Go Pro

Livermore Investments Group (LIV) Competitors

Livermore Investments Group logo
GBX 35 -2.40 (-6.42%)
As of 08/25/2026 03:19 AM Eastern

LIV vs. EGL, SCF, PU13, WPC, and JETI

Should you buy Livermore Investments Group stock or one of its competitors? Livermore Investments Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust (EGL), Schroder Income Growth (SCF), Puma VCT 13 (PU13), Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) (WPC), and JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool (JETI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust?

Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) and Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust (LON:EGL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust pays out 13.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Livermore Investments Group has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust has a beta of 0.996, meaning that its stock price is 0% less volatile than the broader market.

Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust has a net margin of 271.70% compared to Livermore Investments Group's net margin of 56.08%. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust's return on equity of 25.45% beat Livermore Investments Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Livermore Investments Group56.08% 3.94% 8.27%
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust 271.70%25.45%-4.86%

In the previous week, Livermore Investments Group had 1 more articles in the media than Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Livermore Investments Group and 0 mentions for Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust. Livermore Investments Group's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Livermore Investments Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Livermore Investments Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M5.59£24.54M£3.0011.67
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust£68.02M3.56-£9.63M£64.924.04

1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Livermore Investments Group beats Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Schroder Income Growth?

Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) and Schroder Income Growth (LON:SCF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

Schroder Income Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Livermore Investments Group. Schroder Income Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M5.59£24.54M£3.0011.67
Schroder Income Growth£54.92M4.52£37.42M£79.774.75

Livermore Investments Group has a beta of 0.1, suggesting that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder Income Growth has a beta of 1.079, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. Schroder Income Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder Income Growth pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Schroder Income Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder Income Growth shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Livermore Investments Group and Livermore Investments Group both had 1 articles in the media. Schroder Income Growth's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Livermore Investments Group's score of 0.35 indicating that Schroder Income Growth is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Livermore Investments Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Schroder Income Growth
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Schroder Income Growth has a net margin of 94.75% compared to Livermore Investments Group's net margin of 56.08%. Schroder Income Growth's return on equity of 21.54% beat Livermore Investments Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Livermore Investments Group56.08% 3.94% 8.27%
Schroder Income Growth 94.75%21.54%4.32%

Summary

Schroder Income Growth beats Livermore Investments Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Puma VCT 13?

Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) and Puma VCT 13 (LON:PU13) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Puma VCT 13 has a net margin of 76.38% compared to Livermore Investments Group's net margin of 56.08%. Livermore Investments Group's return on equity of 3.94% beat Puma VCT 13's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Livermore Investments Group56.08% 3.94% 8.27%
Puma VCT 13 76.38%2.17%N/A

1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Puma VCT 13 shares are owned by institutional investors. 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Puma VCT 13 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Livermore Investments Group has higher revenue and earnings than Puma VCT 13. Livermore Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Puma VCT 13, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M5.59£24.54M£3.0011.67
Puma VCT 13£5.56M43.84-£13.34M£2.6244.85

Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. Puma VCT 13 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Puma VCT 13 pays out 114.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Livermore Investments Group had 1 more articles in the media than Puma VCT 13. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Livermore Investments Group and 0 mentions for Puma VCT 13. Livermore Investments Group's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Puma VCT 13's score of 0.00 indicating that Livermore Investments Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Livermore Investments Group Neutral
Puma VCT 13 Neutral

Summary

Livermore Investments Group beats Puma VCT 13 on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)?

Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) and Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) (LON:WPC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

Livermore Investments Group has a net margin of 56.08% compared to Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Livermore Investments Group's return on equity of 3.94% beat Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Livermore Investments Group56.08% 3.94% 8.27%
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) N/A N/A N/A

Livermore Investments Group has higher revenue and earnings than Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L). Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M5.59£24.54M£3.0011.67
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)£6.74M0.00N/A£5.70N/A

Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Livermore Investments Group had 1 more articles in the media than Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Livermore Investments Group and 0 mentions for Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L). Livermore Investments Group's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Livermore Investments Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Summary

Livermore Investments Group beats Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool?

JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool (LON:JETI) and Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Livermore Investments Group has a net margin of 56.08% compared to JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool's net margin of 0.00%. Livermore Investments Group's return on equity of 3.94% beat JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income PoolN/A N/A N/A
Livermore Investments Group 56.08%3.94%8.27%

In the previous week, Livermore Investments Group had 1 more articles in the media than JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Livermore Investments Group and 0 mentions for JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool. Livermore Investments Group's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool's score of 0.00 indicating that Livermore Investments Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Livermore Investments Group has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool. JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income PoolN/AN/AN/A£67.80N/A
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M5.59£24.54M£3.0011.67

1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.07 per share. Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Livermore Investments Group beats JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Livermore Investments Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LIV vs. The Competition

MetricLivermore Investments GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£57.87M£5.71B£14.06B£2.93B
Dividend Yield13.98%7.40%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio11.6732.5526.70367.32
Price / Sales5.591,229.32516.4883,741.35
Price / Cash1.7748.3338.5027.89
Price / Book0.362.132.187.02
Net Income£24.54M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-12.06%0.60%1.38%0.89%
1 Month PerformanceN/A2.36%2.93%3.27%
1 Year Performance-29.44%7.75%11.49%22.28%

Livermore Investments Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LIV
Livermore Investments Group
N/AGBX 35
-6.4%
N/A-30.0%£57.87M£10.36M11.674
EGL
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust
N/AGBX 262
flat
N/A+20.0%£244.00M£68.02M4.048,700
SCF
Schroder Income Growth
N/AGBX 373
flat
N/A+15.6%£243.85M£54.92M4.68N/A
PU13
Puma VCT 13
N/AGBX 117.50
flat
N/AN/A£243.73M£5.56M44.85N/A
WPC
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£242.69M£6.74M69.65190

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:LIV) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners