Go Pro
→ The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free INPP Stock Alerts

International Public Partnerships (INPP) Competitors

International Public Partnerships logo
GBX 137.10 -0.90 (-0.65%)
As of 07:18 AM Eastern
Compare

INPP vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

Should you buy International Public Partnerships stock or one of its competitors? International Public Partnerships's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), Pershing Square (PSH), and F&C Investment Trust (FCIT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Schroders?

Schroders (LON:SDR) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

16.9% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroders£3.51B2.59£355.50M£43.5013.41
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.17£43.53M£14.289.60

In the previous week, Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled International Public Partnerships'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroders Neutral
International Public Partnerships Neutral

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Schroders has a beta of 1.077, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroders currently has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, suggesting a potential downside of 22.31%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Schroders' net margin of 20.13%. Schroders' return on equity of 15.55% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroders20.13% 15.55% 1.86%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

Summary

Schroders beats International Public Partnerships on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to M&G?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and M&G (LON:MNG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. International Public Partnerships' return on equity of 9.61% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
M&G 1.73%9.49%0.40%

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, suggesting a potential upside of 98.26%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe M&G is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. International Public Partnerships is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

M&G has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.17£43.53M£14.289.60
M&G£21.71B0.38£166.98M£12.3027.80

In the previous week, M&G had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for M&G and 0 mentions for International Public Partnerships. M&G's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.00 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships Neutral
M&G Positive

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.1% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.953, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

M&G beats International Public Partnerships on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 97.32%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Technology Trust249.53% 55.87% 20.70%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.737, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled International Public Partnerships'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Technology Trust Neutral
International Public Partnerships Neutral

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Technology Trust£3.76B1.84£1.20B£330.421.89
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.17£43.53M£14.289.60

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats International Public Partnerships on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.849, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 97.16%. International Public Partnerships' return on equity of 9.61% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pershing Square97.16% -2.59% 11.83%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square£2.57B2.57£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.68
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.17£43.53M£14.289.60

In the previous week, Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled International Public Partnerships'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square Neutral
International Public Partnerships Neutral

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pershing Square beats International Public Partnerships on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled International Public Partnerships'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust Neutral
International Public Partnerships Neutral

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M9.30£935.32M£75.804.45
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.17£43.53M£14.289.60

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 97.32%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.14% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust103.67% 22.14% 10.80%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.749, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats International Public Partnerships on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get International Public Partnerships News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for INPP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding INPP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

INPP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricInternational Public PartnershipsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.45B£5.71B£14.08B£2.88B
Dividend Yield6.16%7.37%5.88%6.17%
P/E Ratio9.6031.5826.02364.76
Price / Sales9.171,215.41516.4783,665.46
Price / Cash12.7148.1638.4627.89
Price / Book0.921.952.096.79
Net Income£43.53M£418.14M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.12%-0.83%-0.93%-0.80%
1 Month Performance-3.32%1.64%1.76%2.41%
1 Year Performance15.99%6.95%11.21%22.62%

International Public Partnerships Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 137.10
-0.7%		N/A+14.6%£2.45B£267.76M9.60N/A
SDR
Schroders
N/AGBX 583.50
flat		GBX 453.33
-22.3%		+55.8%£9.10B£3.51B13.416,438
MNG
M&G
2.6754 of 5 stars		GBX 348.70
-0.4%		GBX 677.86
+94.4%		+30.7%£8.31B£21.71B28.356,101
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 653.50
+1.6%		N/A+61.2%£7.23B£3.76B1.98120
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,908.20
-0.4%		N/A-12.3%£6.84B£2.57B2.78N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:INPP) was last updated on 9/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A Simple Guide to Options Trading While It's Still Free
A free copy of Options Trading Made Simple is available now but wont stay that way for long. Chris Rowe cal...
True Market Insiders | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for September 30th
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock tomorrow morning
A new strategy called Sell This, Buy That aims to help investors rotate out of overpriced AI stocks before a p...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
These 3 Stocks Could Soar as Sam Altman Announces New Venture After OpenAI
Elon Musk calls it the most disruptive force in history. Sam Altman is reportedly preparing a new venture afte...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel