Go Pro
→ Buy the “unseen winner of the AI race” before July 22 (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free INPP Stock Alerts

International Public Partnerships (INPP) Competitors

International Public Partnerships logo
GBX 140.80 -1.20 (-0.85%)
As of 07/3/2026 11:59 AM Eastern
Compare

INPP vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and STJ

Should you buy International Public Partnerships stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares International Public Partnerships with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with International Public Partnerships include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), Pershing Square (PSH), and St. James's Place (STJ). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Schroders?

Schroders (LON:SDR) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Schroders' net margin of 16.44%. Schroders' return on equity of 12.35% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroders16.44% 12.35% 1.86%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

Schroders presently has a consensus target price of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.77%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 1 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 1 mentions for Schroders. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Schroders' score of 0.74 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Schroders
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
International Public Partnerships
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Schroders has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.364, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

17.3% of Schroders shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Schroders shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroders£3.25B2.82£355.50M£33.6017.47
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.42£43.53M£14.289.86

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Schroders pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. International Public Partnerships is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Schroders beats International Public Partnerships on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to M&G?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and M&G (LON:MNG) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and dividends.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. International Public Partnerships' return on equity of 9.61% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
M&G 1.73%9.49%0.40%

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 1 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 1 mentions for M&G. M&G's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 1.03 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
M&G
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

M&G has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.42£43.53M£14.289.86
M&G£21.71B0.38£166.98M£12.3027.86

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.7% of M&G shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. International Public Partnerships is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, suggesting a potential upside of 97.79%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe M&G is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.364, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.941, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

International Public Partnerships and M&G tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.364, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.9269671, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 2 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Polar Capital Technology Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships Positive
Polar Capital Technology Trust Neutral

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 294.06% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 97.32%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 43.14% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
Polar Capital Technology Trust 294.06%43.14%20.70%

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.42£43.53M£14.289.86
Polar Capital Technology Trust£2.14B3.55£1.20B£188.583.63

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.3% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats International Public Partnerships on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Pershing Square?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.364, suggesting that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8564921, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 2 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 0 mentions for Pershing Square. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships Positive
Pershing Square Neutral

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
Pershing Square 94.13%16.97%11.83%

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.42£43.53M£14.289.86
Pershing Square£2.57B2.57£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.68

Summary

Pershing Square beats International Public Partnerships on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to St. James's Place?

St. James's Place (LON:STJ) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

International Public Partnerships has lower revenue, but higher earnings than St. James's Place. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than St. James's Place, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
St. James's Place£30.14B0.22-£6.46M£98.8013.19
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.42£43.53M£14.289.86

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 2 more articles in the media than St. James's Place. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 0 mentions for St. James's Place. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat St. James' Place's score of 0.00 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
St. James's Place Neutral
International Public Partnerships Positive

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to St. James' Place's net margin of 1.76%. St. James' Place's return on equity of 37.33% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
St. James's Place1.76% 37.33% 0.22%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

St. James's Place presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,689.71, indicating a potential upside of 29.68%. Given St. James' Place's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe St. James's Place is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
St. James's Place
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

77.8% of St. James's Place shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of St. James's Place shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

St. James's Place pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. St. James's Place pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

St. James's Place has a beta of 1.005, suggesting that its share price is 0% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.364, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

St. James's Place beats International Public Partnerships on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get International Public Partnerships News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for INPP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding INPP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

INPP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricInternational Public PartnershipsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.52B£2.43B£5.52B£2.52B
Dividend Yield9.13%6.00%5.24%6.15%
P/E Ratio9.8662.2430.04366.74
Price / Sales9.422,117.571,133.1986,382.22
Price / Cash12.7160.3389.0327.87
Price / Book0.941.416.687.75
Net Income£43.53M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.14%0.77%0.67%0.59%
1 Month Performance2.92%0.30%1.10%-0.75%
1 Year Performance18.34%8.73%17.40%63.99%

International Public Partnerships Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 140.80
-0.8%		N/A+18.3%£2.52B£267.76M9.86N/A
SDR
Schroders
2.0508 of 5 stars		GBX 586.50
+0.1%		GBX 453.33
-22.7%		+58.2%£9.15B£3.25B17.466,438
MNG
M&G
4.4067 of 5 stars		GBX 340
+1.4%		GBX 677.86
+99.4%		+33.3%£8.10B£21.71B27.646,101
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 679
-3.6%		N/A+86.1%£7.56B£2.14B3.60120
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,780
-1.0%		N/A-8.3%£6.62B£2.57B2.68N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:INPP) was last updated on 7/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
World’s Largest Investors Are Moving Their Money (Not Into AI)
While headlines focus on the next AI IPO, the world's largest investors are moving capital into one asset at t...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Goldman Sachs: 300 million jobs will disappear
Goldman Sachs predicts 300 million jobs will disappear - and Elon Musk's 'Project Apex' AI supercomputer is ac...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
URGENT Dollar Reset Warning for Monday
A 50-year U.S.-Saudi arrangement established under Henry Kissinger - one credited with anchoring the dollar in...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
The semiconductor stock supplying Apple and SpaceX on fire in 2026
A semiconductor company supplying both Apple and SpaceX just doubled its data center revenue forecast to 1 bil...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel