Do analysts prefer PFG or FCH?

Funding Circle has a consensus price target of GBX 299, suggesting a potential upside of 61.27%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than Vanquis Banking Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Vanquis Banking Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Funding Circle 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media refer more to PFG or FCH?

In the previous week, Funding Circle had 1 more articles in the media than Vanquis Banking Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Funding Circle and 1 mentions for Vanquis Banking Group. Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Vanquis Banking Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Funding Circle is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Vanquis Banking Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Funding Circle 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate FCH or IPF?

Funding Circle presently has a consensus target price of GBX 299, suggesting a potential upside of 61.27%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than International Personal Finance. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Funding Circle 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 International Personal Finance 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate HAT or FCH?

Funding Circle has a consensus target price of GBX 299, suggesting a potential upside of 61.27%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than H&T Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score H&T Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Funding Circle 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HAT or FCH?

H&T Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Funding Circle. Funding Circle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H&T Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio H&T Group £240.86M 1.18 £21.82M £50.54 12.86 Funding Circle £271.50M 1.93 -£5.47M £19.70 9.41

Is HAT or FCH more profitable?

Funding Circle has a net margin of 22.93% compared to H&T Group's net margin of 8.38%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 26.71% beat H&T Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets H&T Group 8.38% 12.03% 9.07% Funding Circle 22.93% 26.71% -3.89%

Do analysts prefer FCH or EQLS?

Funding Circle currently has a consensus price target of GBX 299, indicating a potential upside of 61.27%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than Equals Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Funding Circle 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Equals Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SUS or FCH?

S&U has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Funding Circle. Funding Circle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio S&U £93.22M 2.49 £18.35M £195.20 9.78 Funding Circle £271.50M 1.93 -£5.47M £19.70 9.41

Is SUS or FCH more profitable?

Funding Circle has a net margin of 22.93% compared to S&U's net margin of 21.13%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 26.71% beat S&U's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets S&U 21.13% 9.55% 4.18% Funding Circle 22.93% 26.71% -3.89%

Does the media refer more to SUS or FCH?

In the previous week, S&U had 4 more articles in the media than Funding Circle. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for S&U and 2 mentions for Funding Circle. Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat S&U's score of 0.74 indicating that Funding Circle is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment S&U 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Funding Circle 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Funding Circle (FCH) Competitors

GBX 188.40 +3.00 (+1.62%)

As of 12:04 PM Eastern

Compare

FCH vs. PFG, IPF, HAT, EQLS, and SUS

Should you buy Funding Circle stock or one of its competitors? Funding Circle's main competitors and comparable companies include Vanquis Banking Group (PFG), International Personal Finance (IPF), H&T Group (HAT), Equals Group (EQLS), and S&U (SUS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "consumer finance" industry.

How does Funding Circle compare to Vanquis Banking Group?

Vanquis Banking Group (LON:PFG) and Funding Circle (LON:FCH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Funding Circle has a consensus price target of GBX 299, suggesting a potential upside of 61.27%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than Vanquis Banking Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vanquis Banking Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Funding Circle	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Funding Circle had 1 more articles in the media than Vanquis Banking Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Funding Circle and 1 mentions for Vanquis Banking Group. Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Vanquis Banking Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Funding Circle is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vanquis Banking Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Funding Circle	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Vanquis Banking Group has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Funding Circle has a beta of 0.755, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

84.0% of Vanquis Banking Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Funding Circle shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Vanquis Banking Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Vanquis Banking Group has higher revenue and earnings than Funding Circle. Vanquis Banking Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Funding Circle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vanquis Banking Group	£446.50M	0.00	£103.50M	£0.41	N/A
Funding Circle	£271.50M	1.93	-£5.47M	£19.70	9.41

Funding Circle has a net margin of 22.93% compared to Vanquis Banking Group's net margin of 8.73%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 26.71% beat Vanquis Banking Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vanquis Banking Group	8.73%	17.19%	4.14%
Funding Circle	22.93%	26.71%	-3.89%

Summary

Funding Circle beats Vanquis Banking Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Funding Circle compare to International Personal Finance?

Funding Circle (LON:FCH) and International Personal Finance (LON:IPF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Funding Circle presently has a consensus target price of GBX 299, suggesting a potential upside of 61.27%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than International Personal Finance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Funding Circle	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
International Personal Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

28.7% of Funding Circle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of International Personal Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of International Personal Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Funding Circle has a beta of 0.755, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Personal Finance has a beta of 0.411, suggesting that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Funding Circle had 2 more articles in the media than International Personal Finance. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Funding Circle and 0 mentions for International Personal Finance. Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat International Personal Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Funding Circle is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Funding Circle	Positive
International Personal Finance	Neutral

International Personal Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Funding Circle. Funding Circle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Personal Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Funding Circle	£271.50M	1.93	-£5.47M	£19.70	9.41
International Personal Finance	£725.10M	0.77	£44.87M	£23.60	10.59

Funding Circle has a net margin of 22.93% compared to International Personal Finance's net margin of 6.03%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 26.71% beat International Personal Finance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Funding Circle	22.93%	26.71%	-3.89%
International Personal Finance	6.03%	8.74%	8.81%

Summary

Funding Circle beats International Personal Finance on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Funding Circle compare to H&T Group?

H&T Group (LON:HAT) and Funding Circle (LON:FCH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Funding Circle had 2 more articles in the media than H&T Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Funding Circle and 0 mentions for H&T Group. Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat H&T Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Funding Circle is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
H&T Group	Neutral
Funding Circle	Positive

H&T Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Funding Circle. Funding Circle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H&T Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
H&T Group	£240.86M	1.18	£21.82M	£50.54	12.86
Funding Circle	£271.50M	1.93	-£5.47M	£19.70	9.41

46.6% of H&T Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Funding Circle shares are held by institutional investors. 10.3% of H&T Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Funding Circle has a consensus target price of GBX 299, suggesting a potential upside of 61.27%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than H&T Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
H&T Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Funding Circle	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

H&T Group has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Funding Circle has a beta of 0.755, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Funding Circle has a net margin of 22.93% compared to H&T Group's net margin of 8.38%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 26.71% beat H&T Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
H&T Group	8.38%	12.03%	9.07%
Funding Circle	22.93%	26.71%	-3.89%

Summary

Funding Circle beats H&T Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Funding Circle compare to Equals Group?

Funding Circle (LON:FCH) and Equals Group (LON:EQLS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Funding Circle currently has a consensus price target of GBX 299, indicating a potential upside of 61.27%. Given Funding Circle's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than Equals Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Funding Circle	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Equals Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Equals Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Funding Circle. Equals Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Funding Circle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Funding Circle	£271.50M	1.93	-£5.47M	£19.70	9.41
Equals Group	£112.32M	0.00	£8.27M	£4.34	N/A

Funding Circle has a net margin of 22.93% compared to Equals Group's net margin of 5.62%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 26.71% beat Equals Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Funding Circle	22.93%	26.71%	-3.89%
Equals Group	5.62%	12.17%	8.11%

Funding Circle has a beta of 0.755, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Equals Group has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

28.7% of Funding Circle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.3% of Equals Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.9% of Equals Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Funding Circle had 2 more articles in the media than Equals Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Funding Circle and 0 mentions for Equals Group. Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Equals Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Funding Circle is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Funding Circle	Positive
Equals Group	Neutral

Summary

Funding Circle beats Equals Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Funding Circle compare to S&U?

S&U (LON:SUS) and Funding Circle (LON:FCH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, S&U had 4 more articles in the media than Funding Circle. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for S&U and 2 mentions for Funding Circle. Funding Circle's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat S&U's score of 0.74 indicating that Funding Circle is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
S&U	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Funding Circle	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

S&U has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Funding Circle. Funding Circle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&U, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
S&U	£93.22M	2.49	£18.35M	£195.20	9.78
Funding Circle	£271.50M	1.93	-£5.47M	£19.70	9.41

S&U currently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,155, suggesting a potential upside of 12.83%. Funding Circle has a consensus price target of GBX 299, suggesting a potential upside of 61.27%. Given Funding Circle's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Funding Circle is more favorable than S&U.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
S&U	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Funding Circle	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

S&U has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Funding Circle has a beta of 0.755, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

4.3% of S&U shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Funding Circle shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.0% of S&U shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Funding Circle shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Funding Circle has a net margin of 22.93% compared to S&U's net margin of 21.13%. Funding Circle's return on equity of 26.71% beat S&U's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
S&U	21.13%	9.55%	4.18%
Funding Circle	22.93%	26.71%	-3.89%

Summary

Funding Circle beats S&U on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Funding Circle News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FCH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Funding Circle	Consumer Finance Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£533.37M	£6.75B	£13.38B	£2.81B
Dividend Yield	N/A	12.83%	6.04%	6.26%
P/E Ratio	9.56	8.49	24.44	366.69
Price / Sales	1.96	66.38	505.94	89,216.45
Price / Cash	0.68	11.12	29.46	27.89
Price / Book	14.69	2.51	2.71	6.98
Net Income	-£5.47M	£442.63M	£1.31B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	3.06%	-0.44%	-0.32%	-0.76%
1 Month Performance	-18.62%	-6.46%	-3.07%	-1.14%
1 Year Performance	53.17%	3.31%	10.57%	22.91%

Funding Circle Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FCH Funding Circle	3.6502 of 5 stars	GBX 188.40 +1.6%	GBX 299 +58.7%	+50.7%	£533.37M	£271.50M	9.56	1,101	Positive News
PFG Vanquis Banking Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£571.19M	£446.50M	548.78	19,300
IPF International Personal Finance	N/A	GBX 250 flat	N/A	N/A	£555.33M	£725.10M	10.59	6,230
HAT H&T Group	N/A	GBX 650 flat	N/A	+0.0%	£283.24M	£240.86M	12.86	1,625
EQLS Equals Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£265.55M	£112.32M	32.12	397

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FCH) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Funding Circle (FCH) Competitors

FCH vs. PFG, IPF, HAT, EQLS, and SUS

How does Funding Circle compare to Vanquis Banking Group?

Summary

How does Funding Circle compare to International Personal Finance?

Summary

How does Funding Circle compare to H&T Group?

Summary

How does Funding Circle compare to Equals Group?

Summary

How does Funding Circle compare to S&U?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

FCH vs. The Competition

Funding Circle Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Funding Circle (FCH) Competitors

FCH vs. PFG, IPF, HAT, EQLS, and SUS

How does Funding Circle compare to Vanquis Banking Group?

Do analysts prefer PFG or FCH?

Does the media refer more to PFG or FCH?

Which has more volatility & risk, PFG or FCH?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PFG or FCH?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PFG or FCH?

Is PFG or FCH more profitable?

Summary

How does Funding Circle compare to International Personal Finance?

Do analysts rate FCH or IPF?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FCH or IPF?

Which has more risk and volatility, FCH or IPF?

Does the media favor FCH or IPF?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, FCH or IPF?

Is FCH or IPF more profitable?

Summary

How does Funding Circle compare to H&T Group?

Does the media prefer HAT or FCH?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HAT or FCH?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HAT or FCH?

Do analysts rate HAT or FCH?

Which has more volatility & risk, HAT or FCH?

Is HAT or FCH more profitable?

Summary

How does Funding Circle compare to Equals Group?

Do analysts prefer FCH or EQLS?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FCH or EQLS?

Is FCH or EQLS more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, FCH or EQLS?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of FCH or EQLS?

Does the media favor FCH or EQLS?

Summary

How does Funding Circle compare to S&U?

Does the media refer more to SUS or FCH?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SUS or FCH?

Do analysts prefer SUS or FCH?

Which has more risk and volatility, SUS or FCH?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SUS or FCH?

Is SUS or FCH more profitable?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

FCH vs. The Competition

Funding Circle Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools