Go Pro

Livermore Investments Group (LIV) Competitors

Livermore Investments Group logo
GBX 37.60 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/16/2026

LIV vs. BPM, CBP, ABD, SCP, and SCF

Should you buy Livermore Investments Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Livermore Investments Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Livermore Investments Group include B.P. Marsh & Partners (BPM), Curtis Banks Group (CBP), abrdn New Dawn (ABD), Schroder UK Mid Cap (SCP), and Schroder Income Growth (SCF). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to B.P. Marsh & Partners?

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) and Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

B.P. Marsh & Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. B.P. Marsh & Partners pays out 10.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

B.P. Marsh & Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Livermore Investments Group. B.P. Marsh & Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
B.P. Marsh & Partners£63.79M3.82£53.77M£125.905.49
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M6.00£24.54M£3.0012.53

In the previous week, B.P. Marsh & Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Livermore Investments Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for B.P. Marsh & Partners and 0 mentions for Livermore Investments Group. B.P. Marsh & Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.69 beat Livermore Investments Group's score of 0.00 indicating that B.P. Marsh & Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
B.P. Marsh & Partners Very Positive
Livermore Investments Group Neutral

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a net margin of 160.46% compared to Livermore Investments Group's net margin of 56.08%. B.P. Marsh & Partners' return on equity of 13.59% beat Livermore Investments Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
B.P. Marsh & Partners160.46% 13.59% 12.41%
Livermore Investments Group 56.08%3.94%8.27%

B.P. Marsh & Partners has a beta of 0.217, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Livermore Investments Group has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

2.2% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.5% of B.P. Marsh & Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

B.P. Marsh & Partners beats Livermore Investments Group on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Curtis Banks Group?

Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) and Curtis Banks Group (LON:CBP) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Livermore Investments Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Curtis Banks Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Livermore Investments Group Neutral
Curtis Banks Group Neutral

Livermore Investments Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Curtis Banks Group. Curtis Banks Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M6.00£24.54M£3.0012.53
Curtis Banks Group£68.06M0.00-£6.71M-£0.10N/A

Livermore Investments Group has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtis Banks Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. Curtis Banks Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9 per share. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Curtis Banks Group pays out -9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Livermore Investments Group has a net margin of 56.08% compared to Curtis Banks Group's net margin of -9.86%. Livermore Investments Group's return on equity of 3.94% beat Curtis Banks Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Livermore Investments Group56.08% 3.94% 8.27%
Curtis Banks Group -9.86%-8.89%0.15%

1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.1% of Curtis Banks Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.5% of Curtis Banks Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Livermore Investments Group beats Curtis Banks Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to abrdn New Dawn?

abrdn New Dawn (LON:ABD) and Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Livermore Investments Group has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn New Dawn. abrdn New Dawn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn New Dawn-£19.43M0.00-£23.50M-£0.22N/A
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M6.00£24.54M£3.0012.53

Livermore Investments Group has a net margin of 56.08% compared to abrdn New Dawn's net margin of 0.00%. Livermore Investments Group's return on equity of 3.94% beat abrdn New Dawn's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn New DawnN/A -7.11% -3.80%
Livermore Investments Group 56.08%3.94%8.27%

abrdn New Dawn has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Livermore Investments Group has a beta of 0.1, suggesting that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

66.8% of abrdn New Dawn shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of abrdn New Dawn shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, abrdn New Dawn's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Livermore Investments Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn New Dawn Neutral
Livermore Investments Group Neutral

abrdn New Dawn pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. abrdn New Dawn pays out -2,727.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Livermore Investments Group beats abrdn New Dawn on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Schroder UK Mid Cap?

Schroder UK Mid Cap (LON:SCP) and Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Schroder UK Mid Cap's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Livermore Investments Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder UK Mid Cap Neutral
Livermore Investments Group Neutral

8.0% of Schroder UK Mid Cap shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder UK Mid Cap shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder UK Mid Cap has a net margin of 91.54% compared to Livermore Investments Group's net margin of 56.08%. Schroder UK Mid Cap's return on equity of 14.71% beat Livermore Investments Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder UK Mid Cap91.54% 14.71% 4.88%
Livermore Investments Group 56.08%3.94%8.27%

Schroder UK Mid Cap has higher revenue and earnings than Livermore Investments Group. Schroder UK Mid Cap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder UK Mid Cap£37.20M6.24£36.42M£105.226.68
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M6.00£24.54M£3.0012.53

Schroder UK Mid Cap has a beta of 1.5083787, indicating that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Livermore Investments Group has a beta of 0.1, indicating that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder UK Mid Cap pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. Schroder UK Mid Cap pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Schroder UK Mid Cap beats Livermore Investments Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Schroder Income Growth?

Schroder Income Growth (LON:SCF) and Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Schroder Income Growth has a beta of 1.0804899, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Livermore Investments Group has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Schroder Income Growth had 1 more articles in the media than Livermore Investments Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder Income Growth and 0 mentions for Livermore Investments Group. Schroder Income Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Livermore Investments Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder Income Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Income Growth Positive
Livermore Investments Group Neutral

8.3% of Schroder Income Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder Income Growth shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder Income Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. Schroder Income Growth pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Schroder Income Growth has a net margin of 94.75% compared to Livermore Investments Group's net margin of 56.08%. Schroder Income Growth's return on equity of 21.54% beat Livermore Investments Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Income Growth94.75% 21.54% 4.32%
Livermore Investments Group 56.08%3.94%8.27%

Schroder Income Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Livermore Investments Group. Schroder Income Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Income Growth£54.92M4.31£37.42M£79.774.51
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M6.00£24.54M£3.0012.53

Summary

Schroder Income Growth beats Livermore Investments Group on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Livermore Investments Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LIV vs. The Competition

MetricLivermore Investments GroupAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£62.17M£2.50B£6.24B£2.86B
Dividend Yield13.98%6.00%5.24%6.12%
P/E Ratio12.5362.7729.67368.59
Price / Sales6.001,843.381,177.0784,750.94
Price / Cash1.7760.50117.4027.89
Price / Book0.391.326.567.56
Net Income£24.54M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.53%-0.25%-0.10%0.24%
1 Month Performance-14.55%0.06%0.23%-1.14%
1 Year Performance-32.25%7.51%15.22%62.41%

Livermore Investments Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LIV
Livermore Investments Group
N/AGBX 37.60
flat
N/A-34.7%£62.17M£10.36M12.534
BPM
B.P. Marsh & Partners
N/AGBX 675
flat
N/A-1.2%£237.86M£63.79M5.3616
CBP
Curtis Banks Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£236.20M£68.06MN/A802
ABD
abrdn New Dawn
N/AN/AN/AN/A£235.97M-£19.43MN/AN/A
SCP
Schroder UK Mid Cap
N/AGBX 714
+1.1%
N/A+7.5%£232.99M£37.20M6.79N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:LIV) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners