Go Pro
→ U.S. energy boom: The next big winner? (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free GMR Stock Alerts

Gaming Realms (GMR) Competitors

Gaming Realms logo
GBX 29.50 -0.50 (-1.67%)
As of 12:42 PM Eastern
Compare

GMR vs. MARS, DPEU, OTB, WVIA, and IHG

Should you buy Gaming Realms stock or one of its competitors? Gaming Realms's main competitors and comparable companies include Marston's (MARS), DP Eurasia (DPEU), On the Beach Group (OTB), Winvia Entertainment (WVIA), and InterContinental Hotels Group (IHG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "hotels, restaurants & leisure" industry.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Marston's?

Marston's (LON:MARS) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Gaming Realms has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marston's. Marston's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marston's£893.20M0.37-£17.06M£11.704.48
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.55£6.70M£1.9115.45

Marston's has a beta of 0.906, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.533, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Marston's' net margin of 8.35%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat Marston's' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marston's8.35% 9.30% 3.72%
Gaming Realms 18.97%15.38%14.19%

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 1 more articles in the media than Marston's. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gaming Realms and 0 mentions for Marston's. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Marston's' score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marston's Neutral
Gaming Realms Neutral

Marston's presently has a consensus target price of GBX 81.50, suggesting a potential upside of 55.53%. Gaming Realms has a consensus target price of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 89.83%. Given Gaming Realms' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Marston's.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marston's
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

26.7% of Marston's shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Marston's shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.2% of Gaming Realms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Marston's on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to DP Eurasia?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and DP Eurasia (LON:DPEU) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.533, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DP Eurasia has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms presently has a consensus price target of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 89.83%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than DP Eurasia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
DP Eurasia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

DP Eurasia has higher revenue and earnings than Gaming Realms. DP Eurasia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.55£6.70M£1.9115.45
DP Eurasia£2.53B0.00£257.91M£0.04N/A

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to DP Eurasia's net margin of -4.72%. DP Eurasia's return on equity of 196.53% beat Gaming Realms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gaming Realms18.97% 15.38% 14.19%
DP Eurasia -4.72%196.53%6.29%

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 1 more articles in the media than DP Eurasia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gaming Realms and 0 mentions for DP Eurasia. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat DP Eurasia's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms Neutral
DP Eurasia Neutral

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of DP Eurasia shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.2% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 120.6% of DP Eurasia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gaming Realms beats DP Eurasia on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to On the Beach Group?

On the Beach Group (LON:OTB) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 1 more articles in the media than On the Beach Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gaming Realms and 0 mentions for On the Beach Group. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat On the Beach Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
On the Beach Group Neutral
Gaming Realms Neutral

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to On the Beach Group's net margin of 3.11%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat On the Beach Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
On the Beach Group3.11% 2.40% 2.35%
Gaming Realms 18.97%15.38%14.19%

On the Beach Group has a beta of 1.295, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.533, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

On the Beach Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 283.43, indicating a potential upside of 45.80%. Gaming Realms has a consensus target price of GBX 56, indicating a potential upside of 89.83%. Given Gaming Realms' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than On the Beach Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
On the Beach Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

52.4% of On the Beach Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. 9.3% of On the Beach Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.2% of Gaming Realms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

On the Beach Group has higher revenue and earnings than Gaming Realms. Gaming Realms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than On the Beach Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
On the Beach Group£114.20M2.45£14.99M£11.8016.47
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.55£6.70M£1.9115.45

Summary

Gaming Realms beats On the Beach Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Winvia Entertainment?

Winvia Entertainment (LON:WVIA) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

0.8% of Winvia Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Winvia Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.2% of Gaming Realms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gaming Realms has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Winvia Entertainment. Gaming Realms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winvia Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Winvia Entertainment£170.33M1.48N/A£4.0059.75
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.55£6.70M£1.9115.45

Gaming Realms has a consensus price target of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 89.83%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Winvia Entertainment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Winvia Entertainment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 1 more articles in the media than Winvia Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gaming Realms and 0 mentions for Winvia Entertainment. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Winvia Entertainment's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Winvia Entertainment Neutral
Gaming Realms Neutral

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Winvia Entertainment's net margin of 0.00%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat Winvia Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Winvia EntertainmentN/A N/A N/A
Gaming Realms 18.97%15.38%14.19%

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Winvia Entertainment on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to InterContinental Hotels Group?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and InterContinental Hotels Group (LON:IHG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Gaming Realms currently has a consensus target price of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 89.83%. InterContinental Hotels Group has a consensus target price of GBX 7,025, suggesting a potential upside of 4,219.09%. Given InterContinental Hotels Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe InterContinental Hotels Group is more favorable than Gaming Realms.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
InterContinental Hotels Group
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

InterContinental Hotels Group has higher revenue and earnings than Gaming Realms. InterContinental Hotels Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.55£6.70M£1.9115.45
InterContinental Hotels Group£5.19B0.05£775.45M£486.500.33

In the previous week, InterContinental Hotels Group had 1 more articles in the media than Gaming Realms. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for InterContinental Hotels Group and 1 mentions for Gaming Realms. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat InterContinental Hotels Group's score of 0.07 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
InterContinental Hotels Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to InterContinental Hotels Group's net margin of 13.44%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat InterContinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gaming Realms18.97% 15.38% 14.19%
InterContinental Hotels Group 13.44%-25.04%14.12%

Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.533, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, InterContinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.027, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.4% of InterContinental Hotels Group shares are held by institutional investors. 30.2% of Gaming Realms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of InterContinental Hotels Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gaming Realms and InterContinental Hotels Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gaming Realms News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GMR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GMR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GMR vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGaming RealmsHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£80.05M£8.19B£13.09B£2.92B
Dividend Yield4.92%3.71%56.32%6.17%
P/E Ratio15.4523.0846.60367.32
Price / Sales2.55319.2988.3983,333.24
Price / Cash17.8622.2729.0727.89
Price / Book3.094.805.986.97
Net Income£6.70M£260.60M£445.38M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.96%-1.46%-0.90%0.74%
1 Month Performance-2.96%0.28%-0.42%3.34%
1 Year Performance-41.93%-4.24%-2.44%23.04%

Gaming Realms Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GMR
Gaming Realms
3.165 of 5 stars		GBX 29.50
-1.7%		GBX 56
+89.8%		-42.3%£80.05M£31.37M15.4578
MARS
Marston's
2.9531 of 5 stars		GBX 52
+0.6%		GBX 81.50
+56.7%		+33.8%£327.24M£893.20M4.4410,000
DPEU
DP Eurasia
N/AN/AN/AN/A£278.52M£2.53B4,750.001,457
OTB
On the Beach Group
N/AGBX 189.40
+2.2%		GBX 283.43
+49.6%		-33.9%£265.37M£114.20M16.05642
WVIA
Winvia Entertainment
N/AGBX 235
-2.1%		N/AN/A£252.30M£170.33M58.75N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GMR) was last updated on 8/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Musk’s Hushed FCC Filing. Sept 25th.
Elon Musk quietly filed a document with the federal government tied to artificial intelligence, one of the lar...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Someone just dumped the biggest gold fund.
Investors pulled 2.9 billion dollars from the world's largest gold fund in a single day this March, pushing to...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today
In 2014, Marc Chaikin pointed readers toward Nvidia. Now the 60-year Wall Street veteran and creator of the Ch...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy These Stocks Before August 31st
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research platform, now used by 180,000 investors worldwi...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
A $382 trillion migration and the position no one is talking about
Trump just signed a law requiring America's entire $382 trillion financial system to migrate to a new money ne...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
I found Rolls-Royce at $2 - now I see the same setup again
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce under $2 - a misunderstood aerospace name the market had wri...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran
For a moment… Forget about Trump’s ties to Israel. Forget about reports of Iran’s nuclear program. Be...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel