Go Pro

Harvest Minerals (HMI) Competitors

Harvest Minerals logo
GBX 0.24 -0.01 (-4.00%)
As of 10/1/2026 05:15 AM Eastern

HMI vs. ADES, BIOM, ZED, ESKN, and VRS

Should you buy Harvest Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Harvest Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include ADES International (ADES), Biome Technologies (BIOM), Zenova Group (ZED), Esken (ESKN), and Versarien (VRS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does Harvest Minerals compare to ADES International?

ADES International (LON:ADES) and Harvest Minerals (LON:HMI) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

ADES International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Harvest Minerals' net margin of -331.67%. ADES International's return on equity of 0.00% beat Harvest Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ADES InternationalN/A N/A N/A
Harvest Minerals -331.67%-262.79%-15.70%

4.6% of Harvest Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 63.2% of Harvest Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Harvest Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than ADES International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Harvest Minerals and 0 mentions for ADES International. ADES International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Harvest Minerals' score of -0.77 indicating that ADES International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ADES International Neutral
Harvest Minerals Negative

ADES International has higher revenue and earnings than Harvest Minerals. Harvest Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ADES International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ADES International£452.11M0.00N/A£0.46N/A
Harvest Minerals£1.75M0.74-£9.24M-£1.45N/A

Summary

ADES International beats Harvest Minerals on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harvest Minerals compare to Biome Technologies?

Harvest Minerals (LON:HMI) and Biome Technologies (LON:BIOM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

4.6% of Harvest Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Biome Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.2% of Harvest Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 83.9% of Biome Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Harvest Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Biome Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Harvest Minerals and 0 mentions for Biome Technologies. Biome Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Harvest Minerals' score of -0.77 indicating that Biome Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Harvest Minerals Negative
Biome Technologies Neutral

Biome Technologies has a net margin of -22.35% compared to Harvest Minerals' net margin of -331.67%. Biome Technologies' return on equity of -103.59% beat Harvest Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harvest Minerals-331.67% -262.79% -15.70%
Biome Technologies -22.35%-103.59%-27.95%

Harvest Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Biome Technologies. Biome Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harvest Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harvest Minerals£1.75M0.74-£9.24M-£1.45N/A
Biome Technologies£5.75M0.85-£17.71M-£0.34N/A

Harvest Minerals has a beta of 1.267, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Biome Technologies has a beta of 2.26, indicating that its share price is 126% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Biome Technologies beats Harvest Minerals on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harvest Minerals compare to Zenova Group?

Zenova Group (LON:ZED) and Harvest Minerals (LON:HMI) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

14.5% of Zenova Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.6% of Harvest Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Zenova Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 63.2% of Harvest Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Harvest Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Zenova Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Harvest Minerals and 0 mentions for Zenova Group. Zenova Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Harvest Minerals' score of -0.77 indicating that Zenova Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zenova Group Neutral
Harvest Minerals Negative

Zenova Group has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harvest Minerals has a beta of 1.267, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Harvest Minerals has a net margin of -331.67% compared to Zenova Group's net margin of -1,820.59%. Zenova Group's return on equity of -69.63% beat Harvest Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zenova Group-1,820.59% -69.63% -40.83%
Harvest Minerals -331.67%-262.79%-15.70%

Zenova Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Harvest Minerals. Zenova Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harvest Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zenova Group£100K7.62-£1.75M-£0.75N/A
Harvest Minerals£1.75M0.74-£9.24M-£1.45N/A

Summary

Harvest Minerals beats Zenova Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harvest Minerals compare to Esken?

Esken (LON:ESKN) and Harvest Minerals (LON:HMI) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Harvest Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Esken. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Harvest Minerals and 0 mentions for Esken. Esken's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Harvest Minerals' score of -0.77 indicating that Esken is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Esken Neutral
Harvest Minerals Negative

Esken has a net margin of -67.12% compared to Harvest Minerals' net margin of -331.67%. Harvest Minerals' return on equity of -262.79% beat Esken's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Esken-67.12% -461.07% -2.10%
Harvest Minerals -331.67%-262.79%-15.70%

64.3% of Esken shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.6% of Harvest Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.9% of Esken shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.2% of Harvest Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Esken has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harvest Minerals has a beta of 1.267, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Harvest Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Esken. Harvest Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Esken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Esken£114.53M0.00-£73.10M-£0.08N/A
Harvest Minerals£1.75M0.74-£9.24M-£1.45N/A

Summary

Esken and Harvest Minerals tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harvest Minerals compare to Versarien?

Harvest Minerals (LON:HMI) and Versarien (LON:VRS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Versarien has a net margin of -225.06% compared to Harvest Minerals' net margin of -331.67%. Versarien's return on equity of -216.70% beat Harvest Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harvest Minerals-331.67% -262.79% -15.70%
Versarien -225.06%-216.70%-26.66%

4.6% of Harvest Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Versarien shares are held by institutional investors. 63.2% of Harvest Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Versarien shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Harvest Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Versarien. Harvest Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Versarien, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harvest Minerals£1.75M0.74-£9.24M-£1.45N/A
Versarien£2.55M0.24-£11.98M-£0.13N/A

In the previous week, Harvest Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Versarien. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Harvest Minerals and 0 mentions for Versarien. Versarien's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Harvest Minerals' score of -0.77 indicating that Versarien is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Harvest Minerals Negative
Versarien Neutral

Harvest Minerals has a beta of 1.267, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Versarien has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Harvest Minerals beats Versarien on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Harvest Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HMI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

HMI vs. The Competition

MetricHarvest MineralsChemicals IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.30M£10.94B£4.70B£2.80B
Dividend YieldN/A2.95%4.75%6.18%
P/E Ratio-0.1736.5425.13366.17
Price / Sales0.7455.5116,596.4189,425.29
Price / Cash6.3014.7624.9927.89
Price / Book0.063.1710.206.83
Net Income-£9.24M£225.75M£158.44M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.38%-1.27%-2.73%-0.75%
1 Month Performance20.00%-4.49%-4.51%16.84%
1 Year Performance-21.57%16.19%18.00%16.40%

Harvest Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HMI
Harvest Minerals
N/AGBX 0.24
-4.0%
N/A-11.4%£1.30M£1.75MN/AN/A
ADES
ADES International
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.09M£452.11M26.62140
BIOM
Biome Technologies
N/AGBX 9.50
flat
N/A+0.0%£4.90M£5.75MN/A27
ZED
Zenova Group
N/AGBX 0.21
flat
N/AN/A£762K£100KN/A11
ESKN
Esken
N/AN/AN/AN/A£714K£114.53MN/A678

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:HMI) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners