Go Pro
→ ALT SL: New Patent Reveals Elon Musk’s Next Breakthrough: M.A.G.I. (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free GMR Stock Alerts

Gaming Realms (GMR) Competitors

Gaming Realms logo
GBX 30.50 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/13/2026 11:53 AM Eastern
Compare

GMR vs. WVIA, EVOK, STR, BOTB, and B90

Should you buy Gaming Realms stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gaming Realms with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gaming Realms include Winvia Entertainment (WVIA), Evoke (EVOK), Stride Gaming (STR), Best of the Best (BOTB), and B90 (B90). These companies are all part of the "gambling" industry.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Winvia Entertainment?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and Winvia Entertainment (LON:WVIA) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Winvia Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.0% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Winvia Entertainment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gaming Realms presently has a consensus target price of GBX 65.50, suggesting a potential upside of 114.75%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Winvia Entertainment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Winvia Entertainment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gaming Realms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Winvia Entertainment. Gaming Realms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winvia Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.65£6.70M£1.9115.97
Winvia Entertainment£170.33M1.54N/A£4.0062.50

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Winvia Entertainment's net margin of 0.00%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat Winvia Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gaming Realms18.97% 15.38% 14.19%
Winvia Entertainment N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Winvia Entertainment'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms Neutral
Winvia Entertainment Neutral

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Winvia Entertainment on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Evoke?

Evoke (LON:EVOK) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Evoke's net margin of -30.73%. Evoke's return on equity of 125.82% beat Gaming Realms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Evoke-30.73% 125.82% 0.88%
Gaming Realms 18.97%15.38%14.19%

Gaming Realms has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Evoke. Evoke is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Evoke£1.78B0.12-£177.72M-£121.80N/A
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.65£6.70M£1.9115.97

41.8% of Evoke shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. 10.3% of Evoke shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.0% of Gaming Realms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Evoke currently has a consensus price target of GBX 46.33, indicating a potential downside of 0.88%. Gaming Realms has a consensus price target of GBX 65.50, indicating a potential upside of 114.75%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Evoke.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Evoke
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Evoke had 1 more articles in the media than Gaming Realms. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Evoke and 0 mentions for Gaming Realms. Evoke's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gaming Realms'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Evoke Neutral
Gaming Realms Neutral

Evoke has a beta of 1.004, indicating that its stock price is 0% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.525, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Evoke on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Stride Gaming?

Stride Gaming (LON:STR) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and dividends.

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. 30.0% of Gaming Realms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Stride Gaming's net margin of 0.00%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat Stride Gaming's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stride GamingN/A N/A N/A
Gaming Realms 18.97%15.38%14.19%

In the previous week, Stride Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gaming Realms'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Stride Gaming Neutral
Gaming Realms Neutral

Gaming Realms has a consensus price target of GBX 65.50, indicating a potential upside of 114.75%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Stride Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stride Gaming
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Gaming Realms has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stride Gaming. Stride Gaming is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stride Gaming£78.21M0.00N/A-£5.90N/A
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.65£6.70M£1.9115.97

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Stride Gaming on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Best of the Best?

Best of the Best (LON:BOTB) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Best of the Best's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gaming Realms'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Best of the Best Neutral
Gaming Realms Neutral

5.3% of Best of the Best shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. 82.6% of Best of the Best shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.0% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Best of the Best has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.525, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms has a consensus price target of GBX 65.50, suggesting a potential upside of 114.75%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Best of the Best.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Best of the Best
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Best of the Best's net margin of 17.82%. Best of the Best's return on equity of 66.52% beat Gaming Realms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Best of the Best17.82% 66.52% 33.09%
Gaming Realms 18.97%15.38%14.19%

Gaming Realms has higher revenue and earnings than Best of the Best. Best of the Best is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Best of the Best£26.15M0.00£4.66M£0.54N/A
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.65£6.70M£1.9115.97

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Best of the Best on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to B90?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and B90 (LON:B90) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled B90'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms Neutral
B90 Neutral

Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.525, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B90 has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms has higher revenue and earnings than B90. Gaming Realms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than B90, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.65£6.70M£1.9115.97
B90£7.15M1.54-£5.39M£0.0927.78

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.5% of B90 shares are held by institutional investors. 30.0% of Gaming Realms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of B90 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gaming Realms presently has a consensus target price of GBX 65.50, suggesting a potential upside of 114.75%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than B90.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
B90
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to B90's net margin of 5.52%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat B90's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gaming Realms18.97% 15.38% 14.19%
B90 5.52%5.70%-21.95%

Summary

Gaming Realms beats B90 on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gaming Realms News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GMR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GMR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GMR vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGaming RealmsGambling IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£83.13M£1.64B£3.87B£2.77B
Dividend Yield4.92%5.37%3.49%6.16%
P/E Ratio15.9711.7577.30368.13
Price / Sales2.654,265.87318.7284,621.88
Price / Cash17.8642.0830.8227.87
Price / Book3.202.473.527.51
Net Income£6.70M-£107.24M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.29%2.59%0.22%-0.27%
1 Month Performance1.67%1.71%5.70%-1.09%
1 Year Performance-42.54%-18.36%3.49%61.67%

Gaming Realms Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GMR
Gaming Realms
2.5284 of 5 stars		GBX 30.50
flat		GBX 65.50
+114.8%		-42.2%£83.13M£31.37M15.9778
WVIA
Winvia Entertainment
N/AGBX 253.10
-0.7%		N/AN/A£265.44M£170.33M63.28N/A
EVOK
Evoke
0.1452 of 5 stars		GBX 46.50
-1.1%		GBX 46.33
-0.4%		-26.8%£209.31M£1.78BN/A11,634
STR
Stride Gaming
N/AN/AN/AN/A£112.95M£78.21MN/A10
BOTB
Best of the Best
N/AN/AN/AN/A£44.84M£26.15M981.4826

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GMR) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
They told you not to miss this one
The largest companies in the SP 500 are now more overvalued relative to fundamentals than they were at the abs...
Thor Metals | Sponsoredtc pixel
Forget SpaceX, this is Elon’s Next Breakthrough
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin - two investors who called Nvidia a decade ago - say Elon Musk's newly filed AI pa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
When I found Rolls-Royce under $2, most people thought I was crazy
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce when it traded under $2. The stock climbed more than 1,100% ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel