Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free GSF Stock Alerts

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF) Competitors

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund logo
GBX 49.31 +0.01 (+0.02%)
As of 07:25 AM Eastern
Compare

GSF vs. JPE, TRY, TFIF, BBGI, and SOI

Should you buy Gore Street Energy Storage Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gore Street Energy Storage Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gore Street Energy Storage Fund include JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth (JPE), TR Property Investment Trust (TRY), TwentyFour Income (TFIF), BBGI Global Infrastructure (BBGI), and Schroder Oriental Income (SOI). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth (LON:JPE) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Positive
JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth Neutral

16.7% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth's net margin of 0.00%. JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth's return on equity of 0.00% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund131.36% -6.58% -0.64%
JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth N/A N/A N/A

JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.48-£5.96M-£6.35N/A
JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth£104.78M0.00N/A£0.75N/A

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund currently has a consensus price target of GBX 60, indicating a potential upside of 21.10%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund beats JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to TR Property Investment Trust?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and TR Property Investment Trust (LON:TRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

TR Property Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TR Property Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.48-£5.96M-£6.35N/A
TR Property Investment Trust£77.76M12.44£284.71M£22.3213.66

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.3819761, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TR Property Investment Trust has a beta of 1.4958382, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat TR Property Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Positive
TR Property Investment Trust Neutral

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. TR Property Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 16 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TR Property Investment Trust pays out 71.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund presently has a consensus target price of GBX 60, indicating a potential upside of 21.10%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than TR Property Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
TR Property Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to TR Property Investment Trust's net margin of 79.93%. TR Property Investment Trust's return on equity of 6.52% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund131.36% -6.58% -0.64%
TR Property Investment Trust 79.93%6.52%-24.58%

16.7% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.4% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and TR Property Investment Trust tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to TwentyFour Income?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.3819761, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.2308851, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 6 more articles in the media than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 0 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat TwentyFour Income's score of -0.53 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Positive
TwentyFour Income Negative

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund presently has a consensus target price of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 21.10%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than TwentyFour Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
TwentyFour Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 62.41%. TwentyFour Income's return on equity of 11.04% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund131.36% -6.58% -0.64%
TwentyFour Income 62.41%11.04%N/A

TwentyFour Income has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.48-£5.96M-£6.35N/A
TwentyFour Income£97.54M10.21£868.58M£12.478.80

16.7% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.0% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Income pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

TwentyFour Income beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to BBGI Global Infrastructure?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and BBGI Global Infrastructure (LON:BBGI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. BBGI Global Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BBGI Global Infrastructure pays out 103.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund presently has a consensus price target of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 21.10%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than BBGI Global Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
BBGI Global Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat BBGI Global Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Positive
BBGI Global Infrastructure Neutral

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.3819761, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BBGI Global Infrastructure has a beta of 0.23, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

16.7% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.9% of BBGI Global Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of BBGI Global Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to BBGI Global Infrastructure's net margin of 61.84%. BBGI Global Infrastructure's return on equity of 2.52% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund131.36% -6.58% -0.64%
BBGI Global Infrastructure 61.84%2.52%3.32%

BBGI Global Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BBGI Global Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.48-£5.96M-£6.35N/A
BBGI Global Infrastructure£67.98M14.48£54.89M£7.7217.93

Summary

BBGI Global Infrastructure beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Schroder Oriental Income?

Schroder Oriental Income (LON:SOI) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to Schroder Oriental Income's net margin of 94.62%. Schroder Oriental Income's return on equity of 39.20% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Oriental Income94.62% 39.20% -2.12%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 131.36%-6.58%-0.64%

Schroder Oriental Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Schroder Oriental Income pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Schroder Oriental Income has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Oriental Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Oriental Income£334.18M2.87£106.18M£144.692.98
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.48-£5.96M-£6.35N/A

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Schroder Oriental Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Oriental Income Neutral
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Positive

Schroder Oriental Income has a beta of 0.664, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.3819761, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a consensus target price of GBX 60, indicating a potential upside of 21.10%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than Schroder Oriental Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroder Oriental Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

9.7% of Schroder Oriental Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.7% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Schroder Oriental Income shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund beats Schroder Oriental Income on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gore Street Energy Storage Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GSF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGore Street Energy Storage FundAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£250.25M£2.42B£6.16B£2.76B
Dividend Yield8.97%6.01%5.23%6.16%
P/E Ratio-7.8061.8229.72368.09
Price / Sales-8.481,857.131,184.4884,632.54
Price / Cash2.7360.3388.6427.87
Price / Book0.451.396.477.60
Net Income-£5.96M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.79%-0.15%-0.17%-0.36%
1 Month Performance-8.42%0.15%0.26%-1.12%
1 Year Performance-23.19%7.58%14.97%61.56%

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GSF
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1.6143 of 5 stars		GBX 49.31
+0.0%		GBX 60
+21.7%		-21.9%£249.06M-£29.52MN/AN/A
JPE
JPMorgan Elect plc ­- Managed Growth
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.00B£104.78M1,250.00N/A
TRY
TR Property Investment Trust
N/AGBX 312.74
+0.4%		N/A-5.4%£992.48M£77.76M14.0126
TFIF
TwentyFour Income
N/AGBX 109.39
-0.2%		N/A-3.2%£992.43M£97.54M8.78N/A
BBGI
BBGI Global Infrastructure
N/AGBX 138.50
flat		N/AN/A£984.71M£67.98M17.931,160

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GSF) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Under $1 while the market panics
The new deadline for crypto’s best bill, the Clarity Act, is August 7th. That's the Senate's final session day...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
They told you not to miss this one
The largest companies in the SP 500 are now more overvalued relative to fundamentals than they were at the abs...
Thor Metals | Sponsoredtc pixel
It’s one of Trump’s biggest holdings. Do you own it?
President Trump holds up to $5 million in shares of an AI company that just landed a nearly $10 billion Pentag...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Forget SpaceX, this is Elon’s Next Breakthrough
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin - two investors who called Nvidia a decade ago - say Elon Musk's newly filed AI pa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel