Which has better valuation and earnings, MNL or HRI?

Herald has higher revenue and earnings than Manchester & London. Manchester & London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Herald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Manchester & London £74.60M 4.73 £120.05M £186.27 4.98 Herald £101.21M 14.00 £175.20M £199.01 14.87

Do analysts prefer MNL or ASHM?

Ashmore Group has a consensus target price of GBX 155, suggesting a potential downside of 26.08%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Manchester & London. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Manchester & London 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Ashmore Group 2 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Manchester & London (MNL) Competitors

GBX 928 +37.21 (+4.18%)

As of 12:34 PM Eastern

Compare

MNL vs. HRI, WWH, BNKR, BHMG, and ASHM

Should you buy Manchester & London stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Manchester & London with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Manchester & London include Herald (HRI), Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), BH Macro GBP (BHMG), and Ashmore Group (ASHM).

How does Manchester & London compare to Herald?

Manchester & London (LON:MNL) and Herald (LON:HRI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Herald had 1 more articles in the media than Manchester & London. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Herald and 0 mentions for Manchester & London. Manchester & London's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Herald's score of -0.99 indicating that Manchester & London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manchester & London	Neutral
Herald	Negative

1.7% of Manchester & London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Herald shares are held by institutional investors. 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Herald shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Herald has higher revenue and earnings than Manchester & London. Manchester & London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Herald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manchester & London	£74.60M	4.73	£120.05M	£186.27	4.98
Herald	£101.21M	14.00	£175.20M	£199.01	14.87

Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9103038, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Herald has a beta of 0.977886, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Herald has a net margin of 101.77% compared to Manchester & London's net margin of 91.75%. Herald's return on equity of 29.18% beat Manchester & London's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manchester & London	91.75%	18.18%	27.70%
Herald	101.77%	29.18%	9.22%

Summary

Herald beats Manchester & London on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manchester & London compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Manchester & London (LON:MNL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 2 more articles in the media than Manchester & London. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Manchester & London. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Manchester & London's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare	Very Positive
Manchester & London	Neutral

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Manchester & London pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manchester & London pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Manchester & London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Manchester & London has a net margin of 91.75% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. Manchester & London's return on equity of 18.18% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare	85.46%	8.01%	-2.02%
Manchester & London	91.75%	18.18%	27.70%

8.0% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Manchester & London shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Manchester & London. Manchester & London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare	£118.16M	11.37	£227.88M	£26.70	13.99
Manchester & London	£74.60M	4.73	£120.05M	£186.27	4.98

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.266, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9103038, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Manchester & London beats Worldwide Healthcare on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manchester & London compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Manchester & London (LON:MNL) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to Manchester & London's net margin of 91.75%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat Manchester & London's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manchester & London	91.75%	18.18%	27.70%
The Bankers Investment Trust	1,132.30%	22.55%	6.13%

Manchester & London pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Manchester & London pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Manchester & London. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manchester & London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manchester & London	£74.60M	4.73	£120.05M	£186.27	4.98
The Bankers Investment Trust	£322.40M	4.28	£218.53M	£30.13	4.96

Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9103038, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.9636718, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

1.7% of Manchester & London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, The Bankers Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Manchester & London. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Bankers Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Manchester & London. The Bankers Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Manchester & London's score of 0.00 indicating that The Bankers Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manchester & London	Neutral
The Bankers Investment Trust	Positive

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats Manchester & London on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manchester & London compare to BH Macro GBP?

Manchester & London (LON:MNL) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Manchester & London has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BH Macro GBP. Manchester & London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro GBP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manchester & London	£74.60M	4.73	£120.05M	£186.27	4.98
BH Macro GBP	£277.60M	4.86	£53.77M	£45.68	9.12

Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9103038, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.14339958, indicating that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Manchester & London's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BH Macro GBP'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manchester & London	Neutral
BH Macro GBP	Neutral

Manchester & London has a net margin of 91.75% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. Manchester & London's return on equity of 18.18% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manchester & London	91.75%	18.18%	27.70%
BH Macro GBP	54.44%	7.42%	-0.31%

1.7% of Manchester & London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Manchester & London beats BH Macro GBP on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manchester & London compare to Ashmore Group?

Manchester & London (LON:MNL) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9103038, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.962, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Manchester & London has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ashmore Group. Manchester & London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manchester & London	£74.60M	4.73	£120.05M	£186.27	4.98
Ashmore Group	£135.90M	10.03	£94.67M	£16.54	12.68

In the previous week, Manchester & London's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ashmore Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manchester & London	Neutral
Ashmore Group	Neutral

Ashmore Group has a consensus target price of GBX 155, suggesting a potential downside of 26.08%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Manchester & London.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Manchester & London	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Ashmore Group	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

Manchester & London pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. Manchester & London pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

1.7% of Manchester & London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Ashmore Group shares are held by institutional investors. 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Manchester & London has a net margin of 91.75% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 78.55%. Manchester & London's return on equity of 18.18% beat Ashmore Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manchester & London	91.75%	18.18%	27.70%
Ashmore Group	78.55%	14.60%	4.52%

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Manchester & London on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Manchester & London News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MNL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Manchester & London	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£352.87M	£5.52B	£13.97B	£2.83B
Dividend Yield	4.44%	7.51%	5.96%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	4.98	36.88	28.78	368.41
Price / Sales	4.73	1,120.23	465.00	83,654.70
Price / Cash	2.97	48.04	29.95	27.89
Price / Book	1.12	3.72	3.71	7.06
Net Income	£120.05M	£417.17M	£1.31B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-3.13%	0.64%	0.80%	0.21%
1 Month Performance	-18.30%	-0.61%	0.79%	0.22%
1 Year Performance	5.45%	6.37%	13.78%	64.12%

Manchester & London Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MNL Manchester & London	N/A	GBX 928 +4.2%	N/A	+1.2%	£352.87M	£74.60M	4.98	N/A	Gap Up
HRI Herald	N/A	GBX 2,960 -0.7%	N/A	+20.9%	£1.42B	£101.21M	14.87	6,600
WWH Worldwide Healthcare	N/A	GBX 390 +0.4%	N/A	+19.4%	£1.40B	£118.16M	14.61	N/A
BNKR The Bankers Investment Trust	N/A	GBX 147 -0.3%	N/A	+21.5%	£1.36B	£322.40M	4.88	N/A	Positive News
BHMG BH Macro GBP	N/A	GBX 417.86 +0.2%	N/A	+5.7%	£1.35B	£277.60M	9.15	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MNL) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Manchester & London (MNL) Competitors

MNL vs. HRI, WWH, BNKR, BHMG, and ASHM

How does Manchester & London compare to Herald?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to BH Macro GBP?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Ashmore Group?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNL vs. The Competition

Manchester & London Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Manchester & London (MNL) Competitors

MNL vs. HRI, WWH, BNKR, BHMG, and ASHM

How does Manchester & London compare to Herald?

Does the media prefer MNL or HRI?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in MNL or HRI?

Which has better valuation and earnings, MNL or HRI?

Which has more risk & volatility, MNL or HRI?

Is MNL or HRI more profitable?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Does the media prefer WWH or MNL?

Is WWH or MNL a better dividend stock?

Is WWH or MNL more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in WWH or MNL?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, WWH or MNL?

Which has more volatility and risk, WWH or MNL?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Is MNL or BNKR more profitable?

Is MNL or BNKR a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MNL or BNKR?

Which has more volatility and risk, MNL or BNKR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MNL or BNKR?

Does the media prefer MNL or BNKR?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to BH Macro GBP?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MNL or BHMG?

Which has more risk and volatility, MNL or BHMG?

Does the media refer more to MNL or BHMG?

Is MNL or BHMG more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MNL or BHMG?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Ashmore Group?

Which has more risk and volatility, MNL or ASHM?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MNL or ASHM?

Does the media refer more to MNL or ASHM?

Do analysts prefer MNL or ASHM?

Is MNL or ASHM a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MNL or ASHM?

Is MNL or ASHM more profitable?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNL vs. The Competition

Manchester & London Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools