LON:LIT

Litigation Capital Management Competitors

GBX 77
+0.30 (+0.39 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
75.80
Now: GBX 77
77.50
50-Day Range
67.20
MA: GBX 76.45
88
52-Week Range
52.40
Now: GBX 77
88.26
Volume192,464 shs
Average Volume350,976 shs
Market Capitalization£89.39 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield1.23%
BetaN/A

Competitors

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) Vs. SUS, IPF, FFX, ASAI, HAT, and DFCH

Should you be buying LIT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "credit services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Litigation Capital Management, including S&U (SUS), International Personal Finance (IPF), Fairfx Group (FFX), ASA International Group (ASAI), H&T Group (HAT), and Distribution Finance Capital (DFCH).

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and S&U (LON:SUS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and S&U's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Litigation Capital ManagementN/AN/AN/A
S&UN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Litigation Capital Management and S&U, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Litigation Capital Management00103.00
S&U02002.00

Litigation Capital Management currently has a consensus price target of GBX 94, suggesting a potential upside of 22.08%. S&U has a consensus price target of GBX 3,300, suggesting a potential upside of 36.36%. Given S&U's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe S&U is more favorable than Litigation Capital Management.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and S&U's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management£22.48 million3.98N/AGBX (0.40)-192.50
S&U£80.15 million3.66N/AGBX 120.7020.05

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

S&U beats Litigation Capital Management on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and International Personal Finance (LON:IPF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and International Personal Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Litigation Capital ManagementN/AN/AN/A
International Personal FinanceN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Litigation Capital Management and International Personal Finance, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Litigation Capital Management00103.00
International Personal Finance00203.00

Litigation Capital Management currently has a consensus price target of GBX 94, suggesting a potential upside of 22.08%. Given Litigation Capital Management's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Litigation Capital Management is more favorable than International Personal Finance.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and International Personal Finance's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management£22.48 million3.98N/AGBX (0.40)-192.50
International Personal Finance£661.30 million0.42N/AGBX (28.90)-4.31

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Personal Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fairfx Group (LON:FFX) and Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Fairfx Group and Litigation Capital Management, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fairfx Group0000N/A
Litigation Capital Management00103.00

Litigation Capital Management has a consensus price target of GBX 94, suggesting a potential upside of 22.08%.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fairfx Group and Litigation Capital Management's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fairfx Group£26.09 million0.00N/AGBX 1.60N/A
Litigation Capital Management£22.48 million3.98N/AGBX (0.40)-192.50

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fairfx Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fairfx Group and Litigation Capital Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fairfx GroupN/AN/AN/A
Litigation Capital ManagementN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Fairfx Group beats Litigation Capital Management on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

ASA International Group (LON:ASAI) and Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares ASA International Group and Litigation Capital Management's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASA International Group£111.93 million1.38N/AGBX 169.69
Litigation Capital Management£22.48 million3.98N/AGBX (0.40)-192.50

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASA International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ASA International Group and Litigation Capital Management, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ASA International Group0000N/A
Litigation Capital Management00103.00

Litigation Capital Management has a consensus price target of GBX 94, indicating a potential upside of 22.08%. Given Litigation Capital Management's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Litigation Capital Management is more favorable than ASA International Group.

Profitability

This table compares ASA International Group and Litigation Capital Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ASA International GroupN/AN/AN/A
Litigation Capital ManagementN/AN/AN/A

H&T Group (LON:HAT) and Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for H&T Group and Litigation Capital Management, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
H&T Group0000N/A
Litigation Capital Management00103.00

Litigation Capital Management has a consensus price target of GBX 94, indicating a potential upside of 22.08%. Given Litigation Capital Management's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Litigation Capital Management is more favorable than H&T Group.

Profitability

This table compares H&T Group and Litigation Capital Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
H&T GroupN/AN/AN/A
Litigation Capital ManagementN/AN/AN/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares H&T Group and Litigation Capital Management's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
H&T Group£129.12 million0.94N/AGBX 32.109.47
Litigation Capital Management£22.48 million3.98N/AGBX (0.40)-192.50

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H&T Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and Distribution Finance Capital (LON:DFCH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Litigation Capital Management and Distribution Finance Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Litigation Capital Management00103.00
Distribution Finance Capital0000N/A

Litigation Capital Management presently has a consensus target price of GBX 94, indicating a potential upside of 22.08%. Given Litigation Capital Management's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Litigation Capital Management is more favorable than Distribution Finance Capital.

Profitability

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and Distribution Finance Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Litigation Capital ManagementN/AN/AN/A
Distribution Finance CapitalN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and Distribution Finance Capital's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management£22.48 million3.98N/AGBX (0.40)-192.50
Distribution Finance Capital£3.54 million31.40N/AGBX (12.60)-4.92

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Distribution Finance Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Litigation Capital Management beats Distribution Finance Capital on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.


Litigation Capital Management Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
S&U logo
SUS
S&U
1.7$2,420.00+0.8%£293.64 million£80.15 million20.05Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
International Personal Finance logo
IPF
International Personal Finance
0.9$124.60+0.6%£278.78 million£661.30 million-4.31Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
FFX
Fairfx Group
0.4N/AN/A£204.20 million£26.09 million77.81
ASAI
ASA International Group
1.1$155.00+0.6%£155 million£111.93 million9.69Gap Up
H&T Group logo
HAT
H&T Group
1.1$304.00+2.6%£121.19 million£129.12 million9.47
DFCH
Distribution Finance Capital
0.6$62.00+0.8%£111.21 million£3.54 million-4.92
PARK
Park Group
1.3N/AN/A£95.97 million£110.39 million10.57
TSL
ThinkSmart
1.6$74.80+0.9%£80.44 million£5.40 million0.90
EQLS
Equals Group
1.3$43.01+1.1%£76.80 million£28.96 million-11.03
APP
Appreciate Group
0.8$40.80+0.7%£76.59 million£106.88 million51.00News Coverage
Gap Down
Amigo logo
AMGO
Amigo
1.3$15.96+0.3%£76.05 million£213.70 million-0.47Gap Up
Morses Club logo
MCL
Morses Club
1.3$51.00+1.0%£66.93 million£114.45 million14.17High Trading Volume
TRU
TruFin
0.8$88.00+6.3%£64.66 million£8.39 million-5.47
UEX
Urban Exposure
1.0N/AN/A£63.40 million£3.69 million-4.56
PCF Group logo
PCF
PCF Group
1.1$24.00+0.0%£60.24 million£28.06 million40.00Gap Up
FFI logo
FFI
FFI
0.9N/AN/A£40.24 million£80.57 million4.72
Non-Standard Finance logo
NSF
Non-Standard Finance
2.0$6.19+10.2%£19.34 million£136.41 million-0.12Gap Up
ZAIM
Zaim Credit Systems
0.3$3.84+0.3%£17.70 million£3.73 million-6.40
GLI Finance logo
GLIF
GLI Finance
0.7$2.90+3.4%£14.21 million£6.20 million-0.63Gap Down
ORCH
Orchard Funding Group
2.1$48.30+1.7%£10.14 million£4.36 million10.98
S&U logo
47IE
S&U
1.3N/AN/A£7.80 million£80.15 million0.54Gap Up
PKG
Park Group
0.6N/AN/A£0.00N/A0.00
TIME
Time Finance
0.0N/AN/A£0.00£25.24 million139.88
VCAP
Vector Capital
0.2N/AN/A£0.00N/A0.00Dividend Announcement
High Trading Volume
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.