LON:LIT

Litigation Capital Management Competitors

GBX 77

+0.30 (+0.39 %)

(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

75.80

Now: GBX 77▼

77.50

50-Day Range

67.20

MA: GBX 76.45▼

52-Week Range

52.40

Now: GBX 77▼

88.26

Volume192,464 shs

Average Volume350,976 shs

Market Capitalization£89.39 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend Yield1.23%

BetaN/A

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) Vs. SUS, IPF, FFX, ASAI, HAT, and DFCH

Should you be buying LIT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "credit services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Litigation Capital Management, including S&U (SUS), International Personal Finance (IPF), Fairfx Group (FFX), ASA International Group (ASAI), H&T Group (HAT), and Distribution Finance Capital (DFCH).

Litigation Capital Management vs. S&U Stock

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and S&U (LON:SUS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and S&U's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Litigation Capital Management	N/A	N/A	N/A
S&U	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Litigation Capital Management and S&U, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Litigation Capital Management	0	0	1	0	3.00
S&U	0	2	0	0	2.00

Litigation Capital Management currently has a consensus price target of GBX 94, suggesting a potential upside of 22.08%. S&U has a consensus price target of GBX 3,300, suggesting a potential upside of 36.36%. Given S&U's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe S&U is more favorable than Litigation Capital Management.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and S&U's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management	£22.48 million	3.98	N/A	GBX (0.40)	-192.50
S&U	£80.15 million	3.66	N/A	GBX 120.70	20.05

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

S&U beats Litigation Capital Management on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Litigation Capital Management vs. International Personal Finance Stock

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and International Personal Finance (LON:IPF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and International Personal Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Litigation Capital Management	N/A	N/A	N/A
International Personal Finance	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Litigation Capital Management and International Personal Finance, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Litigation Capital Management	0	0	1	0	3.00
International Personal Finance	0	0	2	0	3.00

Litigation Capital Management currently has a consensus price target of GBX 94, suggesting a potential upside of 22.08%. Given Litigation Capital Management's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Litigation Capital Management is more favorable than International Personal Finance.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and International Personal Finance's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management	£22.48 million	3.98	N/A	GBX (0.40)	-192.50
International Personal Finance	£661.30 million	0.42	N/A	GBX (28.90)	-4.31

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Personal Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Litigation Capital Management vs. Fairfx Group Stock

Fairfx Group (LON:FFX) and Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Fairfx Group and Litigation Capital Management, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fairfx Group	0	0	0	0	N/A
Litigation Capital Management	0	0	1	0	3.00

Litigation Capital Management has a consensus price target of GBX 94, suggesting a potential upside of 22.08%.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fairfx Group and Litigation Capital Management's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fairfx Group	£26.09 million	0.00	N/A	GBX 1.60	N/A
Litigation Capital Management	£22.48 million	3.98	N/A	GBX (0.40)	-192.50

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fairfx Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fairfx Group and Litigation Capital Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fairfx Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
Litigation Capital Management	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Fairfx Group beats Litigation Capital Management on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Litigation Capital Management vs. ASA International Group Stock

ASA International Group (LON:ASAI) and Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares ASA International Group and Litigation Capital Management's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASA International Group	£111.93 million	1.38	N/A	GBX 16	9.69
Litigation Capital Management	£22.48 million	3.98	N/A	GBX (0.40)	-192.50

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASA International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ASA International Group and Litigation Capital Management, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASA International Group	0	0	0	0	N/A
Litigation Capital Management	0	0	1	0	3.00

Litigation Capital Management has a consensus price target of GBX 94, indicating a potential upside of 22.08%. Given Litigation Capital Management's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Litigation Capital Management is more favorable than ASA International Group.

Profitability

This table compares ASA International Group and Litigation Capital Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASA International Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
Litigation Capital Management	N/A	N/A	N/A

Litigation Capital Management vs. H&T Group Stock

H&T Group (LON:HAT) and Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for H&T Group and Litigation Capital Management, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
H&T Group	0	0	0	0	N/A
Litigation Capital Management	0	0	1	0	3.00

Profitability

This table compares H&T Group and Litigation Capital Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
H&T Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
Litigation Capital Management	N/A	N/A	N/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares H&T Group and Litigation Capital Management's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
H&T Group	£129.12 million	0.94	N/A	GBX 32.10	9.47
Litigation Capital Management	£22.48 million	3.98	N/A	GBX (0.40)	-192.50

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H&T Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Litigation Capital Management vs. Distribution Finance Capital Stock

Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and Distribution Finance Capital (LON:DFCH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Litigation Capital Management and Distribution Finance Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Litigation Capital Management	0	0	1	0	3.00
Distribution Finance Capital	0	0	0	0	N/A

Litigation Capital Management presently has a consensus target price of GBX 94, indicating a potential upside of 22.08%. Given Litigation Capital Management's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Litigation Capital Management is more favorable than Distribution Finance Capital.

Profitability

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and Distribution Finance Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Litigation Capital Management	N/A	N/A	N/A
Distribution Finance Capital	N/A	N/A	N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Litigation Capital Management and Distribution Finance Capital's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Litigation Capital Management	£22.48 million	3.98	N/A	GBX (0.40)	-192.50
Distribution Finance Capital	£3.54 million	31.40	N/A	GBX (12.60)	-4.92

Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Distribution Finance Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Litigation Capital Management beats Distribution Finance Capital on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.