Do analysts rate GMR or LGRS?

Gaming Realms currently has a consensus target price of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 86.67%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Loungers. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gaming Realms 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Loungers 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GMR or LGRS?

Loungers has higher revenue and earnings than Gaming Realms. Loungers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gaming Realms £30.87M 2.60 £6.70M £1.88 15.96 Loungers £347.93M 0.00 £8.98M £8.64 N/A

Is GMR or LGRS more profitable?

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Loungers' net margin of 2.58%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.29% beat Loungers' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Gaming Realms 18.59% 15.29% 14.19% Loungers 2.58% 6.06% 3.21%

Does the media prefer RNK or GMR?

In the previous week, The Rank Group had 2 more articles in the media than Gaming Realms. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for The Rank Group and 1 mentions for Gaming Realms. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat The Rank Group's score of 0.22 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment The Rank Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Gaming Realms 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer WVIA or GMR?

Gaming Realms has a consensus price target of GBX 56, indicating a potential upside of 86.67%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Winvia Entertainment. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Winvia Entertainment 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Gaming Realms 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GMR or MARS?

Gaming Realms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marston's. Marston's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gaming Realms £30.87M 2.60 £6.70M £1.88 15.96 Marston's £893.20M 0.33 -£17.06M £11.70 3.95

Is GMR or MARS more profitable?

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Marston's' net margin of 8.35%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.29% beat Marston's' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Gaming Realms 18.59% 15.29% 14.19% Marston's 8.35% 9.30% 3.72%

Does the media prefer GMR or MARS?

In the previous week, Marston's had 10 more articles in the media than Gaming Realms. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Marston's and 1 mentions for Gaming Realms. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Marston's' score of -0.04 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gaming Realms 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marston's 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend GMR or DPEU?

Gaming Realms presently has a consensus target price of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 86.67%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than DP Eurasia. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gaming Realms 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 DP Eurasia 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, GMR or DPEU?

DP Eurasia has higher revenue and earnings than Gaming Realms. DP Eurasia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gaming Realms £30.87M 2.60 £6.70M £1.88 15.96 DP Eurasia £2.53B 0.00 £257.91M £0.04 N/A

Is GMR or DPEU more profitable?

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.59% compared to DP Eurasia's net margin of -4.72%. DP Eurasia's return on equity of 196.53% beat Gaming Realms' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Gaming Realms 18.59% 15.29% 14.19% DP Eurasia -4.72% 196.53% 6.29%

Gaming Realms (GMR) Competitors

GBX 30 -0.60 (-1.96%)

As of 10/12/2026 11:50 AM Eastern

Compare

GMR vs. LGRS, RNK, WVIA, MARS, and DPEU

Should you buy Gaming Realms stock or one of its competitors? Gaming Realms's main competitors and comparable companies include Loungers (LGRS), The Rank Group (RNK), Winvia Entertainment (WVIA), Marston's (MARS), and DP Eurasia (DPEU). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "hotels, restaurants & leisure" industry.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Loungers?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and Loungers (LON:LGRS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Loungers has higher revenue and earnings than Gaming Realms. Loungers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms	£30.87M	2.60	£6.70M	£1.88	15.96
Loungers	£347.93M	0.00	£8.98M	£8.64	N/A

Gaming Realms currently has a consensus target price of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 86.67%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Loungers.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gaming Realms	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Loungers	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 1 more articles in the media than Loungers. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gaming Realms and 0 mentions for Loungers. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Loungers' score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms	Positive
Loungers	Neutral

Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.528, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loungers has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Loungers' net margin of 2.58%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.29% beat Loungers' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gaming Realms	18.59%	15.29%	14.19%
Loungers	2.58%	6.06%	3.21%

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.7% of Loungers shares are held by institutional investors. 30.7% of Gaming Realms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.1% of Loungers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Loungers on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to The Rank Group?

The Rank Group (LON:RNK) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and profitability.

The Rank Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 147, suggesting a potential upside of 108.22%. Gaming Realms has a consensus target price of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 86.67%. Given The Rank Group's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe The Rank Group is more favorable than Gaming Realms.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
The Rank Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Gaming Realms	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

The Rank Group has higher revenue and earnings than Gaming Realms. The Rank Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
The Rank Group	£835M	0.39	£12.32M	£6.40	11.03
Gaming Realms	£30.87M	2.60	£6.70M	£1.88	15.96

In the previous week, The Rank Group had 2 more articles in the media than Gaming Realms. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for The Rank Group and 1 mentions for Gaming Realms. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat The Rank Group's score of 0.22 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
The Rank Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Gaming Realms	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

24.3% of The Rank Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of The Rank Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.7% of Gaming Realms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Rank Group has a beta of 1.581, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.528, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.59% compared to The Rank Group's net margin of 3.58%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.29% beat The Rank Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
The Rank Group	3.58%	7.83%	3.38%
Gaming Realms	18.59%	15.29%	14.19%

Summary

Gaming Realms beats The Rank Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Winvia Entertainment?

Winvia Entertainment (LON:WVIA) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Winvia Entertainment's net margin of 0.00%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.29% beat Winvia Entertainment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Winvia Entertainment	N/A	N/A	N/A
Gaming Realms	18.59%	15.29%	14.19%

Gaming Realms has a consensus price target of GBX 56, indicating a potential upside of 86.67%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Winvia Entertainment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Winvia Entertainment	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Gaming Realms	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Gaming Realms has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Winvia Entertainment. Gaming Realms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winvia Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Winvia Entertainment	£203.14M	1.43	N/A	£10.72	25.69
Gaming Realms	£30.87M	2.60	£6.70M	£1.88	15.96

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 1 more articles in the media than Winvia Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gaming Realms and 0 mentions for Winvia Entertainment. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Winvia Entertainment's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Winvia Entertainment	Neutral
Gaming Realms	Positive

0.7% of Winvia Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Winvia Entertainment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.7% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Winvia Entertainment on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Marston's?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and Marston's (LON:MARS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Marston's had 10 more articles in the media than Gaming Realms. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Marston's and 1 mentions for Gaming Realms. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Marston's' score of -0.04 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marston's	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Gaming Realms presently has a consensus target price of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 86.67%. Marston's has a consensus target price of GBX 81.50, suggesting a potential upside of 76.41%. Given Gaming Realms' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Marston's.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gaming Realms	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Marston's	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Marston's' net margin of 8.35%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.29% beat Marston's' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gaming Realms	18.59%	15.29%	14.19%
Marston's	8.35%	9.30%	3.72%

Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.528, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marston's has a beta of 0.908, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marston's. Marston's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms	£30.87M	2.60	£6.70M	£1.88	15.96
Marston's	£893.20M	0.33	-£17.06M	£11.70	3.95

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Marston's shares are held by institutional investors. 30.7% of Gaming Realms shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Marston's shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Marston's on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to DP Eurasia?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and DP Eurasia (LON:DPEU) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 1 more articles in the media than DP Eurasia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gaming Realms and 0 mentions for DP Eurasia. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat DP Eurasia's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms	Positive
DP Eurasia	Neutral

Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.528, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DP Eurasia has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

DP Eurasia has higher revenue and earnings than Gaming Realms. DP Eurasia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms	£30.87M	2.60	£6.70M	£1.88	15.96
DP Eurasia	£2.53B	0.00	£257.91M	£0.04	N/A

Gaming Realms presently has a consensus target price of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 86.67%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than DP Eurasia.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gaming Realms	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
DP Eurasia	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.59% compared to DP Eurasia's net margin of -4.72%. DP Eurasia's return on equity of 196.53% beat Gaming Realms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gaming Realms	18.59%	15.29%	14.19%
DP Eurasia	-4.72%	196.53%	6.29%

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of DP Eurasia shares are held by institutional investors. 30.7% of Gaming Realms shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 120.6% of DP Eurasia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gaming Realms beats DP Eurasia on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gaming Realms News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GMR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GMR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Gaming Realms	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£80.19M	£7.35B	£12.60B	£2.81B
Dividend Yield	4.92%	3.97%	81.83%	6.27%
P/E Ratio	15.96	20.88	44.89	367.19
Price / Sales	2.60	322.52	84.25	88,398.88
Price / Cash	17.86	20.57	21.68	27.87
Price / Book	3.15	4.31	3.95	7.17
Net Income	£6.70M	£261.14M	£443.43M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-4.76%	-0.28%	-0.34%	0.05%
1 Month Performance	-0.99%	-3.72%	-2.87%	-0.40%
1 Year Performance	-33.48%	-7.83%	-5.00%	22.73%

Gaming Realms Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GMR Gaming Realms	3.4269 of 5 stars	GBX 30 -2.0%	GBX 56 +86.7%	-33.0%	£80.19M	£30.87M	15.96	78	Gap Up
LGRS Loungers	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£336.83M	£347.93M	37.51	7,500
RNK The Rank Group	4.3374 of 5 stars	GBX 71.30 flat	GBX 147 +106.2%	-43.4%	£331.99M	£835M	11.14	7,300
WVIA Winvia Entertainment	N/A	GBX 277.22 -0.1%	N/A	N/A	£291.73M	£203.14M	25.85	N/A
MARS Marston's	3.5381 of 5 stars	GBX 45.65 flat	GBX 81.50 +78.5%	+11.3%	£290.71M	£893.20M	3.90	10,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GMR) was last updated on 10/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gaming Realms (GMR) Competitors

GMR vs. LGRS, RNK, WVIA, MARS, and DPEU

How does Gaming Realms compare to Loungers?

Summary

How does Gaming Realms compare to The Rank Group?

Summary

How does Gaming Realms compare to Winvia Entertainment?

Summary

How does Gaming Realms compare to Marston's?

Summary

How does Gaming Realms compare to DP Eurasia?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GMR vs. The Competition

Gaming Realms Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Gaming Realms (GMR) Competitors

GMR vs. LGRS, RNK, WVIA, MARS, and DPEU

How does Gaming Realms compare to Loungers?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GMR or LGRS?

Do analysts rate GMR or LGRS?

Does the media refer more to GMR or LGRS?

Which has more volatility and risk, GMR or LGRS?

Is GMR or LGRS more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in GMR or LGRS?

Summary

How does Gaming Realms compare to The Rank Group?

Do analysts recommend RNK or GMR?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, RNK or GMR?

Does the media prefer RNK or GMR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in RNK or GMR?

Which has more risk & volatility, RNK or GMR?

Is RNK or GMR more profitable?

Summary

How does Gaming Realms compare to Winvia Entertainment?

Is WVIA or GMR more profitable?

Do analysts prefer WVIA or GMR?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WVIA or GMR?

Does the media refer more to WVIA or GMR?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of WVIA or GMR?

Summary

How does Gaming Realms compare to Marston's?

Does the media prefer GMR or MARS?

Do analysts rate GMR or MARS?

Is GMR or MARS more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, GMR or MARS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GMR or MARS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of GMR or MARS?

Summary

How does Gaming Realms compare to DP Eurasia?

Does the media refer more to GMR or DPEU?

Which has more risk & volatility, GMR or DPEU?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, GMR or DPEU?

Do analysts recommend GMR or DPEU?

Is GMR or DPEU more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in GMR or DPEU?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GMR vs. The Competition

Gaming Realms Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools