Go Pro

Gaming Realms (GMR) Competitors

Gaming Realms logo
GBX 31.80 +1.00 (+3.25%)
As of 11:52 AM Eastern

GMR vs. MARS, DPEU, WVIA, OTB, and EVOK

Should you buy Gaming Realms stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gaming Realms with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gaming Realms include Marston's (MARS), DP Eurasia (DPEU), Winvia Entertainment (WVIA), On the Beach Group (OTB), and Evoke (EVOK). These companies are all part of the "hotels, restaurants & leisure" industry.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Marston's?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and Marston's (LON:MARS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.525, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marston's has a beta of 0.908, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marston's. Marston's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.76£6.70M£1.9116.65
Marston's£893.20M0.36-£17.06M£11.704.39

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 4 more articles in the media than Marston's. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Gaming Realms and 2 mentions for Marston's. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Marston's' score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Marston's
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Marston's' net margin of 8.35%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat Marston's' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gaming Realms18.97% 15.38% 14.19%
Marston's 8.35%9.30%3.72%

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.9% of Marston's shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.0% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Marston's shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gaming Realms presently has a consensus target price of GBX 56, indicating a potential upside of 76.10%. Marston's has a consensus target price of GBX 81.50, indicating a potential upside of 58.56%. Given Gaming Realms' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Marston's.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Marston's
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Marston's on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to DP Eurasia?

DP Eurasia (LON:DPEU) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

DP Eurasia has higher revenue and earnings than Gaming Realms. DP Eurasia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DP Eurasia£2.53B0.00£257.91M£0.04N/A
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.76£6.70M£1.9116.65

Gaming Realms has a consensus price target of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 76.10%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than DP Eurasia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DP Eurasia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 6 more articles in the media than DP Eurasia. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Gaming Realms and 0 mentions for DP Eurasia. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat DP Eurasia's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
DP Eurasia Neutral
Gaming Realms Neutral

DP Eurasia has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.525, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to DP Eurasia's net margin of -4.72%. DP Eurasia's return on equity of 196.53% beat Gaming Realms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DP Eurasia-4.72% 196.53% 6.29%
Gaming Realms 18.97%15.38%14.19%

1.6% of DP Eurasia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. 120.6% of DP Eurasia shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.0% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gaming Realms beats DP Eurasia on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Winvia Entertainment?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and Winvia Entertainment (LON:WVIA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Winvia Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 30.0% of Gaming Realms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Winvia Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 5 more articles in the media than Winvia Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Gaming Realms and 1 mentions for Winvia Entertainment. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Winvia Entertainment's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms Neutral
Winvia Entertainment Neutral

Gaming Realms presently has a consensus price target of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 76.10%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Winvia Entertainment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Winvia Entertainment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Winvia Entertainment's net margin of 0.00%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat Winvia Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gaming Realms18.97% 15.38% 14.19%
Winvia Entertainment N/A N/A N/A

Gaming Realms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Winvia Entertainment. Gaming Realms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winvia Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.76£6.70M£1.9116.65
Winvia Entertainment£170.33M1.60N/A£4.0065.00

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Winvia Entertainment on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to On the Beach Group?

On the Beach Group (LON:OTB) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 4 more articles in the media than On the Beach Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Gaming Realms and 2 mentions for On the Beach Group. On the Beach Group's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Gaming Realms' score of 0.17 indicating that On the Beach Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
On the Beach Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gaming Realms
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

On the Beach Group has a beta of 1.295, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.525, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

On the Beach Group has higher revenue and earnings than Gaming Realms. On the Beach Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
On the Beach Group£114.20M2.38£14.99M£11.8015.97
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.76£6.70M£1.9116.65

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to On the Beach Group's net margin of 3.11%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat On the Beach Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
On the Beach Group3.11% 2.40% 2.35%
Gaming Realms 18.97%15.38%14.19%

On the Beach Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 283.43, indicating a potential upside of 50.44%. Gaming Realms has a consensus target price of GBX 56, indicating a potential upside of 76.10%. Given Gaming Realms' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than On the Beach Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
On the Beach Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

52.6% of On the Beach Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. 9.3% of On the Beach Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.0% of Gaming Realms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gaming Realms beats On the Beach Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Evoke?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and Evoke (LON:EVOK) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Evoke shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.0% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.3% of Evoke shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Evoke's net margin of -30.73%. Evoke's return on equity of 125.82% beat Gaming Realms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gaming Realms18.97% 15.38% 14.19%
Evoke -30.73%125.82%0.88%

Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.525, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Evoke has a beta of 1.004, meaning that its share price is 0% more volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms presently has a consensus target price of GBX 56, suggesting a potential upside of 76.10%. Evoke has a consensus target price of GBX 46.33, suggesting a potential upside of 4.83%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Evoke.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gaming Realms
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Evoke
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Gaming Realms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Evoke. Evoke is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms£31.37M2.76£6.70M£1.9116.65
Evoke£1.78B0.11-£177.72M-£121.80N/A

In the previous week, Gaming Realms had 5 more articles in the media than Evoke. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Gaming Realms and 1 mentions for Evoke. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Evoke's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Evoke
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Evoke on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gaming Realms News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GMR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GMR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GMR vs. The Competition

MetricGaming RealmsHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£86.67M£8.13B£13.27B£2.83B
Dividend Yield4.92%3.85%53.32%6.15%
P/E Ratio16.6522.4347.66368.41
Price / Sales2.76340.8390.7483,654.70
Price / Cash17.8621.9418.9427.89
Price / Book3.344.974.547.06
Net Income£6.70M£261.43M£444.07M£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.00%0.69%1.34%0.21%
1 Month Performance4.95%-1.39%0.85%0.22%
1 Year Performance-40.89%-3.45%3.73%64.12%

Gaming Realms Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GMR
Gaming Realms
3.1848 of 5 stars
GBX 31.80
+3.2%
GBX 56
+76.1%
-42.8%£86.67M£31.37M16.6578
MARS
Marston's
3.0221 of 5 stars
GBX 51
-1.9%
GBX 81.50
+59.8%
+22.0%£332.93M£893.20M4.3610,000
DPEU
DP Eurasia
N/AN/AN/AN/A£278.52M£2.53B4,750.001,457
WVIA
Winvia Entertainment
N/AGBX 250.57
-0.2%
N/AN/A£263.87M£170.33M62.64N/A
OTB
On the Beach Group
4.6823 of 5 stars
GBX 187.60
+0.3%
GBX 283.43
+51.1%
-28.0%£263.70M£114.20M15.90642

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GMR) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners