LIT vs. FCH, IPF, HAT, EQLS, VANQ, FFX, ASAI, SUS, PARK, and TRU
Should you be buying Litigation Capital Management stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Litigation Capital Management include Funding Circle (FCH), International Personal Finance (IPF), H&T Group (HAT), Equals Group (EQLS), Vanquis Banking Group (VANQ), Fairfx Group (FFX), ASA International Group (ASAI), S&U (SUS), Park Group (PARK), and TruFin (TRU). These companies are all part of the "credit services" industry.
Litigation Capital Management vs.
Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and Funding Circle (LON:FCH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and community ranking.
23.3% of Litigation Capital Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.0% of Funding Circle shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.5% of Litigation Capital Management shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.2% of Funding Circle shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Litigation Capital Management has higher revenue and earnings than Funding Circle. Funding Circle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Litigation Capital Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Litigation Capital Management currently has a consensus price target of GBX 182, suggesting a potential upside of 294.79%. Given Litigation Capital Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Litigation Capital Management is more favorable than Funding Circle.
Litigation Capital Management has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Funding Circle has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Funding Circle had 2 more articles in the media than Litigation Capital Management. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Funding Circle and 0 mentions for Litigation Capital Management. Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat Litigation Capital Management's score of 0.00 indicating that Funding Circle is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 12.80% compared to Funding Circle's net margin of -19.85%. Litigation Capital Management's return on equity of 6.79% beat Funding Circle's return on equity.
Litigation Capital Management received 2 more outperform votes than Funding Circle when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 83.87% of users gave Litigation Capital Management an outperform vote while only 64.86% of users gave Funding Circle an outperform vote.
Summary
Litigation Capital Management beats Funding Circle on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Litigation Capital Management News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Litigation Capital Management Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:LIT) was last updated on 5/23/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff