Free Trial
→ Your $29.97 book is free today (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free GSF Stock Alerts

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF) Competitors

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund logo
GBX 52.70 +0.70 (+1.35%)
As of 11:56 AM Eastern
Compare

GSF vs. VEIL, GSS, AGT, SDP, and EDIN

Should you buy Gore Street Energy Storage Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gore Street Energy Storage Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gore Street Energy Storage Fund include Vietnam Enterprise (VEIL), Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS), AVI Global Trust (AGT), Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (SDP), and Edinburgh Investment (EDIN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Vietnam Enterprise?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and Vietnam Enterprise (LON:VEIL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.363, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vietnam Enterprise has a beta of 0.60559064, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund presently has a consensus target price of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 13.85%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than Vietnam Enterprise.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Vietnam Enterprise
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Vietnam Enterprise has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vietnam Enterprise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-9.02-£5.96M-£6.35N/A
Vietnam Enterprise£81.16M13.17-£4.24M£40.0019.38

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Vietnam Enterprise'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral
Vietnam Enterprise Neutral

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to Vietnam Enterprise's net margin of 67.17%. Vietnam Enterprise's return on equity of 4.38% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund131.36% -6.58% -0.64%
Vietnam Enterprise 67.17%4.38%-7.53%

16.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.3% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Vietnam Enterprise beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

16.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Genesis Emerging Markets Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund Neutral

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-9.02-£5.96M-£6.35N/A
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund presently has a consensus price target of GBX 60, indicating a potential upside of 13.85%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity of 0.00% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund131.36% -6.58% -0.64%
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to AVI Global Trust?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and AVI Global Trust (LON:AGT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.363, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AVI Global Trust has a beta of 0.9491668, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

AVI Global Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AVI Global Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-9.02-£5.96M-£6.35N/A
AVI Global Trust£127.64M8.27£215.81M£28.009.43

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled AVI Global Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral
AVI Global Trust Neutral

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. AVI Global Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AVI Global Trust pays out 14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

16.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of AVI Global Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of AVI Global Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to AVI Global Trust's net margin of 90.88%. AVI Global Trust's return on equity of 10.82% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund131.36% -6.58% -0.64%
AVI Global Trust 90.88%10.82%7.00%

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund presently has a consensus price target of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 13.85%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than AVI Global Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
AVI Global Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

AVI Global Trust beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (LON:SDP) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's net margin of 90.43%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's return on equity of 13.69% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund90.43% 13.69% -1.73%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 131.36%-6.58%-0.64%

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund£127.21M8.46£121.21M£87.169.72
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-9.02-£5.96M-£6.35N/A

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a consensus target price of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 13.85%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund and 0 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund Positive
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a beta of 1.023251, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.363, suggesting that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

17.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Edinburgh Investment?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and Edinburgh Investment (LON:EDIN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to Edinburgh Investment's net margin of 89.72%. Edinburgh Investment's return on equity of 7.03% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund131.36% -6.58% -0.64%
Edinburgh Investment 89.72%7.03%6.69%

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Edinburgh Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 28.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Edinburgh Investment pays out 50.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Edinburgh Investment had 8 more articles in the media than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Edinburgh Investment and 0 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Edinburgh Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Edinburgh Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral
Edinburgh Investment Very Positive

16.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Edinburgh Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Edinburgh Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund currently has a consensus target price of GBX 60, indicating a potential upside of 13.85%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than Edinburgh Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Edinburgh Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.363, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Edinburgh Investment has a beta of 0.9612611, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Edinburgh Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Edinburgh Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-9.02-£5.96M-£6.35N/A
Edinburgh Investment£82.18M12.68£180.50M£57.4813.95

Summary

Edinburgh Investment beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gore Street Energy Storage Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GSF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GSF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGore Street Energy Storage FundAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£266.19M£2.42B£5.83B£2.81B
Dividend Yield8.47%5.92%5.20%6.06%
P/E Ratio-8.3025.3615.94365.76
Price / Sales-9.022,033.031,028.7887,755.03
Price / Cash2.7360.1693.8627.89
Price / Book0.481.386.517.79
Net Income-£5.96M£264.68M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.57%0.98%0.91%0.87%
1 Month Performance-1.50%3.45%3.03%11.27%
1 Year Performance-18.17%13.32%20.32%78.56%

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GSF
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
N/AGBX 52.70
+1.3%		GBX 60
+13.9%		-18.0%£266.19M-£29.52MN/AN/A
VEIL
Vietnam Enterprise
N/AGBX 770.49
-0.6%		N/A+42.4%£1.06B£81.16M19.26N/A
GSS
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.06B£250.40M6.181,626
AGT
AVI Global Trust
N/AGBX 262.24
+0.5%		N/A+11.9%£1.05B£127.64M9.37N/A
SDP
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund
N/AGBX 811.33
+1.2%		N/A+59.0%£1.03B£127.21M9.31N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GSF) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The 1934 playbook
In 1934, a legal government maneuver transferred billions in wealth overnight. Most Americans never saw it com...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX eyes a 1.75 trillion valuation - here's what to know
Elon Musk's team has quietly filed confidential paperwork with the SEC for what Bloomberg estimates could be a...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
In the next 3 minutes… James Altucher – legendary investor and venture capitalist… And someone who’s kno...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX just filed. The clock is ticking.
Reuters reports Elon Musk filed secretly. Barron's says it's being finalized behind closed doors. CNBC just re...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX will mint billionaires. You won't be one of them.
By the time a company goes public, 95% of profits have already been made. Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel