Go Pro
→ Your $29.97 book is free today (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free CAV Stock Alerts

Cavendish Financial (CAV) Competitors

Cavendish Financial logo
GBX 8.82 -0.09 (-0.96%)
As of 09/18/2026 11:41 AM Eastern
Compare

CAV vs. ATS, MHN, MTU, SHRS, and MVCT

Should you buy Cavendish Financial stock or one of its competitors? Cavendish Financial's main competitors and comparable companies include Artemis Alpha Trust (ATS), Menhaden Resource Efficiency (MHN), Montanaro UK Smaller Companies (MTU), Shires Income (SHRS), and Molten Ventures VCT (MVCT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Cavendish Financial compare to Artemis Alpha Trust?

Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) and Artemis Alpha Trust (LON:ATS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Artemis Alpha Trust has a net margin of 86.71% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of 1.00%. Artemis Alpha Trust's return on equity of 13.86% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial1.00% 1.45% -5.44%
Artemis Alpha Trust 86.71%13.86%8.95%

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 1.088, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Artemis Alpha Trust has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Artemis Alpha Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Artemis Alpha Trust pays out 1,296.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cavendish Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Artemis Alpha Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cavendish Financial. Artemis Alpha Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.52-£3.62M£0.1558.77
Artemis Alpha Trust£20.39M0.00£17.68M£0.54N/A

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Artemis Alpha Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cavendish Financial and 0 mentions for Artemis Alpha Trust. Cavendish Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Artemis Alpha Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial Neutral
Artemis Alpha Trust Neutral

4.1% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.2% of Artemis Alpha Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Artemis Alpha Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Artemis Alpha Trust beats Cavendish Financial on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cavendish Financial compare to Menhaden Resource Efficiency?

Menhaden Resource Efficiency (LON:MHN) and Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Menhaden Resource Efficiency has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cavendish Financial. Menhaden Resource Efficiency is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Menhaden Resource Efficiency£2.24M53.81£16.15M£20.497.47
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.52-£3.62M£0.1558.77

Menhaden Resource Efficiency has a net margin of 97.04% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of 1.00%. Menhaden Resource Efficiency's return on equity of 20.90% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Menhaden Resource Efficiency97.04% 20.90% N/A
Cavendish Financial 1.00%1.45%-5.44%

31.3% of Menhaden Resource Efficiency shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 37.0% of Menhaden Resource Efficiency shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Menhaden Resource Efficiency pays an annual dividend of GBX 0 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Menhaden Resource Efficiency pays out 0.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Menhaden Resource Efficiency. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cavendish Financial and 0 mentions for Menhaden Resource Efficiency. Menhaden Resource Efficiency's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cavendish Financial'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Menhaden Resource Efficiency Neutral
Cavendish Financial Neutral

Summary

Menhaden Resource Efficiency beats Cavendish Financial on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cavendish Financial compare to Montanaro UK Smaller Companies?

Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) and Montanaro UK Smaller Companies (LON:MTU) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Montanaro UK Smaller Companies pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Montanaro UK Smaller Companies pays out -7,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

4.1% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Montanaro UK Smaller Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Montanaro UK Smaller Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Montanaro UK Smaller Companies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cavendish Financial. Montanaro UK Smaller Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.52-£3.62M£0.1558.77
Montanaro UK Smaller Companies£620K194.04£26.33M-£0.09N/A

Cavendish Financial has a net margin of 1.00% compared to Montanaro UK Smaller Companies' net margin of -9.15%. Cavendish Financial's return on equity of 1.45% beat Montanaro UK Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial1.00% 1.45% -5.44%
Montanaro UK Smaller Companies -9.15%-0.08%5.77%

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Montanaro UK Smaller Companies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cavendish Financial and 0 mentions for Montanaro UK Smaller Companies. Montanaro UK Smaller Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.01 beat Cavendish Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that Montanaro UK Smaller Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial Neutral
Montanaro UK Smaller Companies Neutral

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 1.088, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Montanaro UK Smaller Companies has a beta of 1.225, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cavendish Financial beats Montanaro UK Smaller Companies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cavendish Financial compare to Shires Income?

Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) and Shires Income (LON:SHRS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Shires Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 15 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Shires Income pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 1.088, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shires Income has a beta of 1.0152379, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Shires Income has a net margin of 89.43% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of 1.00%. Shires Income's return on equity of 16.04% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial1.00% 1.45% -5.44%
Shires Income 89.43%16.04%-0.15%

4.1% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Shires Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Shires Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Shires Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cavendish Financial and 0 mentions for Shires Income. Cavendish Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shires Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial Neutral
Shires Income Neutral

Shires Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cavendish Financial. Shires Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.52-£3.62M£0.1558.77
Shires Income£18.46M6.45£72.33M£44.986.71

Summary

Cavendish Financial and Shires Income tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cavendish Financial compare to Molten Ventures VCT?

Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) and Molten Ventures VCT (LON:MVCT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Molten Ventures VCT has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of 1.00%. Cavendish Financial's return on equity of 1.45% beat Molten Ventures VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial1.00% 1.45% -5.44%
Molten Ventures VCT 24.57%1.34%-1.38%

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Molten Ventures VCT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cavendish Financial and 0 mentions for Molten Ventures VCT. Cavendish Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Molten Ventures VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial Neutral
Molten Ventures VCT Neutral

Cavendish Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Molten Ventures VCT. Cavendish Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.52-£3.62M£0.1558.77
Molten Ventures VCT£1.78M65.52-£8.19M£0.4093.50

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 1.088, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Molten Ventures VCT has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

4.1% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Molten Ventures VCT shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Molten Ventures VCT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Molten Ventures VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Molten Ventures VCT pays out 537.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cavendish Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Molten Ventures VCT has a consensus price target of GBX 790, suggesting a potential upside of 2,012.30%. Given Molten Ventures VCT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Molten Ventures VCT is more favorable than Cavendish Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cavendish Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Molten Ventures VCT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Cavendish Financial beats Molten Ventures VCT on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cavendish Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CAV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CAV vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCavendish FinancialCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£29.88M£5.32B£13.82B£2.89B
Dividend Yield8.99%7.50%5.93%6.22%
P/E Ratio58.7729.9625.31366.66
Price / Sales0.521,183.85500.1589,823.13
Price / CashN/A47.7640.8527.89
Price / Book0.713.522.736.34
Net Income-£3.62M£417.39M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-7.21%-0.57%-0.59%0.07%
1 Month Performance-12.64%-1.68%0.09%0.04%
1 Year Performance-28.40%3.81%8.86%19.18%

Cavendish Financial Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CAV
Cavendish Financial
N/AGBX 8.82
-1.0%		N/A-28.4%£29.88M£56.87M58.77157
ATS
Artemis Alpha Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£120.70M£20.39M683.33N/A
MHN
Menhaden Resource Efficiency
N/AGBX 153
+∞		N/AN/A£120.60M£2.24M7.47147,000
MTU
Montanaro UK Smaller Companies
N/AGBX 108.51
-1.2%		N/A+10.0%£120.32M£620KN/AN/A
SHRS
Shires Income
N/AGBX 302
flat		N/AN/A£119.02M£18.46M6.71N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CAV) was last updated on 9/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel