Go Pro
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free HMI Stock Alerts

Harvest Minerals (HMI) Competitors

Harvest Minerals logo
GBX 0.27 +0.02 (+6.80%)
As of 08/21/2026 09:59 AM Eastern
Compare

HMI vs. ADES, BIOM, ZED, ESKN, and VRS

Should you buy Harvest Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Harvest Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include ADES International (ADES), Biome Technologies (BIOM), Zenova Group (ZED), Esken (ESKN), and Versarien (VRS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does Harvest Minerals compare to ADES International?

Harvest Minerals (LON:HMI) and ADES International (LON:ADES) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Harvest Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled ADES International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Harvest Minerals Neutral
ADES International Neutral

ADES International has higher revenue and earnings than Harvest Minerals. Harvest Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ADES International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harvest Minerals£1.75M0.77-£9.24M-£1.45N/A
ADES International£452.11M0.00N/A£0.46N/A

ADES International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Harvest Minerals' net margin of -331.67%. ADES International's return on equity of 0.00% beat Harvest Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harvest Minerals-331.67% -262.79% -15.70%
ADES International N/A N/A N/A

4.6% of Harvest Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.2% of Harvest Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ADES International beats Harvest Minerals on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harvest Minerals compare to Biome Technologies?

Biome Technologies (LON:BIOM) and Harvest Minerals (LON:HMI) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Harvest Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Biome Technologies. Biome Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harvest Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Biome Technologies£5.75M0.85-£17.71M-£0.34N/A
Harvest Minerals£1.75M0.77-£9.24M-£1.45N/A

In the previous week, Biome Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Harvest Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Biome Technologies Neutral
Harvest Minerals Neutral

Biome Technologies has a net margin of -22.35% compared to Harvest Minerals' net margin of -331.67%. Biome Technologies' return on equity of -103.59% beat Harvest Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Biome Technologies-22.35% -103.59% -27.95%
Harvest Minerals -331.67%-262.79%-15.70%

Biome Technologies has a beta of 2.26, indicating that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harvest Minerals has a beta of 1.374, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of Biome Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.6% of Harvest Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 83.9% of Biome Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 63.2% of Harvest Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Biome Technologies beats Harvest Minerals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harvest Minerals compare to Zenova Group?

Harvest Minerals (LON:HMI) and Zenova Group (LON:ZED) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Harvest Minerals has a beta of 1.374, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zenova Group has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Harvest Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zenova Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Harvest Minerals Neutral
Zenova Group Neutral

Zenova Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Harvest Minerals. Zenova Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harvest Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harvest Minerals£1.75M0.77-£9.24M-£1.45N/A
Zenova Group£100K7.62-£1.75M-£0.75N/A

Harvest Minerals has a net margin of -331.67% compared to Zenova Group's net margin of -1,820.59%. Zenova Group's return on equity of -69.63% beat Harvest Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harvest Minerals-331.67% -262.79% -15.70%
Zenova Group -1,820.59%-69.63%-40.83%

4.6% of Harvest Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Zenova Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.2% of Harvest Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Zenova Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Harvest Minerals beats Zenova Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harvest Minerals compare to Esken?

Harvest Minerals (LON:HMI) and Esken (LON:ESKN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Esken has a net margin of -67.12% compared to Harvest Minerals' net margin of -331.67%. Harvest Minerals' return on equity of -262.79% beat Esken's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harvest Minerals-331.67% -262.79% -15.70%
Esken -67.12%-461.07%-2.10%

Harvest Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Esken. Harvest Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Esken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harvest Minerals£1.75M0.77-£9.24M-£1.45N/A
Esken£114.53M0.00-£73.10M-£0.08N/A

In the previous week, Harvest Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Esken'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Harvest Minerals Neutral
Esken Neutral

Harvest Minerals has a beta of 1.374, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Esken has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

4.6% of Harvest Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Esken shares are held by institutional investors. 63.2% of Harvest Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Esken shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Harvest Minerals and Esken tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harvest Minerals compare to Versarien?

Harvest Minerals (LON:HMI) and Versarien (LON:VRS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Harvest Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Versarien. Harvest Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Versarien, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harvest Minerals£1.75M0.77-£9.24M-£1.45N/A
Versarien£2.55M0.24-£11.98M-£0.13N/A

In the previous week, Harvest Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Versarien'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Harvest Minerals Neutral
Versarien Neutral

4.6% of Harvest Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Versarien shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.2% of Harvest Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Versarien shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Versarien has a net margin of -225.06% compared to Harvest Minerals' net margin of -331.67%. Versarien's return on equity of -216.70% beat Harvest Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harvest Minerals-331.67% -262.79% -15.70%
Versarien -225.06%-216.70%-26.66%

Harvest Minerals has a beta of 1.374, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Versarien has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Harvest Minerals beats Versarien on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Harvest Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HMI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

HMI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHarvest MineralsChemicals IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.26M£11.64B£5.13B£2.54B
Dividend YieldN/A2.85%4.69%6.17%
P/E Ratio-0.1841.3026.61367.57
Price / Sales0.7747.844,771.1183,481.74
Price / Cash6.3015.3227.3027.89
Price / Book0.073.748.967.19
Net Income-£9.24M£222.46M£154.93M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.55%0.63%2.58%0.30%
1 Month Performance-0.37%3.47%10.18%3.31%
1 Year Performance6.37%21.00%45.55%22.13%

Harvest Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HMI
Harvest Minerals
N/AGBX 0.27
+6.8%		N/A+6.4%£1.26M£1.75MN/AN/A
ADES
ADES International
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.09M£452.11M26.62140
BIOM
Biome Technologies
N/AGBX 9.50
flat		N/A+37.1%£4.90M£5.75MN/A27
ZED
Zenova Group
N/AGBX 0.21
flat		N/AN/A£762K£100KN/A11
ESKN
Esken
N/AN/AN/AN/A£714K£114.53MN/A678

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HMI) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel