Free Trial
→ June 12: Elon Musk’s “Day-One Retirement Plan.” (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free HSM Stock Alerts

Samuel Heath & Sons (HSM) Competitors

GBX 340 +15.00 (+4.62%)
As of 03:14 AM Eastern
Compare

HSM vs. NTBR, TON, LIFS, SFE, and FAN

Should you buy Samuel Heath & Sons stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Samuel Heath & Sons with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Samuel Heath & Sons include Northern Bear (NTBR), Titon (TON), LifeSafe (LIFS), Safestyle UK (SFE), and Volution Group (FAN). These companies are all part of the "building products & equipment" industry.

How does Samuel Heath & Sons compare to Northern Bear?

Samuel Heath & Sons (LON:HSM) and Northern Bear (LON:NTBR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Samuel Heath & Sons has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Northern Bear. Northern Bear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Samuel Heath & Sons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Samuel Heath & Sons£14.92M0.58£1.31M£40.208.46
Northern Bear£89.91M0.17£1.30M£29.603.75

Samuel Heath & Sons has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Northern Bear's net margin of 4.63%. Northern Bear's return on equity of 17.65% beat Samuel Heath & Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Samuel Heath & Sons5.04% 6.57% 3.54%
Northern Bear 4.63%17.65%3.83%

Samuel Heath & Sons pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Northern Bear pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Samuel Heath & Sons pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Northern Bear pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Northern Bear had 1 more articles in the media than Samuel Heath & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Northern Bear and 0 mentions for Samuel Heath & Sons. Northern Bear's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Samuel Heath & Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Northern Bear is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Samuel Heath & Sons Neutral
Northern Bear Neutral

Samuel Heath & Sons has a beta of 0.04, suggesting that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Bear has a beta of 0.256, suggesting that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of Samuel Heath & Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Northern Bear shares are held by institutional investors. 25.7% of Samuel Heath & Sons shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 98.8% of Northern Bear shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Northern Bear beats Samuel Heath & Sons on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Samuel Heath & Sons compare to Titon?

Titon (LON:TON) and Samuel Heath & Sons (LON:HSM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

12.2% of Titon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Samuel Heath & Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.9% of Titon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.7% of Samuel Heath & Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Samuel Heath & Sons has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Titon. Titon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Samuel Heath & Sons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Titon£16.23M0.55-£980.29K-£0.14N/A
Samuel Heath & Sons£14.92M0.58£1.31M£40.208.46

Titon has a beta of 0.199, indicating that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Samuel Heath & Sons has a beta of 0.04, indicating that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

Samuel Heath & Sons has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Titon's net margin of 1.77%. Samuel Heath & Sons' return on equity of 6.57% beat Titon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Titon1.77% 2.57% -2.67%
Samuel Heath & Sons 5.04%6.57%3.54%

In the previous week, Titon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Samuel Heath & Sons'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Titon Neutral
Samuel Heath & Sons Neutral

Summary

Samuel Heath & Sons beats Titon on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Samuel Heath & Sons compare to LifeSafe?

Samuel Heath & Sons (LON:HSM) and LifeSafe (LON:LIFS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Samuel Heath & Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LifeSafe'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Samuel Heath & Sons Neutral
LifeSafe Neutral

0.5% of Samuel Heath & Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.9% of LifeSafe shares are held by institutional investors. 25.7% of Samuel Heath & Sons shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of LifeSafe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Samuel Heath & Sons has a beta of 0.04, indicating that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LifeSafe has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Samuel Heath & Sons has higher revenue and earnings than LifeSafe. LifeSafe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Samuel Heath & Sons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Samuel Heath & Sons£14.92M0.58£1.31M£40.208.46
LifeSafe£3.26M0.26-£2.36M-£0.02N/A

Samuel Heath & Sons has a net margin of 5.04% compared to LifeSafe's net margin of -29.47%. Samuel Heath & Sons' return on equity of 6.57% beat LifeSafe's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Samuel Heath & Sons5.04% 6.57% 3.54%
LifeSafe -29.47%-50.82%-33.83%

Summary

Samuel Heath & Sons beats LifeSafe on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Samuel Heath & Sons compare to Safestyle UK?

Samuel Heath & Sons (LON:HSM) and Safestyle UK (LON:SFE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Samuel Heath & Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Safestyle UK'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Samuel Heath & Sons Neutral
Safestyle UK Neutral

Samuel Heath & Sons has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Safestyle UK's net margin of -6.55%. Samuel Heath & Sons' return on equity of 6.57% beat Safestyle UK's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Samuel Heath & Sons5.04% 6.57% 3.54%
Safestyle UK -6.55%-34.92%-6.85%

Samuel Heath & Sons pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Safestyle UK pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Samuel Heath & Sons pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Safestyle UK pays out -1,428.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Samuel Heath & Sons has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Safestyle UK. Safestyle UK is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Samuel Heath & Sons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Samuel Heath & Sons£14.92M0.58£1.31M£40.208.46
Safestyle UK£150.18M0.00-£9.84M-£0.07N/A

Samuel Heath & Sons has a beta of 0.04, indicating that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safestyle UK has a beta of 2.04, indicating that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of Samuel Heath & Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of Safestyle UK shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.7% of Samuel Heath & Sons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Safestyle UK shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Samuel Heath & Sons beats Safestyle UK on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Samuel Heath & Sons compare to Volution Group?

Samuel Heath & Sons (LON:HSM) and Volution Group (LON:FAN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Samuel Heath & Sons pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Volution Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Samuel Heath & Sons pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Volution Group pays out 42.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Samuel Heath & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volution Group has a net margin of 11.19% compared to Samuel Heath & Sons' net margin of 5.04%. Volution Group's return on equity of 18.46% beat Samuel Heath & Sons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Samuel Heath & Sons5.04% 6.57% 3.54%
Volution Group 11.19%18.46%9.42%

Volution Group has a consensus target price of GBX 751, suggesting a potential upside of 21.32%. Given Volution Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Volution Group is more favorable than Samuel Heath & Sons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Samuel Heath & Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Volution Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

0.5% of Samuel Heath & Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Volution Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.7% of Samuel Heath & Sons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Volution Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volution Group has higher revenue and earnings than Samuel Heath & Sons. Samuel Heath & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volution Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Samuel Heath & Sons£14.92M0.58£1.31M£40.208.46
Volution Group£459.96M2.67£42.69M£25.6024.18

Samuel Heath & Sons has a beta of 0.04, indicating that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volution Group has a beta of 1.176, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Volution Group had 1 more articles in the media than Samuel Heath & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Volution Group and 0 mentions for Samuel Heath & Sons. Samuel Heath & Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Volution Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Samuel Heath & Sons Neutral
Volution Group Neutral

Summary

Volution Group beats Samuel Heath & Sons on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Samuel Heath & Sons News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

HSM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSamuel Heath & SonsBuilding Products & Equipment IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£8.62M£2.48B£9.42B£2.82B
Dividend Yield4.02%3.28%3.55%6.08%
P/E Ratio8.4658.0825.57365.87
Price / Sales0.5870.765,098.4487,841.47
Price / Cash3.2817.0727.5927.89
Price / Book0.711.535.067.81
Net Income£1.31M£18.85B£792.97M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A2.28%1.96%2.48%
1 Month PerformanceN/A1.40%2.30%3.71%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-3.20%32.36%79.86%

Samuel Heath & Sons Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HSM
Samuel Heath & Sons
N/AGBX 340
+4.6%		N/AN/A£8.62M£14.92M8.46141
NTBR
Northern Bear
N/AGBX 109.50
+1.9%		N/A+59.4%£14.79M£89.91M3.70411
TON
Titon
N/AGBX 72.50
-3.3%		N/A+3.0%£8.16M£16.23MN/A183
LIFS
LifeSafe
N/AGBX 1.80
flat		N/AN/A£862K£3.26MN/A12
SFE
Safestyle UK
N/AN/AN/AN/A£444K£150.18MN/A18,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HSM) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Opportunity Forming in a U.S. Supply-Chain Weak Spot?
America has a supply-chain problem with graphite - demand is climbing while dependence on foreign sources rema...
i2i Marketing Group, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Is Eyeing the Biggest Monetary Shift Since Nixon
On August 15, 1971, Nixon ended the Bretton Woods agreement and untethered the dollar from gold. Since that ni...
Americas Gold Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
PH: Do THESE 4 things to your bank account now …
In a few short months, the US government could gain unprecedented powers over personal bank accounts - includi...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Three companies about to leapfrog Nvidia [And transform the entire industry]
Futurist George Gilder - who predicted the smartphone years before the iPhone launched - believes today's AI d...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
The S-1 just dropped. 22 days left.
The SpaceX S-1 is now public - $18.7 billion in revenue, a $75 billion raise, and a June 12 Nasdaq listing con...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
How institutional rebalancing quietly affects your retirement holdings
When a mega-IPO like SpaceX hits the market, the 60 days before the listing matter more than the day itself. P...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel