Go Pro
→ Jon Najarian's #1 Energy Trade for 2026 (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free LIV Stock Alerts

Livermore Investments Group (LIV) Competitors

Livermore Investments Group logo
GBX 40.80 +2.70 (+7.09%)
As of 09/15/2026 04:35 AM Eastern
Compare

LIV vs. BRK, PU13, WPC, JETI, and GSF

Should you buy Livermore Investments Group stock or one of its competitors? Livermore Investments Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Brooks Macdonald Group (BRK), Puma VCT 13 (PU13), Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) (WPC), JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool (JETI), and Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Brooks Macdonald Group?

Brooks Macdonald Group (LON:BRK) and Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Brooks Macdonald Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,710, indicating a potential upside of 6.88%. Given Brooks Macdonald Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brooks Macdonald Group is more favorable than Livermore Investments Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brooks Macdonald Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Livermore Investments Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Livermore Investments Group has a net margin of 56.08% compared to Brooks Macdonald Group's net margin of 2.05%. Livermore Investments Group's return on equity of 3.94% beat Brooks Macdonald Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brooks Macdonald Group2.05% 1.65% 7.37%
Livermore Investments Group 56.08%3.94%8.27%

In the previous week, Brooks Macdonald Group had 1 more articles in the media than Livermore Investments Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brooks Macdonald Group and 0 mentions for Livermore Investments Group. Brooks Macdonald Group's average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Livermore Investments Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Brooks Macdonald Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brooks Macdonald Group Neutral
Livermore Investments Group Neutral

Brooks Macdonald Group has a beta of 0.785, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Livermore Investments Group has a beta of 0.095, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Livermore Investments Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brooks Macdonald Group. Livermore Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brooks Macdonald Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brooks Macdonald Group£117.92M2.11£6.54M£15.10105.96
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M6.51£24.54M£3.0013.60

61.9% of Brooks Macdonald Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.1% of Brooks Macdonald Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brooks Macdonald Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 82 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Brooks Macdonald Group pays out 543.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Livermore Investments Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Brooks Macdonald Group beats Livermore Investments Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Puma VCT 13?

Puma VCT 13 (LON:PU13) and Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Puma VCT 13 pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Puma VCT 13 pays out 114.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Puma VCT 13 has a net margin of 76.38% compared to Livermore Investments Group's net margin of 56.08%. Livermore Investments Group's return on equity of 3.94% beat Puma VCT 13's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Puma VCT 1376.38% 2.17% N/A
Livermore Investments Group 56.08%3.94%8.27%

0.0% of Puma VCT 13 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Puma VCT 13 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Puma VCT 13's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Livermore Investments Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Puma VCT 13 Neutral
Livermore Investments Group Neutral

Livermore Investments Group has higher revenue and earnings than Puma VCT 13. Livermore Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Puma VCT 13, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Puma VCT 13£5.56M43.84-£13.34M£2.6244.85
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M6.51£24.54M£3.0013.60

Summary

Livermore Investments Group beats Puma VCT 13 on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)?

Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) (LON:WPC) and Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Livermore Investments Group has a net margin of 56.08% compared to Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Livermore Investments Group's return on equity of 3.94% beat Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)N/A N/A N/A
Livermore Investments Group 56.08%3.94%8.27%

In the previous week, Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Livermore Investments Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) Neutral
Livermore Investments Group Neutral

Livermore Investments Group has higher revenue and earnings than Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L). Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)£6.74M0.00N/A£5.70N/A
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M6.51£24.54M£3.0013.60

Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share. Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Livermore Investments Group beats Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool?

JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool (LON:JETI) and Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Livermore Investments Group has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool. JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income PoolN/AN/AN/A£67.80N/A
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M6.51£24.54M£3.0013.60

In the previous week, JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Livermore Investments Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool Neutral
Livermore Investments Group Neutral

Livermore Investments Group has a net margin of 56.08% compared to JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool's net margin of 0.00%. Livermore Investments Group's return on equity of 3.94% beat JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income PoolN/A N/A N/A
Livermore Investments Group 56.08%3.94%8.27%

1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.07 per share. Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Livermore Investments Group beats JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Livermore Investments Group compare to Gore Street Energy Storage Fund?

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (LON:GSF) and Livermore Investments Group (LON:LIV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Livermore Investments Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Livermore Investments Group pays out 139.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

16.6% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Gore Street Energy Storage Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 89.8% of Livermore Investments Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Livermore Investments Group has higher revenue and earnings than Gore Street Energy Storage Fund. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Livermore Investments Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund-£116.82M-2.03-£5.96M-£23.72N/A
Livermore Investments Group£10.36M6.51£24.54M£3.0013.60

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Livermore Investments Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Gore Street Energy Storage Fund had 8 more articles in the media than Livermore Investments Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Gore Street Energy Storage Fund and 0 mentions for Livermore Investments Group. Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Livermore Investments Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Gore Street Energy Storage Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund Neutral
Livermore Investments Group Neutral

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a beta of 0.342, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Livermore Investments Group has a beta of 0.095, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Gore Street Energy Storage Fund has a net margin of 102.56% compared to Livermore Investments Group's net margin of 56.08%. Livermore Investments Group's return on equity of 3.94% beat Gore Street Energy Storage Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gore Street Energy Storage Fund102.56% -28.75% -0.64%
Livermore Investments Group 56.08%3.94%8.27%

Summary

Livermore Investments Group beats Gore Street Energy Storage Fund on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Livermore Investments Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LIV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LIV vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLivermore Investments GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£67.47M£5.27B£13.79B£2.87B
Dividend Yield13.98%7.50%5.95%6.26%
P/E Ratio13.6029.8425.21366.50
Price / Sales6.511,168.43497.1690,135.34
Price / Cash1.7747.9140.5727.89
Price / Book0.433.502.726.34
Net Income£24.54M£417.39M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.00%-1.35%-0.96%-0.17%
1 Month Performance16.57%-2.91%-1.31%-0.47%
1 Year Performance-21.54%3.87%9.52%20.13%

Livermore Investments Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LIV
Livermore Investments Group
N/AGBX 40.80
+7.1%		N/A-15.7%£67.47M£10.36M13.604
BRK
Brooks Macdonald Group
2.0403 of 5 stars		GBX 1,555.32
-1.6%		GBX 1,710
+9.9%		-13.6%£246.74M£117.92M103.00512
PU13
Puma VCT 13
N/AGBX 117.50
flat		N/AN/A£243.73M£5.56M44.85N/A
WPC
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£242.69M£6.74M69.65190
JETI
JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool
N/AN/AN/AN/A£242.54MN/A2.28N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LIV) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A “bloodbath” Is Coming
Reports suggest some Silicon Valley billionaires are stockpiling gold, guns, and gas masks - or leaving the co...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold majors have a big problem
Newmont spent 15 billion dollars acquiring Newcrest in 2023, the largest deal in gold mining history. Yet prod...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
The dollar reset no one told you about
Porter Stansberry says a dollar reset is underway - one that has happened only once before in America's 250-ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk says UBI is coming. I say it's already here.
Elon Musk says AI could make money irrelevant by 2036. One income program already exists today, funded not by ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War: Why Is Trump Protecting THEM?
A powerful Middle Eastern government is reportedly seeking US intelligence, targeting help, and military prote...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel