Do analysts prefer MUT or GSF?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Murray Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to MUT or GSF?

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 4 more articles in the media than Murray Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 3 mentions for Murray Income Trust. Murray Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's score of 0.52 indicating that Murray Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Murray Income Trust 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer CORD or GSF?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Cordiant Digital Infrastructure 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts rate APAX or GSF?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Apax Global Alpha 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts rate GSF or SLPE?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Standard Life Private Equity Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer USA or GSF?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Baillie Gifford US Growth 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF) Competitors

GBX 48 +0.55 (+1.16%)

As of 08/21/2026 12:44 PM Eastern

Compare

GSF vs. MUT, CORD, APAX, SLPE, and USA

Should you buy Gore Street Energy Storage Fund stock or one of its competitors? Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include Murray Income Trust (MUT), Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (CORD), Apax Global Alpha (APAX), Standard Life Private Equity Trust (SLPE), and Baillie Gifford US Growth (USA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Murray Income Trust?

Murray Income Trust (LON:MUT) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Murray Income Trust has a beta of 1.177, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.3819761, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 4 more articles in the media than Murray Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 3 mentions for Murray Income Trust. Murray Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's score of 0.52 indicating that Murray Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Murray Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Murray Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Murray Income Trust pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Murray Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Murray Income Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murray Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Murray Income Trust	£120.88M	7.69	£90.45M	£119.70	8.32
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	-£116.82M	-2.08	-£5.96M	-£23.72	N/A

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 102.56% compared to Murray Income Trust's net margin of 93.90%. Murray Income Trust's return on equity of 12.73% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Murray Income Trust	93.90%	12.73%	4.65%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	102.56%	-28.75%	-0.64%

10.3% of Murray Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Murray Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Murray Income Trust beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (LON:CORD) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cordiant Digital Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure	£163.11M	5.80	£846.28M	£20.81	5.93
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	-£116.82M	-2.08	-£5.96M	-£23.72	N/A

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 7 more articles in the media than Cordiant Digital Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 0 mentions for Cordiant Digital Infrastructure. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure	Neutral
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	Positive

39.2% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a beta of 0.819, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.3819761, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a net margin of 432.24% compared to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's net margin of 102.56%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's return on equity of 14.55% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure	432.24%	14.55%	5.89%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	102.56%	-28.75%	-0.64%

Summary

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Apax Global Alpha?

Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Apax Global Alpha pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Apax Global Alpha pays out -120.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

14.3% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Apax Global Alpha	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Apax Global Alpha has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.3819761, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 102.56% compared to Apax Global Alpha's net margin of 57.27%. Apax Global Alpha's return on equity of 0.67% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Apax Global Alpha	57.27%	0.67%	2.57%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	102.56%	-28.75%	-0.64%

Apax Global Alpha has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Apax Global Alpha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Apax Global Alpha	-£44.79M	-20.62	£4.12M	-£0.11	N/A
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	-£116.82M	-2.08	-£5.96M	-£23.72	N/A

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 7 more articles in the media than Apax Global Alpha. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 0 mentions for Apax Global Alpha. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Apax Global Alpha's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Apax Global Alpha	Neutral
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	Positive

Summary

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund beats Apax Global Alpha on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Standard Life Private Equity Trust?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and Standard Life Private Equity Trust (LON:SLPE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

16.7% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 102.56% compared to Standard Life Private Equity Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Standard Life Private Equity Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	102.56%	-28.75%	-0.64%
Standard Life Private Equity Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays out 7.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Standard Life Private Equity Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Standard Life Private Equity Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Standard Life Private Equity Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	-£116.82M	-2.08	-£5.96M	-£23.72	N/A
Standard Life Private Equity Trust	£289.51M	3.17	N/A	£186.20	3.20

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 7 more articles in the media than Standard Life Private Equity Trust. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 0 mentions for Standard Life Private Equity Trust. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Standard Life Private Equity Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	Positive
Standard Life Private Equity Trust	Neutral

Summary

Standard Life Private Equity Trust beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford US Growth	£58.05M	15.64	£84.35M	£19.81	16.56
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	-£116.82M	-2.08	-£5.96M	-£23.72	N/A

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 102.56% compared to Baillie Gifford US Growth's net margin of 88.83%. Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity of 7.17% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford US Growth	88.83%	7.17%	N/A
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	102.56%	-28.75%	-0.64%

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.631, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.3819761, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 5 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford US Growth. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 2 mentions for Baillie Gifford US Growth. Baillie Gifford US Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's score of 0.52 indicating that Baillie Gifford US Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford US Growth	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baillie Gifford US Growth	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Baillie Gifford US Growth beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gore Street Energy Storage Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GSF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£239.67M	£5.66B	£13.63B	£2.54B
Dividend Yield	10.94%	7.38%	5.89%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	-2.02	39.09	29.61	367.57
Price / Sales	-2.08	1,262.20	520.75	83,481.74
Price / Cash	2.73	48.31	30.71	27.89
Price / Book	0.43	3.75	2.84	7.19
Net Income	-£5.96M	£417.46M	£1.31B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	N/A	-0.25%	-0.30%	0.30%
1 Month Performance	3.23%	2.06%	2.37%	3.31%
1 Year Performance	-21.05%	5.71%	9.68%	22.13%

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GSF Gore Street Energy Storage Fund	0.9584 of 5 stars	GBX 48 +1.2%	N/A	-21.1%	£239.67M	-£116.82M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage Analyst Forecast
MUT Murray Income Trust	N/A	GBX 1,006.49 +0.2%	N/A	+9.8%	£939.20M	£120.88M	8.41	147,000	News Coverage Positive News Insider Trade
CORD Cordiant Digital Infrastructure	N/A	GBX 122 -0.4%	N/A	+24.2%	£934.18M	£163.11M	5.86	N/A
APAX Apax Global Alpha	N/A	GBX 191.50 flat	N/A	N/A	£923.78M	-£44.79M	N/A	N/A
SLPE Standard Life Private Equity Trust	N/A	GBX 598 -4.2%	N/A	+9.0%	£919.40M	£289.51M	3.21	N/A	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GSF) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF) Competitors

GSF vs. MUT, CORD, APAX, SLPE, and USA

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Murray Income Trust?

Summary

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Apax Global Alpha?

Summary

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Standard Life Private Equity Trust?

Summary

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

GSF vs. The Competition

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF) Competitors

GSF vs. MUT, CORD, APAX, SLPE, and USA

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Murray Income Trust?

Which has more volatility & risk, MUT or GSF?

Does the media refer more to MUT or GSF?

Is MUT or GSF a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer MUT or GSF?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MUT or GSF?

Is MUT or GSF more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MUT or GSF?

Summary

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

Do analysts prefer CORD or GSF?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CORD or GSF?

Does the media prefer CORD or GSF?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CORD or GSF?

Is CORD or GSF a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, CORD or GSF?

Is CORD or GSF more profitable?

Summary

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Apax Global Alpha?

Is APAX or GSF a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of APAX or GSF?

Do analysts rate APAX or GSF?

Which has more risk & volatility, APAX or GSF?

Is APAX or GSF more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, APAX or GSF?

Does the media refer more to APAX or GSF?

Summary

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Standard Life Private Equity Trust?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GSF or SLPE?

Is GSF or SLPE more profitable?

Is GSF or SLPE a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate GSF or SLPE?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, GSF or SLPE?

Does the media favor GSF or SLPE?

Summary

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, USA or GSF?

Is USA or GSF more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, USA or GSF?

Does the media refer more to USA or GSF?

Do analysts prefer USA or GSF?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in USA or GSF?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

GSF vs. The Competition

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools