Gaming Realms (GMR) Competitors

GBX 33.30 -0.60 (-1.77%)

As of 05/13/2026 12:29 PM Eastern

GMR vs. 888, EVOK, STR, BOTB, and B90

Should you buy Gaming Realms stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gaming Realms with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gaming Realms include 888 (888), Evoke (EVOK), Stride Gaming (STR), Best of the Best (BOTB), and B90 (B90). These companies are all part of the "gambling" industry.

How does Gaming Realms compare to 888?

888 (LON:888) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to 888's net margin of -3.30%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat 888's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
888	-3.30%	-47.18%	1.84%
Gaming Realms	18.97%	15.38%	14.19%

888 has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.494, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms has lower revenue, but higher earnings than 888. 888 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
888	£1.71B	0.00	-£56.40M	-£0.13	N/A
Gaming Realms	£31.37M	2.93	£6.70M	£1.91	17.43

43.7% of 888 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of 888 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.0% of Gaming Realms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gaming Realms has a consensus price target of GBX 65.50, indicating a potential upside of 96.70%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than 888.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
888	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Gaming Realms	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat 888's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
888	Neutral
Gaming Realms	Positive

Summary

Gaming Realms beats 888 on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Evoke?

Evoke (LON:EVOK) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and institutional ownership.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Evoke's net margin of -30.73%. Evoke's return on equity of 125.82% beat Gaming Realms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Evoke	-30.73%	125.82%	0.88%
Gaming Realms	18.97%	15.38%	14.19%

41.8% of Evoke shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.3% of Evoke shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.0% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Evoke has a beta of 1.009, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.494, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Evoke presently has a consensus target price of GBX 34, indicating a potential downside of 5.16%. Gaming Realms has a consensus target price of GBX 65.50, indicating a potential upside of 96.70%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Evoke.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Evoke	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Gaming Realms	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Gaming Realms has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Evoke. Evoke is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Evoke	£1.78B	0.09	-£177.72M	-£121.80	N/A
Gaming Realms	£31.37M	2.93	£6.70M	£1.91	17.43

In the previous week, Evoke had 1 more articles in the media than Gaming Realms. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Evoke and 0 mentions for Gaming Realms. Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Evoke's score of 0.66 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Evoke	Positive
Gaming Realms	Positive

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Evoke on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Stride Gaming?

Stride Gaming (LON:STR) and Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and institutional ownership.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Stride Gaming's net margin of 0.00%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat Stride Gaming's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Stride Gaming	N/A	N/A	N/A
Gaming Realms	18.97%	15.38%	14.19%

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.0% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gaming Realms has a consensus target price of GBX 65.50, indicating a potential upside of 96.70%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Stride Gaming.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Stride Gaming	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Gaming Realms	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Gaming Realms has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stride Gaming. Stride Gaming is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Stride Gaming	£78.21M	0.00	N/A	-£5.90	N/A
Gaming Realms	£31.37M	2.93	£6.70M	£1.91	17.43

In the previous week, Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Stride Gaming's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Stride Gaming	Neutral
Gaming Realms	Positive

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Stride Gaming on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to Best of the Best?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and Best of the Best (LON:BOTB) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Best of the Best's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms	Positive
Best of the Best	Neutral

Gaming Realms presently has a consensus target price of GBX 65.50, indicating a potential upside of 96.70%. Given Gaming Realms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Gaming Realms is more favorable than Best of the Best.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gaming Realms	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Best of the Best	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Best of the Best's net margin of 17.82%. Best of the Best's return on equity of 66.52% beat Gaming Realms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gaming Realms	18.97%	15.38%	14.19%
Best of the Best	17.82%	66.52%	33.09%

Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.494, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Best of the Best has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming Realms has higher revenue and earnings than Best of the Best. Best of the Best is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms	£31.37M	2.93	£6.70M	£1.91	17.43
Best of the Best	£26.15M	0.00	£4.66M	£0.54	N/A

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of Best of the Best shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.0% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 82.6% of Best of the Best shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gaming Realms beats Best of the Best on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming Realms compare to B90?

Gaming Realms (LON:GMR) and B90 (LON:B90) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

5.1% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of B90 shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.0% of Gaming Realms shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.7% of B90 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gaming Realms has a net margin of 18.97% compared to B90's net margin of -31.18%. Gaming Realms' return on equity of 15.38% beat B90's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gaming Realms	18.97%	15.38%	14.19%
B90	-31.18%	-21.40%	-21.95%

Gaming Realms has higher revenue and earnings than B90. B90 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaming Realms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gaming Realms	£31.37M	2.93	£6.70M	£1.91	17.43
B90	£4.55M	2.42	-£5.39M	-£0.33	N/A

Gaming Realms has a beta of 0.494, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, B90 has a beta of 0.451, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gaming Realms' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat B90's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming Realms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gaming Realms	Positive
B90	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gaming Realms	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
B90	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Gaming Realms beats B90 on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gaming Realms News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GMR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GMR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Gaming Realms	Gambling Industry	Cyclical Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£93.11M	£1.33B	£4.30B	£2.84B
Dividend Yield	4.92%	5.52%	3.59%	6.09%
P/E Ratio	17.43	9.36	77.10	365.64
Price / Sales	2.93	4,667.54	328.73	88,387.79
Price / Cash	17.86	42.08	30.86	27.89
Price / Book	3.49	2.42	3.17	7.58
Net Income	£6.70M	-£107.93M	£249.43M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-5.67%	-0.25%	-0.46%	0.32%
1 Month Performance	5.38%	6.06%	0.00%	2.32%
1 Year Performance	-24.81%	-14.83%	1.56%	86.76%

Gaming Realms Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GMR Gaming Realms	3.4936 of 5 stars	GBX 33.30 -1.8%	GBX 65.50 +96.7%	-25.7%	£93.11M	£31.37M	17.43	78
888 888	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£383.53M	£1.71B	N/A	11,634
EVOK Evoke	0.2073 of 5 stars	GBX 36.90 -5.0%	GBX 34 -7.9%	-32.4%	£166.17M	£1.78B	N/A	11,634	High Trading Volume
STR Stride Gaming	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£112.95M	£78.21M	N/A	10
BOTB Best of the Best	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£44.84M	£26.15M	981.48	26

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GMR) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gaming Realms (GMR) Competitors