Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF) Competitors

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund logo
GBX 51.50 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:14 PM Eastern

GSF vs. GROW, SDP, GSS, AGT, and VEIL

Should you buy Gore Street Energy Storage Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gore Street Energy Storage Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gore Street Energy Storage Fund include Molten Ventures (GROW), Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (SDP), Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (GSS), AVI Global Trust (AGT), and Vietnam Enterprise (VEIL). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Molten Ventures?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 193.06% compared to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's net margin of 131.36%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 8.51% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures193.06% 8.51% -3.46%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 131.36%-6.58%-0.64%

Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9414055, indicating that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.37207288, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

41.3% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.9% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Molten Ventures presently has a consensus price target of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential upside of 9.64%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a consensus price target of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 16.50%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than Molten Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Molten Ventures. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£125.60M7.99-£33.58M£61.609.46
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.81-£5.96M-£6.35N/A

In the previous week, Molten Ventures had 3 more articles in the media than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Molten Ventures and 0 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gore Street Energy Storage Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures Neutral
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund?

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund (LON:SDP) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund had 2 more articles in the media than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund and 0 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

17.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.9% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a consensus price target of GBX 60, indicating a potential upside of 16.50%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund£191.10M5.81£121.21M£135.646.47
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.81-£5.96M-£6.35N/A

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's net margin of 95.12%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund's return on equity of 20.01% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund95.12% 20.01% -1.73%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 131.36%-6.58%-0.64%

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund has a beta of 1.0276442, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.37207288, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund?

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund (LON:GSS) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a consensus target price of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 16.50%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

16.9% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gore Street Energy Storage Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund Neutral
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Genesis Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity of 0.00% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Emerging Markets FundN/A N/A N/A
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 131.36%-6.58%-0.64%

Genesis Emerging Markets Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Emerging Markets Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund£250.40M0.00N/A£140.70N/A
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.81-£5.96M-£6.35N/A

Summary

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund beats Genesis Emerging Markets Fund on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to AVI Global Trust?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and AVI Global Trust (LON:AGT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. AVI Global Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AVI Global Trust pays out 14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled AVI Global Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral
AVI Global Trust Neutral

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund currently has a consensus target price of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 16.50%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than AVI Global Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
AVI Global Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.37207288, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AVI Global Trust has a beta of 0.95116794, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

16.9% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of AVI Global Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of AVI Global Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to AVI Global Trust's net margin of 90.88%. AVI Global Trust's return on equity of 10.97% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund131.36% -6.58% -0.64%
AVI Global Trust 90.88%10.97%7.00%

AVI Global Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AVI Global Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.81-£5.96M-£6.35N/A
AVI Global Trust£127.64M8.16£215.81M£28.009.34

Summary

AVI Global Trust beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gore Street Energy Storage Fund compare to Vietnam Enterprise?

Vietnam Enterprise (LON:VEIL) and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Vietnam Enterprise has a beta of 0.6047605, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.37207288, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 131.36% compared to Vietnam Enterprise's net margin of 67.17%. Vietnam Enterprise's return on equity of 4.38% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vietnam Enterprise67.17% 4.38% -7.53%
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund 131.36%-6.58%-0.64%

37.0% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.9% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Vietnam Enterprise has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vietnam Enterprise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vietnam Enterprise£81.16M12.67-£4.24M£40.0018.70
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£29.52M-8.81-£5.96M-£6.35N/A

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a consensus price target of GBX 60, suggesting a potential upside of 16.50%. Given Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is more favorable than Vietnam Enterprise.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vietnam Enterprise
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Vietnam Enterprise's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gore Street Energy Storage Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vietnam Enterprise Neutral
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral

Summary

Vietnam Enterprise beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gore Street Energy Storage Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GSF vs. The Competition

MetricGore Street Energy Storage FundAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£260.13M£2.47B£6.02B£2.87B
Dividend Yield8.52%6.03%5.27%6.15%
P/E Ratio-8.1125.7615.70366.87
Price / Sales-8.812,075.721,098.6886,443.27
Price / Cash2.7360.1686.6727.85
Price / Book0.471.386.638.01
Net Income-£5.96M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.81%0.25%0.34%0.08%
1 Month Performance0.19%1.43%2.11%1.66%
1 Year Performance-17.20%11.07%20.91%72.37%

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GSF
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
N/AGBX 51.50
flat
GBX 60
+16.5%
-17.5%£260.13M-£29.52MN/AN/A
GROW
Molten Ventures
1.7652 of 5 stars
GBX 623.59
+0.3%
GBX 599.67
-3.8%
+100.7%£1.07B£125.60M10.1220
SDP
Schroder Investment Trust - Schroder AsiaPacific Fund
N/AGBX 837
+1.5%
N/A+61.0%£1.06B£191.10M6.17N/A
GSS
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.06B£250.40M6.181,626
AGT
AVI Global Trust
N/AGBX 261.37
+1.5%
N/A+9.8%£1.04B£127.64M9.33N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GSF) was last updated on 6/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners