Go Pro
→ Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free LIT Stock Alerts

Litigation Capital Management (LIT) Competitors

Litigation Capital Management logo
GBX 1.62 -0.16 (-8.99%)
As of 12:19 PM Eastern
Compare

LIT vs. VCAP, PCF, ZAIM, MCL, and NSF

Should you buy Litigation Capital Management stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Litigation Capital Management with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Litigation Capital Management include Vector Capital (VCAP), PCF Group (PCF), Adalan Ventures (ZAIM), Morses Club (MCL), and Non-Standard Finance (NSF).

How does Litigation Capital Management compare to Vector Capital?

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and Vector Capital (LON:VCAP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

0.8% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.0% of Vector Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 18.0% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 103.5% of Vector Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 79.70% compared to Vector Capital's net margin of 21.11%. Vector Capital's return on equity of 4.50% beat Litigation Capital Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Litigation Capital Management79.70% -566.76% 8.32%
Vector Capital 21.11%4.50%4.25%

Litigation Capital Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vector Capital. Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vector Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management-£76.34M-0.02£26.20M-£167.47N/A
Vector Capital£5.41M0.00£1.14M£0.03N/A

Litigation Capital Management has a beta of 0.462, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vector Capital has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Litigation Capital Management's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Vector Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Litigation Capital Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Litigation Capital Management Neutral
Vector Capital Neutral

Summary

Vector Capital beats Litigation Capital Management on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Litigation Capital Management compare to PCF Group?

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and PCF Group (LON:PCF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 79.70% compared to PCF Group's net margin of 0.00%. PCF Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Litigation Capital Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Litigation Capital Management79.70% -566.76% 8.32%
PCF Group N/A N/A N/A

Litigation Capital Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PCF Group. Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PCF Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management-£76.34M-0.02£26.20M-£167.47N/A
PCF Group£19.54M0.00N/A-£1.20N/A

In the previous week, Litigation Capital Management's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat PCF Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Litigation Capital Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Litigation Capital Management Neutral
PCF Group Neutral

0.8% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. 18.0% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Litigation Capital Management beats PCF Group on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Litigation Capital Management compare to Adalan Ventures?

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and Adalan Ventures (LON:ZAIM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

0.8% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Adalan Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 18.0% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 62.3% of Adalan Ventures shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Litigation Capital Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Adalan Ventures.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management-£76.34M-0.02£26.20M-£167.47N/A
Adalan Ventures£4.94M0.00-£10.92MN/AN/A

Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 79.70% compared to Adalan Ventures' net margin of 0.00%. Litigation Capital Management's return on equity of -566.76% beat Adalan Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Litigation Capital Management79.70% -566.76% 8.32%
Adalan Ventures N/A -1,160.74%-406.13%

Litigation Capital Management has a beta of 0.462, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Adalan Ventures has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Litigation Capital Management's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Adalan Ventures' score of 0.00 indicating that Litigation Capital Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Litigation Capital Management Neutral
Adalan Ventures Neutral

Summary

Litigation Capital Management beats Adalan Ventures on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Litigation Capital Management compare to Morses Club?

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and Morses Club (LON:MCL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Litigation Capital Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Morses Club. Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Morses Club, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management-£76.34M-0.02£26.20M-£167.47N/A
Morses Club£100.06M0.00-£51.53M£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Litigation Capital Management's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Morses Club's score of 0.00 indicating that Litigation Capital Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Litigation Capital Management Neutral
Morses Club Neutral

Litigation Capital Management has a beta of 0.462, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Morses Club has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

0.8% of Litigation Capital Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.4% of Morses Club shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.0% of Litigation Capital Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 45.3% of Morses Club shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 79.70% compared to Morses Club's net margin of -51.50%. Morses Club's return on equity of -122.39% beat Litigation Capital Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Litigation Capital Management79.70% -566.76% 8.32%
Morses Club -51.50%-122.39%-58.54%

Summary

Morses Club beats Litigation Capital Management on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Litigation Capital Management compare to Non-Standard Finance?

Non-Standard Finance (LON:NSF) and Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Litigation Capital Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Non-Standard Finance. Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Non-Standard Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Non-Standard Finance£69.63M0.00-£56.36M-£0.18N/A
Litigation Capital Management-£76.34M-0.02£26.20M-£167.47N/A

Non-Standard Finance has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Litigation Capital Management has a beta of 0.462, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 79.70% compared to Non-Standard Finance's net margin of -80.94%. Non-Standard Finance's return on equity of 0.00% beat Litigation Capital Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Non-Standard Finance-80.94% N/A -19.95%
Litigation Capital Management 79.70%-566.76%8.32%

In the previous week, Litigation Capital Management's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Non-Standard Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Litigation Capital Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Non-Standard Finance Neutral
Litigation Capital Management Neutral

13.1% of Non-Standard Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. 48.5% of Non-Standard Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.0% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Non-Standard Finance beats Litigation Capital Management on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Litigation Capital Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LIT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLitigation Capital ManagementConsumer Finance IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.84M£7.47B£14.04B£3.02B
Dividend Yield10.08%12.19%5.92%6.13%
P/E Ratio-0.019.4427.75368.30
Price / Sales-0.0239.20476.2883,642.08
Price / Cash1.6111.9138.6127.89
Price / Book0.012.753.737.07
Net Income£26.20M£434.78M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-26.36%0.59%0.91%0.54%
1 Month Performance-2.70%0.31%1.29%0.25%
1 Year Performance-94.84%16.50%13.80%64.64%

Litigation Capital Management Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LIT
Litigation Capital Management
N/AGBX 1.62
-9.0%		N/A-94.1%£1.84M-£76.34MN/AN/A
VCAP
Vector Capital
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.52M£5.41M333.338
PCF
PCF Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.17M£19.54MN/A125
ZAIM
Adalan Ventures
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.31M£4.94M120.00128
MCL
Morses Club
N/AN/AN/AN/A£282K£100.06M21.00560

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LIT) was last updated on 8/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
"Second Wave” Hitting Iran Soon? Wall Street Issues Warning
Analysts at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are warning that a quiet domestic threat - unrelated to overseas ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Free Stock Pick: The Company First in Line for America’s New Super Fuel
The U.S. Army and Department of Energy are launching Project Janus - a high-priority initiative ordered by Pre...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
This loan shouldn't be possible
On May 21, 2026, a federal board unanimously approved a roughly 3 billion dollar loan to a single American min...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
70% of the Fortune 100 depend on this mystery AI stock
Seventy percent of the Fortune 100 already rely on one company's AI cybersecurity platform, which combines mor...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Nvidia's CEO says this small device is critical for AI growth
A tiny glass device smaller than a fingertip could redefine AI hardware. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang calls it esse...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel