Go Pro

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF) Competitors

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund logo
GBX 47.75 +0.35 (+0.74%)
As of 09/11/2026 12:29 PM Eastern

GSF vs. CORD, TRY, MUT, APAX, and SLPE

Should you buy Gore Street Energy Storage Fund stock or one of its competitors? Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (CORD), TR Property Investment Trust (TRY), Murray Income Trust (MUT), Apax Global Alpha (APAX), and Standard Life Private Equity Trust (SLPE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (LON:CORD) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cordiant Digital Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure£163.11M5.82£846.28M£20.815.96
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£116.82M-2.06-£5.96M-£23.72N/A

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 5 more articles in the media than Cordiant Digital Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 0 mentions for Cordiant Digital Infrastructure. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure Neutral
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral

39.1% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.6% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a beta of 0.807, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.342, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a net margin of 432.24% compared to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's net margin of 102.56%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's return on equity of 14.55% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure432.24% 14.55% 5.89%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 102.56%-28.75%-0.64%

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to TR Property Investment Trust?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and TR Property Investment Trust (LON:TRY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

TR Property Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TR Property Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£116.82M-2.06-£5.96M-£23.72N/A
TR Property Investment Trust£77.76M11.84£284.71M£22.3212.99

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. TR Property Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 16 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TR Property Investment Trust pays out 71.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 5 more articles in the media than TR Property Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 0 mentions for TR Property Investment Trust. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat TR Property Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral
TR Property Investment Trust Neutral

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.342, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TR Property Investment Trust has a beta of 1.484, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
TR Property Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

16.6% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 102.56% compared to TR Property Investment Trust's net margin of 79.93%. TR Property Investment Trust's return on equity of 6.52% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund102.56% -28.75% -0.64%
TR Property Investment Trust 79.93%6.52%-24.58%

Summary

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and TR Property Investment Trust tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Murray Income Trust?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and Murray Income Trust (LON:MUT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Murray Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Murray Income Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murray Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£116.82M-2.06-£5.96M-£23.72N/A
Murray Income Trust£120.88M7.50£90.45M£119.708.11

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 4 more articles in the media than Murray Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 1 mentions for Murray Income Trust. Murray Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's score of 0.35 indicating that Murray Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral
Murray Income Trust Very Positive

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Murray Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murray Income Trust pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.342, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murray Income Trust has a beta of 1.181, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 102.56% compared to Murray Income Trust's net margin of 95.27%. Murray Income Trust's return on equity of 13.83% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund102.56% -28.75% -0.64%
Murray Income Trust 95.27%13.83%4.65%

16.6% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.3% of Murray Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Murray Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Murray Income Trust beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Apax Global Alpha?

Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Apax Global Alpha has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Apax Global Alpha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Apax Global Alpha-£44.79M-20.62£4.12M-£0.11N/A
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£116.82M-2.06-£5.96M-£23.72N/A

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 5 more articles in the media than Apax Global Alpha. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 0 mentions for Apax Global Alpha. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Apax Global Alpha's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Apax Global Alpha Neutral
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral

14.3% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.6% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Apax Global Alpha shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Apax Global Alpha pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Apax Global Alpha pays out -120.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Apax Global Alpha
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 102.56% compared to Apax Global Alpha's net margin of 57.27%. Apax Global Alpha's return on equity of 0.67% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Apax Global Alpha57.27% 0.67% 2.57%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 102.56%-28.75%-0.64%

Apax Global Alpha has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.342, meaning that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund beats Apax Global Alpha on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Standard Life Private Equity Trust?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and Standard Life Private Equity Trust (LON:SLPE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 102.56% compared to Standard Life Private Equity Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Standard Life Private Equity Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund102.56% -28.75% -0.64%
Standard Life Private Equity Trust N/A N/A N/A

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays out 7.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Standard Life Private Equity Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 5 more articles in the media than Standard Life Private Equity Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 0 mentions for Standard Life Private Equity Trust. Standard Life Private Equity Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's score of 0.35 indicating that Standard Life Private Equity Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral
Standard Life Private Equity Trust Positive

Standard Life Private Equity Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Standard Life Private Equity Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£116.82M-2.06-£5.96M-£23.72N/A
Standard Life Private Equity Trust£289.51M3.21N/A£186.203.24

16.6% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Standard Life Private Equity Trust beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gore Street Energy Storage Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GSF vs. The Competition

MetricGore Street Energy Storage FundCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£240.68M£5.52B£13.80B£2.51B
Dividend Yield14.69%7.48%5.94%6.25%
P/E Ratio-2.0130.5425.67366.83
Price / Sales-2.061,184.19502.1089,753.13
Price / Cash2.7347.9240.4527.89
Price / Book0.433.532.756.33
Net Income-£5.96M£418.04M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.55%-1.39%-1.17%-0.69%
1 Month Performance-0.21%-1.78%-0.23%0.00%
1 Year Performance-15.93%2.79%8.39%19.96%

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GSF
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
0.772 of 5 stars
GBX 47.75
+0.7%
N/A-15.9%£240.68M-£116.82MN/AN/A
CORD
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure
N/AGBX 124.50
+0.4%
N/A+29.7%£953.32M£163.11M5.98N/A
TRY
TR Property Investment Trust
N/AGBX 300.18
+0.4%
N/A-8.2%£952.62M£77.76M13.4526
MUT
Murray Income Trust
N/AGBX 992.50
-0.4%
N/A+7.9%£926.14M£120.88M8.29147,000
APAX
Apax Global Alpha
N/AGBX 191.50
flat
N/AN/A£923.78M-£44.79MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GSF) was last updated on 9/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners