Free Trial

Kazera Global (KZG) Competitors

GBX 1.08 -0.02 (-2.09%)
As of 11:27 AM Eastern

KZG vs. CBA, JGC, TENT, FWT, and BRIG

Should you buy Kazera Global stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Kazera Global with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Kazera Global include Ceiba Investments (CBA), Jupiter Green (JGC), Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), Foresight Technology VCT (FWT), and BlackRock Income and Growth (BRIG). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Kazera Global compare to Ceiba Investments?

Ceiba Investments (LON:CBA) and Kazera Global (LON:KZG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Ceiba Investments has a net margin of 6,890.36% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Ceiba Investments' return on equity of -25.40% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ceiba Investments6,890.36% -25.40% 2.31%
Kazera Global -15,996.15%-89.18%-11.84%

In the previous week, Ceiba Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kazera Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ceiba Investments Neutral
Kazera Global Neutral

Ceiba Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kazera Global. Kazera Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ceiba Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ceiba Investments-£39.52M-1.01£8.64M-£30.00N/A
Kazera Global£26K456.92-£2.74M-£0.43N/A

Ceiba Investments has a beta of 0.227, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kazera Global has a beta of 1.006, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

1.4% of Ceiba Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Kazera Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.7% of Ceiba Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Kazera Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ceiba Investments beats Kazera Global on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kazera Global compare to Jupiter Green?

Jupiter Green (LON:JGC) and Kazera Global (LON:KZG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

37.4% of Jupiter Green shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Kazera Global shares are held by institutional investors. 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Kazera Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Jupiter Green has a net margin of -26.72% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Jupiter Green's return on equity of -0.45% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Green-26.72% -0.45% 0.15%
Kazera Global -15,996.15%-89.18%-11.84%

In the previous week, Jupiter Green's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kazera Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Green Neutral
Kazera Global Neutral

Jupiter Green has higher revenue and earnings than Kazera Global. Kazera Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Green£7.93M0.00£6.55M£34.51N/A
Kazera Global£26K456.92-£2.74M-£0.43N/A

Jupiter Green has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kazera Global has a beta of 1.006, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Jupiter Green beats Kazera Global on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kazera Global compare to Triple Point Energy Transition?

Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) and Kazera Global (LON:KZG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Triple Point Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kazera Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Triple Point Energy Transition Neutral
Kazera Global Neutral

62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Kazera Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Kazera Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kazera Global has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. Kazera Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Triple Point Energy Transition-£9.97M0.00-£12.35M-£12.35N/A
Kazera Global£26K456.92-£2.74M-£0.43N/A

Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kazera Global has a beta of 1.006, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity of -7.81% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Triple Point Energy Transition152.90% -7.81% -4.86%
Kazera Global -15,996.15%-89.18%-11.84%

Summary

Kazera Global beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kazera Global compare to Foresight Technology VCT?

Kazera Global (LON:KZG) and Foresight Technology VCT (LON:FWT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Foresight Technology VCT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kazera Global. Foresight Technology VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kazera Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kazera Global£26K456.92-£2.74M-£0.43N/A
Foresight Technology VCT-£2.30M-19.28£23.15M-£7.45N/A

2.1% of Kazera Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of Kazera Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Foresight Technology VCT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Foresight Technology VCT has a net margin of 127.75% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Foresight Technology VCT's return on equity of -7.25% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kazera Global-15,996.15% -89.18% -11.84%
Foresight Technology VCT 127.75%-7.25%3.17%

In the previous week, Kazera Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Foresight Technology VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kazera Global Neutral
Foresight Technology VCT Neutral

Kazera Global has a beta of 1.006, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Foresight Technology VCT has a beta of -0.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kazera Global beats Foresight Technology VCT on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kazera Global compare to BlackRock Income and Growth?

Kazera Global (LON:KZG) and BlackRock Income and Growth (LON:BRIG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

2.1% of Kazera Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of BlackRock Income and Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 19.4% of Kazera Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of BlackRock Income and Growth shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Kazera Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BlackRock Income and Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kazera Global Neutral
BlackRock Income and Growth Neutral

BlackRock Income and Growth has a net margin of 87.10% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. BlackRock Income and Growth's return on equity of 13.03% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kazera Global-15,996.15% -89.18% -11.84%
BlackRock Income and Growth 87.10%13.03%2.59%

Kazera Global has a beta of 1.006, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock Income and Growth has a beta of 0.6233016, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Income and Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Kazera Global. Kazera Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Income and Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kazera Global£26K456.92-£2.74M-£0.43N/A
BlackRock Income and Growth£6.20M6.92£6.90M£30.217.63

Summary

BlackRock Income and Growth beats Kazera Global on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Kazera Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KZG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KZG vs. The Competition

MetricKazera GlobalAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.88M£2.40B£5.72B£2.78B
Dividend Yield3.57%6.03%5.29%6.13%
P/E Ratio-2.5025.4516.15364.74
Price / Sales456.922,001.821,040.0387,565.33
Price / Cash16.5060.1591.3227.85
Price / Book1.271.376.557.71
Net Income-£2.74M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-11.72%-0.18%0.27%0.07%
1 Month Performance-9.50%0.89%1.33%3.26%
1 Year Performance-35.89%11.82%19.75%75.52%

Kazera Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KZG
Kazera Global
N/AGBX 1.08
-2.1%
N/A-32.7%£11.88M£26KN/A29
CBA
Ceiba Investments
N/AGBX 29
flat
N/AN/A£47.91M-£39.52MN/AN/A
JGC
Jupiter Green
N/AN/AN/AN/A£46.49M£7.93M7.10N/A
TENT
Triple Point Energy Transition
N/AN/AN/AN/A£44.51M-£9.97MN/AN/A
FWT
Foresight Technology VCT
N/AGBX 88
flat
N/AN/A£44.40M-£2.30MN/A375

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:KZG) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners