Go Pro

FRP Advisory Group (FRP) Competitors

FRP Advisory Group logo
GBX 115.75 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:31 PM Eastern

FRP vs. SDP, GSS, USA, EDIN, and SOI

Should you buy FRP Advisory Group stock or one of its competitors? FRP Advisory Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (SDP), Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS), Baillie Gifford US Growth (USA), Edinburgh Investment (EDIN), and Schroder Oriental Income (SOI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does FRP Advisory Group compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

FRP Advisory Group (LON:FRP) and Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (LON:SDP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a net margin of 95.12% compared to FRP Advisory Group's net margin of 14.80%. FRP Advisory Group's return on equity of 24.47% beat Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FRP Advisory Group14.80% 24.47% 15.94%
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund 95.12%20.01%-1.73%

20.7% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has higher revenue and earnings than FRP Advisory Group. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FRP Advisory Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FRP Advisory Group£177M1.62£23.15M£10.2611.28
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund£191.10M5.50£121.21M£135.646.22

In the previous week, FRP Advisory Group had 4 more articles in the media than Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for FRP Advisory Group and 2 mentions for Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund. FRP Advisory Group's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's score of 0.32 indicating that FRP Advisory Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FRP Advisory Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

FRP Advisory Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 220, suggesting a potential upside of 90.06%. Given FRP Advisory Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe FRP Advisory Group is more favorable than Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FRP Advisory Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

FRP Advisory Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. FRP Advisory Group pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

FRP Advisory Group has a beta of 0.269, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a beta of 0.958, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

FRP Advisory Group beats Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FRP Advisory Group compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

FRP Advisory Group (LON:FRP) and Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

FRP Advisory Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. FRP Advisory Group pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, FRP Advisory Group had 6 more articles in the media than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for FRP Advisory Group and 0 mentions for Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. FRP Advisory Group's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that FRP Advisory Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FRP Advisory Group Positive
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund Neutral

FRP Advisory Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 220, suggesting a potential upside of 90.06%. Given FRP Advisory Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FRP Advisory Group is more favorable than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FRP Advisory Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

FRP Advisory Group has a net margin of 14.80% compared to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. FRP Advisory Group's return on equity of 24.47% beat Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FRP Advisory Group14.80% 24.47% 15.94%
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

20.7% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FRP Advisory Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FRP Advisory Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FRP Advisory Group£177M1.62£23.15M£10.2611.28
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A

Summary

FRP Advisory Group beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FRP Advisory Group compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) and FRP Advisory Group (LON:FRP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FRP Advisory Group. FRP Advisory Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford US Growth£58.05M18.26£84.35M£19.8119.33
FRP Advisory Group£177M1.62£23.15M£10.2611.28

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.618, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FRP Advisory Group has a beta of 0.269, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.7% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, FRP Advisory Group had 4 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford US Growth. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for FRP Advisory Group and 2 mentions for Baillie Gifford US Growth. FRP Advisory Group's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's score of 0.05 indicating that FRP Advisory Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford US Growth
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FRP Advisory Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

FRP Advisory Group has a consensus price target of GBX 220, suggesting a potential upside of 90.06%. Given FRP Advisory Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FRP Advisory Group is more favorable than Baillie Gifford US Growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baillie Gifford US Growth
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FRP Advisory Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a net margin of 96.49% compared to FRP Advisory Group's net margin of 14.80%. Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity of 25.27% beat FRP Advisory Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford US Growth96.49% 25.27% N/A
FRP Advisory Group 14.80%24.47%15.94%

Summary

FRP Advisory Group beats Baillie Gifford US Growth on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FRP Advisory Group compare to Edinburgh Investment?

FRP Advisory Group (LON:FRP) and Edinburgh Investment (LON:EDIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

FRP Advisory Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 220, indicating a potential upside of 90.06%. Given FRP Advisory Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FRP Advisory Group is more favorable than Edinburgh Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FRP Advisory Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Edinburgh Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, FRP Advisory Group had 3 more articles in the media than Edinburgh Investment. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for FRP Advisory Group and 3 mentions for Edinburgh Investment. FRP Advisory Group's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Edinburgh Investment's score of 0.30 indicating that FRP Advisory Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FRP Advisory Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Edinburgh Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Edinburgh Investment has a net margin of 89.72% compared to FRP Advisory Group's net margin of 14.80%. FRP Advisory Group's return on equity of 24.47% beat Edinburgh Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FRP Advisory Group14.80% 24.47% 15.94%
Edinburgh Investment 89.72%7.03%6.69%

FRP Advisory Group has a beta of 0.269, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Edinburgh Investment has a beta of 0.965, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Edinburgh Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FRP Advisory Group. FRP Advisory Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Edinburgh Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FRP Advisory Group£177M1.62£23.15M£10.2611.28
Edinburgh Investment£79.43M12.95£180.50M£55.9114.85

FRP Advisory Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Edinburgh Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 30.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. FRP Advisory Group pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Edinburgh Investment pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FRP Advisory Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

20.7% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of Edinburgh Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of FRP Advisory Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Edinburgh Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FRP Advisory Group beats Edinburgh Investment on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FRP Advisory Group compare to Schroder Oriental Income?

Schroder Oriental Income (LON:SOI) and FRP Advisory Group (LON:FRP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Schroder Oriental Income has a net margin of 94.62% compared to FRP Advisory Group's net margin of 14.80%. Schroder Oriental Income's return on equity of 39.20% beat FRP Advisory Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Oriental Income94.62% 39.20% -2.12%
FRP Advisory Group 14.80%24.47%15.94%

Schroder Oriental Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. FRP Advisory Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Schroder Oriental Income pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FRP Advisory Group pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Schroder Oriental Income has higher revenue and earnings than FRP Advisory Group. Schroder Oriental Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FRP Advisory Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Oriental Income£334.18M3.04£106.18M£144.693.17
FRP Advisory Group£177M1.62£23.15M£10.2611.28

Schroder Oriental Income has a beta of 1.087, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FRP Advisory Group has a beta of 0.269, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FRP Advisory Group had 5 more articles in the media than Schroder Oriental Income. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for FRP Advisory Group and 1 mentions for Schroder Oriental Income. FRP Advisory Group's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Schroder Oriental Income's score of 0.00 indicating that FRP Advisory Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Schroder Oriental Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FRP Advisory Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

9.7% of Schroder Oriental Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.7% of FRP Advisory Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Schroder Oriental Income shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of FRP Advisory Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FRP Advisory Group has a consensus target price of GBX 220, indicating a potential upside of 90.06%. Given FRP Advisory Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FRP Advisory Group is more favorable than Schroder Oriental Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroder Oriental Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
FRP Advisory Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

FRP Advisory Group beats Schroder Oriental Income on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FRP Advisory Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRP vs. The Competition

MetricFRP Advisory GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£286.01M£5.16B£13.39B£2.87B
Dividend Yield5.02%7.51%5.99%6.21%
P/E Ratio11.2829.8724.68366.04
Price / Sales1.621,172.48503.9989,364.46
Price / Cash14.2547.8350.2327.89
Price / Book3.513.492.696.31
Net Income£23.15M£417.69M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.22%-0.95%-1.08%-0.09%
1 Month Performance-2.73%4.76%0.76%10.91%
1 Year Performance-19.06%3.81%8.11%17.58%

FRP Advisory Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRP
FRP Advisory Group
3.6276 of 5 stars
GBX 115.75
flat
GBX 220
+90.1%
-19.1%£286.01M£177M11.28657
SDP
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund
N/AGBX 853
-0.8%
N/A+32.6%£1.06B£191.10M6.29N/A
GSS
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.06B£250.40M6.181,626
USA
Baillie Gifford US Growth
N/AGBX 376
-0.5%
N/A+41.2%£1.04B£58.05M18.98N/A
EDIN
Edinburgh Investment
N/AGBX 825
-1.1%
N/A+4.1%£1.02B£79.43M14.76N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FRP) was last updated on 9/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners