Free Trial
→ Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page (From Reagan Gold Group) (Ad)tc pixel Free LIT Stock Alerts

Litigation Capital Management (LIT) Competitors

Litigation Capital Management logo
GBX 3.60 -0.20 (-5.26%)
As of 05/15/2026 11:51 AM Eastern
Compare

LIT vs. GLIF, ORCH, LEND, VCAP, and PCF

Should you buy Litigation Capital Management stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Litigation Capital Management with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Litigation Capital Management include GLI Finance (GLIF), Orchard Funding Group (ORCH), Sancus Lending Group (LEND), Vector Capital (VCAP), and PCF Group (PCF). These companies are all part of the "credit services" industry.

How does Litigation Capital Management compare to GLI Finance?

GLI Finance (LON:GLIF) and Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) are both small-cap credit services industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation and risk.

Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 79.70% compared to GLI Finance's net margin of 0.00%. GLI Finance's return on equity of 0.00% beat Litigation Capital Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GLI FinanceN/A N/A N/A
Litigation Capital Management 79.70%-566.76%8.32%

In the previous week, GLI Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Litigation Capital Management's score of -0.05 indicating that GLI Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GLI Finance Neutral
Litigation Capital Management Neutral

Litigation Capital Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than GLI Finance. Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GLI Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GLI Finance£6.20M0.00N/A-£4.60N/A
Litigation Capital Management-£76.34M-0.05£26.20M-£167.47N/A

5.7% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Litigation Capital Management beats GLI Finance on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Litigation Capital Management compare to Orchard Funding Group?

Orchard Funding Group (LON:ORCH) and Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation and risk.

Orchard Funding Group has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Litigation Capital Management has a beta of 0.436, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

1.6% of Orchard Funding Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. 57.2% of Orchard Funding Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 79.70% compared to Orchard Funding Group's net margin of 29.21%. Orchard Funding Group's return on equity of 14.61% beat Litigation Capital Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orchard Funding Group29.21% 14.61% 2.57%
Litigation Capital Management 79.70%-566.76%8.32%

In the previous week, Orchard Funding Group had 1 more articles in the media than Litigation Capital Management. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Orchard Funding Group and 0 mentions for Litigation Capital Management. Orchard Funding Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Litigation Capital Management's score of -0.05 indicating that Orchard Funding Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Orchard Funding Group Neutral
Litigation Capital Management Neutral

Litigation Capital Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Orchard Funding Group. Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orchard Funding Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orchard Funding Group£10.50M1.10N/A£14.373.77
Litigation Capital Management-£76.34M-0.05£26.20M-£167.47N/A

Summary

Orchard Funding Group beats Litigation Capital Management on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Litigation Capital Management compare to Sancus Lending Group?

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and Sancus Lending Group (LON:LEND) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

Litigation Capital Management has a beta of 0.436, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sancus Lending Group has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 79.70% compared to Sancus Lending Group's net margin of -57.08%. Litigation Capital Management's return on equity of -566.76% beat Sancus Lending Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Litigation Capital Management79.70% -566.76% 8.32%
Sancus Lending Group -57.08%-1,088.89%-5.62%

5.7% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.6% of Sancus Lending Group shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.2% of Sancus Lending Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Sancus Lending Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Litigation Capital Management's score of -0.05 indicating that Sancus Lending Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Litigation Capital Management Neutral
Sancus Lending Group Neutral

Litigation Capital Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sancus Lending Group. Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sancus Lending Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management-£76.34M-0.05£26.20M-£167.47N/A
Sancus Lending Group£22.10M0.58-£6.47M£0.167.50

Summary

Sancus Lending Group beats Litigation Capital Management on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Litigation Capital Management compare to Vector Capital?

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and Vector Capital (LON:VCAP) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Litigation Capital Management has a beta of 0.436, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vector Capital has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Litigation Capital Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vector Capital. Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vector Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management-£76.34M-0.05£26.20M-£167.47N/A
Vector Capital£5.41M0.00£1.14M£0.03N/A

Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 79.70% compared to Vector Capital's net margin of 21.11%. Vector Capital's return on equity of 4.50% beat Litigation Capital Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Litigation Capital Management79.70% -566.76% 8.32%
Vector Capital 21.11%4.50%4.25%

In the previous week, Vector Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Litigation Capital Management's score of -0.05 indicating that Vector Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Litigation Capital Management Neutral
Vector Capital Neutral

5.7% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.0% of Vector Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Litigation Capital Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 103.5% of Vector Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Vector Capital beats Litigation Capital Management on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Litigation Capital Management compare to PCF Group?

PCF Group (LON:PCF) and Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) are both small-cap credit services industry companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Litigation Capital Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PCF Group. Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PCF Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PCF Group£19.54M0.00N/A-£1.20N/A
Litigation Capital Management-£76.34M-0.05£26.20M-£167.47N/A

5.7% of Litigation Capital Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of Litigation Capital Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, PCF Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Litigation Capital Management's score of -0.05 indicating that PCF Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PCF Group Neutral
Litigation Capital Management Neutral

Litigation Capital Management has a net margin of 79.70% compared to PCF Group's net margin of 0.00%. PCF Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Litigation Capital Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PCF GroupN/A N/A N/A
Litigation Capital Management 79.70%-566.76%8.32%

Summary

Litigation Capital Management beats PCF Group on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Litigation Capital Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LIT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLitigation Capital ManagementCredit Services IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.79M£300.82M£5.16B£2.60B
Dividend Yield10.08%16.79%5.25%6.15%
P/E Ratio-0.026.7215.93365.91
Price / Sales-0.0598.301,025.1088,030.08
Price / Cash1.6114.5891.0127.89
Price / Book0.023.106.597.74
Net Income£26.20M£59.40M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-13.88%-2.55%-0.26%0.21%
1 Month Performance-23.24%-1.99%1.19%1.56%
1 Year Performance-92.92%26.81%18.11%77.95%

Litigation Capital Management Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LIT
Litigation Capital Management
N/AGBX 3.60
-5.3%		N/A-92.8%£3.79M-£76.34MN/AN/A
GLIF
GLI Finance
N/AN/AN/AN/A£12.83M£6.20MN/A25
ORCH
Orchard Funding Group
N/AGBX 57
+0.9%		N/A+54.9%£12.17M£10.50M3.9722
LEND
Sancus Lending Group
N/AGBX 1.10
-12.0%		N/A+183.7%£11.81M£22.10M6.8831
VCAP
Vector Capital
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.52M£5.41M333.338

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LIT) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
The cat is out the bag
Almost 80,000 tech jobs vanished in the first three months of 2026. Meta cut 14,000 roles, Microsoft offered s...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Oil is settling in yuan now - here's what that means for gold
Saudi Arabia has terminated its 1974 petrodollar agreement with the United States - the deal that forced every...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trading legend: “I made millions for CEO clients just repeating this 1 secret”
TradeSmith Senior Analyst Jeff Clark has guided readers through 300-plus winning trades over 9 years - across ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel