S&U (SUS) Competitors

S&U has a consensus price target of GBX 2,110, suggesting a potential upside of 11.64%. Given S&U's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe S&U is more favorable than International Personal Finance.

International Personal Finance has higher revenue and earnings than S&U. S&U is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Personal Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

International Personal Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. S&U pays an annual dividend of GBX 105 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. International Personal Finance pays out 50.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&U pays out 53.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, International Personal Finance had 2 more articles in the media than S&U. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for International Personal Finance and 1 mentions for S&U. S&U's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat International Personal Finance's score of -0.66 indicating that S&U is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

S&U has a net margin of 22.07% compared to International Personal Finance's net margin of 7.35%. International Personal Finance's return on equity of 10.35% beat S&U's return on equity.

International Personal Finance has a beta of 0.415, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&U has a beta of 0.561, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

50.6% of International Personal Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of S&U shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of International Personal Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 65.5% of S&U shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

S&U has a net margin of 22.07% compared to Funding Circle's net margin of 20.90%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 21.54% beat S&U's return on equity.

S&U presently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,110, indicating a potential upside of 11.64%. Given S&U's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe S&U is more favorable than Funding Circle.

S&U has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Funding Circle. S&U is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Funding Circle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

4.2% of S&U shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by institutional investors. 65.5% of S&U shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

S&U has a beta of 0.561, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Funding Circle has a beta of 0.694, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, S&U had 1 more articles in the media than Funding Circle. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for S&U and 0 mentions for Funding Circle. S&U's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Funding Circle's score of 0.00 indicating that S&U is being referred to more favorably in the media.

S&U has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vanquis Banking Group. S&U is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vanquis Banking Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

4.2% of S&U shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.0% of Vanquis Banking Group shares are held by institutional investors. 65.5% of S&U shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Vanquis Banking Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

S&U has a net margin of 22.07% compared to Vanquis Banking Group's net margin of 1.87%. S&U's return on equity of 9.68% beat Vanquis Banking Group's return on equity.

S&U currently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,110, indicating a potential upside of 11.64%. Vanquis Banking Group has a consensus price target of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 27.50%. Given Vanquis Banking Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vanquis Banking Group is more favorable than S&U.

S&U has a beta of 0.561, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vanquis Banking Group has a beta of 1.299, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, S&U and S&U both had 1 articles in the media. S&U's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Vanquis Banking Group's score of 0.00 indicating that S&U is being referred to more favorably in the media.

H&T Group has higher revenue and earnings than S&U. S&U is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H&T Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

S&U has a net margin of 22.07% compared to H&T Group's net margin of 8.38%. H&T Group's return on equity of 12.03% beat S&U's return on equity.

H&T Group has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&U has a beta of 0.561, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

S&U has a consensus price target of GBX 2,110, indicating a potential upside of 11.64%. Given S&U's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe S&U is more favorable than H&T Group.

H&T Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. S&U pays an annual dividend of GBX 105 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. H&T Group pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&U pays out 53.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

46.6% of H&T Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of S&U shares are held by institutional investors. 10.3% of H&T Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 65.5% of S&U shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, S&U had 1 more articles in the media than H&T Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for S&U and 0 mentions for H&T Group. S&U's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat H&T Group's score of 0.00 indicating that S&U is being referred to more favorably in the news media.