Go Pro

Lansdowne Resources (LRES) Competitors

GBX 0.07 +0.00 (+2.78%)
As of 07:34 AM Eastern

LRES vs. ECR, CGNR, GCAT, CNG, and PUR

Should you buy Lansdowne Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lansdowne Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lansdowne Resources include ECR Minerals (ECR), Conroy Gold and Natural Resources (CGNR), Caracal Gold (GCAT), China Nonferrous Gold (CNG), and Pure Gold Mining (PUR). These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Lansdowne Resources compare to ECR Minerals?

ECR Minerals (LON:ECR) and Lansdowne Resources (LON:LRES) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

Lansdowne Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat ECR Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ECR MineralsN/A -23.57% -16.80%
Lansdowne Resources N/A N/A N/A

ECR Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lansdowne Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ECR MineralsN/AN/A-£2.14M-£0.06N/A
Lansdowne ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.10N/A

In the previous week, ECR Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lansdowne Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ECR Minerals Neutral
Lansdowne Resources Neutral

9.9% of ECR Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Lansdowne Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of ECR Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Lansdowne Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ECR Minerals and Lansdowne Resources tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lansdowne Resources compare to Conroy Gold and Natural Resources?

Conroy Gold and Natural Resources (LON:CGNR) and Lansdowne Resources (LON:LRES) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

1.2% of Lansdowne Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Conroy Gold and Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Lansdowne Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lansdowne Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Conroy Gold and Natural Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Conroy Gold and Natural ResourcesN/A -0.55% -1.37%
Lansdowne Resources N/A N/A N/A

Conroy Gold and Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lansdowne Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Conroy Gold and Natural ResourcesN/AN/A-£499.39K-£0.27N/A
Lansdowne ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.10N/A

In the previous week, Conroy Gold and Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lansdowne Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Conroy Gold and Natural Resources Neutral
Lansdowne Resources Neutral

Summary

Lansdowne Resources beats Conroy Gold and Natural Resources on 6 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lansdowne Resources compare to Caracal Gold?

Lansdowne Resources (LON:LRES) and Caracal Gold (LON:GCAT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Lansdowne Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Caracal Gold's net margin of -123.29%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lansdowne ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Caracal Gold -123.29%N/A -43.02%

1.2% of Lansdowne Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.0% of Lansdowne Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Caracal Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lansdowne Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Caracal Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lansdowne Resources Neutral
Caracal Gold Neutral

Lansdowne Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Caracal Gold. Lansdowne Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caracal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lansdowne ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.10N/A
Caracal Gold£4.23M0.00-£5.22M-£0.01N/A

Summary

Lansdowne Resources beats Caracal Gold on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lansdowne Resources compare to China Nonferrous Gold?

Lansdowne Resources (LON:LRES) and China Nonferrous Gold (LON:CNG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

1.2% of Lansdowne Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of China Nonferrous Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Lansdowne Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 72.2% of China Nonferrous Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lansdowne ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
China Nonferrous Gold N/A N/A 0.47%

In the previous week, Lansdowne Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Nonferrous Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lansdowne Resources Neutral
China Nonferrous Gold Neutral

Lansdowne Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China Nonferrous Gold. Lansdowne Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Nonferrous Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lansdowne ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.10N/A
China Nonferrous Gold£67.99M0.00-£294.76M-£5.93N/A

Summary

China Nonferrous Gold beats Lansdowne Resources on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lansdowne Resources compare to Pure Gold Mining?

Lansdowne Resources (LON:LRES) and Pure Gold Mining (LON:PUR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

1.2% of Lansdowne Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of Pure Gold Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Lansdowne Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.6% of Pure Gold Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lansdowne Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Pure Gold Mining's net margin of -188.89%. Lansdowne Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Pure Gold Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lansdowne ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Pure Gold Mining -188.89%-129.12%-10.16%

In the previous week, Lansdowne Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pure Gold Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lansdowne Resources Neutral
Pure Gold Mining Neutral

Lansdowne Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pure Gold Mining. Lansdowne Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pure Gold Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lansdowne ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.10N/A
Pure Gold Mining£38.39M0.00-£72.52M-£5.70N/A

Summary

Lansdowne Resources and Pure Gold Mining tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lansdowne Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LRES and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LRES vs. The Competition

MetricLansdowne ResourcesGold IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.95M£4.79B£4.56B£2.80B
Dividend YieldN/A5.65%5.02%6.16%
P/E Ratio-0.7436.5521.12368.35
Price / SalesN/A204.195,741.5984,415.88
Price / CashN/A22.1126.4727.89
Price / BookN/A10.708.597.41
Net IncomeN/A£6.39M£157.08M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A2.15%1.52%0.41%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.10%-0.72%0.13%
1 Year PerformanceN/A43.25%36.28%67.40%

Lansdowne Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LRES
Lansdowne Resources
N/AGBX 0.07
+2.8%
N/AN/A£1.95MN/AN/AN/A
ECR
ECR Minerals
N/AGBX 0.22
+7.3%
N/A-8.2%£7.80MN/AN/A7
CGNR
Conroy Gold and Natural Resources
N/AGBX 8.01
+0.1%
N/A+18.9%£6.16MN/AN/A8
GCAT
Caracal Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.11M£4.23MN/A396
CNG
China Nonferrous Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.97M£67.99MN/A701

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:LRES) was last updated on 7/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners