S&U Competitors

Provident Financial (LON:PFG) and S&U (LON:SUS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Provident Financial and S&U's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Provident Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Provident Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. S&U pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Provident Financial pays out 0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&U pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Provident Financial and S&U, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Provident Financial presently has a consensus target price of GBX 262.33, indicating a potential upside of 9.40%. S&U has a consensus target price of GBX 3,300, indicating a potential upside of 40.43%. Given S&U's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe S&U is more favorable than Provident Financial.

Profitability

This table compares Provident Financial and S&U's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

S&U beats Provident Financial on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Funding Circle (LON:FCH) and S&U (LON:SUS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Funding Circle and S&U's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Funding Circle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Funding Circle and S&U, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Funding Circle presently has a consensus target price of GBX 75, indicating a potential downside of 53.01%. S&U has a consensus target price of GBX 3,300, indicating a potential upside of 40.43%. Given S&U's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe S&U is more favorable than Funding Circle.

Profitability

This table compares Funding Circle and S&U's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

S&U beats Funding Circle on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

S&U (LON:SUS) and International Personal Finance (LON:IPF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares S&U and International Personal Finance's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

International Personal Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for S&U and International Personal Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.

S&U presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,300, indicating a potential upside of 40.43%. Given S&U's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe S&U is more favorable than International Personal Finance.

Profitability

This table compares S&U and International Personal Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

S&U beats International Personal Finance on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fairfx Group (LON:FFX) and S&U (LON:SUS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Fairfx Group and S&U's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Fairfx Group and S&U, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

S&U has a consensus price target of GBX 3,300, indicating a potential upside of 40.43%.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fairfx Group and S&U's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fairfx Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

S&U beats Fairfx Group on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

S&U (LON:SUS) and ASA International Group (LON:ASAI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for S&U and ASA International Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

S&U presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,300, indicating a potential upside of 40.43%. Given S&U's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe S&U is more favorable than ASA International Group.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares S&U and ASA International Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ASA International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

S&U pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. ASA International Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. S&U pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASA International Group pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares S&U and ASA International Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

S&U beats ASA International Group on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

S&U (LON:SUS) and H&T Group (LON:HAT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares S&U and H&T Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

H&T Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

S&U pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. H&T Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. S&U pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. H&T Group pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares S&U and H&T Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for S&U and H&T Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

S&U presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,300, indicating a potential upside of 40.43%. Given S&U's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe S&U is more favorable than H&T Group.

Summary

S&U beats H&T Group on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.