global Trust (LON:AGT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

FRP Advisory Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 220, suggesting a potential upside of 84.18%. Given FRP Advisory Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe FRP Advisory Group is more favorable than AVI Global Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FRP Advisory Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
AVI Global Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

FRP Advisory Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. AVI Global Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. FRP Advisory Group pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AVI Global Trust pays out 38.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

AVI Global Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FRP Advisory Group. FRP Advisory Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AVI Global Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FRP Advisory Group£177M1.67£23.15M£10.2611.64
AVI Global Trust£57.10M18.12£215.81M£11.7422.35

FRP Advisory Group has a beta of 0.269, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AVI Global Trust has a beta of 0.929, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

AVI Global Trust has a net margin of 92.40% compared to FRP Advisory Group's net margin of 14.80%. FRP Advisory Group's return on equity of 24.47% beat AVI Global Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FRP Advisory Group14.80% 24.47% 15.94%
AVI Global Trust 92.40%4.87%7.00%

20.7% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of AVI Global Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of AVI Global Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, FRP Advisory Group had 3 more articles in the media than AVI Global Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for FRP Advisory Group and 1 mentions for AVI Global Trust. AVI Global Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat FRP Advisory Group's score of -0.28 indicating that AVI Global Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FRP Advisory Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
AVI Global Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

FRP Advisory Group beats AVI Global Trust on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FRP Advisory Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRP vs. The Competition

MetricFRP Advisory GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£295.15M£5.58B£14.05B£2.88B
Dividend Yield4.85%7.43%5.91%6.22%
P/E Ratio11.6431.0025.79366.63
Price / Sales1.671,195.25505.6083,693.95
Price / Cash14.2548.0340.7027.89
Price / Book3.623.562.766.44
Net Income£23.15M£419.48M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.28%6.49%2.50%17.62%
1 Month Performance0.38%-0.81%0.71%0.60%
1 Year Performance-12.78%5.77%10.57%20.56%

FRP Advisory Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRP
FRP Advisory Group
3.1516 of 5 stars
GBX 118
-0.8%
GBX 220
+86.4%
-12.8%£291.57M£177M11.50657
GROW
Molten Ventures
1.4775 of 5 stars
GBX 680
+2.6%
GBX 638.67
-6.1%
+86.7%£1.18B£148M9.8620
FCSS
Fidelity China Special
N/AGBX 254
-0.4%
N/A-19.0%£1.16B£146.54M8.54N/A
EDIN
Edinburgh Investment
N/AGBX 851.99
+0.2%
N/A+3.2%£1.07B£79.43M15.24N/A
GSS
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.06B£250.40M6.181,626

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FRP) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners