Do analysts prefer PEEL or TAM?

Tatton Asset Management has a consensus target price of GBX 797.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.64%. Given Tatton Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tatton Asset Management is more favorable than Peel Hunt. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Peel Hunt 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Tatton Asset Management 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Is PEEL or MTW more profitable?

Peel Hunt has a net margin of 10.40% compared to Mattioli Woods' net margin of 8.59%. Peel Hunt's return on equity of 14.26% beat Mattioli Woods' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Peel Hunt 10.40% 14.26% -0.50% Mattioli Woods 8.59% 4.38% 4.42%

Peel Hunt (PEEL) Competitors

GBX 96 -1.00 (-1.03%)

As of 09:56 AM Eastern

Compare

PEEL vs. PCGH, EOT, TAM, AAIF, and MTW

Should you buy Peel Hunt stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Peel Hunt with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Peel Hunt include Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (PCGH), European Opportunities Trust (EOT), Tatton Asset Management (TAM), abrdn Asian Income Fund (AAIF), and Mattioli Woods (MTW). These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Peel Hunt compare to Polar Capital Glb Healthcare?

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (LON:PCGH) and Peel Hunt (LON:PEEL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a beta of 0.638, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peel Hunt has a beta of 1.038, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

5.8% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of Peel Hunt shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.6% of Peel Hunt shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peel Hunt. Peel Hunt is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare	£48.41M	9.22	£77.59M	£41.76	10.60
Peel Hunt	£143.46M	0.79	-£1.50M	£11.70	8.38

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a net margin of 87.94% compared to Peel Hunt's net margin of 10.40%. Peel Hunt's return on equity of 14.26% beat Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare	87.94%	11.29%	N/A
Peel Hunt	10.40%	14.26%	-0.50%

In the previous week, Peel Hunt had 2 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Peel Hunt and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Peel Hunt's score of -0.05 indicating that Polar Capital Glb Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare	Positive
Peel Hunt	Neutral

Summary

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare beats Peel Hunt on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peel Hunt compare to European Opportunities Trust?

Peel Hunt (LON:PEEL) and European Opportunities Trust (LON:EOT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Peel Hunt had 2 more articles in the media than European Opportunities Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Peel Hunt and 0 mentions for European Opportunities Trust. European Opportunities Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Peel Hunt's score of -0.05 indicating that European Opportunities Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Peel Hunt	Neutral
European Opportunities Trust	Neutral

Peel Hunt has a beta of 1.038, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, European Opportunities Trust has a beta of 1.2273101, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

European Opportunities Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peel Hunt. Peel Hunt is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than European Opportunities Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peel Hunt	£143.46M	0.79	-£1.50M	£11.70	8.38
European Opportunities Trust	£29.05M	15.05	£79.96M	£39.06	23.99

17.0% of Peel Hunt shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.0% of European Opportunities Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.6% of Peel Hunt shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of European Opportunities Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

European Opportunities Trust has a net margin of 73.73% compared to Peel Hunt's net margin of 10.40%. Peel Hunt's return on equity of 14.26% beat European Opportunities Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peel Hunt	10.40%	14.26%	-0.50%
European Opportunities Trust	73.73%	5.01%	7.67%

Summary

European Opportunities Trust beats Peel Hunt on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peel Hunt compare to Tatton Asset Management?

Peel Hunt (LON:PEEL) and Tatton Asset Management (LON:TAM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Tatton Asset Management has a net margin of 34.61% compared to Peel Hunt's net margin of 10.40%. Tatton Asset Management's return on equity of 33.94% beat Peel Hunt's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peel Hunt	10.40%	14.26%	-0.50%
Tatton Asset Management	34.61%	33.94%	16.63%

In the previous week, Peel Hunt had 1 more articles in the media than Tatton Asset Management. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Peel Hunt and 1 mentions for Tatton Asset Management. Tatton Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Peel Hunt's score of -0.05 indicating that Tatton Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Peel Hunt	Neutral
Tatton Asset Management	Very Positive

Tatton Asset Management has a consensus target price of GBX 797.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.64%. Given Tatton Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tatton Asset Management is more favorable than Peel Hunt.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peel Hunt	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Tatton Asset Management	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

17.0% of Peel Hunt shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.2% of Tatton Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. 17.6% of Peel Hunt shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.9% of Tatton Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tatton Asset Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peel Hunt. Peel Hunt is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tatton Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peel Hunt	£143.46M	0.79	-£1.50M	£11.70	8.38
Tatton Asset Management	£54.44M	7.90	£13.50M	£30.22	23.43

Peel Hunt has a beta of 1.038, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tatton Asset Management has a beta of 0.727, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tatton Asset Management beats Peel Hunt on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peel Hunt compare to abrdn Asian Income Fund?

abrdn Asian Income Fund (LON:AAIF) and Peel Hunt (LON:PEEL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

abrdn Asian Income Fund has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peel Hunt. abrdn Asian Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peel Hunt, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asian Income Fund	£76.34M	5.75	£42.37M	£50.95	6.05
Peel Hunt	£143.46M	0.79	-£1.50M	£11.70	8.38

In the previous week, Peel Hunt had 2 more articles in the media than abrdn Asian Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Peel Hunt and 0 mentions for abrdn Asian Income Fund. abrdn Asian Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Peel Hunt's score of -0.05 indicating that abrdn Asian Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asian Income Fund	Neutral
Peel Hunt	Neutral

abrdn Asian Income Fund has a beta of 0.699, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peel Hunt has a beta of 1.038, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

abrdn Asian Income Fund has a net margin of 89.27% compared to Peel Hunt's net margin of 10.40%. abrdn Asian Income Fund's return on equity of 19.40% beat Peel Hunt's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
abrdn Asian Income Fund	89.27%	19.40%	7.35%
Peel Hunt	10.40%	14.26%	-0.50%

4.9% of abrdn Asian Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.0% of Peel Hunt shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of abrdn Asian Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.6% of Peel Hunt shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

abrdn Asian Income Fund beats Peel Hunt on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peel Hunt compare to Mattioli Woods?

Peel Hunt (LON:PEEL) and Mattioli Woods (LON:MTW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Peel Hunt has a beta of 1.038, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mattioli Woods has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

17.0% of Peel Hunt shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.3% of Mattioli Woods shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.6% of Peel Hunt shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of Mattioli Woods shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Peel Hunt had 2 more articles in the media than Mattioli Woods. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Peel Hunt and 0 mentions for Mattioli Woods. Mattioli Woods' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Peel Hunt's score of -0.05 indicating that Mattioli Woods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Peel Hunt	Neutral
Mattioli Woods	Neutral

Peel Hunt has a net margin of 10.40% compared to Mattioli Woods' net margin of 8.59%. Peel Hunt's return on equity of 14.26% beat Mattioli Woods' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peel Hunt	10.40%	14.26%	-0.50%
Mattioli Woods	8.59%	4.38%	4.42%

Mattioli Woods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peel Hunt. Mattioli Woods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peel Hunt, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peel Hunt	£143.46M	0.79	-£1.50M	£11.70	8.38
Mattioli Woods	£115.40M	0.00	£9.91M	£0.19	N/A

Summary

Peel Hunt beats Mattioli Woods on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peel Hunt News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PEEL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Peel Hunt	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£113.30M	£5.56B	£14.04B	£2.86B
Dividend Yield	5.05%	7.47%	5.93%	6.13%
P/E Ratio	8.38	37.01	28.90	368.56
Price / Sales	0.79	1,115.29	465.12	83,560.39
Price / Cash	1.04	48.22	38.61	27.89
Price / Book	1.31	3.71	3.73	7.19
Net Income	-£1.50M	£417.17M	£1.31B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	N/A	1.71%	1.52%	1.09%
1 Month Performance	-0.02%	-0.09%	1.32%	0.78%
1 Year Performance	0.51%	7.22%	13.65%	75.16%

Peel Hunt Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PEEL Peel Hunt	N/A	GBX 96 -1.0%	N/A	-2.2%	£110.99M	£143.46M	8.21	308	Insider Trade Gap Up
PCGH Polar Capital Glb Healthcare	N/A	GBX 438 -1.0%	N/A	+33.2%	£441.81M	£48.41M	10.49	N/A
EOT European Opportunities Trust	N/A	GBX 937 +9.7%	N/A	N/A	£437.20M	£29.05M	23.99	N/A	Gap Up
TAM Tatton Asset Management	4.2111 of 5 stars	GBX 718.15 +0.9%	GBX 797.50 +11.0%	-3.2%	£435.97M	£54.44M	23.76	103	Positive News
AAIF abrdn Asian Income Fund	N/A	GBX 304 +2.4%	N/A	+34.3%	£433.25M	£76.34M	5.97	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PEEL) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Peel Hunt (PEEL) Competitors

PEEL vs. PCGH, EOT, TAM, AAIF, and MTW

How does Peel Hunt compare to Polar Capital Glb Healthcare?

Summary

How does Peel Hunt compare to European Opportunities Trust?

Summary

How does Peel Hunt compare to Tatton Asset Management?

Summary

How does Peel Hunt compare to abrdn Asian Income Fund?

Summary

How does Peel Hunt compare to Mattioli Woods?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

PEEL vs. The Competition

Peel Hunt Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Peel Hunt (PEEL) Competitors

PEEL vs. PCGH, EOT, TAM, AAIF, and MTW

How does Peel Hunt compare to Polar Capital Glb Healthcare?

Which has more volatility and risk, PCGH or PEEL?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PCGH or PEEL?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, PCGH or PEEL?

Is PCGH or PEEL more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PCGH or PEEL?

Summary

How does Peel Hunt compare to European Opportunities Trust?

Does the media favor PEEL or EOT?

Which has more volatility & risk, PEEL or EOT?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, PEEL or EOT?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in PEEL or EOT?

Is PEEL or EOT more profitable?

Summary

How does Peel Hunt compare to Tatton Asset Management?

Is PEEL or TAM more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PEEL or TAM?

Do analysts prefer PEEL or TAM?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PEEL or TAM?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PEEL or TAM?

Which has more risk and volatility, PEEL or TAM?

Summary

How does Peel Hunt compare to abrdn Asian Income Fund?

Which has better earnings & valuation, AAIF or PEEL?

Does the media favor AAIF or PEEL?

Which has more risk and volatility, AAIF or PEEL?

Is AAIF or PEEL more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AAIF or PEEL?

Summary

How does Peel Hunt compare to Mattioli Woods?

Which has more volatility and risk, PEEL or MTW?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PEEL or MTW?

Does the media refer more to PEEL or MTW?

Is PEEL or MTW more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, PEEL or MTW?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

PEEL vs. The Competition

Peel Hunt Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools