Manchester & London (MNL) Competitors

GBX 1,080 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 11:52 AM Eastern

MNL vs. BHMG, FSV, HRI, ASHM, and FCSS

Should you buy Manchester & London stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Manchester & London with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Manchester & London include BH Macro GBP (BHMG), Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), Herald (HRI), Ashmore Group (ASHM), and Fidelity China Special (FCSS). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Manchester & London compare to BH Macro GBP?

BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) and Manchester & London (LON:MNL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.08712986, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9021258, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Manchester & London shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BH Macro GBP has a net margin of 173.32% compared to Manchester & London's net margin of 91.75%. Manchester & London's return on equity of 18.18% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
BH Macro GBP	173.32%	13.24%	-0.31%
Manchester & London	91.75%	18.18%	27.70%

In the previous week, Manchester & London's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat BH Macro GBP's score of 0.00 indicating that Manchester & London is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
BH Macro GBP	Neutral
Manchester & London	Positive

Manchester & London has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BH Macro GBP. Manchester & London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro GBP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
BH Macro GBP	£277.60M	5.07	£53.77M	£45.68	9.35
Manchester & London	£74.60M	5.51	£120.05M	£186.27	5.80

Summary

Manchester & London beats BH Macro GBP on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manchester & London compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) and Manchester & London (LON:MNL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.2728288, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9021258, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

7.7% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Manchester & London shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Manchester & London pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manchester & London pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a net margin of 95.92% compared to Manchester & London's net margin of 91.75%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Manchester & London's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	95.92%	25.87%	0.33%
Manchester & London	91.75%	18.18%	27.70%

In the previous week, Manchester & London's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' score of 0.00 indicating that Manchester & London is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	Neutral
Manchester & London	Positive

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Manchester & London. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manchester & London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	£354.63M	3.85	£223.72M	£109.34	3.85
Manchester & London	£74.60M	5.51	£120.05M	£186.27	5.80

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values and Manchester & London tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manchester & London compare to Herald?

Manchester & London (LON:MNL) and Herald (LON:HRI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9021258, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Herald has a beta of 0.9700596, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Herald has higher revenue and earnings than Manchester & London. Manchester & London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Herald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manchester & London	£74.60M	5.51	£120.05M	£186.27	5.80
Herald	£101.21M	14.53	£175.20M	£199.01	15.44

1.9% of Manchester & London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Herald shares are held by institutional investors. 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Herald shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Manchester & London has a net margin of 91.75% compared to Herald's net margin of 86.00%. Manchester & London's return on equity of 18.18% beat Herald's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manchester & London	91.75%	18.18%	27.70%
Herald	86.00%	7.67%	9.22%

In the previous week, Herald had 2 more articles in the media than Manchester & London. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Herald and 0 mentions for Manchester & London. Manchester & London's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Herald's score of 0.55 indicating that Manchester & London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manchester & London	Positive
Herald	Positive

Summary

Herald beats Manchester & London on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manchester & London compare to Ashmore Group?

Manchester & London (LON:MNL) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

1.9% of Manchester & London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of Ashmore Group shares are held by institutional investors. 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9021258, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.958, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Manchester & London has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ashmore Group. Manchester & London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manchester & London	£74.60M	5.51	£120.05M	£186.27	5.80
Ashmore Group	£135.90M	10.56	£94.67M	£16.54	13.35

Ashmore Group has a consensus target price of GBX 150, indicating a potential downside of 32.07%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Manchester & London.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Manchester & London	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Ashmore Group	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

Manchester & London pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Manchester & London pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Manchester & London has a net margin of 91.75% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 78.55%. Manchester & London's return on equity of 18.18% beat Ashmore Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manchester & London	91.75%	18.18%	27.70%
Ashmore Group	78.55%	14.60%	4.52%

In the previous week, Manchester & London's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Ashmore Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Manchester & London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manchester & London	Positive
Ashmore Group	Neutral

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Manchester & London on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Manchester & London compare to Fidelity China Special?

Manchester & London (LON:MNL) and Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

1.9% of Manchester & London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9021258, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.8760011, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than Manchester & London. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manchester & London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manchester & London	£74.60M	5.51	£120.05M	£186.27	5.80
Fidelity China Special	£559.02M	2.46	£997.06M	£112.60	2.65

Manchester & London pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Manchester & London pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity China Special pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fidelity China Special is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fidelity China Special has a net margin of 93.41% compared to Manchester & London's net margin of 91.75%. Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 35.31% beat Manchester & London's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manchester & London	91.75%	18.18%	27.70%
Fidelity China Special	93.41%	35.31%	N/A

In the previous week, Fidelity China Special had 1 more articles in the media than Manchester & London. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity China Special and 0 mentions for Manchester & London. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Manchester & London's score of 1.11 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Manchester & London	Positive
Fidelity China Special	Positive

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats Manchester & London on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Manchester & London News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MNL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MNL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Manchester & London	Asset Management Industry	Financial Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£410.67M	£2.38B	£5.76B	£2.79B
Dividend Yield	3.86%	5.99%	5.27%	6.09%
P/E Ratio	5.80	25.21	15.78	366.15
Price / Sales	5.51	1,964.78	933.98	88,429.84
Price / Cash	2.97	60.17	90.32	27.89
Price / Book	1.30	1.35	4.39	7.74
Net Income	£120.05M	£265.53M	£1.15B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	13.26%	-0.14%	0.41%	0.82%
1 Month Performance	25.58%	2.38%	2.25%	2.78%
1 Year Performance	50.00%	13.43%	21.87%	87.90%

Manchester & London Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MNL Manchester & London	N/A	GBX 1,080 flat	N/A	+57.4%	£410.67M	£74.60M	5.80	N/A	Positive News
BHMG BH Macro GBP	N/A	GBX 425.03 flat	N/A	+10.4%	£1.40B	£277.60M	9.30	N/A
FSV Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values	N/A	GBX 425.03 flat	N/A	+22.0%	£1.38B	£354.63M	3.89	25,000	High Trading Volume
HRI Herald	N/A	GBX 2,880.23 flat	N/A	+41.1%	£1.38B	£101.21M	14.47	6,600
ASHM Ashmore Group	N/A	GBX 208.82 flat	GBX 150 -28.2%	+46.7%	£1.36B	£135.90M	12.62	283	High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MNL) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Manchester & London (MNL) Competitors

MNL vs. BHMG, FSV, HRI, ASHM, and FCSS

How does Manchester & London compare to BH Macro GBP?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Herald?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Ashmore Group?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Fidelity China Special?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNL vs. The Competition

Manchester & London Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Manchester & London (MNL) Competitors

MNL vs. BHMG, FSV, HRI, ASHM, and FCSS

How does Manchester & London compare to BH Macro GBP?

Which has more risk and volatility, BHMG or MNL?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BHMG or MNL?

Is BHMG or MNL more profitable?

Does the media prefer BHMG or MNL?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BHMG or MNL?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Which has more risk & volatility, FSV or MNL?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FSV or MNL?

Is FSV or MNL a better dividend stock?

Is FSV or MNL more profitable?

Does the media favor FSV or MNL?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FSV or MNL?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Herald?

Which has more volatility & risk, MNL or HRI?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MNL or HRI?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MNL or HRI?

Is MNL or HRI more profitable?

Does the media prefer MNL or HRI?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Ashmore Group?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MNL or ASHM?

Which has more volatility & risk, MNL or ASHM?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MNL or ASHM?

Do analysts rate MNL or ASHM?

Is MNL or ASHM a better dividend stock?

Is MNL or ASHM more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MNL or ASHM?

Summary

How does Manchester & London compare to Fidelity China Special?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in MNL or FCSS?

Which has more risk & volatility, MNL or FCSS?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, MNL or FCSS?

Is MNL or FCSS a better dividend stock?

Is MNL or FCSS more profitable?

Does the media favor MNL or FCSS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNL vs. The Competition

Manchester & London Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools