Go Pro

Funding Circle (FCH) Competitors

Funding Circle logo
GBX 240.84 +0.34 (+0.14%)
As of 12:30 PM Eastern

FCH vs. PFG, IPF, HAT, EQLS, and ASAI

Should you buy Funding Circle stock or one of its competitors? Funding Circle's main competitors and comparable companies include Vanquis Banking Group (PFG), International Personal Finance (IPF), H&T Group (HAT), Equals Group (EQLS), and ASA International Group (ASAI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "consumer finance" industry.

How does Funding Circle compare to Vanquis Banking Group?

Funding Circle (LON:FCH) and Vanquis Banking Group (LON:PFG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Vanquis Banking Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Funding Circle Neutral
Vanquis Banking Group Neutral

Funding Circle has a net margin of 20.67% compared to Vanquis Banking Group's net margin of 8.73%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 21.54% beat Vanquis Banking Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Funding Circle20.67% 21.54% -3.89%
Vanquis Banking Group 8.73%17.19%4.14%

Funding Circle presently has a consensus target price of GBX 295, indicating a potential upside of 22.49%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than Vanquis Banking Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Funding Circle
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Vanquis Banking Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

39.2% of Funding Circle shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.0% of Vanquis Banking Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Vanquis Banking Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Vanquis Banking Group has higher revenue and earnings than Funding Circle. Vanquis Banking Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Funding Circle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Funding Circle£222.50M3.07-£5.47M£14.0017.20
Vanquis Banking Group£446.50M0.00£103.50M£0.41N/A

Funding Circle has a beta of 0.754, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vanquis Banking Group has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Vanquis Banking Group beats Funding Circle on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Funding Circle compare to International Personal Finance?

Funding Circle (LON:FCH) and International Personal Finance (LON:IPF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Funding Circle has a net margin of 20.67% compared to International Personal Finance's net margin of 6.03%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 21.54% beat International Personal Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Funding Circle20.67% 21.54% -3.89%
International Personal Finance 6.03%8.74%8.81%

In the previous week, Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled International Personal Finance'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Funding Circle Neutral
International Personal Finance Neutral

Funding Circle has a beta of 0.754, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Personal Finance has a beta of 0.411, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

International Personal Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Funding Circle. International Personal Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Funding Circle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Funding Circle£222.50M3.07-£5.47M£14.0017.20
International Personal Finance£725.10M0.77£44.87M£23.6010.59

39.2% of Funding Circle shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of International Personal Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of International Personal Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Funding Circle presently has a consensus price target of GBX 295, indicating a potential upside of 22.49%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than International Personal Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Funding Circle
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
International Personal Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Funding Circle beats International Personal Finance on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Funding Circle compare to H&T Group?

Funding Circle (LON:FCH) and H&T Group (LON:HAT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled H&T Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Funding Circle Neutral
H&T Group Neutral

Funding Circle presently has a consensus price target of GBX 295, indicating a potential upside of 22.49%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than H&T Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Funding Circle
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
H&T Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

H&T Group has higher revenue and earnings than Funding Circle. H&T Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Funding Circle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Funding Circle£222.50M3.07-£5.47M£14.0017.20
H&T Group£240.86M1.18£21.82M£50.5412.86

39.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of H&T Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.3% of H&T Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Funding Circle has a beta of 0.754, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, H&T Group has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Funding Circle has a net margin of 20.67% compared to H&T Group's net margin of 8.38%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 21.54% beat H&T Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Funding Circle20.67% 21.54% -3.89%
H&T Group 8.38%12.03%9.07%

Summary

Funding Circle beats H&T Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Funding Circle compare to Equals Group?

Equals Group (LON:EQLS) and Funding Circle (LON:FCH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Equals Group has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Funding Circle has a beta of 0.754, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

51.3% of Equals Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by institutional investors. 29.9% of Equals Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Equals Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Funding Circle'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Equals Group Neutral
Funding Circle Neutral

Funding Circle has a consensus target price of GBX 295, suggesting a potential upside of 22.49%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than Equals Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Equals Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Funding Circle
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Funding Circle has a net margin of 20.67% compared to Equals Group's net margin of 5.62%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 21.54% beat Equals Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Equals Group5.62% 12.17% 8.11%
Funding Circle 20.67%21.54%-3.89%

Equals Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Funding Circle. Equals Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Funding Circle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Equals Group£112.32M0.00£8.27M£4.34N/A
Funding Circle£222.50M3.07-£5.47M£14.0017.20

Summary

Funding Circle beats Equals Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Funding Circle compare to ASA International Group?

ASA International Group (LON:ASAI) and Funding Circle (LON:FCH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends and earnings.

ASA International Group has a beta of 2.017, meaning that its share price is 102% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Funding Circle has a beta of 0.754, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

3.8% of ASA International Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of ASA International Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ASA International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Funding Circle. ASA International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Funding Circle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASA International Group£257.00M0.89£611.58M£57.004.11
Funding Circle£222.50M3.07-£5.47M£14.0017.20

In the previous week, ASA International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Funding Circle'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ASA International Group Neutral
Funding Circle Neutral

ASA International Group has a net margin of 25.29% compared to Funding Circle's net margin of 20.67%. ASA International Group's return on equity of 33.54% beat Funding Circle's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASA International Group25.29% 33.54% 3.82%
Funding Circle 20.67%21.54%-3.89%

Funding Circle has a consensus target price of GBX 295, suggesting a potential upside of 22.49%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than ASA International Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASA International Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Funding Circle
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

ASA International Group beats Funding Circle on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Funding Circle News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FCH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FCH vs. The Competition

MetricFunding CircleConsumer Finance IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£681.98M£7.53B£14.06B£2.92B
Dividend YieldN/A12.29%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio17.209.2426.63367.27
Price / Sales3.0775.18514.3283,460.67
Price / Cash0.6811.8230.7327.89
Price / Book18.782.712.887.12
Net Income-£5.47M£442.63M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.74%0.74%1.37%0.74%
1 Month Performance5.17%1.94%2.98%3.13%
1 Year Performance62.51%8.35%11.65%22.34%

Funding Circle Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FCH
Funding Circle
N/AGBX 240.84
+0.1%
GBX 295
+22.5%
+62.3%£681.98M£222.50M17.201,101
PFG
Vanquis Banking Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£571.19M£446.50M548.7819,300
IPF
International Personal Finance
N/AGBX 250
flat
N/AN/A£555.33M£725.10M10.596,230
HAT
H&T Group
N/AGBX 650
flat
N/A+0.0%£283.24M£240.86M12.861,625
EQLS
Equals Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£265.55M£112.32M32.12397

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FCH) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners