Free Trial

Kazera Global (KZG) Competitors

GBX 1.10 0.00 (-0.18%)
As of 08:33 AM Eastern

KZG vs. JGC, OFG, TENT, JARA, and RSE

Should you buy Kazera Global stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Kazera Global with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Kazera Global include Jupiter Green (JGC), Octopus Future Generations VCT (OFG), Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets (JARA), and Riverstone Energy (RSE). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Kazera Global compare to Jupiter Green?

Kazera Global (LON:KZG) and Jupiter Green (LON:JGC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Kazera Global has a beta of 1.006, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Green has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Jupiter Green has higher revenue and earnings than Kazera Global. Kazera Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kazera Global£26K465.83-£2.74M-£0.43N/A
Jupiter Green£7.93M0.00£6.55M£34.51N/A

In the previous week, Kazera Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jupiter Green'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kazera Global Neutral
Jupiter Green Neutral

Jupiter Green has a net margin of -26.72% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Jupiter Green's return on equity of -0.45% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kazera Global-15,996.15% -89.18% -11.84%
Jupiter Green -26.72%-0.45%0.15%

2.1% of Kazera Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Jupiter Green shares are held by institutional investors. 19.4% of Kazera Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Jupiter Green beats Kazera Global on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kazera Global compare to Octopus Future Generations VCT?

Octopus Future Generations VCT (LON:OFG) and Kazera Global (LON:KZG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

2.1% of Kazera Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Octopus Future Generations VCT shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Kazera Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Octopus Future Generations VCT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kazera Global. Octopus Future Generations VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kazera Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Octopus Future Generations VCT-£767K-63.38N/A-£2.30N/A
Kazera Global£26K465.83-£2.74M-£0.43N/A

In the previous week, Octopus Future Generations VCT had 1 more articles in the media than Kazera Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Octopus Future Generations VCT and 0 mentions for Kazera Global. Octopus Future Generations VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kazera Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Octopus Future Generations VCT Neutral
Kazera Global Neutral

Octopus Future Generations VCT has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Octopus Future Generations VCT's return on equity of 0.00% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Octopus Future Generations VCTN/A N/A N/A
Kazera Global -15,996.15%-89.18%-11.84%

Summary

Kazera Global beats Octopus Future Generations VCT on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kazera Global compare to Triple Point Energy Transition?

Kazera Global (LON:KZG) and Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity of -7.81% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kazera Global-15,996.15% -89.18% -11.84%
Triple Point Energy Transition 152.90%-7.81%-4.86%

2.1% of Kazera Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of Kazera Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kazera Global has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. Kazera Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kazera Global£26K465.83-£2.74M-£0.43N/A
Triple Point Energy Transition-£9.97M0.00-£12.35M-£12.35N/A

In the previous week, Kazera Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Triple Point Energy Transition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kazera Global Neutral
Triple Point Energy Transition Neutral

Kazera Global has a beta of 1.006, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kazera Global beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kazera Global compare to JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets?

JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets (LON:JARA) and Kazera Global (LON:KZG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets has a beta of 0.087, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kazera Global has a beta of 1.006, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Kazera Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets. Kazera Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets£8.07M5.18-£4.51M£2.1935.62
Kazera Global£26K465.83-£2.74M-£0.43N/A

In the previous week, JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets had 5 more articles in the media than Kazera Global. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets and 0 mentions for Kazera Global. Kazera Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets' score of -0.57 indicating that Kazera Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets Negative
Kazera Global Neutral

JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets has a net margin of 77.28% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets' return on equity of 5.64% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets77.28% 5.64% -3.14%
Kazera Global -15,996.15%-89.18%-11.84%

7.6% of JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Kazera Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Kazera Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets beats Kazera Global on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kazera Global compare to Riverstone Energy?

Riverstone Energy (LON:RSE) and Kazera Global (LON:KZG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Riverstone Energy has a beta of 0.294, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kazera Global has a beta of 1.006, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Riverstone Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kazera Global. Riverstone Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kazera Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Riverstone Energy£31.65M0.90£78.63M-£2.17N/A
Kazera Global£26K465.83-£2.74M-£0.43N/A

In the previous week, Riverstone Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kazera Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Riverstone Energy Neutral
Kazera Global Neutral

Riverstone Energy has a net margin of -0.58% compared to Kazera Global's net margin of -15,996.15%. Riverstone Energy's return on equity of -0.20% beat Kazera Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Riverstone Energy-0.58% -0.20% -0.22%
Kazera Global -15,996.15%-89.18%-11.84%

20.0% of Riverstone Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Kazera Global shares are held by institutional investors. 66.9% of Riverstone Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Kazera Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Riverstone Energy beats Kazera Global on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Kazera Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KZG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KZG vs. The Competition

MetricKazera GlobalAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£12.11M£2.37B£5.76B£2.79B
Dividend Yield3.57%5.99%5.27%6.09%
P/E Ratio-2.5525.2115.77366.15
Price / Sales465.831,964.78995.1088,429.84
Price / Cash16.5060.1790.3227.89
Price / Book1.301.354.407.74
Net Income-£2.74M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.57%-0.13%0.43%0.82%
1 Month Performance46.40%2.39%2.28%2.78%
1 Year Performance-46.93%13.44%21.88%87.90%

Kazera Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KZG
Kazera Global
N/AGBX 1.10
-0.2%
N/A-47.7%£12.11M£26KN/A29
JGC
Jupiter Green
N/AN/AN/AN/A£46.49M£7.93M7.10N/A
OFG
Octopus Future Generations VCT
N/AGBX 77
flat
N/AN/A£46.00M-£166KN/A2,250
TENT
Triple Point Energy Transition
N/AN/AN/AN/A£44.51M-£9.97MN/AN/A
JARA
JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets
N/AGBX 82
+6.5%
N/A+2.6%£43.98M£8.07M37.44N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:KZG) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners