Go Pro

Cavendish Financial (CAV) Competitors

Cavendish Financial logo
GBX 9.50 +0.25 (+2.70%)
As of 08/27/2026 07:49 AM Eastern

CAV vs. MTU, SEC, CMPI, ATS, and MHN

Should you buy Cavendish Financial stock or one of its competitors? Cavendish Financial's main competitors and comparable companies include Montanaro UK Smaller Companies (MTU), Strategic Equity Capital (SEC), CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (CMPI), Artemis Alpha Trust (ATS), and Menhaden Resource Efficiency (MHN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does Cavendish Financial compare to Montanaro UK Smaller Companies?

Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) and Montanaro UK Smaller Companies (LON:MTU) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial and Cavendish Financial both had 1 articles in the media. Montanaro UK Smaller Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Cavendish Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that Montanaro UK Smaller Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Montanaro UK Smaller Companies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Montanaro UK Smaller Companies pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Montanaro UK Smaller Companies pays out -7,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Montanaro UK Smaller Companies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cavendish Financial. Montanaro UK Smaller Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.56-£3.62M£0.1563.33
Montanaro UK Smaller Companies£620K202.23£26.33M-£0.09N/A

Cavendish Financial has a net margin of 1.00% compared to Montanaro UK Smaller Companies' net margin of -9.15%. Cavendish Financial's return on equity of 1.45% beat Montanaro UK Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial1.00% 1.45% -5.44%
Montanaro UK Smaller Companies -9.15%-0.08%5.77%

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 1.088, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Montanaro UK Smaller Companies has a beta of 1.235, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

4.4% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Montanaro UK Smaller Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Montanaro UK Smaller Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cavendish Financial and Montanaro UK Smaller Companies tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cavendish Financial compare to Strategic Equity Capital?

Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) and Strategic Equity Capital (LON:SEC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

Strategic Equity Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cavendish Financial. Strategic Equity Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.56-£3.62M£0.1563.33
Strategic Equity Capital£19.38M6.21£25.65M£38.249.28

Strategic Equity Capital has a net margin of 33.47% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of 1.00%. Strategic Equity Capital's return on equity of 10.95% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial1.00% 1.45% -5.44%
Strategic Equity Capital 33.47%10.95%10.64%

4.4% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.0% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.8% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Strategic Equity Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Strategic Equity Capital pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 1.088, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strategic Equity Capital has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial and Cavendish Financial both had 1 articles in the media. Strategic Equity Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Cavendish Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that Strategic Equity Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Strategic Equity Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Strategic Equity Capital beats Cavendish Financial on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cavendish Financial compare to CT Global Managed Portfolio Income?

Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

4.4% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cavendish Financial and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. Cavendish Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cavendish Financial Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Cavendish Financial has a beta of 1.088, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.737, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cavendish Financial. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.56-£3.62M£0.1563.33
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M6.02£101.85M£17.157.72

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of 1.00%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cavendish Financial1.00% 1.45% -5.44%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

Summary

Cavendish Financial and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cavendish Financial compare to Artemis Alpha Trust?

Artemis Alpha Trust (LON:ATS) and Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

22.2% of Artemis Alpha Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.0% of Artemis Alpha Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Artemis Alpha Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cavendish Financial. Artemis Alpha Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Artemis Alpha Trust£20.39M0.00£17.68M£0.54N/A
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.56-£3.62M£0.1563.33

Artemis Alpha Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Artemis Alpha Trust pays out 1,296.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cavendish Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Artemis Alpha Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cavendish Financial and 0 mentions for Artemis Alpha Trust. Artemis Alpha Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cavendish Financial'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Artemis Alpha Trust Neutral
Cavendish Financial Neutral

Artemis Alpha Trust has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cavendish Financial has a beta of 1.088, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Artemis Alpha Trust has a net margin of 86.71% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of 1.00%. Artemis Alpha Trust's return on equity of 13.86% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Artemis Alpha Trust86.71% 13.86% 8.95%
Cavendish Financial 1.00%1.45%-5.44%

Summary

Artemis Alpha Trust beats Cavendish Financial on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cavendish Financial compare to Menhaden Resource Efficiency?

Menhaden Resource Efficiency (LON:MHN) and Cavendish Financial (LON:CAV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

Menhaden Resource Efficiency pays an annual dividend of GBX 0 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Cavendish Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Menhaden Resource Efficiency pays out 0.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cavendish Financial pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Cavendish Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Menhaden Resource Efficiency. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cavendish Financial and 0 mentions for Menhaden Resource Efficiency. Menhaden Resource Efficiency's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cavendish Financial'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Menhaden Resource Efficiency Neutral
Cavendish Financial Neutral

Menhaden Resource Efficiency has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cavendish Financial. Menhaden Resource Efficiency is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cavendish Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Menhaden Resource Efficiency£2.24M53.81£16.15M£20.497.47
Cavendish Financial£56.87M0.56-£3.62M£0.1563.33

31.3% of Menhaden Resource Efficiency shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.0% of Menhaden Resource Efficiency shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.9% of Cavendish Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Menhaden Resource Efficiency has a net margin of 97.04% compared to Cavendish Financial's net margin of 1.00%. Menhaden Resource Efficiency's return on equity of 20.90% beat Cavendish Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Menhaden Resource Efficiency97.04% 20.90% N/A
Cavendish Financial 1.00%1.45%-5.44%

Summary

Menhaden Resource Efficiency beats Cavendish Financial on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cavendish Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CAV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CAV vs. The Competition

MetricCavendish FinancialCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£31.90M£5.71B£14.09B£2.92B
Dividend Yield8.21%7.39%5.90%6.17%
P/E Ratio63.3332.5626.72367.45
Price / Sales0.561,273.87523.5983,539.61
Price / CashN/A48.4239.1427.89
Price / Book0.762.132.196.93
Net Income-£3.62M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.17%0.56%1.02%0.74%
1 Month PerformanceN/A2.29%2.29%3.40%
1 Year Performance-24.48%7.85%11.47%23.21%

Cavendish Financial Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CAV
Cavendish Financial
N/AGBX 9.50
+2.7%
N/A-25.8%£31.90M£56.87M63.33157
MTU
Montanaro UK Smaller Companies
N/AGBX 111.50
+0.9%
N/A+14.7%£123.89M£620KN/AN/A
SEC
Strategic Equity Capital
N/AGBX 364
+1.1%
N/A-5.1%£123.34M£19.38M9.52N/A
CMPI
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income
N/AGBX 128.64
+0.2%
N/A+9.4%£122.96M£21.03M7.50N/A
ATS
Artemis Alpha Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£120.70M£20.39M683.33N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CAV) was last updated on 8/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners