S&U (SUS) Competitors

Funding Circle has a beta of 0.821, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&U has a beta of 0.578, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Funding Circle had 5 more articles in the media than S&U. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Funding Circle and 0 mentions for S&U. Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat S&U's score of 0.00 indicating that Funding Circle is being referred to more favorably in the media.

18.7% of Funding Circle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of S&U shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 62.0% of S&U shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Funding Circle currently has a consensus target price of GBX 302.50, suggesting a potential upside of 21.00%. S&U has a consensus target price of GBX 2,310, suggesting a potential upside of 17.86%. Given Funding Circle's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than S&U.

S&U has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Funding Circle. S&U is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Funding Circle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Funding Circle has a net margin of 22.93% compared to S&U's net margin of 21.13%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 26.71% beat S&U's return on equity.

International Personal Finance has a beta of 0.411, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&U has a beta of 0.578, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

International Personal Finance has higher revenue and earnings than S&U. S&U is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Personal Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

S&U has a consensus price target of GBX 2,310, suggesting a potential upside of 17.86%. Given S&U's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe S&U is more favorable than International Personal Finance.

S&U has a net margin of 21.13% compared to International Personal Finance's net margin of 6.03%. S&U's return on equity of 9.55% beat International Personal Finance's return on equity.

In the previous week, International Personal Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled S&U'saverage media sentiment score.

50.6% of International Personal Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of S&U shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of International Personal Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 62.0% of S&U shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

International Personal Finance pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. S&U pays an annual dividend of GBX 115 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. International Personal Finance pays out 50.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&U pays out 58.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

S&U presently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,310, suggesting a potential upside of 17.86%. Given S&U's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe S&U is more favorable than H&T Group.

S&U has a beta of 0.578, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, H&T Group has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

S&U pays an annual dividend of GBX 115 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. H&T Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. S&U pays out 58.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. H&T Group pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

S&U has a net margin of 21.13% compared to H&T Group's net margin of 8.38%. H&T Group's return on equity of 12.03% beat S&U's return on equity.

In the previous week, S&U's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled H&T Group'saverage media sentiment score.

4.3% of S&U shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of H&T Group shares are held by institutional investors. 62.0% of S&U shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.3% of H&T Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

H&T Group has higher revenue and earnings than S&U. S&U is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H&T Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, S&U's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Equals Group'saverage media sentiment score.

4.3% of S&U shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.3% of Equals Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.0% of S&U shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.9% of Equals Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

S&U has a net margin of 21.13% compared to Equals Group's net margin of 5.62%. Equals Group's return on equity of 12.17% beat S&U's return on equity.

S&U pays an annual dividend of GBX 115 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Equals Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. S&U pays out 58.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equals Group pays out 46.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

S&U has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Equals Group. Equals Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

S&U currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,310, indicating a potential upside of 17.86%. Given S&U's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe S&U is more favorable than Equals Group.

S&U has a beta of 0.578, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Equals Group has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.