LIT vs. SUS, FFX, ASAI, PARK, TRU, APP, DFCH, TIME, UEX, and FFI
Should you be buying Litigation Capital Management stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Litigation Capital Management include S&U (SUS), Fairfx Group (FFX), ASA International Group (ASAI), Park Group (PARK), TruFin (TRU), Appreciate Group (APP), Distribution Finance Capital (DFCH), Time Finance (TIME), Urban Exposure (UEX), and FFI (FFI). These companies are all part of the "credit services" industry.
Litigation Capital Management vs. Its Competitors
Litigation Capital Management (LON:LIT) and S&U (LON:SUS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.
Litigation Capital Management has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, S&U has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, S&U had 1 more articles in the media than Litigation Capital Management. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for S&U and 1 mentions for Litigation Capital Management. S&U's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Litigation Capital Management's score of 0.60 indicating that S&U is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Litigation Capital Management presently has a consensus target price of GBX 182, indicating a potential upside of 605.92%. S&U has a consensus target price of GBX 1,700, indicating a potential downside of 6.08%. Given Litigation Capital Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Litigation Capital Management is more favorable than S&U.
S&U has a net margin of 28.21% compared to Litigation Capital Management's net margin of 12.80%. S&U's return on equity of 8.05% beat Litigation Capital Management's return on equity.
Litigation Capital Management has higher revenue and earnings than S&U. Litigation Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
23.3% of Litigation Capital Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.8% of S&U shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.5% of Litigation Capital Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 88.9% of S&U shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Litigation Capital Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. S&U pays an annual dividend of GBX 150 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Litigation Capital Management pays out 17.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&U pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
Summary
S&U beats Litigation Capital Management on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Litigation Capital Management News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Litigation Capital Management Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:LIT) was last updated on 7/14/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff